Jobs · Finance · Minnesota

Senior Internal Audit Analyst

Graco · Minneapolis, MN · 3 wk ago
Finance$75k–$131k/yrFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? The posting includes description of Graco, role location, responsibilities, qualifications, benefits, pay. We need to use

for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections with real content. No job title heading. No metadata like Job ID. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. The posting includes some legal bits: Applicants must be legally authorized to work... This position is not eligible for immigration sponsorship... etc. Those are requirements (legal). Should we include them? They are part of requirements. We'll keep them under Requirements or Qualifications. Also mention E-Verify etc maybe not needed but it's part of company policy; could be omitted as boilerplate? It's not EEO but still legal. Might be considered boilerplate but it's about employment verification. Probably we can keep as part of Requirements. We need to preserve all substantive information. So include: - About the role: description of Graco and role location (Minneapolis office transitioning to Dayton HQ in 2027). Also mention Senior Internal Auditor conducts audits etc. Could be part of About the role. - Responsibilities: list bullet points under Audit Planning & Execution, Audit Documentation & Reporting, Risk & Department Support. - Requirements: Bachelor’s degree, 5+ years experience, proficiency, communication skills, computer skills, ability to work independently, ability to travel up to 30%, legal work authorization, not eligible for sponsorship, etc. - Qualifications/Skills: maybe combine? The posting has "What You Will Bring To Graco" which includes degree, experience, proficiency, skills, etc. Also "Accelerators" list: Master's degree, certifications, public accounting experience, experience with Oracle etc, foreign language skills, global industrial manufacturing knowledge. Those are preferred qualifications. Could be under Qualifications or Skills. We'll create a Qualifications section for required qualifications, and a Skills section for preferred? But we should not create thin sections. Maybe combine Requirements and Qualifications into one? But we have to follow headings list; we can include both if they have substantive content. Let's see: Requirements (mandatory) and Qualifications (preferred) both have content. So we can include both. - Benefits: Graco offers attractive compensation, benefits and career development opportunities. Comprehensive benefits include medical, dental, stock purchase plan, 401(k), tuition reimbursement and more. Also mention Best Place to Work awards. Could be Benefits. - Pay: base pay range $75,000 - $131,200. Also note about base hourly rate determination etc. That's substantive. - Schedule: not mentioned. No schedule info. So omit Schedule section. - Skills: maybe we can include under Qualifications or separate. But we already have Qualifications for preferred. Could also have Skills for technical skills like financial systems, databases, Oracle, OneStream, Power BI, etc. But those are in Accelerators. Might be better to put them under Skills. However we need to avoid thin sections. Let's see if we have enough content for Skills: experience with financial systems and databases, Oracle, OneStream, Power BI, etc. That's substantive. Could create Skills section. But we must not repeat job title as heading. We'll not. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /. Use

for each section heading, then content:

for prose,

  • for lists. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all bullet points exactly as given, but we can rephrase? The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." Means we should not omit details, but we can reformat. Likely we can keep the same wording but maybe adjust to fit HTML. We'll keep the sentences. Let's extract sections. About the role: First paragraph: "Graco manufactures and markets premium equipment to move, measure, control, dispense and spray a wide variety of fluid and powder materials. What does that mean? Well, we pump peanut butter into your jar, and the oil in your car. We glue the soles of your shoes, the glass in your windows and the screen on your phone. We spray the finish on your vehicle, coatings on your pills, the paint on your house and texture on your walls. Graco is part of your daily life. This role is currently based at our Minneapolis office and will transition to our new headquarters in Dayton, MN, in 2027. The Senior Internal Auditor conducts audits at domestic and international Graco locations to evaluate processes and controls with the objective of improving operational effectiveness, assessing compliance with financial accounting and reporting standards, and reviewing compliance with corporate governance and regulatory requirements. Collaborates with the director to drive process and quality improvements within the department." That's a lot; we can keep as prose. Responsibilities: three subheadings in original: Audit Planning & Execution, Audit Documentation & Reporting, Risk & Department Support. Each has bullet points. We'll make a
      with
    • for each bullet point, maybe grouping under subheadings? But we only have

      for section headings, not subheadings. Could we include subheadings as inside
    • ? Might be okay. But we need to preserve content. We'll just list each bullet as
    • . Might lose subheading grouping but still preserve bullet text. However we could embed subheading as part of
    • text: e.g., "
    • Audit Planning & Execution: Perform research and audit planning..." That preserves. Let's list all bullets: Audit Planning & Execution: - Perform research and audit planning and assist in the development of audit programs. - Assess financial, operational, compliance, and control risks within the scope of assigned audits. - Identify relevant processes, controls, systems, and data required to support audit objectives. - Collaborate with Internal Audit leadership to ensure audit activities appropriately address identified risks. Audit Documentation & Reporting: - Develop and maintain clear, organized workpapers that support audit findings and recommendations. - Summarize audit results and draft reports and recommendations. - Assist in obtaining management responses to audit findings and recommendations. - Communicate audit results clearly and professionally to stakeholders. Risk & Department Support: - Identify and lead process and quality improvements within the Internal Audit department. - Lead live fraud, cybersecurity and Code of Conduct training sessions. - Assist Internal Audit leadership with fraud, anti-corruption and enterprise risk management assessments. Now Requirements (What You Will Bring To Graco mandatory): - Bachelor’s degree in Accounting, Finance or related field. - 5+ years of relevant auditing, accounting or related experience. - Proficiency in auditing principles, practices and procedures used to complete complex assignments. - Strong communication & interpersonal skills with demonstrated discretion in handling highly confidential information. - Strong computer skills, including experience with financial systems and databases. - Ability to work independently and effectively with employees at all organizational levels. - Ability to travel to domestic and international locations up to 30%. - Applicants must be legally authorized to work in the United States on a permanent and unrestricted basis. - This position is not eligible for immigration sponsorship now or in the future (e.g., H-1B, TN, E-3, O-1, L-1, or employment-based permanent residence sponsorship). - Candidates working under temporary employment authorization, including F-1 OPT, STEM OPT, CPT, or similar programs, are not eligible for this position. Also maybe include "At Graco, you truly make a difference..." but that's more culture; could be part of Benefits or About the role? It's about culture; maybe we can include in Benefits? But it's not benefit. Could be part of About the role? It's about employee value proposition. Might be okay to include in Benefits? But we have a Benefits section for medical etc. Could add a paragraph about culture under Benefits? Might be okay but it's not a benefit. However we can include it in About the role as part of company description. But we already have About the role covering role description; we could add a paragraph about culture there. The instruction: preserve all substantive information. So we need to include that paragraph somewhere. Let's put it in About the role after the role description. Paragraph: "At Graco, you truly make a difference. Your unique talents contribute to our organizational growth and future. Not only do you make a difference, but Graco’s culture empowers employees to create their own career path. Whether you choose to advance within your current department or explore new opportunities in different divisions, you have the ability to build your future. Our managers are here to provide support and guidance as you continue to grow within your career. Graco has excellent opportunities available to individuals who want to be part of a fast-moving, growing company that is committed to quality, innovation and solving fluid handling problems for our customers. Graco is proud to be named a Best Place to Work by Fortune Magazine in 2016, 2018, 2019, 2021 & 2022." That's substantive. Benefits: "Graco offers attractive compensation, benefits and career development opportunities. Graco’s comprehensive benefits include medical, dental, stock purchase plan, 401(k), tuition reimbursement and more." Also maybe mention E-Verify? That's not a benefit but a policy; could be omitted as boilerplate? It's not EEO but still legal. Might be considered boilerplate; but it's substantive about hiring process. However instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. E-Verify is legal but not exactly EEO; still could be considered legal boilerplate. Safer to omit? But it's part of the posting; maybe we should keep as it's about employment verification. However it's not a benefit; could be placed under Requirements as a note. But it's not a requirement for candidate; it's company policy. Might be considered boilerplate. I'd omit to stay safe. Pay: "The base pay range for this position is listed below, exclusive of fringe benefits or other compensation. If you are hired, your final base hourly rate will be determined based on factors such as geographic location, skills, competencies, education, and/or experience. In addition to those factors, we will also consider internal equity of our current employees. Please keep in mind that the range provided is the full base salary range for the role. Hiring at or near the maximum of the range would not be typical to allow for future and continued salary growth. $75,000.00 - $131,200.00" We'll include that as prose. Now Qualifications (preferred) "Accelerators": list: - Master’s degree in Accounting, Finance, Business, or related field. - CPA, CIA, CFE, or related professional certification. - Public accounting experience with publicly traded companies. - Experience with Oracle, OneStream, Power BI or similar systems. - Experience conducting audits in a global or multinational organization. - Foreign-language skills. - Global industrial manufacturing knowledge and experience. We'll put these under Qualifications section. Skills: maybe we could combine with Qualifications; but we already have Qualifications for preferred. Could also have Skills for technical skills like financial systems, databases, Oracle etc. But those are already in Qualifications. To avoid thin sections, we could omit Skills section and put those under Qualifications. However the instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we can combine Qualifications and Skills into one Qualifications section that includes both required and preferred? But we already have Requirements section for mandatory. We could have Qualifications section for preferred (including education, certifications, experience, technical skills). That's fine. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay. Check if any other content: "Our company uses E-Verify..." we omitted. Might be considered legal boilerplate; we removed. Now produce HTML. We need to wrap each section:

      About the role

      then <

Similar jobs