Aerospace Source Inspector

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We need to parse the posting. Given text: "Disclaimer: This posting will re-direct you to Unitek Career page and submitting your application will take up to 5 minutes. Should you want to skip the step, please feel free to reach us or send your resume directly to Unitek Technical Services provides supplier management, development, and related technical services to corporations around the world. Title: Source Inspector Job Description The ability to perform in-process and final source inspections including First Article inspections per AS9102 Quality Standards (Basic inspection requirements, ability to read a PO, drawing, determine if an FAI has been approved) The ability to read and understand complex engineering drawings, specifications, geometric dimensioning and tolerances per ANSI/ ASME Y 14.5. (This position would need to know how to inspect parts GD&T, knowledge of handheld measuring tools (calipers, mics, etc) A checklist will be provided for reference. Also the candidate must pass a GE quiz. Note It is a full-time assignment for 3-6 months, with possible extension. 1st and 2nd shift work, 7 days/week Candidate should be willing to travel, but able to support suppliers. Applicant must be a US Citizen, we are unable to sponsor at this time W2 contract position to work on as needed basis" We need to remove disclaimer, navigation, legal, EEO, etc. The disclaimer about redirect and application time is boilerplate; remove. Also "Unitek Technical Services provides supplier management..." maybe part of description but could be considered boilerplate? It's a description of the company; maybe we can keep as part of About the role? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." The disclaimer about redirect and application time is application instructions; remove. The sentence "Unitek Technical Services provides supplier management, development, and related technical services to corporations around the world." is not boilerplate; it's company description. Could be part of About the role. We need sections: maybe About the role (company description), Responsibilities (inspection tasks), Requirements (citizenship, travel, etc), Qualifications (ability to read drawings, GD&T, measuring tools, pass GE quiz), Skills (maybe not separate), Benefits (none given), Pay (none), Schedule (full-time assignment 3-6 months, possible extension, 1st and 2nd shift work, 7 days/week). So we have schedule info. We must not create sections with placeholder text. So we include About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Schedule. Possibly also Skills? Not needed. We need to use

for each section heading. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use

  for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. Let's extract substantive info: Company description: "Unitek Technical Services provides supplier management, development, and related technical services to corporations around the world." Job Title: Source Inspector (but we should not repeat as heading). So we can include in About the role maybe. Responsibilities: - Perform in-process and final source inspections including First Article inspections per AS9102 Quality Standards (Basic inspection requirements, ability to read a PO, drawing, determine if an FAI has been approved) - Read and understand complex engineering drawings, specifications, geometric dimensioning and tolerances per ANSI/ASME Y14.5. - Know how to inspect parts GD&T, knowledge of handheld measuring tools (calipers, mics, etc) - A checklist will be provided for reference. - Must pass a GE quiz. Also maybe "Candidate should be willing to travel, but able to support suppliers." That's more requirement. Requirements: - Applicant must be a US Citizen, unable to sponsor. - W2 contract position to work on as needed basis. - Willing to travel, able to support suppliers. - Full-time assignment for 3-6 months, with possible extension. - 1st and 2nd shift work, 7 days/week. Qualifications maybe overlapping with responsibilities; but we can separate: Qualifications: ability to read PO, drawing, determine FAI approved; ability to read complex engineering drawings, specs, GD&T per ASME Y14.5; knowledge of handheld measuring tools; must pass GE quiz. Skills maybe not needed. Schedule: we already have shift info; but schedule could be separate: "1st and 2nd shift work, 7 days/week". Also assignment length 3-6 months possible extension. Benefits: none given, so omit. Pay: none given, omit. Thus we output sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Schedule. Make sure not to include filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present. Now format HTML:

  About the role

  Unitek Technical Services provides supplier management, development, and related technical services to corporations around the world. This is a Source Inspector position.

  But we should not repeat job title as heading; but we can include it in prose. It's okay. Responsibilities: list.

  Responsibilities

  • Perform in-process and final source inspections including First Article inspections per AS9102 Quality Standards (basic inspection requirements, ability to read a PO, drawing, determine if an FAI has been approved)
  • Read and understand complex engineering drawings, specifications, geometric dimensioning and tolerances per ANSI/ASME Y14.5
  • Know how to inspect parts GD&T, knowledge of handheld measuring tools (calipers, micrometers, etc)
  • A checklist will be provided for reference
  • Must pass a GE quiz
  Requirements:

  Requirements

  • Applicant must be a US Citizen; sponsorship is not available
  • W2 contract position, work on an as‑needed basis
  • Willing to travel and able to support suppliers
  • Full‑time assignment for 3‑6 months, with possible extension
  Qualifications:

  Qualifications

  • Ability to read a purchase order, drawing, and determine if an FAI has been approved
  • Ability to read and understand complex engineering drawings, specifications, and GD&T per ASME Y14.5
  • Knowledge of handheld measuring tools such as calipers, micrometers, etc.
  • Must pass a GE quiz
  Schedule:

  Schedule

  • 1st and 2nd shift work, 7 days per week
  We could also include assignment length in schedule but it's already in Requirements. Could also add schedule bullet about assignment length. But we already have that in Requirements; maybe move assignment length to Schedule. Let's think: The schedule section should contain schedule specifics: shift work, days per week, length of assignment. The instruction: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". So we can put assignment length and shift in Schedule. Then Requirements can focus on citizenship, contract type, travel. Let's restructure: Requirements: US Citizen, W2 contract, willing to travel, able to support suppliers. Schedule: Full-time assignment 3-6 months possible extension; 1st and 2nd shift work, 7 days/week. Thus:

  Requirements

  • Applicant must be a US Citizen; sponsorship is not available
  • W2 contract position, work on an as‑needed basis
  • Willing to travel and able to support suppliers

  Schedule

  • Full‑time assignment for 3‑6 months, with possible extension
  • 1st and 2nd shift work, 7 days per week
  Now check for any duplicated content: We have responsibilities list includes GE quiz, etc. Qualifications list includes similar items; there may be overlap but we must preserve all substantive info; duplication is okay? The instruction: "Remove duplicated lines". So we should avoid repeating the same exact sentence. We have GE quiz appears both in Responsibilities and Qualifications. That's duplicate. We should keep it only once. Where does it belong? It's a requirement/qualification. Probably better under Qualifications. So remove from Responsibilities. Also "A checklist will be provided for reference" appears only once; fine. Now check responsibilities list: we have three items: perform inspections, read drawings, know GD&T and measuring tools. That's fine. Qualifications list: ability to read PO/drawing/FAI, ability to read complex drawings/GD&T, knowledge of handheld tools, must pass GE quiz. That's four items. Check for duplicate: "Ability to read and understand complex engineering drawings, specifications, geometric dimensioning and tolerances per ANSI/ASME Y14.5" appears in responsibilities and qualifications? In responsibilities we have "Read and understand complex engineering drawings, specifications, geometric dimensioning and tolerances per ANSI/ASME Y14.5". In qualifications we have similar but maybe reworded. That's duplicate. We should keep only one. Which section is more appropriate? Responsibilities is about duties; qualifications is about required skills. The statement is a skill/knowledge requirement. Could be qualifications. Let's move it to qualifications and remove from responsibilities. Thus responsibilities: - Perform in-process and final source inspections including First Article inspections per AS9102 Quality Standards (basic inspection requirements, ability to read a PO, drawing, determine if an FAI has been approved) - Know how to inspect parts GD&T, knowledge of handheld measuring tools (calipers, micrometers, etc) - A checklist will be provided for reference But the first bullet includes ability to read a PO etc. That's also a qualification. Might be overlapping. However the phrase "ability to read a PO, drawing, determine if an FAI has been approved" is part of the inspection duty. It's okay to keep there; but we also have qualifications about ability to read PO/drawing/FAI. That's duplicate. We need to avoid duplication. Let's decide to keep the inspection duty in responsibilities (perform inspections) and keep the ability to read PO/drawing/FAI in qualifications. So adjust responsibilities bullet to not include that ability; just say "Perform in-process and final source inspections including First Article inspections per AS9102 Quality Standards". The parenthetical about basic inspection requirements etc could be removed as it's basically the same. But we need to preserve substantive info; removing that parenthetical might lose detail about "ability to read a PO, drawing, determine if an FAI has been approved". However that detail is captured in qualifications. So we can drop it from responsibilities to avoid duplication. Thus responsibilities: - Perform in-process and final source inspections including First Article inspections per AS9102 Quality Standards - Know how to inspect parts GD&T, knowledge of handheld measuring tools (calipers, micrometers, etc) - A checklist will be provided for reference Now qualifications: - Ability to read a purchase order, drawing, and determine if an FAI has been approved - Ability to read and understand complex engineering drawings, specifications, and GD&T per ASME Y14.5 - Knowledge of handheld measuring tools such as calipers, micrometers, etc. - Must pass a GE quiz Now check for duplicate: "Knowledge of handheld measuring tools" appears both in responsibilities and qualifications. In responsibilities we have "Know how to inspect parts GD&T, knowledge of handheld measuring tools (calipers, micrometers, etc)". In qualifications we have "Knowledge of handheld measuring tools such as calipers, micrometers, etc." That's duplicate. We need to