Jobs · Business Development · Florida

Senior Consultant - Grants Development and Management

WSP in the U.S. · Tampa, FL · 1 mo ago
Business Development$90k–$157k/yrFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, remove boilerplate (cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions). Also we must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless posting actually states them. The posting includes Benefits and Compensation (Pay). No schedule mentioned. So we include Benefits and Pay sections. Also we need sections like About the role (maybe description), Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to parse content. Let's extract substantive content: Job Description snippet: "This Opportunity WSP is currently initiating a search for an Senior Consultant to join the Grants Strategy and Development Team in our Florida offices. The following locations will be considered: Tampa, Jacksonville, Orlando, Tallahassee, and open to other offices within the state. WSP’s Grants Strategy and Development Team supports our clients in planning, securing, and managing grant funding from federal, state, and local sources. We offer clients the technical and strategic experience to navigate every stage of the grant lifecycle, from strategy to close-out. The Senior Consultant role is a senior position within the Economics, Finance and Grants team, which offers great opportunities for professional growth. You will work directly with public and private organizations across the country to lead infrastructure‑related engagements and provide expert grant management services to support investment, funding, and delivery decisions. At WSP, we are driven by inspiring the right people to be part of our future-focused business objectives. Our devotion to teamwork has allowed us to build communities and expand our skylines. Come join us and help shape the future!" Then "Your Impact" bullet list: - Lead post-award grant management and compliance strategies for public infrastructure projects, on behalf of clients, and in collaboration with the Advisory team and other WSP practice groups - Contribute to various business development efforts with a particular emphasis on building the Grant Strategy and Development Team’s portfolio of post-award grant management support contracts – from opportunity identification, proposal development, interview and negotiations - Leverage professional network across industry to support business development opportunities, marketing, proposals, and cross-selling of other WSP capabilities - Contribute to client engagement and foster client relationships - Demonstrate knowledge of Federal regulations and grant requirements, ensure all grant activities are compliant with Federal guidelines including 2 CFR 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards). Manage and oversee the development of complex post-award grant deliverables such as preparing milestone/progress and financial reports, obligating grant funds and managing grant agreements, conducting subrecipient oversight, and grant closeout. - Take initiative and work collaboratively with other team members to deliver high-quality deliverables and client services - Serve as task lead / key staff for grant assistance contracts; manage scope, schedule, and budget Then "Who You Are" sections: Required Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications. Required Qualifications bullet list: - Bachelor’s degree in Finance, Accounting, Public Policy, Urban or Transportation Planning, or related discipline. - 5-7 years of relevant experience performing complex grant functions, including grant writing for federal discretionary programs, executing grant agreements, post-award grant administration, and grant accounting functions such as reconciliations, reimbursement requests, and financial reporting. - Previous experience supporting business development efforts, shaping pursuit strategy, and securing new advisory engagements with public- and private-sector client. - Strong interpersonal, written, and verbal communication skills - Ability to work well with multiple deadlines and flexibility to adapt to unanticipated client requests for grant development and/or management support - Experience with post-award grant management platforms such as the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Award Management System (TrAMS) - Exercise responsible and ethical decision-making regarding company funds, resources and conduct and adhere to WSP's Code of conduct and related policies and procedures. - Proven track record of upholding workplace safety and ability to abide by WSP’s health, safety and drug/alcohol and harassment policies Preferred Qualifications bullet list: - Master's degree in Finance, Accounting, Public Policy, Urban or Transportation Planning, or related disciplines - Demonstrated ability to engage effectively with private- and public-sector clients, including federal, state, regional, or local agencies - Familiarity with administration of grants related to energy, water, and other infrastructure - Strong understanding of federal and state-level infrastructure policy and funding - Familiarity with non-Federal grants, such as State grants from California, Florida, New York and other States - Active member of local professional organizations Then "WSP Benefits" paragraph: "WSP provides a comprehensive suite of benefits focused on a providing health and financial stability throughout the employee’s career. These benefits include coverage related to medical, dental, vision, disability, and life; retirement savings; paid sick leave; paid vacation (or other personal time); paid parental leave; and paid time off for purposes of bereavement, voting, and/or attendance at naturalization proceedings." Then "Compensation" sections: Expected Salary (all locations): $89,600 - $156,600 with explanation. Also Expected Salary (Colorado only): $89,600 - $130,600 with explanation. We need to include Pay section with that info. Should we include both? Probably include both as part of Pay section. The instructions: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we can combine Pay info into one

Pay

with paragraphs. We must not include Schedule (none). Also we must not include "About the role" heading if we have other sections? The posting includes an introductory paragraph describing the opportunity. Could be considered "About the role". We'll include that as a section. Responsibilities: The "Your Impact" list is responsibilities. Requirements: Could be Required Qualifications? But we also have Qualifications sections. The instruction says use headings for section headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we need to map content accordingly. We have: - About the role: introductory paragraph (maybe also locations). - Responsibilities: Your Impact bullet list. - Requirements: maybe Required Qualifications? But also there is a "Who You Are" with Required Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications. Could treat Required Qualifications as Requirements, and Preferred Qualifications as Qualifications? Or we could have Requirements (required) and Qualifications (preferred). Skills maybe could be extracted from required qualifications like communication skills, etc. But we can also put skills under Skills heading. We need to avoid thin sections. Perhaps combine Required Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications into Qualifications heading, and put Skills under Skills heading (like communication, interpersonal, etc). But we have many skill-like items. Better: Use headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (required qualifications), Qualifications (preferred qualifications), Benefits, Pay. Possibly Skills not needed if we already covered in Requirements/Qualifications. But we could still include Skills if we have distinct skill items not captured elsewhere. However the instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe we skip Skills if not needed. We need to ensure we preserve all substantive information. If we omit Skills heading, we must still include the skill-related content somewhere else (like in Requirements or Qualifications). We can embed communication skills etc within Required Qualifications (they already are there). So we can skip Skills. Thus sections:

About the role

with paragraph(s) covering intro and locations.

Responsibilities

with
  • list of your impact bullets.

    Requirements

    with
    • list of required qualifications.

      Qualifications

      with
      • list of preferred qualifications.

        Benefits

        with

        benefits paragraph.

        Pay

        with

        compensation info (both all locations and Colorado only). Could also include explanation text. We must not include boilerplate like EEO, etc. Remove duplicated lines. Also remove "About WSP" etc? That's boilerplate? The "About WSP" section includes generic description; might be considered boilerplate but it's substantive about company. However instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The "About WSP" is not explicitly listed as boilerplate but could be considered generic. However it's part of job description; maybe we should keep it? The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The "About WSP" is substantive about the company. However it's also repeated later in "WSP provides a flexible and agile workplace model..." which is duplicated. We need to deduplicate. The first "About WSP" paragraph: "WSP USA is the U.S. operating company of WSP, one of the world's leading engineering and professional services firms. Dedicated to serving local communities, we are engineers, planners, technical experts, strategic advisors and construction management professionals. WSP USA designs lasting solutions in the buildings, transportation, energy, water and environment markets. With more than 15,000 employees in over 300 offices across the U.S., we partner with our clients to help communities prosper. www.wsp.com" Then later: "WSP provides a flexible and agile workplace model while meeting client needs. Employees are also afforded a comprehensive suite of benefits including medical, dental, vision, disability, life, and retirement savings focused on providing health and financial stability throughout the employee’s career. At WSP, we want to give our employees the challenges they seek to grow their careers and knowledge base. Your daily contributions to your team will be essential in meeting client objectives, goals and challenges. Are you ready to get started?" This is somewhat generic but still about benefits and culture. Might be considered boilerplate but it's not EEO etc. However we already have Benefits section covering benefits; the later paragraph repeats benefits and adds some fluff. We could keep the unique parts: "WSP provides a flexible and agile workplace model while meeting client needs." and "At WSP, we want to give our employees the challenges they seek to grow their careers and knowledge base." and "Your daily contributions to your team will be essential in meeting client objectives, goals and challenges. Are you ready to get started?" This seems like a call to action; maybe considered application instruction? It's not exactly instruction to apply but encouraging. Might be considered boilerplate. Safer to omit it as it's not essential substantive info about the role. The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." The latter part seems like application encouragement; could be considered application instructions. So we can drop that. Thus we keep only the first About WSP paragraph? But that is also generic about the company; not specific to role. However it's substantive info about the employer. Might be okay to keep under About the role? But we already have About the role section focusing on the role. Could incorporate company description there. However we risk duplication. Perhaps we can include a brief company description under About the role as part of the intro. The intro already mentions WSP’s Grants Strategy and Development Team etc. The company description could be added but not required. To be safe, we can keep the About WSP paragraph as part of About the role section (makes it more substantive). But we must avoid duplication: we already have the intro paragraph that mentions WSP’s Grants Strategy and Development Team etc. The About WSP paragraph is separate; we can include it as a second paragraph under About the role. Thus About the role will have two paragraphs: first the opportunity/intro, second the company overview. Now we need to ensure we don't include any boilerplate like "WSP USA is providing the compensation range that the company in good faith believes..." That's part of Pay section; we

Similar jobs