Component Design Engineer
for section headings. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose.
We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail.
We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences.
We need to decide which sections to include:
- About the role: could include "Why Rolls-Royce?" and Position Summary and maybe "Our vision". That's substantive.
- Responsibilities: "What You Will Be Doing" (list of duties). We'll make a
.
- Requirements: Could be Basic Requirements (Engineer I & II). Might be separate for each level? Could combine. We'll list bullet points.
- Qualifications: Might be same as Requirements? The instruction says use headings like Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide what goes where. Typically Requirements = basic qualifications, Qualifications = preferred? But we have both Basic Requirements and Preferred Requirements. Could map Basic Requirements to Requirements, Preferred Requirements to Skills (or Qualifications). However we also have a separate Skills heading. The Preferred Requirements include technical knowledge, ability to apply logical thinking, knowledge of product integrity, membership of professional body, communication skills. Those are skills. So we can put those under Skills.
Qualifications could be education/experience (Basic Requirements). But we already have Requirements heading for that. Might be redundant. The instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one? But we must follow headings list; we can omit sections if no real specific content. So we could include only sections that have content: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (basic), Skills (preferred), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. That's 7 sections.
We must not include empty sections.
Now we need to extract content precisely.
About the role: combine "Why Rolls-Royce?" paragraph and Position Summary and maybe "Our vision..." paragraph.
Let's extract:
"Why Rolls-Royce? At Rolls-Royce we are proud to be a business that has truly helped to shape the modern world and are committed to always being a force for progress; powering, protecting and connecting people everywhere. By joining Rolls-Royce, you’ll have the opportunity to create world-class power and propulsion solutions, pushing your problem-solving and ingenuity, to deliver real impact that puts safety first. You’ll be given responsibility and the opportunity to grow in our high-performance culture. This is Infinite Potential. And it’s your chance to really shine and contribute to one of the world’s most recognized brands and a beacon for engineering excellence."
Position Summary: "The Component Design Engineer is part of the Global Mechanical Systems Capability function. The Component Design Engineer shall create engineering solutions that satisfy functional and physical requirements symptomatic of Product System and Sub-System level environments. Crucially, the engineered solutions must exhibit robustness for manufacturing capability. The Component Design Engineer is responsible for the on-time delivery and quality of component design definition artifacts, i.e. documents, models, definitions that meet system level and sub-system requirements. The Component Design Engineer will participate within an IPT described by Product Lifecycle System (PLS) and operate in accordance with applicable Rolls-Royce Management System (RRMS) policies and processes. The Component Design Engineer is responsible for sub-system integration of technical activities for their design solutions and enabling lifecycle profitability through the Supply Chain Design."
Our vision paragraph: "Our vision is to ensure that the quality and dynamism that shaped our history continues into our future. It’s a bold pursuit, and we never stop striving to go further, faster, and better. We lead progress, creating the technologies that move us forward. If you’re driven to grow, to learn, and to make a lasting difference, this is where you belong."
We can combine these into About the role section as prose ().
Responsibilities: "What You Will Be Doing" bullet-like sentences. Let's extract each sentence as a list item.
The text:
"Deliver design solutions for component(s), complex assemblies and whole engines in consideration of safety, manufacturing capability, product physical and functional robustness. Design solutions also should address Unit Cost, Lifecycle Cost, Weight, Maintainability, Repair.Deliver definition to appropriate stakeholder groups’ requirements (e.g. manufacturing (domestic/external), project customers, airframers and partners, analysis team etc.) in accordance with associated agreed policies via conventional and future state approaches (Model Based Definition in association with the Model Based Environment).Create and use automated and integrated tool sets. When repeat design is anticipated, create automated workflows to enable the design of the component utilizing house style, standard features, and standard assessments to define the optimum design as part of automated MBD, manufacture and measurement definitions.Elimination of Non-Conformance/Zero Defects/Delivery of Producibility within a Manufacturing Environment. This will be through analyzing customer and program requirements, incorporation of manufacturing and measurement process capability into the design solution rationale and associated manufacturing definition. Establish and adopt lean principles like standardization/house style to achieve deterministic solutions and producible components in a repeatable fashion. Improvements to design methods, rules and tools to achieve robustness. Application of Robust Design, Systems Engineering, Risk Management (xFMEA) and Design in Context to ensure right first time can be achieved.Quality Assurance through checking design documents, models, drawings in accordance with RRMS technical requirements and proactive Zero Defects approaches.Carry out analyses using formula-based calculations and/or automated workflows for dimensioning of parts and components (e.g. stability, stiffness, profiles, balance point, weights) and where appropriate, use analytical rules, tools and methods to underwrite the design solution against requirements.NB in Nuclear, the CAD team are not responsible for carrying out analyses.Create technical documents to comply with process, knowledge management, information and data policies.Enabled through life Supply Chain Design and Lifecycle profitability for mature product fleets through the application and possibly creation of various mechanisms (non-conformance management, drawing alteration requests, repair instructions, engine manual limits and technical variants (TV)).Plan, manage and execute external designs via orders placed at design service providers or suppliers with design and production authorization for complete devices (Design only / Design and Make Package) leading to approval of the designs and all documents.Manage product configuration and ensure data integrity.Execute sub-system integration process including the appropriate use of Systems Engineering and Robust Design tools to ensure that the technical attributes of the Sub-system design meet the agreed requirements."
We need to split into sensible list items. Each sentence separated by period. We'll create
- for each.
We must preserve all substantive information; not summarize away detail. So we need to keep each sentence as is.
Let's list them:
1. Deliver design solutions for component(s), complex assemblies and whole engines in consideration of safety, manufacturing capability, product physical and functional robustness.
2. Design solutions also should address Unit Cost, Lifecycle Cost, Weight, Maintainability, Repair.
3. Deliver definition to appropriate stakeholder groups’ requirements (e.g. manufacturing (domestic/external), project customers, airframers and partners, analysis team etc.) in accordance with associated agreed policies via conventional and future state approaches (Model Based Definition in association with the Model Based Environment).
4. Create and use automated and integrated tool sets.
5. When repeat design is anticipated, create automated workflows to enable the design of the component utilizing house style, standard features, and standard assessments to define the optimum design as part of automated MBD, manufacture and measurement definitions.
6. Elimination of Non-Conformance/Zero Defects/Delivery of Producibility within a Manufacturing Environment.
7. This will be through analyzing customer and program requirements, incorporation of manufacturing and measurement process capability into the design solution rationale and associated manufacturing definition.
8. Establish and adopt lean principles like standardization/house style to achieve deterministic solutions and producible components in a repeatable fashion.
9. Improvements to design methods, rules and tools to achieve robustness.
10. Application of Robust Design, Systems Engineering, Risk Management (xFMEA) and Design in Context to ensure right first time can be achieved.
11. Quality Assurance through checking design documents, models, drawings in accordance with RRMS technical requirements and proactive Zero Defects approaches.
12. Carry out analyses using formula-based calculations and/or automated workflows for dimensioning of parts and components (e.g. stability, stiffness, profiles, balance point, weights) and where appropriate, use analytical rules, tools and methods to underwrite the design solution against requirements.
13. NB in Nuclear, the CAD team are not responsible for carrying out analyses.
14. Create technical documents to comply with process, knowledge management, information and data policies.
15. Enabled through life Supply Chain Design and Lifecycle profitability for mature product fleets through the application and possibly creation of various mechanisms (non-conformance management, drawing alteration requests, repair instructions, engine manual limits and technical variants (TV)).
16. Plan, manage and execute external designs via orders placed at design service providers or suppliers with design and production authorization for complete devices (Design only / Design and Make Package) leading to approval of the designs and all documents.
17. Manage product configuration and ensure data integrity.
18. Execute sub-system integration process including the appropriate use of Systems Engineering and Robust Design tools to ensure that the technical attributes of the Sub-system design meet the agreed requirements.
Check for any missing: The original had "Deliver definition to appropriate stakeholder groups’ requirements (e.g. manufacturing (domestic/external), project customers, airframers and partners, analysis team etc.) in accordance with associated agreed policies via conventional and future state approaches (Model Based Definition in association with the Model Based Environment)." That's item 3.
Now Requirements (basic): For Engineer I and II.
We have:
Basic Requirements For Engineer I Bachelor’s degree in engineering, with 1+ years of experience, ORMaster’s degree in engineering, ORJD/PhD in EngineeringIn order to be eligible for consideration, you must be a U.S. Citizen
Basic Requirements For Engineer II Bachelor’s degree in engineering, with 2+ years of experience, ORMaster’s degree in engineering, ORJD/PhD in EngineeringIn order to be eligible for consideration, you must be a U.S. Citizen
We need to preserve detail. Could present as two bullet points: Engineer I and Engineer II.
We'll make
with two - each containing the
for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences. We need to decide which sections to include: - About the role: could include "Why Rolls-Royce?" and Position Summary and maybe "Our vision". That's substantive. - Responsibilities: "What You Will Be Doing" (list of duties). We'll make a
- .
- Requirements: Could be Basic Requirements (Engineer I & II). Might be separate for each level? Could combine. We'll list bullet points.
- Qualifications: Might be same as Requirements? The instruction says use headings like Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide what goes where. Typically Requirements = basic qualifications, Qualifications = preferred? But we have both Basic Requirements and Preferred Requirements. Could map Basic Requirements to Requirements, Preferred Requirements to Skills (or Qualifications). However we also have a separate Skills heading. The Preferred Requirements include technical knowledge, ability to apply logical thinking, knowledge of product integrity, membership of professional body, communication skills. Those are skills. So we can put those under Skills.
Qualifications could be education/experience (Basic Requirements). But we already have Requirements heading for that. Might be redundant. The instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one? But we must follow headings list; we can omit sections if no real specific content. So we could include only sections that have content: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (basic), Skills (preferred), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. That's 7 sections.
We must not include empty sections.
Now we need to extract content precisely.
About the role: combine "Why Rolls-Royce?" paragraph and Position Summary and maybe "Our vision..." paragraph.
Let's extract:
"Why Rolls-Royce? At Rolls-Royce we are proud to be a business that has truly helped to shape the modern world and are committed to always being a force for progress; powering, protecting and connecting people everywhere. By joining Rolls-Royce, you’ll have the opportunity to create world-class power and propulsion solutions, pushing your problem-solving and ingenuity, to deliver real impact that puts safety first. You’ll be given responsibility and the opportunity to grow in our high-performance culture. This is Infinite Potential. And it’s your chance to really shine and contribute to one of the world’s most recognized brands and a beacon for engineering excellence."
Position Summary: "The Component Design Engineer is part of the Global Mechanical Systems Capability function. The Component Design Engineer shall create engineering solutions that satisfy functional and physical requirements symptomatic of Product System and Sub-System level environments. Crucially, the engineered solutions must exhibit robustness for manufacturing capability. The Component Design Engineer is responsible for the on-time delivery and quality of component design definition artifacts, i.e. documents, models, definitions that meet system level and sub-system requirements. The Component Design Engineer will participate within an IPT described by Product Lifecycle System (PLS) and operate in accordance with applicable Rolls-Royce Management System (RRMS) policies and processes. The Component Design Engineer is responsible for sub-system integration of technical activities for their design solutions and enabling lifecycle profitability through the Supply Chain Design."
Our vision paragraph: "Our vision is to ensure that the quality and dynamism that shaped our history continues into our future. It’s a bold pursuit, and we never stop striving to go further, faster, and better. We lead progress, creating the technologies that move us forward. If you’re driven to grow, to learn, and to make a lasting difference, this is where you belong."
We can combine these into About the role section as prose (
- for each.
We must preserve all substantive information; not summarize away detail. So we need to keep each sentence as is.
Let's list them:
1. Deliver design solutions for component(s), complex assemblies and whole engines in consideration of safety, manufacturing capability, product physical and functional robustness.
2. Design solutions also should address Unit Cost, Lifecycle Cost, Weight, Maintainability, Repair.
3. Deliver definition to appropriate stakeholder groups’ requirements (e.g. manufacturing (domestic/external), project customers, airframers and partners, analysis team etc.) in accordance with associated agreed policies via conventional and future state approaches (Model Based Definition in association with the Model Based Environment).
4. Create and use automated and integrated tool sets.
5. When repeat design is anticipated, create automated workflows to enable the design of the component utilizing house style, standard features, and standard assessments to define the optimum design as part of automated MBD, manufacture and measurement definitions.
6. Elimination of Non-Conformance/Zero Defects/Delivery of Producibility within a Manufacturing Environment.
7. This will be through analyzing customer and program requirements, incorporation of manufacturing and measurement process capability into the design solution rationale and associated manufacturing definition.
8. Establish and adopt lean principles like standardization/house style to achieve deterministic solutions and producible components in a repeatable fashion.
9. Improvements to design methods, rules and tools to achieve robustness.
10. Application of Robust Design, Systems Engineering, Risk Management (xFMEA) and Design in Context to ensure right first time can be achieved.
11. Quality Assurance through checking design documents, models, drawings in accordance with RRMS technical requirements and proactive Zero Defects approaches.
12. Carry out analyses using formula-based calculations and/or automated workflows for dimensioning of parts and components (e.g. stability, stiffness, profiles, balance point, weights) and where appropriate, use analytical rules, tools and methods to underwrite the design solution against requirements.
13. NB in Nuclear, the CAD team are not responsible for carrying out analyses.
14. Create technical documents to comply with process, knowledge management, information and data policies.
15. Enabled through life Supply Chain Design and Lifecycle profitability for mature product fleets through the application and possibly creation of various mechanisms (non-conformance management, drawing alteration requests, repair instructions, engine manual limits and technical variants (TV)).
16. Plan, manage and execute external designs via orders placed at design service providers or suppliers with design and production authorization for complete devices (Design only / Design and Make Package) leading to approval of the designs and all documents.
17. Manage product configuration and ensure data integrity.
18. Execute sub-system integration process including the appropriate use of Systems Engineering and Robust Design tools to ensure that the technical attributes of the Sub-system design meet the agreed requirements.
Check for any missing: The original had "Deliver definition to appropriate stakeholder groups’ requirements (e.g. manufacturing (domestic/external), project customers, airframers and partners, analysis team etc.) in accordance with associated agreed policies via conventional and future state approaches (Model Based Definition in association with the Model Based Environment)." That's item 3.
Now Requirements (basic): For Engineer I and II.
We have:
Basic Requirements For Engineer I Bachelor’s degree in engineering, with 1+ years of experience, ORMaster’s degree in engineering, ORJD/PhD in EngineeringIn order to be eligible for consideration, you must be a U.S. Citizen
Basic Requirements For Engineer II Bachelor’s degree in engineering, with 2+ years of experience, ORMaster’s degree in engineering, ORJD/PhD in EngineeringIn order to be eligible for consideration, you must be a U.S. Citizen
We need to preserve detail. Could present as two bullet points: Engineer I and Engineer II.
We'll make
- with two
- each containing the
). Responsibilities: "What You Will Be Doing" bullet-like sentences. Let's extract each sentence as a list item. The text: "Deliver design solutions for component(s), complex assemblies and whole engines in consideration of safety, manufacturing capability, product physical and functional robustness. Design solutions also should address Unit Cost, Lifecycle Cost, Weight, Maintainability, Repair.Deliver definition to appropriate stakeholder groups’ requirements (e.g. manufacturing (domestic/external), project customers, airframers and partners, analysis team etc.) in accordance with associated agreed policies via conventional and future state approaches (Model Based Definition in association with the Model Based Environment).Create and use automated and integrated tool sets. When repeat design is anticipated, create automated workflows to enable the design of the component utilizing house style, standard features, and standard assessments to define the optimum design as part of automated MBD, manufacture and measurement definitions.Elimination of Non-Conformance/Zero Defects/Delivery of Producibility within a Manufacturing Environment. This will be through analyzing customer and program requirements, incorporation of manufacturing and measurement process capability into the design solution rationale and associated manufacturing definition. Establish and adopt lean principles like standardization/house style to achieve deterministic solutions and producible components in a repeatable fashion. Improvements to design methods, rules and tools to achieve robustness. Application of Robust Design, Systems Engineering, Risk Management (xFMEA) and Design in Context to ensure right first time can be achieved.Quality Assurance through checking design documents, models, drawings in accordance with RRMS technical requirements and proactive Zero Defects approaches.Carry out analyses using formula-based calculations and/or automated workflows for dimensioning of parts and components (e.g. stability, stiffness, profiles, balance point, weights) and where appropriate, use analytical rules, tools and methods to underwrite the design solution against requirements.NB in Nuclear, the CAD team are not responsible for carrying out analyses.Create technical documents to comply with process, knowledge management, information and data policies.Enabled through life Supply Chain Design and Lifecycle profitability for mature product fleets through the application and possibly creation of various mechanisms (non-conformance management, drawing alteration requests, repair instructions, engine manual limits and technical variants (TV)).Plan, manage and execute external designs via orders placed at design service providers or suppliers with design and production authorization for complete devices (Design only / Design and Make Package) leading to approval of the designs and all documents.Manage product configuration and ensure data integrity.Execute sub-system integration process including the appropriate use of Systems Engineering and Robust Design tools to ensure that the technical attributes of the Sub-system design meet the agreed requirements." We need to split into sensible list items. Each sentence separated by period. We'll create