Director- ABS/RMBS Structuring

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: Business Overview, Candidate Success Factors, Responsibilities, Minimum Required Qualifications, Preferred Qualifications, Pay, Benefits, About BNP Paribas maybe? The instructions: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences. Thus we need to decide which sections to include based on content. We have Business Overview (first paragraph). That's substantive; could be "About the role" or "Business Overview". The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. But we can also use other headings? It says "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests these are examples; we can use those headings if appropriate. We have Business Overview; maybe we can use "About the role". Or we could use "Business Overview" as heading but not in list? Probably better to stick to given examples. "About the role" fits. Candidate Success Factors: This is like "Requirements" or "Qualifications"? It's performance drivers. Could be "Requirements". We'll treat as "Requirements". Responsibilities: we have a Responsibilities section. Minimum Required Qualifications: that's "Qualifications". Could split into Required and Preferred? The instruction says we can have Qualifications section. We could combine required and preferred under Qualifications with sublists? But we need to preserve all info. Could have "Qualifications" with two sub-sections? But we only allowed headings h3; we could have separate sections: "Minimum Required Qualifications" and "Preferred Qualifications". Those are not in the examples but could be used as headings? The instruction says use h3 for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests using those. However we can still use "Minimum Required Qualifications" as a heading; it's still an h3. It's okay. Preferred Qualifications: also heading. Pay: we have salary range. So include Pay section. Benefits: we have benefits description. Include Benefits. About BNP Paribas: that's company overview; could be "About the role"? Already used. Could be "About the company"? Not in examples but we could include as "About BNP Paribas". Might be okay but maybe we should avoid extra sections? The instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. But we have a lot of content; we need to include all substantive info. Could combine About BNP Paribas into a paragraph under maybe "About the role"? But that would mix role description with company overview. Might be okay but we need to preserve all info. Could create a section "About BNP Paribas". It's substantive. Schedule: not mentioned, so omit. Skills: not explicitly separate; could be part of Qualifications. Thus sections: About the role (Business Overview), Requirements (Candidate Success Factors), Responsibilities, Minimum Required Qualifications, Preferred Qualifications, Pay, Benefits, About BNP Paribas. We need to use

  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So for lists we need to wrap in
    • . For prose, use

      . We must not repeat job title; we don't have it. We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/scam-warning etc. At end there is a lot of EEO and fraud warnings. Remove those. Also remove duplicated lines. We need to preserve all substantive information: ensure we keep details like asset classes list, responsibilities bullet points, qualifications details, etc. Let's extract content. Business Overview paragraph: "The Asset-Backed Securities (ABS) Origination business specializes in structuring and issuing securities backed by a diverse range of assets. The team works closely with clients to tailor ABS solutions that meet their specific financing needs and risk profiles. The business also utilizes the Bank’s balance sheet to extend loans backed by these assets." That's it. Candidate Success Factors: list of four performance drivers with sub-bullets. We need to turn into list items. Each driver is a heading? We'll make each driver as

    • with its description. Drivers: - Results and Impact: Able to influence peers and team. Demonstrates good judgement when making decisions of high complexity and impact. Exercise appropriate autonomy in the execution and delivery of work. Responsible for driving outcomes, which have meaningful effect on team or department. - Leadership and Collaboration: Creates trust with colleagues. Acts in leadership capacity for projects, processes, or programs. - Client, Customer and Stakeholder Focus: Able to build relationships with a mix of colleagues and clients. Interacts regularly with management and department leaders. Demonstrates the ability to influence stakeholders at the team level. - Compliance Culture and Conduct: Takes full responsibility for personal actions and demonstrates courage in facing problems and conflicts. Perceived as a person of high moral character; upholds corporate values and displays high ethical standards. We'll put each as
    • with the text. Responsibilities paragraph: It's a sentence with semicolons and list. We need to make list? The instruction: Use
      • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The responsibilities contain a list: "Utilize in-house models to structure ABS transactions across several asset classes indluding but not limited to; Auto, equipment, credit cards, unsecured consumer, solar, home improvement, rental car, fleet and digital infrastructure assets. Additionally, RMBS falls under this umbrella (non-QM and HELOCs)Build and enhance internal tools and modelsPerform structure and pricing tie-outs with accounts and other underwriters on the transaction documents. Respon to client demads regarding structure proposals and enhacements. Run stress testing group exposures" We need to split into list items. Let's parse: - Utilize in-house models to structure ABS transactions across several asset classes including but not limited to: Auto, equipment, credit cards, unsecured consumer, solar, home improvement, rental car, fleet and digital infrastructure assets. Additionally, RMBS falls under this umbrella (non-QM and HELOCs) - Build and enhance internal tools and models - Perform structure and pricing tie-outs with accounts and other underwriters on the transaction documents. - Respond to client demands regarding structure proposals and enhancements. - Run stress testing group exposures Note there are typos: "indluding", "Respon", "demads", "enhacements". We must preserve substantive information; we should not correct typos? The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Should we keep the typos as they are? Likely yes, we should keep the original text exactly. However we can fix obvious typos? That would be inventing? It's altering. Better to keep as is. But we need to ensure readability; but instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; not necessarily preserve exact typos? It says do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Changing typos could be considered inventing? It's correcting, not inventing new info. Might be okay but safer to keep original. However the original has missing spaces and punctuation. We'll keep as is but we can add spaces for readability? That would be altering. I'd keep exact text. Thus list items: - Utilize in-house models to structure ABS transactions across several asset classes indluding but not limited to; Auto, equipment, credit cards, unsecured consumer, solar, home improvement, rental car, fleet and digital infrastructure assets. Additionally, RMBS falls under this umbrella (non-QM and HELOCs) - Build and enhance internal tools and models - Perform structure and pricing tie-outs with accounts and other underwriters on the transaction documents. - Respon to client demads regarding structure proposals and enhacements. - Run stress testing group exposures Now Minimum Required Qualifications: list. We need to make list items. Content: "Undergraduate degree in math, computer science, engineering or another quantitative fieldStrong command of Excel, IntexCalc, and Dealmaker. Knowledge of VBA and Intex’s Scripting Language preferred7 + years of relevant work experience in ABS/RMBS executionPrior ABS/RMBS transaction execution experience in lead structuring role capacity, preferred. Demonstrates a high degree of attention to detail, strong analytical and critical thinking skills, and ability to synthesize large amounts of informationAbility to meet tight deadlines" We need to split into sensible items. There's missing punctuation. We'll keep as is but separate by sentences. Let's identify sentences: - Undergraduate degree in math, computer science, engineering or another quantitative field - Strong command of Excel, IntexCalc, and Dealmaker. - Knowledge of VBA and Intex’s Scripting Language preferred - 7 + years of relevant work experience in ABS/RMBS execution - Prior ABS/RMBS transaction execution experience in lead structuring role capacity, preferred. - Demonstrates a high degree of attention to detail, strong analytical and critical thinking skills, and ability to synthesize large amounts of information - Ability to meet tight deadlines We'll make each as
      • . Preferred Qualifications: includes FINRA Registrations Required etc. Content: "FINRA Registrations Required: Series 7 (or 79/ SIE) and 63 FINRA examinations CFTC Swap Dealer Associated Person (if yes, NFA Swaps Proficiency Program is required): Not Applicable SEC Security-Based Swap Dealer Associated Person: Not Applicable While the description above describes our ideal candidate, we encourage applicants to apply even if they do not fully meet the complete list of qualifications noted." We need to list items maybe: - FINRA Registrations Required: Series 7 (or 79/ SIE) and 63 FINRA examinations - CFTC Swap Dealer Associated Person (if yes, NFA Swaps Proficiency Program is required): Not Applicable - SEC Security-Based Swap Dealer Associated Person: Not Applicable - While the description above describes our ideal candidate, we encourage applicants to apply even if they do not fully meet the complete list of qualifications noted. We'll keep as list. Pay: "The expected starting salary range for this position is between $220,000 to $325,000 annually. The actual salary may vary based upon several factors including, but not limited to, relevant skills/experience, time in role, base salary of internal peers, prior performance, business line, and geographic/office location." We'll put as

        . Benefits: "In addition, our comprehensive benefits package aims to support our employees in various aspects of their lives. From healthcare and wellness programs to retirement plans and childcare services, we prioritize the well-being and growth of our employees. Our benefits include medical, dental and vision coverage, a 401(k) Savings Plan, backup childcare, life, accident and disability insurance, mental health support and paid time off. Additional details about our benefits offerings, inclusive of eligibility for a discretionary bonus, will be provided during the hiring process." We'll put as