Jobs · OTHR · Colorado

Color Guard Coach

Academy School District 20 · Colorado Springs, CO · 1 mo ago
OTHRPart-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: only include sections that have real specific content. The posting includes location, recruiting start date, estimated start date, description of duties, knowledge/skills/abilities, work environment, physical demands, cognitive functions, required qualifications, preferred qualifications, minimum compensation (scheduled weekly hours, hours per day, number of days per year), benefits eligibility, FLSA status, hiring manager email. Also compensation details: "Compensation for all hired extra pay positions ... contingent upon the specific athletic, activity, or academic event being approved..." Not a specific amount, so we should not create Pay section because no specific pay. Benefits: they mention benefits eligibility under part-time - ineligible, and link. That's specific enough to include Benefits section? It says "Benefits Eligibility Under Part-time - Ineligible For more information on our benefits, please visit ..." That's specific content. So include Benefits section. Schedule: they give scheduled weekly hours 37.5, hours per day 7.5, number of days per year 183 days M-F. That's schedule info. So include Schedule section. Pay: no specific pay amount, so omit Pay. Qualifications: they have Required Qualifications (high school graduate) and Preferred Qualifications (none listed? Actually "Preferred Qualifications Minimum Compensation:" seems weird; maybe they omitted. The line "Preferred Qualifications Minimum Compensation: Scheduled Weekly Hours 37.5 Hours Per Day 7.5 hour(s) per day Number Of Days Per Year 183 Days M-F" seems misplaced. Actually they likely meant "Preferred Qualifications:" then "Minimum Compensation:" then schedule. So we have Required Qualifications: high school graduate or equivalent. Preferred Qualifications: none given. So we can include Qualifications section with required qualifications only? The rule: include a section only when posting has real, specific content for it. We have Required Qualifications content. So we can have a Qualifications section (maybe split into Required and Preferred? But we can just list required qualifications as
    ). Preferred qualifications absent, so we don't create a separate heading. Skills: they have Knowledge, Skills, And Abilities list. That's substantive. So include Skills section. Responsibilities: they have illustrative statements of essential functions etc. That's duties. So include Responsibilities section. About the role: maybe not explicit. The posting starts with location, dates, description. Could treat as About the role? But we should not invent headings without content. There's no explicit "About the role" heading. However we could combine location and dates into a short

    maybe under a generic intro? The instruction: Use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It says we can use those headings if we have content. We have content for Responsibilities, Skills, Qualifications, Benefits, Schedule. Also maybe Requirements? They have Required Qualifications (which is similar to Qualifications). Could combine Requirements and Qualifications? But we already have Qualifications. Requirements maybe not needed. We should not repeat job title as heading. No job title given. We need to preserve all substantive information. So include location, recruiting start date, estimated start date somewhere. Could be in a

    before sections. Not a heading. We must remove boilerplate: legal, EEO, application instructions, etc. Remove "How To Apply" etc. Also remove "FLSA Status" maybe? That's substantive? It's metadata but could be included in a

    . The instruction: do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

    or drop it. FLSA status is minor metadata; we can include in a

    . Similarly, hiring manager email can be in a

    . We need to output only HTML fragment. Let's craft:

    Location: Pine Creek High School. Recruiting Start Date: 09/15/2026. Estimated Start Date: 09/22/2026.

    Then sections:

    Responsibilities

    • Performs temporary, instructional-related activities at the direction of a licensed staff member
    • Reports consistently for work as scheduled
    • Performs other duties as assigned
    • Attains proficient or higher evaluations on established Performance Standards
    • Assists the licensed staff member with assigned tasks
    • Completes non-licensed instructional responsibilities
    • Displays personal and professional qualities that promote a safe and caring environment conducive to student learning such as maintaining confidentiality, collaborating with staff, accepting constructive feedback, being a positive role model, treating others with respect, etc.
    • Meets the identified learning needs of assigned students as directed by a licensed staff member
    • Works collaboratively and cooperatively with instructional staff and others in completing responsibilities
    But note some of these are repetitive; we need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. The list includes many items from the description. We should include each distinct duty. Let's extract from the text: - Performs temporary, instructional-related activities at the direction of a licensed staff member - Compensation for all hired extra pay positions (coaches, sponsors, ancillary instructors, etc.) is contingent upon the specific athletic, activity, or academic event being approved by the District to occur during the school year related to this position/posting. (This is about compensation, but we have no specific pay; maybe we can note in Benefits? Actually it's about compensation contingency; but we decided not to create Pay section. Could include as a note in Responsibilities? It's about compensation, not duty. Might be omitted as boilerplate? It's substantive but not a duty. However we could include in a

    under Responsibilities? Might be okay. But instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep that sentence somewhere. It's about compensation contingency. Since we are not making a Pay section, we could put it in a

    under Responsibilities or maybe a separate note. But we must not create Pay section. So we can include it as a

    within Responsibilities? Might be odd but acceptable. However the instruction says use

    • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

      for prose. So that sentence is prose, not a list item. So we can put it as a

      after the

        or before. - Reports consistently for work as scheduled - Performs other duties as assigned - Attains proficient or higher evaluations on established Performance Standards - Assists the licensed staff member with assigned tasks - Completes non-licensed instructional responsibilities - Displays personal and professional qualities that promote a safe and caring environment conducive to student learning such as maintaining confidentiality, collaborating with staff, accepting constructive feedback, being a positive role model, treating others with respect, etc. - Meets the identified learning needs of assigned students as directed by a licensed staff member - Works collaboratively and cooperatively with instructional staff and others in completing responsibilities That covers duties. Now Skills section: Knowledge, Skills, And Abilities list. Extract each ability: - Ability to be flexible and patient in work demands - Ability to assist students in assigned areas - Ability to communicate effectively verbally and in writing - Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships with individuals from many diverse backgrounds and professions including supervisors, administrators, coworkers, staff, students, parents, and the general public - Ability to follow oral and written instructions - Ability to greet and interact with the public in a courteous and professional manner - Ability to maintain confidentiality - Ability to manage simultaneous demands and set clear priorities - Ability to work days, hours, locations, and assignments as directed by the supervisor within the position responsibilities - Commitment to the education of students as a primary responsibility - Demonstrated ability to manage simultaneous demands and set clear priorities (duplicate) - Demonstrated ability to work well with others in a team setting - Demonstrates citizenship, compassion, courage, discernment, excellence, honesty, hope, integrity, patience, perseverance, reliability, respect, responsibility, and trustworthiness - Demonstrates effective organizational and time management skills - Detail-oriented - Energetic, creative, innovative, flexible - Excellent cooperative, collaborative, and problem-solving skills - Promotes a positive climate, culture, and community - Student-centered and relationship-focused - Understanding of data privacy laws and their implications for the educational community We should deduplicate similar items but preserve all substantive information; duplicates can be removed? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Duplicates are not adding new info; we could keep one instance. It's okay to deduplicate to avoid redundancy but not lose info. We'll keep unique. Now Qualifications section: Required Qualifications: High school graduate - high school diploma or equivalent. Preferred Qualifications: none given. So we can list required. Benefits section: Benefits eligibility: Under Part-time - Ineligible. For more information on our benefits, please visit Employee Benefits | Academy District 20 (asd20.org). So we can put that as prose

        . Schedule section: Scheduled Weekly Hours 37.5 Hours Per Day 7.5 hour(s) per day Number Of Days Per Year 183 Days M-F. So we can put as

        or

          . Since it's not a list of items but details, we can use

          . Also we have Work Environment, Physical Demands, Cognitive Functions. Those are substantive but not covered by headings. Should we include them? The instruction says we can use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. It doesn't forbid other headings, but says use

          for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It implies we should stick to those headings. However we have content for Work Environment, Physical Demands, Cognitive Functions. Should we create sections for them? The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe we can incorporate those details into existing sections like Responsibilities or Skills? But they are distinct categories. However we could include them under Responsibilities as prose? Might be okay but could lose structure. The instruction says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". It does not forbid creating other headings beyond the examples, but the examples are given. Safer to stick to the given headings and fold other info into appropriate sections. For Work Environment, Physical Demands, Cognitive Functions we could put them under Responsibilities as prose? Or maybe under Skills? They are not skills. Could create a section "Working Conditions" but not in list. Might be considered adding a heading not in examples, which might be against instruction? It says "Use

          for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." suggests those are examples, not an exhaustive list. So we could use other headings if needed. But they say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could combine them into a single "Work Details" section. However to preserve all substantive information, we need to include them. Let's create a section

          Work Environment

          with

          containing the description. Similarly Physical Demands and Cognitive Functions could be separate sections but that would be many thin sections. Better to combine them into one section "Working Conditions" with subpoints? But we must not invent headings that are not representative? The instruction didn't forbid. I'd create a section

          Working Conditions

          and include the three paragraphs as

          elements. But we also have "Required Qualifications" and "Preferred Qualifications". We already have Qualifications section. We also have "FLSA Status" and "Hiring Manager Email". Those can be in a

          at the

Similar jobs

Coaches

Stuart Country Day School of the Sacred HeartPrinceton, NJ· 4 mo ago
OTHRapply on recruit.hirebridge.com

Coach

Fellowship of Christian AthletesCanyon, TX· 6 days ago
OTHRapply on myjobs.adp.com

Coach

Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill Area· 1 mo ago
OTHR$20/hrapply on forms.gle

Coach

BSN SPORTSFarmers Branch, TX· 1 mo ago
OTHRapply on careers.varsitybrands.com

Coach

Community Action in Aroostook, Washington and Hancock CountiesPresque Isle, ME· 2 mo ago
apply on recruiting.paylocity.com

Coach

Camarillo Fitness LLC | Orangetheory FitnessStafford, VA· 3 mo ago
Educationapply on recruiting.paylocity.com