Senior Counsel, Regulatory Compliance

We need to output HTML fragment with sections for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections where there is real specific content. Must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, no invention. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove EEO statements, scam warning, etc. Also remove "About McKesson Medical-Surgical" maybe considered boilerplate? It's substantive about the company but maybe considered part of description? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." The "About McKesson Medical-Surgical" is not exactly those categories; it's company description. Might be considered part of "About the role"? The posting includes a paragraph about McKesson at start, then about MMS Legal Department seeking Senior Counsel... Then description of role. Then "Key Responsibilities" list. Then "Qualifications" with Minimum Requirements and Critical Skills & Experience. Then "Preferred Qualifications". Then "Additional Information" includes Hybrid work model, travel, Authorization. Then "About McKesson Medical-Surgical" description. Then "Our Base Pay Range for this position $132,000 - $220,000". Then other compensation mention. Then benefits link. Then scam warning, EEO, etc. We need to include sections: About the role (maybe the introductory paragraph about role), Responsibilities (Key Responsibilities), Requirements (maybe Minimum Requirements?), Qualifications (maybe Critical Skills & Experience?), Skills (maybe combine?), Benefits (maybe mention benefits link? but we should not include placeholder like "For more information regarding benefits at McKesson, please click here." That's not specific benefit details, it's a link. The instruction: never create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. It does mention benefits link but not specific benefits. So we should not create Benefits section. Pay: we have base pay range $132,000 - $220,000. That's specific. So include Pay section. Schedule: we have hybrid work model and up to 25% travel. That's schedule info? Could be considered schedule. The instruction: include Schedule section only when posting has real specific content. It does mention hybrid work model (locations) and up to 25% travel. That's schedule-related. So we can include Schedule section. We also need to include maybe "About the role" summarizing the role description (the paragraph after the intro). Must not repeat job title. Provide prose. We must not include duplicated lines. Also must not include EEO etc. We need to preserve all substantive information: that includes the hybrid work model locations, travel %, authorization to work in US, no sponsorship. Also includes base pay range. Also includes the description of MMS Legal Department seeking Senior Counsel, TRP pillar, reporting line, role purpose, etc. Also includes responsibilities list. Also includes qualifications: JD, bar membership, 7-10 years experience, experience advising on healthcare regulatory etc. Also includes critical skills & experience list. Also includes preferred qualifications. Also includes additional info about hybrid work model, travel, authorization. Also includes About McKesson Medical-Surgical description (maybe considered substantive about the company). Should we include that? It's not explicitly required sections but could be part of "About the role" or maybe a separate "About the company"? Not in allowed headings. The allowed headings are limited to those list. So we should fold company description into About the role maybe as part of role context. But we must not invent headings. So we can include About the role section containing the description of the role and maybe company context. We must not include the "Additional Information" heading; we need to fold its content into appropriate sections: Hybrid work model and travel into Schedule; Authorization into maybe Requirements? Actually authorization is a requirement: must be authorized to work in US; sponsorship not available. That could go under Requirements or Qualifications. Probably Requirements. We must not include the "About McKesson Medical-Surgical" as a separate heading; we could incorporate into About the role. We must not include the "Our Base Pay Range" as separate heading? We'll create Pay section. We must not include benefits section. We must not include scam warning, EEO, etc. Now produce HTML fragment with headings

for each section. Use

• for lists. Use

  for prose. We need to decide which sections to include: - About the role: prose summarizing role purpose, context, reporting line, etc. - Responsibilities: list from Key Responsibilities. - Requirements: maybe combine Minimum Requirements and Authorization? Could also include "Must be authorized to work in the United States; sponsorship is not available." Also maybe include "Hybrid work model" not a requirement but schedule. - Qualifications: maybe the Critical Skills & Experience list (the bullet list). Or we could treat that as Skills. The instruction: Use sections for Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to decide what goes where. The posting has "Minimum Requirements" and "Critical Skills & Experience" and "Preferred Qualifications". We could map: Requirements: Minimum Requirements (JD, bar, 7-10 years experience, experience advising on healthcare regulatory etc.) plus Authorization. Qualifications: Critical Skills & Experience (the list of skills/experience). Skills: maybe Preferred Qualifications? Or we could treat Preferred Qualifications as Skills. But better to follow typical: Requirements = mandatory; Qualifications = preferred? But we have both. Let's assign: - Requirements: Minimum Requirements + Authorization. - Qualifications: Critical Skills & Experience (the list). - Skills: Preferred Qualifications (the list). Or we could combine Preferred Qualifications into Qualifications and leave Skills empty? But we should not create empty sections. So we need to decide if we have content for Skills. Preferred Qualifications is a list of experiences; could be considered skills. We'll put them under Skills. Thus we have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Pay, Schedule. Check if we have content for each: About the role: we have description of role: "The MMS Legal Department is seeking Senior Counsel, Regulatory Compliance to join its Technology, Risk & People (TRP) pillar. This role is critical to MMS’s transition to a standalone company. The TRP team provides practical, business-oriented legal support across operations, technology, data, compliance, and risk-related matters, helping the business achieve its objectives while appropriately managing legal and regulatory risk. The role reports to the Managing Principal Counsel, Technology, Risk & People. This role will provide day-to-day legal support on healthcare regulatory and compliance matters, including support for regulatory risk assessments, policy development, investigations, compliance monitoring, training, and enterprise risk management initiatives. The successful candidate will partner closely with Compliance, Enterprise Risk Management, and business stakeholders to identify legal and regulatory risks, develop practical solutions, and support informed business decision-making. The ideal candidate exercises sound judgment, communicates effectively with both legal and business audiences, and thrives in a dynamic environment with evolving priorities. This position offers the opportunity to help build scalable compliance processes and contribute to the growth of a newly independent healthcare organization." That's substantive. Responsibilities: list from Key Responsibilities. Requirements: Minimum Requirements: JD from accredited law school and active U.S. bar membership. 7-10 years of relevant legal experience in a law firm, government agency, and/or in-house legal department. Experience advising on healthcare regulatory, compliance, risk management, or related legal matters. Plus Authorization: Must be authorized to work in the United States; sponsorship is not available. Qualifications: Critical Skills & Experience list: Experience with: Healthcare regulatory compliance counseling; Compliance program development and support; Regulatory risk assessment and mitigation; Policy and procedure development; Internal investigations, audits, monitoring, or corrective action initiatives; Cross-functional counseling in a highly regulated industry; Working knowledge of healthcare regulatory frameworks and compliance requirements; Foundational knowledge of regulations applicable to medical devices, controlled substances, and related healthcare products and services; Familiarity with enterprise risk management principles and processes; Strong drafting, issue-spotting, and legal analysis skills; Strong research and problem-solving skills; Ability to provide clear, practical legal guidance; Proven ability to adapt to evolving business needs and operate effectively in ambiguous situations; Strong collaboration and communication skills. Skills: Preferred Qualifications list: Experience in the healthcare, life sciences, pharmaceutical, medical device, healthcare technology, or healthcare distribution industries. Experience supporting compliance programs involving FDA-regulated products, controlled substance compliance, quality systems, or related healthcare regulatory frameworks. Pay: Base Pay Range $132,000 - $220,000. Also mention additional compensation: annual bonus or long-term incentive opportunities may be offered. That's substantive. Schedule: Hybrid work model (Richmond, VA (Preferred); Jacksonville, FL; Alpharetta, GA). Up to 25% travel. We should not include the "About McKesson Medical-Surgical" description. Could we incorporate into About the role? It's about the company, not the role. But maybe we can include a brief sentence about MMS being a subsidiary etc. However the instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." If we omit that description, we are losing substantive info about the company. But is that considered required? The sections allowed do not include a company description heading. However we could fold it into About the role as context. That would preserve the info, albeit under About the role heading. That seems acceptable. Thus we can add a sentence: "McKesson Medical-Surgical (MMS), which is expected to become Wellverse in early 2027, is a subsidiary and publicly reported segment of the McKesson Corporation. MMS distributes medical-surgical supplies, pharmaceuticals, diagnostic equipment and supplies, along with other solutions and services to virtually every type of healthcare setting and provider outside of the traditional hospital..." etc. That is substantive. We need to ensure we don't repeat the job title. The job title is Senior Counsel, Regulatory Compliance. We must not repeat it as a heading. We can mention it in prose. Now produce HTML. We must not include any markdown code fences. Just raw HTML. Let's craft:

  About the role

  ...

  Responsibilities

  • ...
  ...

  Requirements

  • JD from an accredited law school and active U.S. bar membership.
  • 7-10 years of relevant legal experience in a law firm, government agency, and/or in-house legal department.
  • Experience advising on healthcare regulatory, compliance, risk management, or related legal matters.
  • Must be authorized to work in the United States; sponsorship is not available.

  Qualifications

  • Experience with healthcare regulatory compliance counseling
  • Compliance program development and support
  • Regulatory risk assessment and mitigation
  • Policy and procedure development
  • Internal investigations, audits, monitoring, or corrective action initiatives
  • Cross-functional counseling in a highly regulated industry
  • Working knowledge of healthcare regulatory frameworks and compliance requirements
  • Foundational knowledge of regulations applicable to medical devices, controlled substances, and related healthcare products and services
  • Familiarity with enterprise risk management principles and processes
  • Strong drafting, issue-spotting, and legal analysis skills
  • Strong research and problem-solving skills
  • Ability to provide clear, practical legal guidance
  • Proven ability to adapt to evolving business needs and operate effectively in ambiguous situations
  • Strong collaboration and communication skills

  Skills

  • Experience in the healthcare, life sciences, pharmaceutical, medical device, healthcare technology, or healthcare distribution industries
  • Experience supporting compliance programs involving FDA-regulated