Advisory Intern, Federal Change Management | McLean Summer 2027

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? The posting includes intro about KPMG, but we need sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include only sections with real specific content. Let's parse. The posting: - Intro paragraph about KPMG (mission). Could be "About the role" maybe? Actually "About the role" would be description of role. The posting says "KPMG is currently seeking an Advisory Intern for our Advisory practice." Then responsibilities list. So we can have a section "About the role" with a short paragraph describing the role (maybe the first paragraph after seeking). But we must not repeat job title as heading. So we can put a paragraph about the role. - Responsibilities: list of duties (multiple bullet points). Use

• . - Qualifications: includes education, GPA, clearance, skills, etc. Could be split into Qualifications and Skills? The posting lumps many items under "Qualifications". We can treat that as Qualifications section. Might also separate Skills if distinct. But we can keep as Qualifications. - Benefits: mentions comprehensive benefits package, medical/dental, vision, disability, life insurance, 401(k), personal well-being, PTO, holidays, breaks. Also link to benefits page. So we have Benefits section. - Pay: mentions salary ranges, link to pay transparency, but no specific numbers. It says "KPMG LLP and its affiliates... complies with all local/state regulations regarding displaying salary ranges. If required, the ranges displayed below or via the URL below are specifically for those potential hires who will work in the location(s) listed. Any offered salary is determined based on relevant factors..." This is generic, not a specific range. The instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Here Pay is mentioned but not specific numbers; it's more about policy. Is that considered stating them? It says they comply and provide link. Might be considered stating that salary ranges are available via link. However the instruction says avoid filler like "not specified". The text does not give a range, just says they comply and provide link. That might be considered not substantive. Safer to omit Pay section. - Schedule: mentions work location may be office, client sites, virtual/remote, must be located within US when working remotely, client site may require travel and overnight/extended stay. Also mentions standard work hours? Not specific. It mentions "Depending on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service, KPMG provides Personal Time Off per fiscal year." That's more about benefits. No explicit schedule like full-time, part-time, hours. So we may omit Schedule. - Skills: Could extract from qualifications: strong in technical, business acumen, critical thinking and agility skills; ability to leverage MS Office (Excel) and AI; strong communication, organization and relationship-building skills; ability to apply professional judgment and skepticism, manage priorities, deliver high-quality work. Could be a Skills section. But we already have Qualifications covering many. To avoid thin sections, we could combine Qualifications and Skills into one Qualifications section. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we can have About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits. That's four sections. We must not include boilerplate like EEO, equal opportunity, scam warning, navigation, cookie, legal, application instructions, etc. Remove duplicated lines. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to include the details about responsibilities, qualifications (including education, GPA, clearance, skills, residency, work location, travel, authorization to work, no sponsorship), benefits details. We must not include the link to benefits page? It's part of benefits info; we can keep as a link maybe but it's okay. The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep the link as part of benefits description. Similarly we should keep the link to pay transparency? Since we omitted Pay section, we might drop that link. But it's part of pay info; if we omit Pay section, we might be losing substantive info about pay transparency link. However the instruction says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. It does state pay transparency link. But we deemed it filler? It's a link to salary ranges. Could be considered substantive. However the instruction also says avoid filler like "not specified". The link is specific. But we don't have actual salary range. The link is to a page that provides ranges. Might be considered substantive. But we need to decide. Given the instruction to prefer few substantive sections, we could include a Pay section with the link and statement that salary ranges are available via link, and that offered salary based on factors. That is not filler; it's specific info about pay transparency. It doesn't give a number but provides a link. Is that considered filler? The examples of filler: "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD". The text says "If required, the ranges displayed below or via the URL below are specifically for those potential hires who will work in the location(s) listed." That's not filler; it's a statement about where to find ranges. So we could include Pay section with that statement and the link. Similarly Schedule: we have info about work location options, remote within US, travel, overnight stay. That's substantive. So we could include Schedule section. Thus we could have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. But we must avoid thin sections. Each of these has substantive content. Let's extract content. About the role: The paragraph after "KPMG is currently seeking an Advisory Intern for our Advisory practice." Could be: "At KPMG, we are not only keeping pace with the future of business; we are defining it. Harnessing the full power of AI and digital innovation, we deliver intelligent, data-driven solutions to help our clients navigate change and transform their competitive edge. Our people-first approach makes this possible. KPMG invests in continuous learning by providing the tools and training for you to thrive within a culture that fosters growth and collaboration, whether you're launching your career or bringing decades of experience. Join an inclusive team that inspires excellence, delivers meaningful impact, and empowers you to shape your own future." That's generic about KPMG, not specifically about the role. But we can treat as About the role (description of company and role). It's okay. Responsibilities: list bullet points: - Support delivery and development of advisory services to clients, primarily with services related to projects, programs or portfolio management - Support development and maintenance of program/project charters, schedules, management plans, risk management and supporting artifacts - Support regular reporting and communication to client and KPMG leadership and adhere to quality and performance standards set by team leadership - Support teams to conceptualize and determine communications and training strategies that support their goals and objectives - Support the development of communications and training products that support transformation goals/objectives and adoption of new technologies and/or processes - Develop content for and design PowerPoint decks, fact sheets, roadmaps, status reports We need to preserve all. Qualifications: includes: - Must be enrolled in an accredited college or university and pursuing the following degrees/majors: Bachelors or Masters degree in Business Administration, Communications, Marketing, Public Relations, Public Policy, Organizational Psychology, Operations, Management, Strategy, Political Science, Government, Human Factors/Human Centered Design, or equivalent program - Must have a current/most recent GPA of 3.0 or above - Applicant must be eligible for or possess a U.S. Government Security clearance - Strong in technical, business acumen, critical thinking and agility skills; demonstrated ability to excel and drive strategic outcomes, coupled with a professional demeanor and a collaborative leadership approach, in a dynamic, evolving environment - Ability to leverage common business technologies, including MS Office (with an emphasis on Excel) and AI, and quickly learn KPMG tools and applications used by our clients - Strong communication, organization and relationship-building skills, with the ability to apply professional judgment and skepticism, manage priorities across multiple tasks and deliver high-quality work in a professional services capacity - Must reside within a commutable distance of the office for this position and be responsible for your own transportation, such as personal vehicle or public transportation, to get to and from office / client locations to satisfactorily fulfill your job duties, as determined by your practice leadership - Work location may be in the office, at client sites, or virtual/remote depending on business need. You must be located within the U.S. when working remotely. Client site locations may require travel and overnight/extended stay - Must be authorized to work in the U.S. without the need for employment-based visa sponsorship now or in the future. KPMG LLP will not sponsor applicants for U.S. work visa status for this opportunity (no sponsorship is available for H-1B, L-1, TN, O-1, E-3, H-1B1, F-1, J-1, OPT, CPT or any other employment-based visa). We could split some into Skills but we can keep as Qualifications. Benefits: includes: - KPMG is proud to offer a comprehensive, competitive benefits package, with options designed to help you make the best decisions for yourself, your family, and your lifestyle. Available benefits are based on eligibility. - Our Total Rewards package includes a variety of medical and dental plans, vision coverage, disability and life insurance, 401(k) plans, and a robust suite of personal well-being benefits to support your mental health. - Depending on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service, KPMG provides Personal Time Off per fiscal year. - Additionally, each year KPMG publishes a calendar of holidays to be observed during the year and provides eligible employees two breaks each year where employees will not be required to use Personal Time Off; one is at year end and the other is around the July 4th holiday. - Additional details about our benefits can be found towards the bottom of our KPMG US Careers site at Benefits & How We Work. - Follow this link to obtain salary ranges by city outside of CA: https://kpmg.com/us/en/how-we-work/pay-transparency.html/?id=UTAADVIC1_8_24 - KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package. Note: The link about salary ranges is actually pay info; we might move that to Pay section. But it's included in benefits paragraph. We'll keep it in Benefits? Might be confusing. Better to extract pay info to Pay section. Thus Benefits section: medical/dental, vision, disability/life insurance, 401(k), personal well-being, PTO, holidays, breaks, link to benefits page. Pay section: statement about salary ranges compliance, link to pay transparency, and that offered salary based on factors. Schedule section: work location options (office, client sites, virtual/remote), must be located within US when remote, client site may require travel and overnight/extended stay. Now we need to output HTML fragment with headings

  for each section, and

  • for lists,

    for prose. We must not include any extra text outside HTML. Let's craft. First, About the role: combine the intro paragraphs into a

    . Second, Responsibilities:

    Responsibilities

    then
    with each bullet as
    • . Third, Qualifications:

      Qualifications

      then maybe we can split into
      for each qualification item. Many items are sentences; we can put each as
      • . That's okay. Fourth, Benefits:

        Benefits

        then
        for each benefit item. Fifth, Pay:

        Pay

        then

        with statements. Sixth, Schedule: