Associate Director, Technology Enablement LRMC (Legal, Risk Management and Compliance)
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences.
We need to decide which sections to include based on content.
We have:
- Intro paragraph about KPMG being great place to work, culture, rankings. That's about the company, could be "About the role"? Actually "About the role" would be description of role. But we have responsibilities listed later. The intro is more about the firm. Could be "About KPMG" but not in list of allowed headings. Allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We can use "About the role" for the intro describing the role and company? Might be okay.
- Responsibilities: a long list of bullet-like sentences separated by semicolons. We need to turn into
- . Each bullet is a responsibility.
- Qualifications: list of requirements: Minimum eight years..., Master's degree..., Bachelor's degree..., PMP..., Strong working knowledge..., Demonstrated capability..., Proficient stakeholder..., Proven experience..., Applicant must be authorized to work in the U.S.... That's qualifications.
- There's also "Skills"? Not explicitly separate; qualifications include skills. Could combine.
- Benefits: The posting mentions "In addition, KPMG is proud to offer a comprehensive, competitive benefits package..." then details: medical, dental, vision, disability, life insurance, 401(k), personal well-being benefits, Personal Time Off, holidays, breaks. Also link to benefits page. So we have benefits content. Should we include Benefits section? Yes, because they state benefits. Provide
- for each benefit.
- Pay: They mention salary ranges link but not actual numbers. They say "KPMG LLP and its subsidiaries (“KPMG”) complies with all local/state regulations regarding displaying salary ranges. If required, the ranges displayed below or via the URL below are specifically for those potential hires who will work in the location(s) listed. Any offered salary is determined based on relevant factors..." They do not give actual numbers. So we should NOT create Pay section because no specific salary range given. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Benefits they state, so we can include Benefits. Pay they do not state actual numbers, just link. So we should not include Pay.
- Schedule: They mention "Depending on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service, KPMG provides Personal Time Off per fiscal year. Additionally, each year KPMG publishes a calendar of holidays to be observed during the year and provides eligible employees two breaks each year where employees will not be required to use Personal Time Off; one is at year end and the other is around the July 4th holiday." That's more about benefits/time off, not schedule. No explicit schedule like "full-time", "40 hours/week". So we should not create Schedule section.
- Requirements: Might be similar to Qualifications. The allowed headings include Requirements and Qualifications. We have qualifications content. Could put under Qualifications. Could also have Requirements separate but we have no separate list besides qualifications. So we can just use Qualifications.
- Skills: Not separate.
Thus sections: About the role (intro), Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits.
We need to ensure we preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. We need to include all details from intro, responsibilities, qualifications, benefits.
We must remove boilerplate: EEO, equal-opportunity, scam-warning, application instructions, navigation, cookie, legal, duplicated lines. Also remove the line about "No phone calls or agencies please." etc. Also remove the Los Angeles County applicants stuff? That's legal/EEO? It's about Fair Chance Act. That's likely boilerplate legal; we should remove. Also remove the link about salary ranges? That's maybe part of benefits/pay but it's a link; we might keep if it's part of benefits? It's about pay transparency; but we are not including Pay section. The link is about salary ranges; we could drop it as it's not substantive detail (just a link). The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The link is not substantive detail about the job; it's a reference. Could drop.
Also remove the repeated line "KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package." Already covered.
We need to keep the benefits details: medical and dental plans, vision coverage, disability and life insurance, 401(k) plans, robust suite of personal well-being benefits to support mental health. Personal Time Off per fiscal year, calendar of holidays, two breaks each year (year end and around July 4th). Also link to Benefits & How We Work. Could keep that link? It's a reference; maybe keep as part of benefits? Might be considered substantive? It's a link to more details. Could keep as a
with link? But we should not include navigation boilerplate; but this is a benefits link. Might be okay to keep as a
with link.
We also need to keep the line about "Depending on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service, KPMG provides Personal Time Off per fiscal year." That's part of benefits.
Now format.
We'll output:
About the role
Known for being a great place to work and build a career, KPMG provides audit, tax and advisory services for organizations in today's most important industries. Our growth is driven by delivering real results for our clients. It's also enabled by our culture, which encourages individual development, embraces an inclusive environment, rewards innovative excellence and supports our communities. With qualities like those, it's no wonder we're consistently ranked among the best companies to work for by Fortune Magazine, Consulting Magazine, Seramount, Fair360 and others. If you're as passionate about your future as we are, join our team. KPMG is currently seeking an Associate Director, LRMC (Legal, Risk Management and Compliance) Technology Enablement to join our Legal Risk Management Compliance organization.
Then Responsibilities:
Responsibilities
- Provide end-to-end management and delivery oversight of technology projects, from business case refinement through deployment and continuous improvement, ensuring project goals are met with minimal guidance; prioritize enhancements for existing systems based on stakeholder feedback and manage the execution of the delivery roadmap
- Assume business and product ownership of assigned implemented solutions, managing system enhancements and updates to support tactical requirements; promote customer satisfaction by ensuring technology solutions meet the immediate operational requirements of business stakeholders
- Oversee the technology delivery lifecycle, ensuring that core technical teams adhere to established Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) processes; monitor technical teams to ensure they generate the required documentation evidencing compliance with firm policy, risk management, and security standards
- Facilitate transparent progress and status reporting to project sponsors, portfolio stakeholders, and department leaders; monitor and track project budgets, tracking spend against plan, identifying variances, and supporting the annual budgeting process
- Serve as a technology liaison to department leaders and functional partners within the assigned LRMC portfolio, aligning digital delivery with tactical plans; interact regularly with department leaders and Digital Nexus, proactively sharing ideas to improve service and recommending digital solutions that support business value
- Direct the daily workflows of cross-functional, matrixed, on- and offshore resources to execute project deliverables on time and within budget; mentor, develop, and share technical and process expertise with junior team members and peers to build organizational capability and support career progression
- Act with integrity, professionalism, and personal responsibility to uphold KPMG's respectful and courteous work environment
Qualifications:
Qualifications
- Minimum eight years of recent progressive experience in technology project/program management, business systems enablement, or strategic technology portfolio management; proven track record of successfully delivering complex, enterprise-grade technology projects or programs within a matrixed corporate environment
- Master's degree from an accredited college or university or relevant advanced degree is preferred; Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university is required; Project Management Professional (PMP), Program Management Professional (PgMP), or equivalent project/program delivery certifications is a plus but not required
- Strong working knowledge of various project delivery methodologies (such as Agile, Waterfall, Hybrid) and software development lifecycles (SDLC); solid understanding of IT compliance, SDLC governance, and risk management documentation standards
- Demonstrated capability in financial management, including project budgeting, forecasting, and resource allocation
- Proficient stakeholder management skills with the ability to interact confidently with and influence department leaders and delivery partners
- Proven experience managing, mentoring, and developing direct reports and leading cross-functional, multi-disciplinary teams
- Applicant must be authorized to work in the U.S. without the need for employment-based visa sponsorship now or in the future; KPMG LLP will not sponsor applicants for U.S. work visa status for this opportunity (no sponsorship is available for H-1B, L-1, TN, O-1, E-3, H-1B1, F-1, J-1, OPT, CPT or any other employment-based visa)
Benefits:
Benefits
- Comprehensive, competitive benefits package including medical and dental plans, vision coverage, disability and life insurance
- 401(k) plans
- Robust suite of personal well-being benefits to support mental health
- Personal Time Off per fiscal year (based on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service)
- Annual calendar of holidays to be observed
- Two breaks each year where employees are not required to use Personal Time Off (one at year end and one around the July 4th holiday)
- Additional details available on the KPMG US Careers site at Benefits & How We Work
We should not include Pay or Schedule sections.
Check for any leftover boilerplate: We removed EEO lines, "KPMG is an equal opportunity employer." etc. Also removed "No phone calls or agencies please." etc. Also removed Los Angeles County applicants legal text. Also removed the link about salary ranges. Also removed "KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package." (we kept benefits details). Also removed "KPMG LLP and its subsidiaries (“KPMG”) complies with all local/state regulations regarding displaying salary ranges. If required, the ranges displayed below or via the URL below are specifically for those potential hires who will
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences. We need to decide which sections to include based on content. We have: - Intro paragraph about KPMG being great place to work, culture, rankings. That's about the company, could be "About the role"? Actually "About the role" would be description of role. But we have responsibilities listed later. The intro is more about the firm. Could be "About KPMG" but not in list of allowed headings. Allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We can use "About the role" for the intro describing the role and company? Might be okay. - Responsibilities: a long list of bullet-like sentences separated by semicolons. We need to turn into
- . Each bullet is a responsibility.
- Qualifications: list of requirements: Minimum eight years..., Master's degree..., Bachelor's degree..., PMP..., Strong working knowledge..., Demonstrated capability..., Proficient stakeholder..., Proven experience..., Applicant must be authorized to work in the U.S.... That's qualifications.
- There's also "Skills"? Not explicitly separate; qualifications include skills. Could combine.
- Benefits: The posting mentions "In addition, KPMG is proud to offer a comprehensive, competitive benefits package..." then details: medical, dental, vision, disability, life insurance, 401(k), personal well-being benefits, Personal Time Off, holidays, breaks. Also link to benefits page. So we have benefits content. Should we include Benefits section? Yes, because they state benefits. Provide
- for each benefit.
- Pay: They mention salary ranges link but not actual numbers. They say "KPMG LLP and its subsidiaries (“KPMG”) complies with all local/state regulations regarding displaying salary ranges. If required, the ranges displayed below or via the URL below are specifically for those potential hires who will work in the location(s) listed. Any offered salary is determined based on relevant factors..." They do not give actual numbers. So we should NOT create Pay section because no specific salary range given. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Benefits they state, so we can include Benefits. Pay they do not state actual numbers, just link. So we should not include Pay.
- Schedule: They mention "Depending on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service, KPMG provides Personal Time Off per fiscal year. Additionally, each year KPMG publishes a calendar of holidays to be observed during the year and provides eligible employees two breaks each year where employees will not be required to use Personal Time Off; one is at year end and the other is around the July 4th holiday." That's more about benefits/time off, not schedule. No explicit schedule like "full-time", "40 hours/week". So we should not create Schedule section.
- Requirements: Might be similar to Qualifications. The allowed headings include Requirements and Qualifications. We have qualifications content. Could put under Qualifications. Could also have Requirements separate but we have no separate list besides qualifications. So we can just use Qualifications.
- Skills: Not separate.
Thus sections: About the role (intro), Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits.
We need to ensure we preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. We need to include all details from intro, responsibilities, qualifications, benefits.
We must remove boilerplate: EEO, equal-opportunity, scam-warning, application instructions, navigation, cookie, legal, duplicated lines. Also remove the line about "No phone calls or agencies please." etc. Also remove the Los Angeles County applicants stuff? That's legal/EEO? It's about Fair Chance Act. That's likely boilerplate legal; we should remove. Also remove the link about salary ranges? That's maybe part of benefits/pay but it's a link; we might keep if it's part of benefits? It's about pay transparency; but we are not including Pay section. The link is about salary ranges; we could drop it as it's not substantive detail (just a link). The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The link is not substantive detail about the job; it's a reference. Could drop.
Also remove the repeated line "KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package." Already covered.
We need to keep the benefits details: medical and dental plans, vision coverage, disability and life insurance, 401(k) plans, robust suite of personal well-being benefits to support mental health. Personal Time Off per fiscal year, calendar of holidays, two breaks each year (year end and around July 4th). Also link to Benefits & How We Work. Could keep that link? It's a reference; maybe keep as part of benefits? Might be considered substantive? It's a link to more details. Could keep as a
with link? But we should not include navigation boilerplate; but this is a benefits link. Might be okay to keep as a
with link. We also need to keep the line about "Depending on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service, KPMG provides Personal Time Off per fiscal year." That's part of benefits. Now format. We'll output:
About the role
Known for being a great place to work and build a career, KPMG provides audit, tax and advisory services for organizations in today's most important industries. Our growth is driven by delivering real results for our clients. It's also enabled by our culture, which encourages individual development, embraces an inclusive environment, rewards innovative excellence and supports our communities. With qualities like those, it's no wonder we're consistently ranked among the best companies to work for by Fortune Magazine, Consulting Magazine, Seramount, Fair360 and others. If you're as passionate about your future as we are, join our team. KPMG is currently seeking an Associate Director, LRMC (Legal, Risk Management and Compliance) Technology Enablement to join our Legal Risk Management Compliance organization.
Then Responsibilities:Responsibilities
- Provide end-to-end management and delivery oversight of technology projects, from business case refinement through deployment and continuous improvement, ensuring project goals are met with minimal guidance; prioritize enhancements for existing systems based on stakeholder feedback and manage the execution of the delivery roadmap
- Assume business and product ownership of assigned implemented solutions, managing system enhancements and updates to support tactical requirements; promote customer satisfaction by ensuring technology solutions meet the immediate operational requirements of business stakeholders
- Oversee the technology delivery lifecycle, ensuring that core technical teams adhere to established Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) processes; monitor technical teams to ensure they generate the required documentation evidencing compliance with firm policy, risk management, and security standards
- Facilitate transparent progress and status reporting to project sponsors, portfolio stakeholders, and department leaders; monitor and track project budgets, tracking spend against plan, identifying variances, and supporting the annual budgeting process
- Serve as a technology liaison to department leaders and functional partners within the assigned LRMC portfolio, aligning digital delivery with tactical plans; interact regularly with department leaders and Digital Nexus, proactively sharing ideas to improve service and recommending digital solutions that support business value
- Direct the daily workflows of cross-functional, matrixed, on- and offshore resources to execute project deliverables on time and within budget; mentor, develop, and share technical and process expertise with junior team members and peers to build organizational capability and support career progression
- Act with integrity, professionalism, and personal responsibility to uphold KPMG's respectful and courteous work environment
Qualifications
- Minimum eight years of recent progressive experience in technology project/program management, business systems enablement, or strategic technology portfolio management; proven track record of successfully delivering complex, enterprise-grade technology projects or programs within a matrixed corporate environment
- Master's degree from an accredited college or university or relevant advanced degree is preferred; Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university is required; Project Management Professional (PMP), Program Management Professional (PgMP), or equivalent project/program delivery certifications is a plus but not required
- Strong working knowledge of various project delivery methodologies (such as Agile, Waterfall, Hybrid) and software development lifecycles (SDLC); solid understanding of IT compliance, SDLC governance, and risk management documentation standards
- Demonstrated capability in financial management, including project budgeting, forecasting, and resource allocation
- Proficient stakeholder management skills with the ability to interact confidently with and influence department leaders and delivery partners
- Proven experience managing, mentoring, and developing direct reports and leading cross-functional, multi-disciplinary teams
- Applicant must be authorized to work in the U.S. without the need for employment-based visa sponsorship now or in the future; KPMG LLP will not sponsor applicants for U.S. work visa status for this opportunity (no sponsorship is available for H-1B, L-1, TN, O-1, E-3, H-1B1, F-1, J-1, OPT, CPT or any other employment-based visa)
Benefits
- Comprehensive, competitive benefits package including medical and dental plans, vision coverage, disability and life insurance
- 401(k) plans
- Robust suite of personal well-being benefits to support mental health
- Personal Time Off per fiscal year (based on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service)
- Annual calendar of holidays to be observed
- Two breaks each year where employees are not required to use Personal Time Off (one at year end and one around the July 4th holiday)
- Additional details available on the KPMG US Careers site at Benefits & How We Work
- for each benefit.
- Pay: They mention salary ranges link but not actual numbers. They say "KPMG LLP and its subsidiaries (“KPMG”) complies with all local/state regulations regarding displaying salary ranges. If required, the ranges displayed below or via the URL below are specifically for those potential hires who will work in the location(s) listed. Any offered salary is determined based on relevant factors..." They do not give actual numbers. So we should NOT create Pay section because no specific salary range given. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Benefits they state, so we can include Benefits. Pay they do not state actual numbers, just link. So we should not include Pay.
- Schedule: They mention "Depending on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service, KPMG provides Personal Time Off per fiscal year. Additionally, each year KPMG publishes a calendar of holidays to be observed during the year and provides eligible employees two breaks each year where employees will not be required to use Personal Time Off; one is at year end and the other is around the July 4th holiday." That's more about benefits/time off, not schedule. No explicit schedule like "full-time", "40 hours/week". So we should not create Schedule section.
- Requirements: Might be similar to Qualifications. The allowed headings include Requirements and Qualifications. We have qualifications content. Could put under Qualifications. Could also have Requirements separate but we have no separate list besides qualifications. So we can just use Qualifications.
- Skills: Not separate.
Thus sections: About the role (intro), Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits.
We need to ensure we preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. We need to include all details from intro, responsibilities, qualifications, benefits.
We must remove boilerplate: EEO, equal-opportunity, scam-warning, application instructions, navigation, cookie, legal, duplicated lines. Also remove the line about "No phone calls or agencies please." etc. Also remove the Los Angeles County applicants stuff? That's legal/EEO? It's about Fair Chance Act. That's likely boilerplate legal; we should remove. Also remove the link about salary ranges? That's maybe part of benefits/pay but it's a link; we might keep if it's part of benefits? It's about pay transparency; but we are not including Pay section. The link is about salary ranges; we could drop it as it's not substantive detail (just a link). The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The link is not substantive detail about the job; it's a reference. Could drop.
Also remove the repeated line "KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package." Already covered.
We need to keep the benefits details: medical and dental plans, vision coverage, disability and life insurance, 401(k) plans, robust suite of personal well-being benefits to support mental health. Personal Time Off per fiscal year, calendar of holidays, two breaks each year (year end and around July 4th). Also link to Benefits & How We Work. Could keep that link? It's a reference; maybe keep as part of benefits? Might be considered substantive? It's a link to more details. Could keep as a