Licensed Optical Supervisor - Soho, NYC

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually the posting includes description paragraphs. We need to use

for section headings: e.g., About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include a section only when posting has real, specific content for it. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "Warby Parker will consider for employment all qualified applicants..." etc. Also remove "CO only: The application window..." etc. Also remove "About Us:" maybe? The "About Us" is not a required heading but could be considered part of description? The instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can include sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits. Pay and Schedule only if present. The posting mentions compensation: "We offer a comprehensive compensation package that includes not only a competitive base salary/hourly rate but also variable compensation for eligible employees." Also mentions overtime pay for non-exempt. It does not give specific numbers. It says "For applicable postings, the range listed is a good faith estimate..." but no range given. So we should not create Pay section because no specific pay info. Schedule: not mentioned. So we omit Pay and Schedule. Benefits: there is a list of benefits for full-time and part-time. We should include Benefits section with

• . Need to preserve all substantive information; we can combine full-time and part-time benefits maybe separate lists? Could have two sub-sections? But we only have Benefits heading. Could list all benefits, noting which are for full-time vs part-time. The posting includes specifics: "Some benefits of working at Warby Parker for full-time employees: Health, vision, and dental insurance Life and AD&D Insurance Paid sick leave 1 Paid Holidays 1 Vacation days per year 1 Retirement savings plan (401(k)) Parental leave (non-birthing parents included) Short-term disability Employee Stock Purchase Plan Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Bereavement Support Optical Education Reimbursement Free eyewear And more (just ask!) Some benefits of working at Warby Parker for part-time employees: Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Employee Stock Purchase Plan Free eyewear Paid sick leave 2 And more (just ask!)" Also there are footnotes: "1 WA only: Full-Time employees' paid sick leave is accrued at a rate of 1 hour per every 26 hours worked. Full-time employees receive 5 paid holidays and 5-10 vacation days per year (after waiting period, depending on tenure and hours worked). 2 WA PT only: Paid sick leave (accrued at a rate of 1 hour per every 30 hours worked)." This is specific to Washington state. Should we keep? It's substantive info about benefits. Probably include as part of Benefits section. We also need About the role: The initial paragraph(s) describing role: "Warby Parker is searching for an Optical Supervisor to join our growing team of in-house optical professionals. In this role, you'll rely on your optical prowess, friendly demeanor, and product expertise to create incredible customer experiences. Whether you're helping longtime WarbyParker fans or first-time wearers, you'll leave them excited and confident about our glasses. (Our frames are really special, after all. Take a peek at how our glasses are made.) Acting as a keyholder to the store, you'll help open and close up shop as well as maintain internal operations. As a leader of the team, you'll foster an upbeat and productive work environment for the opticians and retail advisors. Our ideal candidate is an energetic self-starter and a lifelong learner who's eager to help Warby Parker grow. Sound like your cup of tea? Read on!" That's about the role. Responsibilities: The "What you'll do" section with bullet points under Optical duties and Leadership responsibilities. We need to convert to
  • . Should we separate into two sub-lists? Could just combine all duties under Responsibilities. Might be okay. Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: The "Who you are" section includes many bullet points: licensed dispensing optician, ABO-certified, 2+ years experience, etc. Also includes "Not on the Office of Inspector General's List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE)". Also includes compliance statement about pay transparency etc. That's not a requirement. We need to decide which headings to use: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. The posting includes qualifications (license, experience), skills (communication, detail-oriented, etc.). We could split: Requirements: license/certification, experience. Qualifications: maybe same? But we need to avoid thin sections. Better to have one section "Requirements" that includes license, experience, etc. And another "Skills" for communication, detail-oriented, etc. Or "Qualifications" for the same. Let's see: The instruction says use headings e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we can have multiple. We need to include only when posting has real, specific content. So we can have Requirements (license, experience), Qualifications (maybe passionate about eyewear, etc.), Skills (communication, detail-oriented, etc.). But there is overlap. Could combine into Requirements and Skills. Let's decide: Requirements: license/certification, 2+ years experience including supervisor responsibilities. Qualifications: passionate about eyewear and retail industries, clear communicator, dedicated, energetic positive team player, detail-oriented, cool under pressure, juggling responsibilities, open-minded, takes work seriously but not yourself, not on LEIE. Skills: maybe same as qualifications? Might be redundant. Better to have Requirements and Skills only. But we need to follow instruction: we can use Qualifications if we have content. Let's parse the "Who you are" bullet list: - A licensed dispensing optician in states that require a license or an ABO-certified optician in non-licensing states, with 2+ years of experience, including supervisor responsibilities - Passionate about the eyewear and retail industries - A clear, effective, and professional communicator-you can break down technical terms for customers to easily understand - Dedicated to going above-and-beyond to make customers (and your teammates!) happy - An energetic, positive team player who's able to adapt in a fast-paced, ever-changing work environment - Extremely detail-oriented, cool under pressure, and capable of juggling a wide range of responsibilities - Open-minded-you're constantly learning and challenging what you know - Someone who takes your work very seriously, but not yourself - Not on the Office of Inspector General's List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE) We could treat first bullet as Requirements (license/experience). The rest as Skills or Qualifications. Let's make Requirements: license/certification + experience. Qualifications: passionate about eyewear/retail, dedicated, energetic positive team player, open-minded, takes work seriously but not yourself, not on LEIE. Skills: communication, detail-oriented, cool under pressure, juggling responsibilities. That seems reasonable. Now Benefits section: list as above. We must not include boilerplate like "Warby Parker will consider for employment all qualified applicants..." etc. Also remove "In compliance with local and state requirements, Warby Parker is committed to pay transparency..." maybe that's part of Benefits? It's about compensation, but we are not making Pay section. Could we include that as part of Benefits? It's about compensation package. Might be considered part of Benefits? But we have no Pay section. The instruction says include Pay section only if posting actually states them. It does state compensation package but not specific numbers. It says "We offer a comprehensive compensation package that includes not only a competitive base salary/hourly rate but also variable compensation for eligible employees." That's still compensation info. Should we create a Pay section? The rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It does state compensation package, albeit not specific numbers. So we could include a Pay section with that description. However, they also say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." The Pay section would be thin but still substantive (describes base salary/hourly rate + variable compensation). Might be okay. But we also have Benefits section. Could combine compensation and benefits into one "Compensation & Benefits"? But instruction says use specific headings. Might be better to include Pay section with that description, and Benefits section with benefits list. Schedule: not mentioned, so omit. Now we need to remove duplicated lines, navigation, legal, EEO, etc. Also remove "Our frames are really special, after all. Take a peek at how our glasses are made." That's a parenthetical; it's substantive? It's about frames being special; maybe keep as part of About the role? It's a parenthetical note; we can keep it. Also remove "Sound like your cup of tea? Read on!" That's a call to action; maybe remove as application instruction? It's not exactly instruction but could be considered fluff. Might remove. Also remove "What you'll do" heading? We'll convert to Responsibilities heading. Also remove "Who you are" heading; convert to Requirements/Qualifications/Skills. Also remove "Some benefits of working at Warby Parker for full-time employees:" etc. We'll put under Benefits. Also remove "And more (just ask!)" maybe keep as part of list? It's vague; maybe we can keep as a bullet "And more (just ask!)" but it's not specific. Might be considered filler. Better to omit that phrase. Also remove footnotes about WA only? That's specific to Washington state; it's substantive about benefits accrual. Keep. Also remove "About Us:" section? That's not required heading but could be considered part of About the role? It's about company mission. Could be included under About the role? Might be considered extra but not required. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep the About Us paragraph as it's substantive about company. Could be part of About the role or maybe a separate section? There's no heading for About Us. Could we add a section "About the company"? Not in allowed headings. So we should incorporate it into About the role section maybe as a paragraph. Thus About the role will include initial paragraphs plus the About Us paragraph. Now we need to output HTML fragment only, no /. Use

    for each section heading. Use

    • for lists. Use

      for prose. Let's craft:

      About the role

      Warby Parker is searching for an Optical Supervisor to join our growing team of in-house optical professionals. In this role, you'll rely on your optical prowess, friendly demeanor, and product expertise to create incredible customer experiences. Whether you're helping longtime Warby Parker fans or first-time wearers, you'll leave them excited and confident about our glasses. (Our frames are really special, after all. Take a peek at how our glasses are made.) Acting as a keyholder to the store, you'll help open and close up shop as well as maintain internal operations. As a leader of the team, you'll foster an upbeat and productive work environment for the opticians and retail advisors. Our ideal candidate is an energetic self-starter and a lifelong learner who's eager to help Warby Parker grow.

      Warby Parker was founded with a mission: to inspire and impact the world with vision, purpose, and style. We're constantly asking ourselves how we can do more and make a greater impact, and that starts by reimagining everything that a company and industry can be. We want to demonstrate that a business can scale while doing good in the world, without charging a premium for it. And we've learned that it takes creativity, empathy, and innovation to