Principal Product Owner / Architect
for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include sections only when posting has real specific content. We have content for responsibilities (DAY-TO-DAY Key Activities, What You Own Core Responsibilities). Requirements: Required Qualifications. Qualifications: Preferred Qualifications. Skills: maybe combine? Could have Skills section from required/preferred? But we need to follow instructions: Use headings for those categories. We'll map content accordingly. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate: navigation, legal, EEO, etc. Also remove application instructions. The posting includes "Become a part of our caring community" maybe that's intro; we can keep as
maybe under About the role? Actually "About the role" heading could contain the introductory paragraph describing role. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to include details: role description, day-to-day activities, core responsibilities, required qualifications, preferred qualifications, benefits, pay range, schedule (40 hours). Also maybe skills? Could embed skills within qualifications. We must not create sections with placeholder text. So we will include sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills?, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Check if we have content for Skills: The posting mentions many skills (Azure, API design, FHIR, etc.) Could be placed under Skills. But we already have Required Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications which include skills. Might be redundant. However instruction: Use headings for those categories; we can still include Skills if we have specific skill list not covered elsewhere. But we could merge skills into Qualifications. Safer to include Skills section with bullet list of technical skills extracted from Required/Preferred Qualifications. But we must not invent or summarize away detail; we can list them as they appear. Let's extract skills: Hands-on architecture experience with Azure services (Azure API Management, Event Hub, Service Bus, Azure Data Factory, AKS, Azure AD/Entra ID); working knowledge of Snowflake or Databricks data platform patterns. Deep competency in API design and governance, event-driven architecture, and microservices patterns; experience with FHIR R4 and HL7 interoperability standards. Demonstrated ability to produce reference architectures, ADRs, solution blueprints. Experience participating in and translating output from enterprise governance forums (ARB, TRB, MOR). Proficiency in agile and SAFe delivery models: backlog management, PI planning, iteration ceremonies, dependency management across agile release trains. Executive-level communication skills. Generative & Agentic AI: experience incorporating AI/ML capabilities into product strategy and architectural design, including Generative AI use cases such as clinical document NLP, prior authorization automation, member-facing conversational AI, or care gap identification. Working knowledge of LLM integration patterns including RAG, prompt engineering, knowledge management, and fine-tuning; ability to evaluate platform options (Azure OpenAI, Amazon Bedrock, Vertex AI) and make informed build/buy/integrate recommendations. Depth in agent orchestration: planning loops, tool/function calling, multi-agent coordination, and human-in-the-loop override workflows—especially for clinically sensitive or compliance-gated outputs. Familiarity with MLOps/LLMOps practices: model lifecycle governance, observability, evaluation frameworks, and cost/performance optimization at enterprise scale. Understanding of enterprise AI guardrails including responsible AI principles, bias mitigation, policy enforcement, and regulatory considerations specific to healthcare (FDA SaMD guidance, ONC AI framework). Preferred Qualifications includes cross-segment domain depth, agentic AI & platform skills, enterprise architecture & governance. We could put all these under Skills. But we also have Required Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications sections; maybe we should keep those as separate headings and not duplicate. The instruction: Use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid having both Requirements and Qualifications; they are separate. We'll include both.
Thus:
About the role
... introductory paragraph ...
Responsibilities
- ... list items from DAY-TO-DAY Key Activities and What You Own Core Responsibilities ...
Requirements
- ... Required Qualifications bullet points ...
Qualifications
- ... Preferred Qualifications bullet points ...
Skills
- ... maybe we can list technical skills extracted but risk duplication. Could we omit Skills? The instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. If we already have Requirements and Qualifications covering skills, we could omit Skills. But they said use headings for those categories (list). It doesn't say we must include all; we include only when posting has real specific content. We have specific content for Skills (technical skills). However that content is also covered in Requirements/Qualifications. To avoid duplication, we could still include Skills but ensure not duplicate same sentences. Might be okay to include but risk duplication. The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." Duplication is not prohibited but could be considered redundant. Safer to include Skills with bullet list of technical skills that are not already captured as qualifications? But many are.
Maybe better to include Skills section with a concise list of technical competencies extracted from Required/Preferred Qualifications, but we must preserve all info; if we omit some details from Requirements/Qualifications we would lose info. So we need to keep Requirements and Qualifications sections fully. Then Skills could be omitted to avoid thin section. Since we already have Requirements and Qualifications, we can skip Skills. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we can omit Skills.
Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
Now we need to extract content for each.
About the role: The first paragraph: "Become a part of our caring community The Principal Product Owner / Architect is a dual-mandate leadership role that unifies product strategy and solution architecture across CenterWell's four core business segments: Pharmacy, Primary Care Organization (PCO), Home Solutions, and Humana Military. This senior individual contributor serves as the connective tissue between business vision and technical execution—owning cross-segment product roadmaps while simultaneously authoring and governing the architectural blueprints that underpin them. You will operate within CenterWell IT – Cross-CenterWell Architecture, partnering with segment product leaders, engineering teams, EA Activation, security, data, and compliance to deliver integrated, interoperable health solutions that serve members, providers, and partners across the full care continuum. Your decisions shape what gets built, how it gets built, and the standard by which all four segments measure delivery readiness."
We'll put that in
. Responsibilities: Combine DAY-TO-DAY Key Activities and What You Own Core Responsibilities. List items: - Define and own a unified cross-segment product roadmap that balances segment-specific priorities against shared platform investments, and communicates trade-offs clearly to leadership. - Establish and maintain reference architectures, design patterns, and integration standards applicable across all four CenterWell segments. - Conduct cross-segment discovery sessions, design workshops, and architecture reviews to surface shared needs, resolve competing priorities, and prevent duplicative build. - Own and prioritize top-level product backlogs for shared platforms, partnering with segment product owners to decompose initiatives into delivery-ready user stories with clear acceptance criteria and non-functional requirements (NFRs). - Define integration contracts, API standards, and domain boundaries for cross-segment data flows spanning pharmacy, clinical, home health, and military health domains. - Lead architecture checkpoints and risk reviews for cross-segment initiatives; represent the combined product and architecture perspective in governance forums (ARB, TRB, MOR). - Translate product vision into architectural runways and delivery-ready specifications that engineering teams across segments can act on immediately. - Identify and steward opportunities for component and pattern reuse across segments; build the case for platform consolidation where segment convergence creates lasting efficiency. - Serve as the primary liaison between segment business leaders, engineering leads, EA Activation, security, and the enterprise CIO organization. Also from Core Responsibilities: - Own and continuously evolve a shared platform product roadmap spanning Pharmacy, PCO, Home Solutions, and Humana Military. Balance segment-specific priorities against enterprise platform investments; facilitate structured prioritization across competing segment demands, and communicate decisions and rationale clearly to executives and delivery teams alike. - Serve as the architectural decision-maker for cross-segment initiatives. Produce and maintain reference architectures, integration patterns, and design standards that guide delivery teams across all four segments. Author architectural decision records (ADRs) that capture context, alternatives considered, and governing rationale for reuse by future teams. - Own top-level product backlog items for shared platforms and cross-segment capabilities. Partner with segment-level product owners to decompose epics into executable user stories with well-defined acceptance criteria, architectural constraints, and measurable NFRs. Serve as the final arbiter on cross-segment feature scope and dependency sequencing. - Lead architecture and product checkpoints for cross-segment solutions. Ensure all designs conform to enterprise security, privacy, and regulatory requirements including HIPAA/PHI, ONC interoperability rules, and DoD/TRICARE data standards where applicable. Represent the combined product and architecture voice in governance forums (ARB, TRB, MOR). - Define integration contracts, API standards, and domain data boundaries for cross-segment data flows. Ensure observability, data lineage, and end-to-end data protection for shared assets spanning pharmacy benefit, clinical EMR, home health operational, and military health domains on Snowflake, Databricks, and Azure data platforms. - Proactively identify opportunities to reuse components, services, and architectural patterns across segments. Evangelize shared capabilities over duplicated build; build quantitative business cases for platform consolidation where segment convergence creates measurable efficiency and reduces long-term technical debt. - Act as the primary connector between segment business leaders, product owners, engineering leads, EA Activation, security, data, and enterprise CIO teams. Translate complex architectural and product decisions into narratives that resonate at every level—from PI planning rooms to executive briefings—and maintain alignment across four distinct segment operating rhythms. We can merge duplicates; but we need to preserve all substantive information; duplicates okay but we could deduplicate to avoid repetition. However deduplication might be considered summarizing? It's okay to remove duplicate lines as they are redundant; but we must not lose any unique info. Many items repeat. We'll combine unique points. Let's create a unified list: - Define and own a unified cross-segment product roadmap that balances segment-specific priorities against shared/platform investments, communicates trade-offs clearly to leadership/executives. - Establish and maintain reference architectures, design patterns, and integration standards applicable across all four CenterWell segments. - Conduct cross-segment discovery sessions, design workshops, and architecture reviews to surface shared needs, resolve competing priorities, and prevent duplicative build. - Own and prioritize top-level product backlogs for shared platforms, partnering with segment product owners to decompose initiatives into delivery-ready user stories with clear acceptance criteria and non-functional requirements (NFRs). - Define integration contracts, API standards, and domain boundaries for cross-segment data flows spanning pharmacy, clinical, home health, and military health domains. - Lead architecture checkpoints and risk reviews for cross-segment initiatives; represent the combined product and architecture perspective in governance forums (ARB, TRB, MOR). - Translate product vision into architectural runways and delivery-ready specifications that engineering teams across segments can act on immediately. - Identify and steward opportunities for component and pattern reuse across segments; build the case for platform consolidation where segment convergence creates lasting efficiency/measurable efficiency and reduces long-term technical debt. - Serve as the primary liaison/connector between segment business leaders, engineering leads, product owners, EA Activation, security, data, and enterprise CIO organization/teams. - Ensure all designs conform to enterprise security, privacy, and regulatory requirements including HIP