TFS Asset Analyst

We need to produce HTML fragment with sections: About the role? The posting includes Job Summary, Job Description, What we're looking for: Education And Work Experience Requirements, Other Requirements, Compensation Data. We need to map to headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Use

for section headings. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. Do NOT repeat job title as heading. Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "Job Posting End Date" etc? That's metadata; we can fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it. The posting end date is not substantive; we can drop. Also "Please note the job posting will close on the day before the posting end date." drop. Also "Hear about it first! Get job alerts by email..." drop. Also "If you're passionate..." maybe part of company description but could be considered boilerplate? It's not EEO but it's generic marketing; maybe keep? The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The marketing paragraph about AEP mission might be considered not boilerplate but could be kept as part of About the role? However we need to preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. The mission statement is substantive? It's generic but maybe considered part of About the role. We'll keep it as a paragraph under About the role. We need sections only when posting has real, specific content. So we need to decide which sections to include: About the role (Job Summary), Responsibilities (Job Description bullet list), Requirements (Education And Work Experience Requirements), Qualifications maybe same as Requirements? Could combine. Skills maybe from "Proficient in MS Excel, Visio and Outlook and data entry. Excellent communication and organizational skills." Benefits? Not mentioned. Pay: we have compensation grade and range. So we can include Pay section. Schedule: not mentioned. So we omit Schedule and Benefits. We must not create sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". We have actual pay range: $25.99 - $93,188.50 (looks weird: maybe hourly to annual?). We'll include as is. We need to format responsibilities as list items. The job description includes many duties for Associate, Analyst, Senior levels. We need to preserve all substantive information; we can combine them into a list of duties (maybe grouped by level). But we must not invent or summarize away detail. We could create a list with each duty as separate

• . However there is repetition across levels; we could keep them as is but might be duplicated. The instruction: remove duplicated lines. So we should deduplicate similar duties across levels. But we need to preserve all substantive information; deduplication may be okay if it's truly duplicate text. Let's examine. The posting includes three levels: Associate, Analyst (intermediate), Senior. Each lists many duties, with overlapping. Many duties are same across levels with slight supervision differences. To avoid duplication, we could combine into a single list of duties, noting supervision levels? But that might be summarizing. However the instruction says remove duplicated lines. So we should remove exact duplicate lines. Many lines are identical across levels (e.g., "Perform project print review at the beginning of a capital project to examine all relevant prints (one-lines, schematics, bills of material, equipment manufacturer drawings, etc.) in order to accurately identify and gather information about Transmission assets intended for commissioning on the project.") appears in all three. So we should keep only one instance. We need to be careful not to lose nuance like supervision level. But if we drop the supervision qualifier, we lose detail. However the duplicated lines are identical; the nuance is in the preceding phrase: "With instruction and limited supervision, the Associate level..." vs "With minimal supervision, ..." vs "With limited supervision, ..." Actually they differ. The exact sentence after that may be same but the preceding clause differs. The lines we consider as duty start after that clause? The duty sentences themselves are identical across levels. The preceding clause varies. If we keep only the duty sentence, we lose supervision nuance. But the instruction says remove duplicated lines, not necessarily remove duplicated duty sentences if they appear in different contexts with different supervision qualifiers. However the lines themselves are identical; the supervision qualifier is part of the sentence? Let's look: For Associate: "With instruction and limited supervision, perform project print review at the beginning of a capital project to examine all relevant prints (one-lines, schematics, bills of material, equipment manufacturer drawings, etc.) in order to accurately identify and gather information about Transmission assets intended for commissioning on the project." For Analyst: "With minimal supervision, review drawings with field changes at the end of a capital project, to understand any changes that were made, and to ensure that they are correctly documented in our asset management database, IPS." That's different duty. Actually many duties are same but with different supervision qualifiers at start. Let's list a few: Associate: - With instruction and limited supervision, perform project print review at the beginning of a capital project... - As requested, support creation of the location hierarchy... - Support managing asset entry lifecycle using Data Tracker database. - Review the assignment of Commissioning Actions in IPS... - Review IPS Audit Trail of asset attributes for accuracy, and with direct supervision, resolve errors as necessary. - Develop skills to be able to provide a specialized level of process support... - Assist in coordinating the configuration and release of the substation Capital Commissioning Checklists... - Assist in the development of process improvements and documentation... - Support asset-level management of IPS data... - With limited supervision, develop the skills to perform quality assurance... Analyst (intermediate): - Perform project print review at the beginning of a capital project... - With minimal supervision, review drawings with field changes at the end of a capital project... - Coordinate elements of print management as requested... - With limited supervision, create the location hierarchy... - Manage asset entry lifecycle using Data Tracker database. - With direct oversight, read and interpret Spider Diagrams... - Review the assignment of Commissioning Actions... - With minimal supervision, review IPS Audit Trail... - Provide a specialized level of process support... - With limited oversight, coordinate the configuration and release... - Assist in the development of process improvements... - Perform asset-level management of IPS data... - Perform quality assurance... - With limited supervision, coordinate reporting and monitoring... Senior: - Perform project print review... - Review drawings with field changes... - Lead and coordinate elements of print management... - Create the location hierarchy... - Manage asset entry lifecycle... - Read and interpret Spider Diagrams... - Review the assignment of Commissioning Actions... - Provide peer review for teammates... - Review IPS Audit Trail... - Provide leadership level of process support... - Coordinate the configuration and release... - Lead the development of process improvements... - Oversee and lead asset-level management... - Lead and assist lesser-experienced teammates... - Envision training needs and lead training sessions... - Assume lead role for the team in peer reviews and quality assurance... - Coordinate reporting and monitoring... Thus many duties are similar but with different supervision/leadership qualifiers. The exact sentences after the qualifiers sometimes identical (e.g., "Perform project print review at the beginning of a capital project...") appears in all three but with different qualifiers preceding. The duty sentence itself is identical. If we deduplicate that sentence, we lose the qualifier differences. However the instruction says remove duplicated lines. It might be acceptable to keep one instance and note that it's performed at all levels with varying supervision. But that could be considered summarizing. However the instruction also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could combine duties into a single list without repeating identical duty sentences, but we need to preserve the supervision/leadership nuance. Perhaps we can include the qualifier as part of the list item, but if the qualifier differs, the line is not identical. For example, "With instruction and limited supervision, perform project print review..." vs "With minimal supervision, perform project print review..." vs "Perform project print review..." (no qualifier). Those are not identical lines. So we should keep each distinct line. So we need to keep all three lines because they differ in the leading phrase. Let's verify: Are there any lines that are exactly identical across levels? Let's scan. Associate lines: 1. With instruction and limited supervision, perform project print review at the beginning of a capital project to examine all relevant prints (one-lines, schematics, bills of material, equipment manufacturer drawings, etc.) in order to accurately identify and gather information about Transmission assets intended for commissioning on the project. 2. Assist in reviewing drawings with field changes at the end of a capital project, to understand any changes that were made, and to ensure that they are correctly documented in our asset management database, IPS. 3. Coordinate elements of print management as requested, such as by monitoring our print platform (DSTrack) and following up on overdue records that have not been submitted. 4. As requested, support creation of the location hierarchy, addition of new capital assets, and population of asset attributes into IPS, based on information found in technical drawings and project scopes. 5. Support managing asset entry lifecycle using Data Tracker database. 6. Review the assignment of Commissioning Actions in IPS to the newly created assets and make corrections/additions/deletions as needed. 7. Review IPS Audit Trail of asset attributes for accuracy, and with direct supervision, resolve errors as necessary. 8. Develop skills to be able to provide a specialized level of process support including response to questions from the field, problem diagnosis and research, troubleshooting, tracking and resolution. 9. Assist in coordinating the configuration and release of the substation Capital Commissioning Checklists for specific jobs. 10. Assist in the development of process improvements and documentation regarding the Capital Commissioning Checklist creation, and initial IPS data entry. 11. Support asset-level management of IPS data by updating asset attributes for new capital assets, processing testing documentation, updating asset statuses after in-servicing, and other associated items as needed. 12. With limited supervision, develop the skills to perform quality assurance of Transmission Field Services data by routine checks of accuracy of asset attribute data, correction of discrepancies, assistance with CICO requests (AEP’s proprietary Check-in Check-out app), and updating GPS and address information in IPS. 13. Assist in the coordination of reporting and monitoring activities directly with field teams, such as by utilizing TFS' metric platform, PowerBI, to report on overdue settings, overdue commissioning actions, and others. Analyst lines: 1. Perform project print review at the beginning of a capital project to examine all relevant prints (one-lines, schematics, bills of material, equipment manufacturer drawings, etc.) in order to accurately identify and gather information about Transmission assets intended for commissioning on the project. 2. With minimal supervision, review drawings with field changes at the end of a capital project, to understand any changes that were made, and to ensure that they are correctly documented in our asset management database, IPS. 3. Coordinate elements of print management as requested, such as by monitoring our print platform (DSTrack) and following up on overdue records that have not been submitted. 4. With limited supervision, create the location hierarchy, add new capital assets, and populate asset attributes into IPS, based on information found in technical drawings and project scopes. 5. Manage asset entry lifecycle using Data Tracker database. 6. With direct oversight, read and interpret Spider Diagrams and complete element Bus/Branch reviews. 7. Review the assignment of Commissioning Actions in IPS to the newly created assets and make corrections/additions/deletions as needed. 8. With minimal supervision, review IPS Audit Trail of asset attributes for accuracy, and resolve errors as necessary. 9. Provide a specialized level of process support including response to questions from the field, problem diagnosis and research, troubleshooting, tracking