Jobs · Healthcare · Texas

Spanish Speaking Behavior Technician (RBT)

Centria Autism · Carrollton, TX · 2 days ago
Healthcare$18–$25/hrPart-time
The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. Let me analyze the content and apply the rules. First, I need to identify the sections: - About the role (introductory paragraph) - Responsibilities (duties described) - Requirements (listed) - Qualifications (some overlap with requirements) - Skills (implied) - Benefits/Perks (listed as "Perks Of Working At Centria") - Pay (given as "Pay Range: $18 - $25") - Schedule (not explicitly mentioned, but maybe implied? Not stated, so omit) Rules: - Use

for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. - Use
  • for lists,

    for prose. - Do NOT repeat job title as heading (page already shows it). The job title is "Behavior Technician" but the posting starts with "We are looking for enthusiastic individuals to join our team as Behavior Technicians." I should not include a heading for the job title. - Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

    or drop it. There's no Job ID here. - Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. - Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. - Include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. - Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. - Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences. Now, parse the content: The posting has: - Introductory paragraph(s) describing the role. - Responsibilities: "implementing individualized behavior intervention plans under the guidance of a BCBA", "use evidence-based techniques to teach communication, social, and daily living skills while reducing interfering behaviors", "work one-on-one with children". Also physical demands: "standing, walking, sitting, grasping, reaching, bending, kneeling, crouching, squatting, lifting, and at times carrying children or objects that weigh up to 50 pounds." That's part of responsibilities or working conditions. - Requirements: listed as bullet points: "Passionate about helping children with autism.", "Patient, compassionate, and able to work well in a team.", "18+ years of age", "High school diploma or GED", "Ability to obtain a CPR, First Aid Certification and Tuberculosis test (if you haven’t had one in the last year)", "Ability to pass a pre employment background check", "Ability to move in various positions (sit, squat, bend, etc.)", "Ability to lift and carry up to 50 pounds", "Candidates must obtain an Registered Behavior Technician Certification after completing onboarding" - Perks/Benefits: "Structured career path in the field of Behavioral Analysis", "Discounts to hundreds of retail partners via our Benefit Hub", "Access to Centria’s Employee Assistance Plan with benefits around mental health and counseling", "Early wage access to employees through Rain - Work today, get paid tomorrow!", "Unlimited opportunities to make an impact in the life of a special needs child" - Pay: "Pay Range: $18 - $25" - Schedule: not mentioned. So omit Schedule section. - EEO statement: "We are an equal opportunity employer..." - this is boilerplate, remove. - Disclaimer: "This job description is not intended to be an exhaustive list..." - boilerplate, remove. - Pay scale disclaimer: "This pay scale range is the full range..." - boilerplate, but pay range is given, so we keep pay range but not the disclaimer. - "Centria reserves the right to amend..." - boilerplate, remove. - "Apply now to start your journey..." - application instruction, remove. Now, structure sections: 1. About the role: introductory prose. Could be one or two paragraphs. The first paragraph: "We are looking for enthusiastic individuals to join our team as Behavior Technicians. As a Behavior Technician, you will have the opportunity to make a real difference in the lives of children with autism. In this role, you will work one-on-one with children, implementing individualized behavior intervention plans under the guidance of a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). You will use evidence-based techniques to teach communication, social, and daily living skills while reducing interfering behaviors. We are looking for candidates who are passionate about helping children with autism reach their full potential. You will need to be patient, compassionate, and able to work well in a team environment. We will provide comprehensive training so that you are equipped and empowered to help each child, even if you don’t currently have experience. Children can be unpredictable and potentially confrontational, so this role is not for the weak of spirit, mind, or body. Part of the joy of working with kids is exercise! Our clients move, so you need to be comfortable standing, walking, sitting, grasping, reaching, bending, kneeling, crouching, squatting, lifting, and at times carrying children or objects that weigh up to 50 pounds. At the end of each day, you will go home knowing that you have made a meaningful impact on the life of a child and their family. Join us and become a part of a dedicated team that is changing lives for the better." That's a lot of prose. Could split into multiple paragraphs. But keep as

    tags. 2. Responsibilities: Could extract the duties. The introductory paragraph already includes many responsibilities. But we can create a Responsibilities section with bullet points for clarity. However, the rule says use

    • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The posting doesn't have a separate responsibilities list; it's embedded in prose. But we can extract key duties into a list. However, the rule says "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." So we should keep the prose as is, but we can also create a Responsibilities section with bullet points if we can extract distinct duties. But the prose is already descriptive. Perhaps we keep the prose under About the role, and then have a Responsibilities section with bullet points summarizing? But that might duplicate. Better to have About the role as prose, and then Responsibilities as a list of key duties extracted from the prose. However, the rule says "use
      • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". The posting doesn't have a list of duties; it's narrative. But we can create a list from the narrative. But we must not invent. We can parse the narrative into bullet points. That might be acceptable as restructuring. But the rule says "Preserve ALL substantive information". So we need to include all details. If we convert to bullet points, we might lose some nuance. Perhaps keep the narrative as prose under About the role, and then have a separate Responsibilities section with bullet points for the physical demands? Actually, the physical demands are part of the role. Could be under Requirements or Responsibilities. The posting lists physical abilities under Requirements. But also mentions them in the intro. The Requirements section includes "Ability to move in various positions..." and "Ability to lift and carry up to 50 pounds". That's already in Requirements. So maybe we don't need a separate Responsibilities section? The rule says include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it. The posting has responsibilities described in prose. We could create a Responsibilities section with bullet points derived from the prose. But the rule says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe we combine: About the role (prose), Requirements (list), Benefits (list), Pay (prose). That's four sections. Could also have Qualifications? The requirements include qualifications. The heading "Requirements" is appropriate. The posting says "Requirements" then a list. So we'll use that. Skills: not explicitly listed separately. Could be part of requirements. Omit Skills section. Benefits: "Perks Of Working At Centria" is a list. So Benefits section. Pay: given. Schedule: not mentioned, omit. Now, we need to output HTML fragment with

        headings and appropriate tags. Let's draft:

        About the role

        We are looking for enthusiastic individuals to join our team as Behavior Technicians. As a Behavior Technician, you will have the opportunity to make a real difference in the lives of children with autism. In this role, you will work one-on-one with children, implementing individualized behavior intervention plans under the guidance of a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). You will use evidence-based techniques to teach communication, social, and daily living skills while reducing interfering behaviors. We are looking for candidates who are passionate about helping children with autism reach their full potential. You will need to be patient, compassionate, and able to work well in a team environment. We will provide comprehensive training so that you are equipped and empowered to help each child, even if you don’t currently have experience. Children can be unpredictable and potentially confrontational, so this role is not for the weak of spirit, mind, or body. Part of the joy of working with kids is exercise! Our clients move, so you need to be comfortable standing, walking, sitting, grasping, reaching, bending, kneeling, crouching, squatting, lifting, and at times carrying children or objects that weigh up to 50 pounds. At the end of each day, you will go home knowing that you have made a meaningful impact on the life of a child and their family. Join us and become a part of a dedicated team that is changing lives for the better.

        Responsibilities

        • Implement individualized behavior intervention plans under the guidance of a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA)
        • Use evidence-based techniques to teach communication, social, and daily living skills
        • Reduce interfering behaviors
        • Work one-on-one with children with autism
        • Perform physical activities including standing, walking, sitting, grasping, reaching, bending, kneeling, crouching, squatting, lifting, and carrying children or objects up to 50 pounds
        But note: the physical demands are also in requirements. Might be duplication. But the rule says preserve all substantive information. The physical demands are mentioned in both intro and requirements. We can include them in Responsibilities as they are part of the job duties. However, the requirements list includes "Ability to move in various positions..." and "Ability to lift and carry up to 50 pounds". That's about ability, not duty. But the duty includes those movements. I think it's okay to have them in both sections? But we should avoid duplication. The rule says "Remove duplicated lines". So we should not duplicate. The intro paragraph already includes the physical demands. The requirements list also includes them. We can keep the requirements list as is, and in Responsibilities we can list the core duties without the physical demands? But the physical demands are part of the job. Perhaps we keep the physical demands only in Requirements (since they are listed as requirements). In Responsibilities, we list the behavioral duties. That seems logical. Let's examine the requirements list: it includes "Ability to move in various positions (sit, squat, bend, etc.)" and "Ability to lift and carry up to 50 pounds". Those are physical requirements. The intro says "you need to be comfortable standing, walking, sitting, grasping, reaching, bending, kneeling, crouching, squatting, lifting, and at times carrying children or objects that weigh up to 50 pounds." That's essentially the same. So we can keep the physical demands in Requirements and not repeat in Responsibilities. Thus, Responsibilities list: - Implement individualized behavior intervention plans under the guidance of a BCBA - Use evidence-based techniques

Similar jobs