Jobs · Analyst · California

(CLS) Clinical Lab Scientist/Spec - Per Diem - 140028

UC San Diego Health · San Diego, CA · 1 mo ago
Analyst$163k/yrFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually we need to use

for section headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections when posting has real specific content. We need to parse the job posting. Key info: - Payroll Title: CLIN LAB SCI SPEC PD - Department: La Jolla Clinical Lab - Hiring Pay Scale: $74.27 / Hour - Worksite: Jacobs Medical Center - Appointment Type: Per Diem - Appointment Percent: 20% - Union: HX Contract - Total Openings: 3 - Work Schedule: Eves, 8-Hour Shifts, Sunday-Saturday - Job ID: #140028 (CLS) Clinical Lab Scientist/Spec - Per Diem - Extended Deadline: Thu 9/24/2026 (but we drop application instructions and deadlines? The instruction says remove application instructions. Deadline is part of application instructions? Probably we should drop it as it's application instruction. It says "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we should drop the deadline line. - Description: Under the supervision... etc. That's responsibilities. - Minimum Qualifications: list. - Preferred Qualifications: list. - SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Must be able to work various hours and locations based on business needs. Employment is subject to a criminal background check and pre-employment physical. - Pay Transparency Act Annual Full Pay Range: $162,822 - $162,822 (will be prorated if the appointment percentage is less than 100%) Hourly Equivalent: $77.98 - $77.98 - Also mention Hiring Pay Scale $74.27/Hour. - Benefits? Not explicitly listed. There's mention of vaccination policy, etc. Not benefits. So we should not create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. It does not list benefits like health insurance, retirement, etc. So omit Benefits. - Pay: we have Hiring Pay Scale and Annual Full Pay Range. So we can include Pay section with that info. - Schedule: Work Schedule: Eves, 8-Hour Shifts, Sunday-Saturday. Also mention must be able to work weekends, holidays, other shifts as needed. So we can include Schedule section. - About the role: maybe a brief summary? The description could be considered responsibilities. Could have About the role as a short paragraph summarizing role. But we need to only include sections when posting has real specific content. We could put a short paragraph under About the role using the first sentences: "Under the supervision of a Senior Supervisor CLS, perform a wide variety of technical procedures in a section of the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine." That's from description. But that is also responsibilities. Might be okay to have About the role as a brief overview, and Responsibilities as a list of duties. We need to preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from description, qualifications, etc. We should not repeat the job title as a heading. The page already shows it, so we don't add

for job title. We need to use

for section headings. We need to use
  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

    for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information: include details like department, worksite, appointment type, percent, union, total openings, work schedule, hiring pay scale, annual full pay range, hourly equivalent, etc. Also include the description paragraphs, minimum qualifications, preferred qualifications, special conditions, vaccination policy, etc. However we need to remove boilerplate like EEO, equal opportunity, etc. Also remove duplicated lines, application instructions, etc. We need to decide what constitutes boilerplate: lines about UC San Diego values, vaccination programs, life-support certifications, UC San Diego Health description, etc. Those might be considered boilerplate? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." The paragraphs about UC San Diego values, vaccination programs, life-support certifications, description of UC San Diego Health, etc. Might be considered boilerplate? They are not EEO or legal? They are more about the organization. Might be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. However they are generic promotional text. The instruction says to remove EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. It doesn't say to remove all promotional text. But we should aim to keep substantive job-specific info. The paragraphs about UC San Diego Health being the only academic health system etc. could be considered boilerplate but not explicitly prohibited. However to be safe, we might keep them? The instruction says "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So only those specific types. The promotional paragraphs about UC San Diego Health are not those. So we keep them? But they are not directly about the job; they are generic. However they are not duplicated lines. The instruction does not forbid keeping them. However the goal is to produce a clean semantic HTML of the job posting; likely we should keep the description of the role and responsibilities, qualifications, etc., and maybe omit the generic fluff about the institution unless it's part of the job posting's substantive content. The instruction says "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." The generic fluff about UC San Diego Health might be considered substantive? It's not about the job but about the employer. Might be considered part of the posting but not essential. However it's not explicitly prohibited. I'd lean to keep it as it's part of the posting, but we could also drop it as it's not job-specific. The instruction does not say to drop generic employer description. However many similar tasks drop that. I think we should keep it because it's substantive information about the employer, but it's not required. However to be safe, I'll include it as a paragraph under maybe "About the role" or separate section? There's no heading for employer info. Could just include as a

    after the description. But we need to avoid duplication: there are duplicated lines like "Apply Now" repeated. We should remove those. Also there is a line "Extended Deadline: Thu 9/24/2026" which is application instruction; remove. Also "Apply Now" repeated multiple times; remove. Also "If employed by the University of California, you will be required to comply with our Policy on Vaccination Programs..." That is not EEO but maybe considered legal? It's about vaccination policy. Might be considered legal boilerplate? It's a policy requirement. Could be considered legal. The instruction says remove legal boilerplate. So we should remove that vaccination policy line. Also the lines about life-support certifications, etc. Might be considered legal? Possibly. But it's about job requirements. Might be considered substantive. However it's about certification requirements; could be considered part of qualifications. But it's a generic statement about certification acceptance. Might be considered boilerplate. I'd lean to remove it as it's not specific to the role. Also the lines about UC San Diego Health being the only academic health system etc. Might be considered promotional but not prohibited. I'd keep it as it's substantive about the workplace. Also the lines about "Applications/Resumes are accepted for current job openings only..." etc. That's application instructions; remove. Also lines about "To foster the best possible working and learning environment..." that's EEO/diversity statement; remove as EEO boilerplate. Also lines about "The University of California is an Equal Opportunity Employer..." remove. Also lines about smoke and tobacco free environment, marijuana and drug free environment, misconduct disclosure requirement: those are legal/EEO? Might be considered legal boilerplate. Remove. Thus we keep: job details (title, department, worksite, appointment type, percent, union, total openings, work schedule, hiring pay scale, annual full pay range, hourly equivalent), description (responsibilities), minimum qualifications, preferred qualifications, special conditions. We also need to include the Pay Transparency Act info. Now we need to format. We'll have sections: - About the role? Could be a short paragraph summarizing the role: maybe combine the first sentence of description. But we already have Responsibilities section with list. Could have About the role as a brief overview: "Under the supervision of a Senior Supervisor CLS, perform a wide variety of technical procedures in a section of the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine." That's from description. Then Responsibilities can list the rest: method development, modification, parallel testing, collaboration on or preparation of abstracts or manuscripts, repair of laboratory instruments, sample processing, reagent preparation, data entry and phlebotomy duties. Must be able to work weekends, holidays, and other shifts as needed. Daily, assess the overall workload for any area that needs help and help coworkers without being reassigned by the supervisor. Work is assigned daily and reviewed by supervisory personnel or designee. All Clinical Laboratory Scientists may process specimens, perform waived and non-waived testing without direct and constant supervision, and report results without supervisor or director review for the tests that are within their scope of licensure and for which they have been trained and deemed competent. We need to preserve all substantive information; we should not lose any detail. So we need to include all those sentences. We could put the entire description as a

    under Responsibilities, but we need to use

    • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The description is not a list but prose. So we can keep as

      . However there are multiple sentences; we can keep as one

      or split. It's okay. For Minimum Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications, we should use

      • . Special Conditions also list. Pay section: we can include

        with details: Hiring Pay Scale $74.27/Hour; Annual Full Pay Range $162,822 - $162,822 (prorated if appointment percentage less than 100%); Hourly Equivalent $77.98 - $77.98. Schedule section: Work Schedule: Eves, 8-Hour Shifts, Sunday-Saturday. Also note must be able to work weekends, holidays, other shifts as needed (already in responsibilities). Could include schedule details. We also have other metadata: Department, Worksite, Appointment Type, Appointment Percent, Union, Total Openings. Where to put? Could be in a

        under About the role or a separate section like "Job Details". But we only have allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We could put metadata under About the role as a paragraph. Or we could create a "Requirements" section? But requirements is for qualifications. Better to put metadata in About the role. Thus About the role paragraph will include: Department: La Jolla Clinical Lab; Worksite: Jacobs Medical Center; Appointment Type: Per Diem; Appointment Percent: 20%; Union: HX Contract; Total Openings: 3; Work Schedule: Eves, 8-Hour Shifts, Sunday-Saturday; Hiring Pay Scale: $74.27/Hour. But we also have Pay section separate; we might duplicate pay. Better to keep Pay section separate and not repeat in About the role. So About the role can include department, worksite, appointment type, percent, union, total openings, work schedule. Pay section will include hiring pay scale, annual full pay range, hourly equivalent. Schedule section will include work schedule details (maybe just restate). But we already have work schedule in About the role; we could avoid duplication by putting schedule only in Schedule section and not repeat in About the role. Let's decide: About the role can include

Similar jobs