Phillips & Associates | Sexual Harassment, Discrimination, & Employment Lawyers

Rank & Visibility

• Rank: #6 of 320 firms in New York City employment law (plaintiff) category
• Response mention rate: 8.2% ±2.3% (95% confidence)
• Cited by: 3 of 4 AI assistants (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity; not cited by Gemini)
• Total citations: 45 mentions in the latest snapshot

Per-AI Breakdown

• Claude: 32 mentions
• ChatGPT: 3 mentions
• Gemini: 0 mentions
• Perplexity: 10 mentions

By Question Type

• Decision: 28 mentions
• Follow Up: 6 mentions
• Situation: 2 mentions
• Validation: 9 mentions

Winning Prompts (23)

Prompts where AI cited this firm, with other firms also mentioned:

• W-001 (Validation): Wigdor LLP ×8, Fox News ×3, Chambers ×2
• W-002 (Decision): Wigdor LLP ×8, Outten & Golden LLP ×6, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×5
• W-003 (Validation): Liddle & Robinson ×8, Outten & Golden LLP ×4, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×2
• W-004 (Decision): Wigdor LLP ×7, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×5, Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC ×4
• W-005 (Validation): Filippatos PLLC ×7, Martindale-Hubbell ×2, Avvo ×2
• W-006 (Decision): Wigdor LLP ×7, Outten & Golden LLP ×2, Phillips Nizer LLP ×2
• W-007 (Decision): Outten & Golden LLP ×6, Wigdor LLP ×6, Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC ×3
• W-008 (Decision): New York City Bar Association ×4, New York State Bar Association ×3, Avvo ×2
• W-009 (Decision): Outten & Golden LLP ×4, Katz Melinger ×2, Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC ×2
• W-010 (Decision): Wigdor LLP ×4, Outten & Golden LLP ×4, Phillips Nizer LLP ×3

Missing Prompts (77)

Prompts where the firm is not cited. The three firms cited most on each missing prompt are:

• P-001 (Follow Up): Outten & Golden LLP ×8, Wigdor LLP ×1, Boutique Firm X ×1
• P-002 (Validation): Outten & Golden LLP ×8, Martindale-Hubbell ×1, Chambers ×1
• P-003 (Validation): Outten & Golden LLP ×8, Wigdor LLP ×8, Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC ×8
• P-004 (Decision): Outten & Golden LLP ×8, Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C. ×4, Joseph Law Group, P.C. ×2
• P-005 (Situation): New York State Division of Human Rights ×7, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×6, NYC Commission on Human Rights ×6
• P-006 (Decision): Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×6, Legal Aid Society ×4, Legal Aid Society ×4
• P-007 (Decision): Labaton Sucharow LLP ×6, Phillips & Cohen LLP ×5, Zuckerman Law ×4
• P-008 (Situation): New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA) ×6, NY Attorney General ×3, New York State Department of Health ×2
• P-009 (Decision): Outten & Golden LLP ×6, Joseph Law Group, P.C. ×5, Virginia & Ambinder, LLP ×4
• P-010 (Situation): NYC Commission on Human Rights ×5, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×4, Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×3
• P-011 (Situation): NYC Commission on Human Rights ×5, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×4, American Diabetes Association ×2
• P-012 (Situation): United Federation of Teachers ×5, Office of Special Investigations ×5, Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×4
• P-013 (Situation): Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ×4, Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×3, NYC Commission on Human Rights ×3
• P-014 (Situation): Shim Law Group, P.C. ×4, CIR/SEIU ×4, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP ×3
• P-015 (Decision): Joseph Law Group, P.C. ×4, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP ×3, Proskauer Rose LLP ×3

62 more missing prompts not shown. The full list — with verbatim prompt text and every cited firm — is part of a Viclaro audit.

Peer Firms in New York City Employment Law (Plaintiff)

Other firms that ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name in this category:

• #1 Outten & Golden LLP: 27.8% share, cited by 4/4 AI
• #2 Wigdor LLP: 23.6% share, cited by 4/4 AI
• #3 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight: 13.6% share, cited by 4/4 AI
• #4 Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC: 10.9% share, cited by 4/4 AI
• #5 Phillips Nizer LLP: 8.9% share, cited by 3/4 AI
• #7 Joseph Law Group, P.C.: 5.1% share, cited by 3/4 AI
• #8 Terc Law Offices, P.C.: 4.2% share, cited by 3/4 AI
• #9 New York State Division of Human Rights: 3.8% share, cited by 4/4 AI