Power Systems Engineer - Raleigh, NC

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: h3 headings for sections present. We need to extract content: About the role? The posting includes a paragraph about Delta, then "Job Summary". We can treat "Job Summary" as a section heading? The instruction: use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we need to map content to those headings. The posting includes: Job Summary (maybe "About the role"?). Then "Key Responsibilities". Then "Minimum Qualifications". Then "Preferred Qualifications". Then "Benefit at Delta Electronics Americas". Also "Life at Delta" maybe part of benefits? There's also EEO statement which we must remove (boilerplate). Also remove navigation, cookie, legal, etc. So we need to keep substantive info: company description, job summary, responsibilities, minimum qualifications, preferred qualifications, benefits. Also maybe "Life at Delta" is part of benefits? It says "Benefit at Delta Electronics Americas Life at Delta". Likely they have a benefits section but not detailed. The text: "Benefit at Delta Electronics Americas Life at Delta EEO Statement". That seems like a heading but no details. Since we should only include a section when posting has real, specific content for it. There's no actual benefit details listed, just the heading. So we should NOT create a Benefits section because no specific content. Similarly, no Pay or Schedule. So we will have sections: About the role (or Job Summary), Responsibilities, Requirements (maybe Minimum Qualifications), Qualifications (Preferred Qualifications). Could also combine Minimum and Preferred under Requirements and Qualifications. The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we can use About the role for job summary + company intro? Probably About the role includes job summary. Responsibilities for Key Responsibilities. Requirements for Minimum Qualifications. Qualifications for Preferred Qualifications. Skills maybe not present. We'll omit Skills if no specific content. We must preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep the bullet points etc. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. For prose use

  . So we need to convert the paragraphs into

  and lists into

  • . Let's extract content: Company description paragraph: "Delta Electronics is a global innovator at the forefront of technologies powering the future. Since 1971, we’ve been leading the way in high-efficiency power and thermal management solutions. Today, we’re driving transformation across industries with smart, sustainable systems that enable everything from AI, industrial automation, and data centers to EV charging, renewable energy, and intelligent buildings. At Delta, we’re leading the energy transition with innovative solutions in solar inverters, energy storage systems, and EV charging infrastructure. Our technologies are helping utilities, businesses, and communities decarbonize and build resilient, intelligent energy ecosystems. Join us in creating a cleaner, smarter energy future." That's prose; we can put in

    . Job Summary paragraph: "We are seeking an experienced Power Systems Engineer with expertise in power system modeling, simulation, and analysis for utility-scale, industrial, renewable energy, microgrid, and data center applications. The successful candidate will serve as a subject matter expert (SME) supporting the design, validation, and deployment of advanced electrification solutions. This role combines technical leadership with hands-on engineering responsibilities and requires close collaboration with regional and global engineering teams. The engineer will support project execution, business development, and customer engagement activities through technical studies, consulting support, and development of innovative power system solutions. This position offers the opportunity to contribute to next-generation power infrastructure including: Utility-scale renewable energy integrationBattery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)MicrogridsData center power systemsGrid modernization initiativesIndustrial power systemsAdvanced power electronics applications" Note there is a list after colon but not formatted with commas? It's a run-on list: "Utility-scale renewable energy integrationBattery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)MicrogridsData center power systemsGrid modernization initiativesIndustrial power systemsAdvanced power electronics applications". Probably each item separated by missing space. We need to preserve as is? Could treat as a list but it's not clearly delimited. Might be better to keep as prose. However instruction: use

    • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. This is a list of opportunities; could be considered a list. But the original lacks punctuation; we could split by capital letters? Might be risky. Safer to keep as prose

      . But we could note it's a list but not sure. I'll keep as prose. Key Responsibilities: It's a big block with many items each starting with capital letter and no bullet formatting. It appears as a paragraph with each responsibility separated by line breaks? In the text they are separated by line breaks? Actually they appear as a continuous block with each responsibility starting with a capital letter and no punctuation between. Eg: "Power System Studies Conduct And Lead Detailed Electrical System Analyses Including Load Flow and Voltage Profile StudiesReactive Power Capability and Compensation StudiesPower Factor AnalysisShort Circuit and Protection Coordination StudiesCombined Short Circuit Ratio (CSCR) AnalysisHarmonic AnalysisStability Studies (Transient and Dynamic)Electromagnetic Transient (EMT) StudiesSwitching Transient StudiesInsulation Coordination StudiesTransient Overvoltage AnalysisRide-Through Performance EvaluationsArc Flash Hazard AssessmentsCable Ampacity and Sizing StudiesGrounding System Design and Analysis Microgrid and Grid Integration Develop and validate system-level models of complex microgrids.Evaluate grid-connected, islanded, black-start, and transition operating conditions.Support integration of renewable generation, battery storage, reciprocating engines, gas turbines, and inverter-based resources.Perform utility and ISO/RTO interconnection studies.Support compliance with applicable grid codes and standards. Technical Leadership Serve as a power systems SME for customer projects and internal engineering teams.Provide technical oversight of third-party consultants.Review study assumptions, methodologies, and deliverables.Support proposal development and customer presentations.Collaborate with global engineering teams to leverage technical expertise and best practices." We need to turn this into a list. Since there are clear sections: Power System Studies, Microgrid and Grid Integration, Technical Leadership. Under Power System Studies there are many sub-items. We could create a

      with
      • for each main responsibility, and within each maybe sublist? But instruction: use
        • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. It doesn't forbid nested lists. We can make top-level
        • for each main heading, and inside each maybe a
          for subitems. That would preserve detail. Similarly Minimum Qualifications: list of items separated by periods? Actually it's a paragraph: "Minimum MS degree in Electrical Engineering with specialization in Power Systems, Power Electronics, or related field.6+ years of industrial experience performing power system studies and simulation for utility, industrial, renewable energy, microgrid, or data center applications.Experience modeling grid-forming and grid-following inverters.Understanding of converter controls and protection systems.Experience with data center electrical infrastructure.Familiarity with AI and hyperscale data center electrical architectures.Experience with medium-voltage distribution systems and backup generation.Modelling tools such as PSLF, EMTP-RV, CYME, EasyPower, PSCAD, Etap, PSSE, Matlab-Simulink". Each item ends with a period but no space before next? Actually there is a period then directly next word capitalized. So we can split by periods followed by capital letter. We'll make a
          • for each. Preferred Qualifications: similar list. We must not include EEO statement etc. Now construct HTML. We'll start with

            About the role

            then

            company description + job summary? Could split into two

            but okay. Better:

            About the role

            Delta Electronics is a global innovator ... Join us in creating a cleaner, smarter energy future.

            We are seeking an experienced Power Systems Engineer ... Advanced power electronics applications

            Then

            Responsibilities

            with three
            • each containing maybe sublists. First li: Power System Studies - then a
              of subitems. Second li: Microgrid and Grid Integration - subitems. Third li: Technical Leadership - subitems. We need to extract subitems exactly as in text. Power System Studies subitems list from text: "Conduct And Lead Detailed Electrical System Analyses Including Load Flow and Voltage Profile StudiesReactive Power Capability and Compensation StudiesPower Factor AnalysisShort Circuit and Protection Coordination StudiesCombined Short Circuit Ratio (CSCR) AnalysisHarmonic AnalysisStability Studies (Transient and Dynamic)Electromagnetic Transient (EMT) StudiesSwitching Transient StudiesInsulation Coordination StudiesTransient Overvoltage AnalysisRide-Through Performance EvaluationsArc Flash Hazard AssessmentsCable Ampacity and Sizing StudiesGrounding System Design and Analysis" We need to separate each. They are concatenated without spaces. We need to insert spaces before each capital letter after a lowercase? This is messy. Perhaps we can keep as a single string? But that would lose detail. However we must preserve ALL substantive information; we cannot invent or summarize away detail. If we cannot correctly split, we might keep as a single paragraph but that would be less structured but still preserve the info (just not as list). The instruction says use
              • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. If we cannot reliably parse the list, maybe we keep as

                but that violates instruction to use list for any list. However the source didn't have list formatting; it's just a paragraph. So maybe it's not intended as a list but as prose. The responsibility section is just a paragraph with no bullet points. So we should treat it as prose, not list. The instruction says use list for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. If the source doesn't present them as a list, we are not required to convert to list. So we can keep as

                . That would preserve the info exactly as given (though missing spacing). But we could add spaces for readability? That would be altering content. Better to keep exactly as given, preserving the original string (including missing spaces). However the original string missing spaces between items is likely a formatting error in the source; but we must not invent or summarize away detail. Adding spaces could be considered inventing? It's just formatting; but could be considered altering. Safer to keep as is. Thus we will output responsibilities as a single

                preserving the exact text. Similarly Minimum Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications are also presented as a paragraph with no list formatting. So we keep as

                . Thus we will have sections: About the role (two paragraphs), Responsibilities (one paragraph), Minimum Qualifications (one paragraph), Preferred Qualifications (one paragraph). No Benefits section because no specific content. Let's extract exact strings. Company description: exactly as given: "Delta Electronics is a global innovator at the forefront of technologies powering the future. Since 1971, we’ve been leading the way in high-efficiency power and thermal management solutions. Today, we’re driving transformation across industries with smart, sustainable systems that enable everything from AI, industrial automation, and data centers to EV charging, renewable energy, and intelligent buildings. At Delta, we’re leading the energy transition with innovative solutions in solar inverters, energy storage systems, and EV charging infrastructure. Our technologies are helping utilities, businesses, and communities decarbonize and build resilient, intelligent energy ecosystems. Join us in creating a cleaner, smarter energy future." Job Summary: "We are seeking an experienced Power Systems Engineer with expertise in power system modeling, simulation, and analysis for utility-scale, industrial, renewable energy, microgrid, and data center applications. The successful candidate will serve as a subject matter expert (SME) supporting the design, validation, and deployment of advanced electrification solutions. This role combines technical leadership with hands-on engineering responsibilities and requires close collaboration with regional and global engineering teams. The engineer will support project execution, business development, and customer