System Tester

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings using

for section headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include only sections with real content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, remove boilerplate. We need to parse the posting. Key info: - Location: Chicago, IL. Must be located or willing to relocate specifically to Chicago, IL. - Role: System Tester at Siemens. - About Siemens description: multiple paragraphs about mission, etc. - Responsibilities: list bullet points after "You’ll make an impact by:" includes: - Develop and execute comprehensive test plans for new systems, including functional, integration, and performance testing. - Validate system behavior in simulated and live environments, ensuring compliance with safety and regulatory standards. - Automate test workflows where possible to improve efficiency and repeatability. - Collaborate with developers, architects, and deployment teams to identify and resolve issues quickly. - Document test results, compliance reports, and best practices for future deployments. - Support rapid iteration during customer pilots by adapting test cases to real-world constraints. - Qualifications: "You’ll win us over by having the following qualifications:" then Basic Qualifications list: - Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in Engineering, Computer Science, or a related field. - 8+ years prior experience in system testing, validation, and quality assurance within industrial or automation environments. - Familiarity with test automation tools, scripting languages, and CI/CD pipelines. - Strong analytical and problem-solving skills with attention to detail. - Ability to work in cross-functional teams and adapt testing strategies to evolving requirements. - Great teamwork and proactive work ethic - Legally authorized to work in the United States on a continual and permanent basis without company sponsorship - Preferred Qualifications list: - Experience with forward deployment engineering: embedding with customer teams, validating systems in live environments, and iterating test strategies based on field feedback. - Knowledge of industrial automation systems, OT/IT integration, and compliance frameworks. - Familiarity with cybersecurity standards and safety-critical testing. - Willingness to travel or co-locate with customer teams during critical deployment phases. - Demonstrated ability to bridge the gap between lab validation and real-world deployment for scalable, reliable adoption. - ISTQB/ASTQB certificate - Pay: "$ 112,669.20 $193,000.00 10%" This seems like salary range and maybe bonus? It says "$ 112,669.20 $193,000.00 10%". Likely salary range $112,669.20 - $193,000.00 plus 10% bonus? We need to include Pay section only if posting actually states them. It does state numbers. So we should include Pay section with that info. - Benefits: Not explicitly stated. No benefits listed. So we should not include Benefits section. - Schedule: Not stated. No schedule info. So omit. - About the role: Could be a section summarizing role description. The posting includes introductory paragraphs about Siemens mission, etc. Could be "About the role" or "About Siemens". The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide which sections to include based on content. We have content for: - About the role: Could include description of role, mission, etc. The posting includes "System Tester Here at Siemens, we take pride..." etc. That's about the role and company. We can put that under About the role. - Responsibilities: we have bullet list. - Requirements: Could be basic qualifications? The instruction includes Requirements as a possible heading. But we also have Qualifications heading. The list includes both Requirements and Qualifications as possible headings. We need to decide which to use. The posting separates Basic Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications. Could treat Basic Qualifications as Requirements, Preferred as Qualifications (or Skills). However we also have Skills heading possible. But we can combine. We need to avoid thin sections. Prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine Basic and Preferred under Qualifications heading, with sub-bullets maybe? But we must use

• for any list. We could have two separate lists under Qualifications: one for Basic, one for Preferred. Or we could have Requirements (basic) and Qualifications (preferred). That would be two sections. But we need to avoid filler. Both have substantive content. We also have location info: "This role is located in Chicago, IL. Candidates must be located in, or willing to relocate specifically to Chicago, IL in order to be considered for this role." This is location info; could be placed in a short paragraph under About the role or maybe a separate section like Location? Not in allowed headings. So we can incorporate into About the role paragraph. Also there is a line: "As a System Tester at Siemens, you will ensure the reliability, safety, and compliance of new systems through rigorous testing in both lab and real-world environments." That's also role description. We need to preserve all substantive info. So we need to include location requirement, the description of role, responsibilities, basic qualifications, preferred qualifications, pay. We must not include boilerplate like EEO, etc. The posting includes "Our Commitment to Equity and Inclusion..." which is EEO boilerplate; we must remove. Also "About Siemens: ..." is company description; could be part of About the role or maybe separate About Siemens but not in allowed headings. We could incorporate into About the role. We must not repeat job title as heading. So no

  System Tester

  . We must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings; none present. We must output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown. Thus produce something like:

  About the role

  This role is located in Chicago, IL. Candidates must be located in, or willing to relocate specifically to Chicago, IL in order to be considered for this role. At Siemens, we take pride in enabling sustainable progress through technology... (rest of description).

  Responsibilities

  • Develop and execute comprehensive test plans for new systems, including functional, integration, and performance testing.
  • Validate system behavior in simulated and live environments, ensuring compliance with safety and regulatory standards.
  • Automate test workflows where possible to improve efficiency and repeatability.
  • Collaborate with developers, architects, and deployment teams to identify and resolve issues quickly.
  • Document test results, compliance reports, and best practices for future deployments.
  • Support rapid iteration during customer pilots by adapting test cases to real-world constraints.

  Requirements

  • Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in Engineering, Computer Science, or a related field.
  • 8+ years prior experience in system testing, validation, and quality assurance within industrial or automation environments.
  • Familiarity with test automation tools, scripting languages, and CI/CD pipelines.
  • Strong analytical and problem-solving skills with attention to detail.
  • Ability to work in cross-functional teams and adapt testing strategies to evolving requirements.
  • Great teamwork and proactive work ethic.
  • Legally authorized to work in the United States on a continual and permanent basis without company sponsorship.

  Qualifications

  • Experience with forward deployment engineering: embedding with customer teams, validating systems in live environments, and iterating test strategies based on field feedback.
  • Knowledge of industrial automation systems, OT/IT integration, and compliance frameworks.
  • Familiarity with cybersecurity standards and safety-critical testing.
  • Willingness to travel or co-locate with customer teams during critical deployment phases.
  • Demonstrated ability to bridge the gap between lab validation and real-world deployment for scalable, reliable adoption.
  • ISTQB/ASTQB certificate.

  Pay

  $112,669.20 – $193,000.00 (plus 10% bonus)

  We need to ensure we preserve the exact numbers as posted: "$ 112,669.20 $193,000.00 10%". Could format as "$112,669.20 – $193,000.00 plus 10%". The original had a space after $ and before number. We can keep as "$ 112,669.20 $193,000.00 10%" but better to make readable. However we must preserve ALL substantive information; we can reformat but not lose info. Changing format is okay as long as we keep the numbers and meaning. The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." So we can present as "$112,669.20 – $193,000.00 plus 10%". That's still same info. We must not include Benefits or Schedule sections. We must not include any filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present. We must not include duplicated lines. Ensure we don't repeat. Check for any duplicated content: The posting had repeated sentence "We do this through empowering customers by combining the real and digital worlds." twice. We should include only once? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we should remove duplicated lines. So we need to deduplicate that sentence. We'll include only one instance. Also there is repeated "We do this through empowering customers by combining the real and digital worlds, thereby improving how we live, work, and move today and for the next generation!" Actually the first line: "We do this through empowering customers by combining the real and digital worlds." Then later: "We do this through empowering customers by combining the real and digital worlds, thereby improving how we live, work, and move today and for the next generation!" That's not exactly duplicate but similar. Might be considered duplicated? The instruction says duplicated lines. The second line is longer, not exact duplicate. We'll keep both? Might be considered redundant but not exact duplicate. Safer to keep both as they add nuance. However we could combine? But better to keep as is. We also have repeated "System Tester Here at Siemens, we take pride..." Actually the posting: "System Tester Here at Siemens, we take pride in enabling sustainable progress through technology. We do this through empowering customers by combining the real and digital worlds. We do this through empowering customers by combining the real and digital worlds, thereby improving how we live, work, and move today and for the next generation!" So there is a duplicate phrase "We do this through empowering customers by combining the real and digital worlds." appears twice. We should remove one duplicate. We'll keep the first occurrence and maybe keep the second longer phrase? Actually the second includes the same phrase plus extra. So we could keep the longer one and drop the shorter duplicate. Let's keep the longer one: "We do this through empowering customers by combining the real and digital worlds, thereby improving how we live, work, and move today and for the next generation!" and drop the shorter duplicate. Thus About the role paragraph will include: "System Tester Here at Siemens, we take pride in enabling sustainable progress through technology. We do this through empowering customers by combining the real and digital worlds, thereby improving how we live, work, and move today and for the next generation! We know that the only way a business thr