Quality Manager

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections where there is real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, not invent or summarize away detail. Remove boilerplate like EEO, application instructions, etc. Also remove duplicated lines. Must not create sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". Pay and Schedule only if posting actually states them. The posting does not mention pay or schedule specifics (except "Full time" under Time Type). That is schedule? It says "Time Type Full time". That's schedule info. So we can include Schedule section with "Full time". Pay not mentioned, so omit Pay section. Benefits: The posting includes "What can you expect from us? Paid vacation. Paid sick time. Healthcare, dental, prescription drug insurance plans. Company paid and voluntary life insurance plans. Disability benefits." That's benefits. So include Benefits section. Qualifications: There's a "Qualifications" heading in the posting. It includes Education And/Or Experience, Language Skills, Mathematical Skills, REASONING ABILITY, etc. Also there is "IATF 16949/ ISO14001 / ISO 45001 RESPONSIBILITIES" repeated twice. That seems like responsibilities but also qualifications? Actually it's responsibilities. We'll treat as part of Responsibilities. We need sections: About the role (summary), Responsibilities (essential duties), Requirements (maybe education/experience?), Qualifications (maybe certifications?), Skills (maybe language, math, reasoning?), Benefits, Schedule. We must not create thin sections; combine where appropriate. But we need to follow instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we must use those exact headings if we include them. We can decide to include only those with content. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to extract duties, responsibilities, qualifications, etc. Let's parse the posting. First paragraph: "We open up your world with every drive Would you like to work on the development of roof systems for future car models together with some of the market leaders in the automotive industry? Inalfa Roof Systems is a world leading supplier for OEM automotive roof systems and still growing strong. Are you ready to grow with us?" That's about the role/company. Could be About the role. Then "Job Title: Plant Quality Manger Department: Operations Reports To: Plant General Manager FLSA Status: Exempt Summary Plans and directs activities concerned with development, application, and directs maintenance of internal quality systems and quality processes. The Plant Quality Manager communicates corrective actions to the customer, establishes effective containment, and verifies corrective action effectiveness. Directs the daily quality activities on the production to ensure compliance to internal and customer requirements." That's summary; could be About the role. Then "ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES include the following. Other duties may be assigned." Then a long list. We need to extract that list into

• items. List items (some duplicated). Let's extract unique duties but preserve all? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove duplicated lines. So we should deduplicate but keep each unique duty. Let's list them: - Establish and maintain system for statistical reporting of product compliance. - Supervises the internal audit process. - Develop and maintains internal audit plan - Monitor and Control internal audits program - Supervises the internal audit process. (duplicate) - Maintains Corrective Action Program - Facilitate PFMEA & Control Plan reviews - Supports Supplier Development and SQE activities. - Coordinates Receiving Inspection activities - Supports Receiving Inspection Management at plant level. - Develop and implement Performance training for Quality Associates - Monitor the Quality Management System - Single point contact for External IATF16949 Audits - Single point contact for External ISO 14001 Audits - Support all launch activities - Maintains safe and clean working environment by complying with 6S procedures, rules, and regulations. - Support 6s standards - Develop and implement new quality procedures - Facilitate Continuous improvement activities - Assign and Monitor Quality Techs daily tasks - Report out weekly quality performance to upper management - Facilitate Risk Assessment activities - Monitor and Control Quality Hold activities - Facilitate weekly Material Review Board - MRB - Supervises and evaluates plant quality personnel performance - Supervises the product and process activity - Supervises and maintains the corrective action system - Maintains associated budgets - Supervises the internal audit process (duplicate again) - Supervises the warranty and return sales activity - Prepares management and customer reports - Supervises the inspection laboratory - Maintains and follows all system procedures and policies - Responsible for CCC / CCAP certification - Supervisory Responsibilities Engineering Supervisor, Product/process Auditors, CMM Technicians, Receiving Inspectors, Quality Engineers - Management Responsibilities Reporting every change that has been done to CCC / CCAP scope (certificate extension, change modifications, suspension, cancellation or withdrawal) - Any changes to be announced to the Chinese certification authority. - The Quality Control Manager Shall Ensure That the requirements of China's Implementation Rules for CCAP Mark Certification of Motor Vehicle Products (for interior trim parts: CCAP-GZ-5101:2019) are fulfilled and that the complete implementation is secured and adjusted periodically according to the given changes. - That the CCAP certified products at all times comply with the Chinese product standard (for interior trim parts: GB 8410-2006) - That a procedure exists that controls the labeling of the product with the CCAP logo - That a procedure exists which controls the marking of the CCAP logo, and assures that it is not applied on faulty or non-certified products. - The procedure must also make sure that the logo cannot be put on any products that have been modified after certification without an adjustment of the certificate. - That a CoP Control Plan is created and implemented - That any relevant changes are announced to the Chinese Certification Authority before production of marked CCAP products is allowed. - IATF 16949/ ISO14001 / ISO 45001 RESPONSIBILITIES The IATF16949and ISO14001 responsibilities listed below are required for this position. Adhere to all IATF16949 (Quality) / ISO14001 (Environmental) / ISO 45001 (Health & Safety) procedures as related to the operations department function. - Qualifications ... (we'll treat separately) - PHYSICAL DEMANDS ... - WORK ENVIRONMENT ... - What can you expect from us? ... benefits. - Our Core Values ... - Location Cherokee Assembly - Time Type Full time - Contact Person Ginarvia Lamb We need to separate sections. About the role: Could include the introductory paragraphs and summary. Responsibilities: The essential duties list. Requirements: Education and/or experience? The posting has "Education And/Or Experience Minimum of B.S. Degree (Engineering or Manufacturing Operations Preferred). Five years minimum quality supervisory experience. TS16949/ISO 14001 Auditor Certification. VDA Auditor (Preferred)". That's qualifications/requirements. Qualifications: Could include Language Skills, Mathematical Skills, REASONING ABILITY, etc. But the posting lumps them under Qualifications heading. Actually after Education And/Or Experience, there is "Language Skills", "Mathematical Skills", "REASONING ABILITY". Those are qualifications/skills. Skills: Could be language, math, reasoning, maybe also "Proficient with Microsoft Office Software. ASQ certification (Preferred)". That's skills. We need to avoid thin sections. Perhaps combine Requirements and Qualifications into one? But instruction says use those headings if we have content. We could have Requirements (education/experience) and Qualifications (certifications, language, math, reasoning). Skills could be Microsoft Office, ASQ certification. But that may be thin. Better: Use Requirements for education/experience, Qualifications for certifications and language/math/reasoning, Skills for Microsoft Office/ASQ. But we need to ensure each section has substantive content. Let's extract: Education/Experience: - Minimum of B.S. Degree (Engineering or Manufacturing Operations Preferred). - Five years minimum quality supervisory experience. - TS16949/ISO 14001 Auditor Certification. - VDA Auditor (Preferred) Language Skills: - Proficient with Microsoft Office Software. (Actually that's under Language Skills? The posting says "Language Skills Proficient with Microsoft Office Software." That seems odd; maybe misplace. But we treat as language skill: proficiency with MS Office. - ASQ certification (Preferred) (maybe under Language Skills? Actually after Language Skills they list "ASQ certification (Preferred)". We'll treat as skill/certification.) - Have the ability to read, analyze, and interpret general business periodicals, professional journals, technical procedures, or governmental regulations. - Have the ability to write reports, business correspondence, and procedure manuals. - Have the ability to present information and respond to questions from groups of managers, clients, customers, and the general public effectively. Mathematical Skills: - Ability to work with mathematical concepts such as probability and statistical inference, and fundamentals of plane and solid geometry and trigonometry. - Ability to apply concepts such as fractions, percentages, ratios and proportions to practical situations. REASONING ABILITY: - Ability to define problems collects data, establish facts, and draw valid conclusions. - Ability to interpret an extensive variety of technical instructions in mathematical or diagram form and deal with several abstract and concrete variables. Physical Demands and Work Environment: Could be omitted? They are substantive but not requested headings. We could include them under Requirements? Not exactly. The instruction says we can include only those headings listed; but we can also include other headings? It says use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It implies we should use those headings for sections; we could also add other headings if needed? It says "Use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The e.g. suggests those are examples; but likely they want only those headings. Safer to stick to those. So we should not add Physical Demands or Work Environment sections. However we must preserve ALL substantive information. If we omit those, we lose info. But maybe we can incorporate them into existing sections like Responsibilities or Requirements? They are not exactly duties but could be placed under Requirements (maybe as "Working Conditions") but not listed. The instruction says we must not invent or summarize away detail. We could include them as a

  under Responsibilities? Might be okay if we keep them as part of the description. But the instruction about sections: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". It doesn't forbid adding other headings beyond the list, but the examples given are those. Safer to follow the examples and only use those headings. We can embed physical demands and work environment as a paragraph under Responsibilities or Requirements? Might be considered part of the role description. However the instruction says "Use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid other headings, but to be safe, we can add a section "Working Conditions" but that's not in the list; might be considered deviating.