Senior Counsel, Regulatory Compliance

We need to output HTML fragment with sections for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. Must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "Additional Information" maybe not needed unless it contains benefits/pay/schedule. The posting includes: "Hybrid work model (Richmond, VA (Preferred); Jacksonville, FL; Alpharetta, GA) Up to 25% travel Authorization Must be authorized to work in the United States; sponsorship is not available". That's about work location and travel, maybe schedule? Not exactly schedule. There's also "Our Base Pay Range for this position $132,000 - $220,000". So we have Pay. Benefits: mention "competitive compensation package ... In addition to base pay, other compensation, such as an annual bonus or long-term incentive opportunities may be offered. For more information regarding benefits at McKesson, please click here." That's generic but includes mention of benefits. Should we include Benefits section? It says "competitive compensation package ... other compensation ... For more information regarding benefits at McKesson, please click here." That's somewhat generic but still mentions benefits. The rule: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Here we have specific pay range, so Pay section is okay. Benefits: they mention competitive compensation package and other compensation, but not specific benefits like health insurance, 401k, etc. It's somewhat generic but still mentions benefits. Might be considered specific enough? The phrase "competitive compensation package at McKesson as part of our Total Rewards." plus "In addition to base pay, other compensation, such as an annual bonus or long-term incentive opportunities may be offered." That's somewhat specific about bonus and long-term incentive. I'd include Benefits section with that info. Schedule: Not mentioned besides hybrid work model and up to 25% travel. That's not schedule (like full-time, part-time, shift). Could treat hybrid work model as schedule? The rule: include Schedule section only if posting actually states them. It doesn't state schedule like "Full-time", "Monday-Friday". So we should not create Schedule section. About the role: The intro paragraphs about McKesson and the role description. We'll put that under About the role. Responsibilities: The bullet list under "Key Responsibilities". We'll put each as

. Requirements: The "Minimum Requirements" and maybe "Qualifications" sections. The posting has "Qualifications" heading with Minimum Requirements and then "Critical Skills & Experience". Also "Preferred Qualifications". We need to separate Requirements vs Qualifications vs Skills? The instruction: use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we need to map content accordingly. We have: - About the role: intro paragraphs. - Responsibilities: Key Responsibilities list. - Requirements: Minimum Requirements (JD, bar membership, 7-10 years experience, experience advising on healthcare regulatory, compliance, risk management). Also maybe "Authorization Must be authorized to work in the United States; sponsorship is not available" could be a requirement. - Qualifications: Could be "Critical Skills & Experience" and "Preferred Qualifications". But the heading list includes Qualifications and Skills separate. So we can put under Qualifications the "Critical Skills & Experience" (maybe as a list). And under Skills we could put the specific skills enumerated? However the instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Might combine Qualifications and Skills? But we need to follow headings list; we can omit sections if no real specific content. We have content for both Qualifications and Skills. Let's decide: Qualifications: Minimum Requirements (JD, bar, years experience, healthcare regulatory experience). That's qualifications. Skills: Critical Skills & Experience list (Healthcare regulatory compliance counseling, Compliance program development and support, etc.) plus maybe "Strong drafting, issue-spotting, and legal analysis skills" etc. Also Preferred Qualifications could be additional qualifications but could go under Qualifications as well. But to avoid duplication, we can put: - Qualifications: Minimum Requirements (JD, bar, 7-10 years, healthcare regulatory experience) plus Preferred Qualifications (industry experience, FDA-regulated products, etc.) - Skills: Critical Skills & Experience (list of specific skills) plus maybe the "Strong drafting, issue-spotting, legal analysis skills" etc. We need to ensure we don't repeat content. Let's extract text. About the role: The first paragraph(s) up to "The MMS Legal Department is seeking Senior Counsel, Regulatory Compliance to join its Technology, Risk & People (TRP) pillar." plus description of TRP team, role reports, etc. We'll include all that descriptive content before "Key Responsibilities". That is: "McKesson is an impact-driven, Fortune 10 company that touches virtually every aspect of healthcare. We are known for delivering insights, products, and services that make quality care more accessible and affordable. Here, we focus on the health, happiness, and well-being of you and those we serve – we care. What you do at McKesson matters. We foster a culture where you can grow, make an impact, and are empowered to bring new ideas. Together, we thrive as we shape the future of health for patients, our communities, and our people. If you want to be part of tomorrow’s health today, we want to hear from you. The MMS Legal Department is seeking Senior Counsel, Regulatory Compliance to join its Technology, Risk & People (TRP) pillar. This role is critical to MMS’s transition to a standalone company. The TRP team provides practical, business-oriented legal support across operations, technology, data, compliance, and risk-related matters, helping the business achieve its objectives while appropriately managing legal and regulatory risk. The role reports to the Managing Principal Counsel, Technology, Risk & People. This role will provide day-to-day legal support on healthcare regulatory and compliance matters, including support for regulatory risk assessments, policy development, investigations, compliance monitoring, training, and enterprise risk management initiatives. The successful candidate will partner closely with Compliance, Enterprise Risk Management, and business stakeholders to identify legal and regulatory risks, develop practical solutions, and support informed business decision-making. The ideal candidate exercises sound judgment, communicates effectively with both legal and business audiences, and thrives in a dynamic environment with evolving priorities. This position offers the opportunity to help build scalable compliance processes and contribute to the growth of a newly independent healthcare organization." That's About the role. Responsibilities: The list under "Key Responsibilities". Each bullet: - Regulatory Counseling: Provide practical, risk-based legal advice on healthcare regulatory and compliance matters, including regulations applicable to medical devices, controlled substances, healthcare operations, and related business activities. - Compliance Program Support: Partner with Compliance and business teams to identify, assess, and help mitigate regulatory and compliance risks. - Risk Assessment & Monitoring: Support regulatory risk assessments, audits, investigations, monitoring activities, and corrective action initiatives. - Drafting: Draft and review policies, procedures, training materials, compliance guidance, and other regulatory-related documents. - Collaboration: Partner with Legal, Compliance, Quality, Regulatory Affairs, Operations, and business stakeholders to proactively identify regulatory risks and develop practical, business-oriented solutions. - Regulatory Research & Guidance: Monitor legal and regulatory developments and translate evolving requirements into actionable guidance for business and functional teams. - Execution & Adaptability: Manage multiple priorities, adapt to changing business needs, and operate effectively in a fast-paced, highly regulated environment. We'll output as

• ... etc. Requirements: Minimum Requirements: - JD from an accredited law school and active U.S. bar membership. - 7-10 years of relevant legal experience in a law firm, government agency, and/or in-house legal department. - Experience advising on healthcare regulatory, compliance, risk management, or related legal matters. Also Authorization: Must be authorized to work in the United States; sponsorship is not available. Could be included under Requirements. We'll include that as a requirement. Qualifications: Could include Preferred Qualifications and maybe Critical Skills & Experience? But we have Skills separate. Let's put under Qualifications the Preferred Qualifications: - Experience in the healthcare, life sciences, pharmaceutical, medical device, healthcare technology, or healthcare distribution industries. - Experience supporting compliance programs involving FDA-regulated products, controlled substance compliance, quality systems, or related healthcare regulatory frameworks. Also maybe "Hybrid work model (Richmond, VA (Preferred); Jacksonville, FL; Alpharetta, GA) Up to 25% travel" is not a qualification but could be under Schedule? But we decided not to include Schedule. Could put under Qualifications? Not really. Might be better to put under a separate section like "Work Location" but not in allowed headings. Since we cannot invent headings, we could drop it or incorporate into About the role? The instruction: "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it." So we can fold minor metadata like work location and travel into a short

  maybe under About the role or a separate paragraph not under a heading. But we must output only HTML fragment; we can include a

  for that info without a heading. However the instruction says "Use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use

  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

    for prose." So we can have

    elements outside headings for prose. So we can include a

    for work location/travel after the About the role section maybe. But we need to preserve all substantive information. So we should include that info somewhere. Let's structure:

    About the role

    ... (the long paragraph)

    Hybrid work model (Richmond, VA (Preferred); Jacksonville, FL; Alpharetta, GA). Up to 25% travel. Authorization: Must be authorized to work in the United States; sponsorship is not available.

    Then

    Responsibilities

    with
    . Then

    Requirements

    with
    for JD, bar, years experience, healthcare regulatory experience. Then

    Qualifications

    with
    for Preferred Qualifications. Then

    Skills

    with
    for Critical Skills & Experience list (including the bullet points). Also include the strong drafting etc? Those are part of Critical Skills & Experience list: "Strong drafting, issue-spotting, and legal analysis skills", "Strong research and problem-solving skills.", "Ability to provide clear, practical legal guidance", "Proven ability to adapt to evolving business needs and operate effectively in ambiguous situations", "Strong collaboration and communication skills". We'll include those as list items. Then

    Benefits

    with

    about competitive compensation package, annual bonus, long-term incentive opportunities. Then

    Pay

    with

    "$132,000 - $220,000". We should not include Schedule. Check for any duplicated lines: we need to avoid repeating same content. Ensure we didn't include the "Additional Information" heading; we folded location/travel/auth into a paragraph. We must not include boilerplate like EEO, scam warning, etc. So we removed those. Now ensure we preserve all substantive info: Did we