Jobs · Business Development

Head of Corporate Accounts

Takeda · United States · 1 mo ago
RemoteRemoteBusiness Development$212k–$333k/yrFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting includes a job description, responsibilities, minimum requirements/qualifications, travel requirement, compensation and benefits summary (pay range), benefits mention but no details (just link). No schedule details. So we should include sections: About the role (maybe from "Job Description: Join Takeda..."), Responsibilities (the bullet points under "How you will contribute:" and earlier responsibilities), Requirements/Qualifications (the Minimum Requirements/Qualifications block), Skills (maybe derived from requirements but we could combine? The instruction: prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section? But they said use headings for those specific headings if content exists. We have both Requirements and Qualifications content. Could put them together under a single heading? But they said use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have separate headings if content exists. We have content for Requirements and Qualifications (the Minimum Requirements/Qualifications block includes both). Could split? Probably better to put all under Requirements (or Qualifications) but we need to follow instruction: include a section ONLY when posting has real, specific content for it. The posting has a block labeled "Minimum Requirements/Qualifications:" which includes both requirements and qualifications. We could treat that as Qualifications section. Requirements maybe not separately listed. Could we extract "Minimum Requirements" as separate? The block includes both. Might be okay to have Qualifications section only. For Skills, we could extract skillset from that block but it's overlapping. Might be better to have a Skills section summarizing skillset from the block. But we must not invent or summarize away detail; we can list the skillset as bullet points preserving detail. That's acceptable. Pay: we have salary range. So include Pay section. Benefits: posting says "Benefits For information about our benefits, please click here." No actual benefits listed. So we should NOT include Benefits section because no specific content. Schedule: no schedule info besides remote, full-time. Could we include Schedule? The posting mentions "Time Type: Full time" and "Worker Type: Employee". That's schedule info (full-time). Could include Schedule section with that detail. It's specific. So include Schedule. Also we have travel requirement: could be part of Responsibilities or maybe a separate section? Not in headings list. Could fold into Responsibilities. We need to output only HTML fragment, using

for headings,
  • for lists,

    for prose. We must not repeat job title as heading. Not include Job ID etc. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to include the job description paragraph, responsibilities bullet points, qualifications bullet points, skills bullet points (maybe derived), pay info (salary range), schedule (full-time, remote), travel requirement maybe. Let's extract content. Job Description paragraph: "Join Takeda as Head of Corporate Accounts reporting to the VP, Head of Payer Accounts. As a Senior Director of Corporate Accounts, you will be responsible for developing an integrated account strategy, ensuring patients have appropriate access to the entire portfolio of Takeda products within the US Business Unit. You will be responsible for implementing and being an integral part in the development of Takeda’s market access product strategy working with cross-functional leadership from internal and external stakeholders. Work cross-functionally to help develop go-to-market pipeline product pricing and market access strategies. You will be responsible for providing customer insights and leveraging environmental shifts to strategically provide inputs that directly shape Takeda’s financial planning process for in-line and pipeline products. You will address the needs of decision-makers at UHC/Optum/Emisar; lead a complex cross-functional team to ensure appropriate input from other Takeda teams (e.g., medical, marketing, contracts & pricing, legal, etc.), and work with the regional account team to ensure sales pull-through. Ensure C-Suite executives from Takeda and payer accounts are being connected." That's a paragraph; we can keep as

    . Then "How you will contribute:" followed by bullet-like sentences. We'll turn each sentence into

  • under Responsibilities. List them: - Establish and maintain, high-level C-Suite/B2B customer relationships - Support strategic plans with defined tactics and objectives to move payer decisions in a direction that continues to open access for the appropriate patients - Gaining C-Suite payer insights on pipeline products to help shape the pricing and reimbursement strategy - Navigate partner organizations to ensure that Takeda is building relationships with all key stakeholders, including creating opportunities for other Takeda functions to proactively engage account counterparts, including medical, HEOR, etc. - Assess competitive market landscape and opportunities for improved or expanded market penetration and adoption - Lead a cross-functional team to deliver account goals: - Collaborate with Senior Takeda leadership, contracting, analytics, and medical partners to deliver account goals - Collaborate across all relevant business units within the organization to establish contracting strategies and plans aligned with the managed care access goals of the overall corporate strategy - Work with Takeda’s Government Affairs team to understand changes to policy and develop appropriate strategies for their accounts - Collaborate with Takeda Business Unit/Franchise Heads to educate on access and coverage for Takeda products in addition to helping resolve unique reimbursement challenges that may arise - Develop programs for the account, and contract for patient access: - Identify and monitor new or evolving market dynamics and impact to customer systems and provide input internally for prioritizing coverage for optimal access. - Ensure Takeda formulary positioning and meet overall access objectives - Develop and continuously improve innovative strategic programs and contracts, including value-based and partnership agreements to meet the account and Takeda’s needs - Negotiate and optimize contracts to meet formulary access, revenue and GTN objectives - Support sales pull-through: - Review data (sales, trends, comparison etc.) to identify pull-through opportunities - Develop (and align) business cases (including tactics, budgets, KPIs) for investment based on clear pull-through assumptions - Work with regional account managers and sales to execute pull-through plans and adjust strategy as needed We need to preserve all detail. Could flatten but keep hierarchy? Use nested lists? Probably okay to have
    • with sublists. Now Minimum Requirements/Qualifications block: list items: - Bachelor’s Degree Required - Preferred--10+ years in managed care and/or pharmaceutical industry - Preferred--minimum of 3 years’ experience calling on payer/PBM accounts and designing/negotiating multi-product, large contractual arrangements - Strategic account management skillset with extensive experience in strategic tactical planning, execution and negotiation skills with proven track record of success - Detailed knowledge of payor/PBM economics understanding key issues and how these shift given changing US healthcare landscape - In-depth pharma knowledge including prescribing, regulations, supply chain, managed care, sales and legal - Consultative selling ability to identify emerging stakeholder needs and to problem-solve innovative ways (programs, contracts etc.) for Takeda to help meet those needs - Clear understanding of analytics ability to develop strategies from analytical insights to drive account performance and ability to “ask the right questions” of analytical resources - Business planning develop a robust and challenging business plan for multiple accounts and align Takeda stakeholders against delivery - Ability to skillfully communicate and negotiate successful agreements despite challenging situations with both internal and external customers, while working within an ever-changing managed markets, payer, and corporate environment - Possess strong leadership, business acumen and ability to manage multiple priorities, processes, timelines and expectations of multiple stakeholder groups. Inspire and lead innovation and synergies across teams to maximize team productivity and outcomes in support of overall portfolio - Strong work ethic and the ability to foster a culture of collaboration, continuous improvement and operational excellence. Demonstrable ‘passion’ for ensuring effective communications with all internal and external stakeholders leading to highly productive, collaborative and efficient relationships. - Travel Requirement- :25-50% Travel, with some international travel We could separate travel requirement maybe into its own line. Now Skills: we could extract skillset from the qualifications but maybe better to have Skills section summarizing skillset: "Strategic account management skillset...", "Consultative selling ability...", "Clear understanding of analytics...", "Business planning...", "Ability to skillfully communicate and negotiate...", "Possess strong leadership...", "Strong work ethic...". But that duplicates qualifications. Might be okay to have Skills section separate but risk duplication. The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we put same content in two sections, that's duplication but not inventing. Might be okay but could be considered redundant. Better to combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section? But they said use headings for those specific headings if content exists. Could we put all under "Requirements" and omit Qualifications? The block is labeled Minimum Requirements/Qualifications, so it's both. We could treat that as Requirements section (since it's requirements) and not have Qualifications. But we might lose the label "Qualifications". However the instruction says use headings for those specific headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't say we must use both if content overlaps; we can choose to use only Requirements if that covers the content. That seems acceptable. Thus we will have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Pay, Schedule. Possibly also Skills? But we can incorporate skillset into Requirements. Pay: we have salary range and description. We'll put as

      . Schedule: we have "This position is currently classified as "remote" in accordance with Takeda's Hybrid and Remote Work policy." and "Worker Type: Employee", "Worker Sub-Type: Regular", "Time Type: Full time". So schedule: Full-time, remote. We'll output:

      About the role

      Join Takeda as Head of Corporate Accounts reporting to the VP, Head of Payer Accounts. As a Senior Director of Corporate Accounts, you will be responsible for developing an integrated account strategy, ensuring patients have appropriate access to the entire portfolio of Takeda products within the US Business Unit. You will be responsible for implementing and being an integral part in the development of Takeda’s market access product strategy working with cross-functional leadership from internal and external stakeholders. Work cross-functionally to help develop go-to-market pipeline product pricing and market access strategies. You will be responsible for providing customer insights and leveraging environmental shifts to strategically provide inputs that directly shape Takeda’s financial planning process for in-line and pipeline products. You will address the needs of decision-makers at UHC/Optum/Emisar; lead a complex cross-functional team to ensure appropriate input from other Takeda teams (e.g., medical, marketing, contracts & pricing, legal, etc.), and work with the regional account team to ensure sales pull-through. Ensure C-Suite executives from Takeda and payer accounts are being connected.

      Responsibilities

      • Establish and maintain, high-level C-Suite/B2B customer relationships
      • Support strategic plans with defined tactics and objectives to move payer decisions in a direction that continues to open access for the appropriate patients
      • Gaining C-Suite payer insights on pipeline products to help shape the pricing and reimbursement strategy
      • Navigate partner organizations to ensure that Takeda is building relationships with all key stakeholders, including creating opportunities for other Takeda functions to proactively engage account counterparts, including medical, HEOR, etc.
      • Assess competitive market landscape and opportunities for improved or expanded market penetration and adoption
      • Lead a cross-functional team to deliver account goals:
        • Collaborate with Senior Takeda leadership, contracting, analytics, and medical partners to deliver account goals
        • Collaborate across all relevant business units within the organization to establish contracting strategies and plans aligned with the managed care access goals of the overall corporate strategy
        • Work with Takeda’s

Similar jobs

Head of Accounts

​Participatory Research & Action Network- PRAANHilton Head Island, South Carolina Area· 3 mo ago
Managementapply on praan.org.bd

Head of Accounts

Mass CultureUnited States· 3 mo ago
RemoteManagementapply on ats.rippling.com