Jobs · Quality Assurance · Massachusetts

Quality Engineer

Litron · Agawam, MA · 2 wk ago
Quality AssuranceFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? The description includes "Ready to help build parts that matter? PacAero is looking for an experienced Quality Engineer..." That's like an intro paragraph. Then "Why Join PacAero?" with bullet list of benefits. Then "What You’ll Do" with responsibilities. Then "What We’re Looking For" with qualifications/requirements. Then "Schedule: Full-time | Day Shift | Onsite in Agawam, MA | Monday–Friday". Also "Expected Compensation" but it's vague: "The anticipated pay range posted for this position represents PacAero (Litron, LLC)’s good-faith estimate of compensation for the role at the time of posting. Actual compensation will be determined based on factors..." This is not a specific range; it's generic. According to rules: do NOT create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. For Pay, we have no specific range; it's generic statement. Should we include Pay section? The rule: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The posting states "Expected Compensation" but does not give a range; it's a generic statement. Likely we should not create a Pay section because it's not substantive. Schedule: they gave schedule details: "Schedule: Full-time | Day Shift | Onsite in Agawam, MA | Monday–Friday". That's specific schedule info, so we should include a Schedule section. Benefits: they list benefits in "Why Join PacAero?" and later "Benefits PacAero offers a comprehensive benefits package...". So we should include Benefits section. We need headings: use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). We need to decide which sections to include based on content. We have: - Intro paragraph: maybe "About the role" or we could just put as

without heading? The instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't say we must have a heading for intro, but we could use About the role heading for the introductory description. However they said "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". So we can have About the role heading. - Responsibilities: "What You’ll Do" section. - Requirements/Qualifications: There's "What We’re Looking For" which includes qualifications and requirements. Also there is a separate "Requirements" list later (looks like a bulleted list of duties? Actually after "What We’re Looking For" there is a "Requirements" heading with a long list of responsibilities again? Let's examine: after "What We’re Looking For" there is a block starting with "Requirements Support manufacturing operations..." That seems like a list of duties (maybe they duplicated). Actually the posting includes a "Requirements" section that lists many bullet-like sentences (no bullet formatting). Then later "Qualifications" with bullet-like list. Then "Preferred Experience". Then "Work Environment & Physical Requirements". Then "Expected Compensation". Then "Benefits". Then EEO etc. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. We should not duplicate content. We need to decide how to structure. We have overlapping content: "What You’ll Do" describes responsibilities. Then later "Requirements" also lists similar responsibilities but maybe more detailed. We should combine? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all points, but we can organize them under appropriate headings without duplication? If we duplicate, that's repeating info, which might be okay but could be considered redundant. Better to combine similar points under one heading, but we must not lose any detail. We can include all points under Responsibilities and Requirements sections, but ensure we don't omit any. We could have sections: - About the role (intro paragraph) - Responsibilities (What You’ll Do + maybe the Requirements list? Actually Requirements list seems like duties as well) - Qualifications (What We’re Looking For + Qualifications + Preferred Experience + Work Environment & Physical Requirements? Actually work environment is separate but could be part of Qualifications or its own section. There's no standard heading for Work Environment, but we could include under Qualifications or as its own section if we want. The instruction only lists example headings; we can add others if needed but better to stick to given ones. However we can still use

for any section heading; not limited to those examples. So we could add a heading like "Work Environment". But the instruction says "Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests those as examples. Safer to use those headings where applicable. For work environment, maybe we can include under Qualifications or Responsibilities? Might be okay to add a Work Environment heading as

as it's substantive. But we need to avoid creating sections with filler. We have concrete info for Work Environment & Physical Requirements, so we can include a section. Similarly, we have "Expected Compensation" but it's vague; we should not create Pay section because no specific range. So we omit Pay. We have Benefits: we have details. We have Schedule: we have specifics. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits, Schedule, Work Environment (maybe). Could also include Requirements as separate if distinct from Qualifications. But we have both Requirements and Qualifications sections in the posting. We could treat "Requirements" as the list of duties (like responsibilities) and "Qualifications" as the education/experience etc. However we already have Responsibilities from "What You’ll Do". The "Requirements" list seems to be similar to responsibilities but maybe more detailed. To avoid duplication, we could merge them under Responsibilities. But we need to preserve all detail; merging is fine as long as we include all points. Thus: - About the role: intro paragraph. - Responsibilities: combine "What You’ll Do" and the "Requirements" list (the long list of duties). We'll output as
  • items. - Qualifications: combine "What We’re Looking For", "Qualifications", "Preferred Experience". Also maybe include Work Environment & Physical Requirements as separate section. - Benefits: from "Why Join PacAero?" and later Benefits paragraph. - Schedule: from the schedule line. - Work Environment & Physical Requirements: its own section. We must not include boilerplate like EEO, ITAR, etc. Now we need to format. We'll produce:

    About the role

    Ready to help build parts that matter? PacAero is looking for an experienced Quality Engineer to join our team in Agawam, MA. In this role, you’ll work directly with Manufacturing, Engineering, and Quality to ensure our products and processes meet the high standards required for critical aerospace and other high-reliability applications. We’re looking for someone who brings hands-on quality engineering experience in a precision manufacturing environment and understands quality beyond the paperwork — someone who can get out on the floor, investigate what happened, lead root cause and corrective action efforts, and work with the team to put sustainable solutions in place.

    Responsibilities

    • Support manufacturing operations to ensure products, processes, and quality systems meet internal, customer, and regulatory requirements.
    • Investigate quality issues, lead root cause and corrective action efforts.
    • Analyze quality data, and partner with teams across the business to improve processes and prevent problems from happening again.
    • Spend time both at your desk and on the manufacturing floor, working directly with Manufacturing, Engineering, customers, and other members of the Quality team.
    • From new product introductions and first article inspections to audits, corrective actions, and continuous improvement, you’ll play an important role in strengthening both product quality and manufacturing performance.
    • Support manufacturing operations to ensure products and processes meet internal, customer, and regulatory quality requirements.
    • Investigate nonconformances and lead root cause analysis and corrective actions using structured problem-solving methods.
    • Partner with Manufacturing and Engineering to resolve quality issues, reduce defects, improve processes, and strengthen product reliability.
    • Review and analyze quality and manufacturing data to identify trends, recurring issues, and opportunities for improvement.
    • Support customer quality inquiries, corrective action requests, and technical responses.
    • Support new product introductions (NPI) to ensure quality requirements are identified, understood, and properly implemented.
    • Review engineering drawings, specifications, customer requirements, and manufacturing documentation to ensure quality requirements are clearly defined.
    • Participate in first article inspections (FAI), product qualification, and production-readiness activities.
    • Support the development and maintenance of quality procedures, inspection plans, work instructions, and related documentation.
    • Support internal, customer, and third-party audits, including AS9100 and Nadcap audits.
    • Work with cross-functional teams to identify and mitigate quality and manufacturing risks.
    • Support and maintain compliance with applicable AS9100, ISO, Nadcap, customer, and internal quality requirements.
    • Lead and support continuous improvement initiatives that strengthen quality systems, manufacturing performance, and customer satisfaction.
    • Maintain accurate quality records and documentation in accordance with established requirements.
    • Perform other related duties as assigned by the Quality Manager.

    Qualifications

    • Bachelor’s degree in Engineering, Quality, Manufacturing, or a related technical field preferred.
    • 3–7 years of direct Quality Engineering experience in a manufacturing environment required.
    • Experience working in a regulated or high-precision manufacturing environment required.
    • Demonstrated experience investigating nonconformances and leading root cause analysis and corrective action.
    • Strong working knowledge of structured problem-solving methodologies and quality tools, including 8D, CAPA, SPC, and related methods.
    • Strong ability to read and interpret engineering drawings, specifications, tolerances, and manufacturing documentation.
    • Experience working directly with Manufacturing and Engineering to investigate and resolve product and process quality issues.
    • Experience analyzing quality and manufacturing data to identify trends and drive corrective or improvement actions.
    • Experience supporting quality management systems and applicable regulatory, customer, or industry requirements.
    • Strong analytical, technical, and problem-solving skills.
    • Strong written and verbal communication skills, including the ability to communicate quality issues and corrective actions across functions.
    • Experience working with ERP systems and quality documentation systems.
    • Proficiency with Microsoft Excel, Word, and other standard business applications.
    • Preferred: Aerospace, defense, medical device, or other high-reliability manufacturing experience.
    • Preferred: Working knowledge of AS9100 requirements.
    • Preferred: Experience with Nadcap processes and audits.
    • Preferred: Experience supporting customer and third-party audits.
    • Preferred: Experience preparing and responding to customer corrective action requests.
    • Preferred: Experience with first article inspection (FAI) requirements and documentation.
    • Preferred: Experience with CNC machining, plating, laser welding, or electronic packaging processes.
    • Preferred: Experience leading or supporting continuous improvement and process-improvement initiatives.

    Benefits

    • Annual bonus opportunity.
    • 12 paid company holidays — including your birthday!
    • Medical, dental, vision, disability coverage & more.
    • 401(k) with up to 4% company match.
    • Employer HSA contribution.
    • Separate PTO and sick time.

Similar jobs

Quality Engineer

Grammer AGBelden, MS· 4 wk ago
Quality Assuranceapply on de.jobsyn.org

Quality Engineer

Applied MedicalRancho Santa Margarita, CA· 1 mo ago
Quality Assurance$71k–$75k/yrapply on careers.appliedmedical.com

Quality Engineer

Corning IncorporatedRochester, NY· 1 mo ago
Engineeringapply on bit.ly

Quality Engineer

MANITOU GroupMadison, SD· 1 mo ago
$60k–$85k/yrapply on careers.manitou-group.com

Quality Engineer

Bastion Technologies, Inc.New Orleans, LA· 2 mo ago
Engineeringapply on bastiontechnologies.applicantpro.com

Quality Engineer

Amsted AutomotiveTaylor, MI· 2 mo ago
Quality Assuranceapply on ars2.equest.com