Mobile Account Mgr

The user provided a block of text that appears to be an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) statement and additional comments from a job posting. According to the instructions, I need to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. However, the provided text is only boilerplate EEO language and disclaimers — no actual job content like responsibilities, requirements, qualifications, benefits, pay, schedule, etc. The rules state: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." This text is explicitly EEO boilerplate and legal disclaimer language. It contains no substantive job information — no duties, requirements, skills, pay, schedule, or benefits. It's purely legal/compliance text. Therefore, I should not output any HTML sections for this content. The instruction says: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". Since this entire input is boilerplate with no job-specific content, the correct output is nothing — an empty fragment. But wait: the user said "Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences." If there's no substantive content, I should output nothing at all? Or perhaps just omit everything. The instruction says "Preserve ALL substantive information" — but there is none here. So the appropriate response is to output nothing (empty string). However, the system might expect some output. But logically, if the input is pure boilerplate, and we're told to remove it, then output should be empty. I'll output nothing.