EHS Engineer

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We need to parse the job posting. First part: "Why Castelion, Why Now Castelion is moving incredibly fast..." This is introductory text about company. Could be "About the role"? Actually "Why Castelion, Why Now" is like about the company. Could be considered "About the role"? The instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can create sections: About the role (maybe includes the intro). Then Responsibilities (list). Then Requirements (maybe Minimum Qualifications). Then Qualifications (maybe Preferred Skills And Experience). Then Skills (maybe not separate). Benefits: there is a line "Castelion offers a generous benefits package. Please refer to the bottom of our Careers page for more details." That's vague, not specific details. According to rule: never create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. It states they offer a generous benefits package but refers to elsewhere for details. That's not specific content; it's generic. Should we include? The rule: "never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. 'commensurate with experience', 'not specified', 'N/A', 'varies', 'TBD')". This is similar: "generous benefits package" is vague but not placeholder. However they say refer to bottom of Careers page for more details. That is not specific. I'd argue we should not include Benefits section because no specific benefits listed. Similarly Pay and Schedule not mentioned. So omit those. We need to include sections only when posting has real specific content. Thus sections: About the role (intro), Responsibilities, Requirements (minimum qualifications), Qualifications (preferred skills and experience), Skills? Could combine preferred skills into Qualifications. But we can have Skills section if there is specific skill list. The posting includes "Preferred Skills And Experience" which is a list of skills/experience. Could be Skills section. But we already have Qualifications for minimum qualifications. Could treat "Preferred Skills And Experience" as Skills section. Or we could have Qualifications (minimum) and Skills (preferred). Let's follow typical: Requirements = minimum qualifications; Qualifications = preferred? But they gave both. We'll create:

About the role

with paragraph(s) containing the intro text (Why Castelion, Why Now ... plus description of EHS Engineer – Project Ranger, New Mexico). Ensure we preserve all substantive information. Then

Responsibilities

with

• each responsibility bullet. Then

  Requirements

  with
  • each minimum qualification bullet. Then

    Skills

    (or Preferred Skills) with
    • each preferred skill/experience bullet. We must not repeat job title as heading. Already not. We must not include Job ID etc. We must remove boilerplate: EEO statement, EAR/ITAR requirements, Additional Eligibility Requirements, Affirmative Action/EEO Statement, etc. Also remove "Other Duties", "Additional Eligibility Requirements", "Affirmative Action/EEO Statement", "EAR/ITAR Requirements". Also remove "Please refer to the bottom of our Careers page for more details." (benefits vague). Also remove "Castelion offers a generous benefits package." maybe we can keep as part of Benefits? But we decided not to include Benefits. Could we include a short paragraph about benefits under About the role? Probably not; better to omit. We must preserve all substantive information: that includes the description of role, responsibilities, minimum qualifications, preferred skills/experience. Also note about location (New Mexico), full-time onsite, ability to work outside normal business hours, ability to meet export-control requirements (ITAR or EAR). That is part of minimum qualifications? It appears under Minimum Qualifications list: "Ability to work full-time onsite at Project Ranger in New Mexico and to support operations outside normal business hours when required. Ability to meet U.S. export-control requirements (ITAR or EAR)." So include those as bullets. Also note about "Additional Eligibility Requirements" regarding classified info, security clearance. That's substantive but maybe we should keep? It's about eligibility. The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The Additional Eligibility Requirements is not exactly boilerplate; it's about security clearance. Might be considered substantive. However it's under a heading "Additional Eligibility Requirements". The instruction says we can use headings only from the list; we could incorporate that info into Requirements or Qualifications? It's about eligibility: "This position may require access to classified information or restricted U.S. Government sites, systems, or information, as determined by the Company and/or applicable U.S. Government requirements. If the position is so designated, your employment in the role may be contingent upon your ability to obtain and maintain the required U.S. Government security clearance or other government authorization, and to satisfy any citizenship or other eligibility requirements imposed by applicable law, regulation, executive order, or government contract requirements. You will be notified if and when such requirements apply." That is substantive. Should we include? It's not in the list of allowed headings, but we could fold into Requirements or Qualifications as a bullet. The instruction: "Use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid other headings, but says use those for section headings. It says "Use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." Likely they expect only those headings. So we should not create a heading for Additional Eligibility Requirements; we can incorporate its content into Requirements or Qualifications as a bullet. Similarly "EAR/ITAR Requirements" is also substantive but already covered in minimum qualifications (Ability to meet U.S. export-control requirements). So we can ignore duplicate. Now we need to preserve all substantive information: ensure we don't lose any details from responsibilities, minimum qualifications, preferred skills. Let's extract sections. Intro text: "Why Castelion, Why Now Castelion is moving incredibly fast to develop and deliver advanced defense systems at a time when execution matters more than ever. We believe focus, ownership, and excellence are decisive advantages - and we're building a world-class team to turn bold ideas into real capability. This is a rare opportunity to join at an early stage, where you'll have significant ownership, collaborate with exceptional teammates, and make a direct, measurable impact on our mission and the future of the company - regardless of your function." Then job title line: "EHS Engineer – Project Ranger, New Mexico". Not a heading. Then description: "The Environmental, Health & Safety (EHS) Engineer provides hands-on and technical EHS support for Castelion's Project Ranger operations in New Mexico. The role spans facility construction and buildout, manufacturing, maintenance, facilities, engineering, commissioning, and other site operations. Project Ranger is a rapidly developing manufacturing site. Facilities, equipment, processes, and operational requirements will continue to evolve as the site moves from construction and commissioning into sustained manufacturing. The EHS Engineer must be comfortable working through ambiguity, adapting to changing priorities, and building practical EHS systems that keep pace with the site. This is a highly field-oriented role. The EHS Engineer will spend significant time where the work is performed, partnering with operators, technicians, engineers, maintenance, facilities, construction partners, and supervisors. Together they identify hazards, develop practical controls, and make sure EHS requirements are effectively implemented. On a given day that may mean conducting an inspection, reviewing equipment design, participating in a PHA, investigating an incident, or coaching an employee." We'll combine that into About the role paragraph(s). Could be two paragraphs. Now Responsibilities list: we need to extract each bullet from the responsibilities paragraph. The responsibilities section is a long paragraph with sentences separated by periods. We need to turn each into

      . Let's list them: - Provide daily, hands-on EHS support across construction and buildout, manufacturing, maintenance, facilities, engineering, commissioning, and supporting operations, maintaining a strong presence in operational areas. - Serve as an accessible onsite EHS resource for employees, contractors, and leadership. - Independently resolve routine issues, recognize when specialized expertise is needed, and escalate significant risks appropriately. - Partner with facilities, engineering, construction teams, and contractors to identify and control EHS risks associated with facility construction, equipment installation, infrastructure development, and site modifications. - Participate in facility, equipment, and process design reviews, and ensure EHS considerations are built into equipment procurement, installation, and modification before construction or startup. - Support new equipment, process changes, commissioning, turnover, pre-startup reviews, and first-time operations, ensuring EHS controls are established before work begins. - Identify and evaluate workplace, equipment, process, chemical, construction, and operational hazards, including machine guarding, hazardous energy, electrical, ergonomics, material handling, and access/egress. - Partner with engineering and operations to develop practical engineering, administrative, and procedural controls. - Lead and support risk assessments, including JHAs, PHAs, What-If analyses, equipment/process reviews, and operational readiness assessments for new, modified, and higher-risk operations. - Support Management of Change processes so that changes to equipment, processes, facilities, materials, procedures, or operating conditions are evaluated before implementation. - Develop, implement, and continuously improve site EHS SOPs, programs, policies, JHAs, work instructions, and inspection tools based on regulatory requirements, operational needs, risk assessments, and lessons learned. - Develop and deliver EHS training for employees, contractors, technicians, engineers, supervisors, and managers. - Work directly with affected teams to roll out new programs, verify that requirements are practical, and reinforce expectations through field coaching. - Execute and maintain core site EHS programs, including LOTO, machine safety, PPE, respiratory protection, Hazard Communication, electrical safety, hot work, fall protection, confined space, material handling, contractor safety, and emergency preparedness and response. - Conduct routine field inspections and operational walkdowns to verify that controls are effective and to identify emerging risks. - Track findings and corrective actions, and work with responsible teams to prioritize them and drive them to closure. - Lead and support incident and near-miss investigations. Identify root causes and contributing factors, develop corrective actions, communicate lessons learned, and verify effectiveness. - Support industrial hygiene activities, including exposure assessments, sampling, evaluation of results, and implementation of exposure controls. - Manage day-to-day environmental compliance activities, including hazardous waste management, chemical inventories, spill prevention and response, inspections, and required records. - Support operations involving energetic materials and explosives by evaluating operational hazards and working with the Site EHS Manager and the Energetics Safety Manager to incorporate explosives-safety requirements and established controls into operations. - Maintain working knowledge of DoD Manual 4145.26 sufficient to recognize applicable requirements and potential compliance concerns. - Support site compliance with applicable ATF explosives requirements, including routine inspections, explosives storage and inventory controls, required records, and corrective actions, in coordination with the EHS Site Manager and EHS leadership. - Collaborate with Castelion EHS personnel at other locations to share procedures, tools, training, and lessons learned while accounting for site-specific requirements. Now Minimum Qualifications bullets: - Bachelor's degree in engineering, occupational safety, environmental health and safety, industrial hygiene, environmental science, or a related technical field. - 5+ years of EHS, safety engineering, manufacturing safety, process safety, or related experience in aerospace, defense, chemical processing, advanced manufacturing, or another industrial environment. - Working knowledge of OSHA requirements and common industrial EHS programs. - Working knowledge of DoD Manual 4145.26 and its application within operations involving ammunition, explosives, or energetic materials. -