Supervising Special Investigator (Non-Peace Officer)

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, etc. Also remove application instructions (survey, etc). Keep substantive info. Let's parse the job description. Key parts: - Intro: "In all job functions, employees are responsible for creating an inclusive, safe, and secure work environment that values diverse cultures, perspectives, and experiences, and is free from discrimination. Employees are expected to provide all members of the public equitable services and treatment, collaborate with underserved communities and tribal governments, and work toward improving outcomes for all Californians." That's about role/responsibilities. - "Under direction of the Supervising Special Investigator II (SSI II), the Supervising Special Investigator I (SSI I) is responsible for planning, organizing, and directing a variety of investigative functions at CSLB. The SSI I supervises a multi-disciplinary group of professional, semi-professional, and support staff. This position is located in Norwalk, CA." That's responsibilities. - "Working Conditions Candidates who reside outside of the State of California may be admitted to the job interview. However, they must reside in the State of California once they are hired and start working." That's maybe a note about location/residency. - "Effective July 1, 2025, the State of California implemented the Personal Leave Program 2025 (PLP 2025) which reduces an employee's monthly salary in exchange for leave credits. Employees appointed to this classification will have their monthly salary reduced and will accrue hours of PLP 2025 on the first day of each pay period as outlined on "Section 2113 - Personal Leave Program (PLP)" of the CalHR Manual. The salary range(s) included on this job posting do not reflect the reduction in pay." That's about pay reduction; but we cannot create Pay section unless posting actually states them. It does mention salary reduction but not actual salary range. It says salary range(s) included do not reflect reduction. No actual numbers given. So we should not create Pay section because no specific salary numbers. We could maybe include a note about PLP but not as Pay heading? The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." We could include a "Benefits" section if there is mention of PLP? It's a leave program, could be considered benefit. But they said "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting does mention PLP 2025 which is a leave program (benefit). So we could include a Benefits section describing PLP. However they also say "never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. 'commensurate with experience', 'not specified', 'N/A', 'varies', 'TBD')". The PLP description is specific, not placeholder. So we could include Benefits. - Special Requirements: COI Conflict of Interest, Drivers License, DMV EPN, Fingerprint. Those are requirements. - Desirable Qualifications: Knowledge of..., Skill in..., Ability to... That's qualifications/skills. We need sections: maybe About the role (intro), Responsibilities (supervisory duties), Requirements (special requirements), Qualifications (desirable qualifications), Skills (maybe combine with qualifications?), Benefits (PLP). Also maybe Working Conditions (location/residency) could be part of About the role or Responsibilities. We must not include headings with no content. Let's extract content for each. About the role: The introductory paragraph about inclusive environment, equitable services, collaborate with underserved communities, improve outcomes for Californians. Responsibilities: Planning, organizing, directing investigative functions; supervising multi-disciplinary group; located in Norwalk, CA. Also maybe mention working under direction of SSI II. Requirements: Special Requirements: COI Conflict of Interest (submit Form 700), valid driver's license (provide photocopy), participate in DMV EPN, fingerprinting (submit fingerprints). Also maybe residency requirement: must reside in CA once hired. Qualifications: Desirable Qualifications: Knowledge of mediation and investigation techniques, directing others, rules of investigatory work, rules of evidence, court procedure, principles of identification, preservation, presentation of evidence, sources of information for locating persons, laws of arrest, search and seizure, service of legal process, legal rights of citizens, interviewing techniques, duties of Federal, State, local law enforcement agencies, interpreting/applying provisions, principles and techniques of personnel management and supervision, supervising staff, promoting equal opportunity, maintaining discrimination-free work environment. Skill in: Planning, organizing, directing investigations. Ability to: Direct others in performance of mediation and investigatory work; interpret/apply provisions; supervise staff; gather, analyze, prepare effective evidence; dictate correspondence and prepare reports; communicate effectively; establish/maintain cooperative relations with law enforcement; analyze situations accurately; think/act quickly in emergencies; adopt effective course of action; promote equal opportunity; maintain discrimination-free work environment. We could combine Knowledge, Skill, Ability into Qualifications and Skills sections. But we have both Qualifications and Skills headings allowed. Could put Knowledge under Qualifications, Skill under Skills, Ability under Abilities? But we only have headings list: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. No Abilities. So we could put Ability under Qualifications or Skills. Probably better to put Knowledge under Qualifications, Skill under Skills, Ability under Qualifications as well (or combine). But we need to avoid thin sections. Maybe we make Qualifications include Knowledge and Ability, and Skills include Skill. Let's decide: - Qualifications: Knowledge of ... (list) and Ability to ... (list). Could be long but okay. - Skills: Skill in: Planning, organizing, and directing investigations. But that seems thin. Could combine Skill into Qualifications as well, making only Qualifications section. However we have to follow instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe better to have Qualifications (knowledge + ability) and Skills (skill). But Skills would be just one bullet; still maybe okay but could be thin. Could merge Skill into Qualifications as well, making only Qualifications. But we have both headings allowed; we can choose to not include Skills if it's thin. The instruction: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". It doesn't forbid having a section with minimal content if it's real specific. But they prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits. Benefits: PLP 2025 details. We should not include Pay or Schedule. Now we need to format with

headings,

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we must keep the details as given, not paraphrase too much but we can keep the same wording. We need to remove boilerplate: survey, CalCareers Exams, etc. Also remove "Please let us know how you heard about our position by taking this brief survey." etc. Also remove "Department of Consumer Affairs Recruitment Survey CalCareers Exams: Once you find the job you want, we need to learn more about you." etc. Also remove "Working Conditions" heading? We can incorporate that info into About the role or Responsibilities as prose. We must not repeat job title as heading. Now craft HTML. Start with

  About the role

  then

  ...

  . Content: "In all job functions, employees are responsible for creating an inclusive, safe, and secure work environment that values diverse cultures, perspectives, and experiences, and is free from discrimination. Employees are expected to provide all members of the public equitable services and treatment, collaborate with underserved communities and tribal governments, and work toward improving outcomes for all Californians. The position is located in Norwalk, CA and operates under the direction of the Supervising Special Investigator II (SSI II)." We also need to mention that candidates residing outside CA may be admitted to interview but must reside in CA once hired. That's a condition; could be in About the role or Responsibilities. Let's put in About the role as a sentence. Now Responsibilities:

  Responsibilities

  then
  • ...
  . List duties: planning, organizing, directing investigative functions; supervising multi-disciplinary group of professional, semi-professional, and support staff. Also maybe "Under direction of the Supervising Special Investigator II (SSI II)" but that's already in About. We'll keep. Now Requirements:

  Requirements

  then
  • ...
  . Items: Conflict of Interest: must submit Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700) within 30 days of assuming office, annually by April 1, and within 30 days of leaving office. Valid driver's license required; must provide photocopy PDF front and back showing name, issuing state, DL number, class, expiration. Participation in DMV's Employer Pull Notice Program (EPN). Fingerprinting: submit fingerprints to DOJ per regulations. Also must reside in State of California once hired (if not already). We'll include that. Now Qualifications:

  Qualifications

  then maybe
  • for Knowledge and Ability? Could separate into two lists: Knowledge and Ability. But we need to use
    • for any list. So we can have two separate lists each preceded by a

      maybe? But we can just combine into one list with items being long sentences. That's okay. We'll list Knowledge items as separate

    • each? That would be many items but okay. However we need to preserve all detail; we could keep as a paragraph but they said use
      • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Knowledge is a list; Ability is also a list. So we should use lists. Thus:

        Qualifications

        Knowledge of:

        • Mediation and investigation techniques and procedures, and directing others in the performance of investigatory work;
        • rules of investigatory work;
        • rules of evidence and court procedure;
        • principles of identification, preservation, and presentation of evidence;
        • sources of information used in locating persons;
        • laws of arrest, search and seizure, service of legal process, and the legal rights of citizens;
        • interviewing techniques;
        • duties of Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies;
        • interpreting and applying to specific cases the provisions of the laws, rules, or regulations enforced or administered;
        • principles and techniques of personnel management and supervision and supervising a staff of investigators;
        • and a manager's/supervisor's responsibility for promoting equal opportunity in hiring and employee development and promotion, and for maintaining a work environment that is free of discrimination and harassment.
        Then Ability:

        Ability to:

        • Direct others in the performance of mediation and investigatory work;
        • interpret and apply to specific cases the provisions of the laws, rules, or regulations enforced or administered;
        • supervise a staff of investigators;
        • gather, analyze, and prepare effective evidence;
        • dictate correspondence and prepare reports;
        • communicate effectively;
        • establish and maintain cooperative relations with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies;
        • analyze situations accurately;
        • think and act