Mission Development Manager - Air Force & Space Force
for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. Must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, no invented or summarized away detail. Remove boilerplate like EEO, legal, scam warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. Also remove "Why Gallatin?" maybe not a standard heading; but we could treat as maybe "About Gallatin"? Actually there is "About Gallatin" at top. That's a section heading? The instruction: use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should map content to those headings if appropriate. The posting includes "About Gallatin" (company overview). That's not one of the listed examples but could be considered "About the role"? Actually "About Gallatin" is about company, not role. The instruction says use those headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). It doesn't forbid other headings, but says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). Likely they expect we use those headings where applicable. We have content: About Gallatin (company overview). Could map to "About the role"? No, that's about role. There's "About The Role" heading in posting. That matches "About the role". So we will use About the role
and put the content under that.
Then we have responsibilities: "What You'll Do Overview ..." plus bullet-like paragraphs. We'll put under Responsibilities
with - items.
Then requirements/qualifications: there is "Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise", "Enterprise Sales Capability", "Technical & Mission Fluency", "Leadership & Operating Style", "Clearance & Military Experience". Those could be under Requirements or Qualifications. We'll decide: maybe combine into
Requirements
with sub-sections? But we cannot add extra headings beyond those? The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests we use those. Probably we should map content to those categories. Let's see: The posting includes "What We're Looking For" which is qualifications/experience. Also "Bonus Points". Could be under Qualifications. Also "Clearance & Military Experience" could be under Requirements. Also "Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise" etc could be under Skills? Actually Skills could be technical & mission fluency, leadership etc. But we have to decide.
We need to preserve all substantive info. We can create multiple sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to include only those with real content. Pay: The posting mentions "Compensation Gallatin offers competitive compensation commensurate with experience. Actual compensation may vary based on experience, skills, and location. In addition to base salary, we offer a generous equity grant, full healthcare coverage, 401k, unlimited PTO, and the perks of working in a high-caliber, mission-driven environment." That's specific enough for Pay and Benefits. So we can have Pay
with description of compensation (competitive, commensurate, equity grant etc). And Benefits
with healthcare, 401k, unlimited PTO, perks. However the instruction says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state compensation and benefits, so okay.
Schedule: Not mentioned. So omit Schedule.
Now we need to avoid boilerplate: remove EEO, equal opportunity, legal, scam warning, etc. Also remove "Why Gallatin?" maybe not needed but could be considered part of About Gallatin? Actually there is a "Why Gallatin?" section after mission and identity. That's more about company culture; could be part of About Gallatin or maybe we could include as part of About the role? But it's not required. The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. "Why Gallatin?" is not boilerplate; it's part of the posting describing mission and identity. Could be considered part of About Gallatin or maybe a separate section like "Mission and Identity". But we only have allowed headings list; we could put it under About the role? Might be okay to include as a paragraph under About the role or maybe under a separate heading like "Mission and Identity" but that's not in the list. Safer to incorporate into About the role or maybe under a generic
without heading? The instruction says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). It doesn't forbid other headings, but we should likely stick to those. So we can put the mission/identity content under About the role as additional paragraphs.
Now we need to preserve all substantive info: we must not lose any details. Let's extract sections.
First, "About Gallatin": paragraph about rebuilding logistics infrastructure, AI systems, etc.
Then "About The Role": description of role, mission development manager, etc.
Then "What You'll Do Overview": bullet-like responsibilities.
Then "Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise": bullet-like requirements.
Then "Enterprise Sales Capability": bullet-like.
Then "Technical & Mission Fluency": bullet-like.
Then "Leadership & Operating Style": bullet-like.
Then "Clearance & Military Experience": bullet-like.
Then "What We're Looking For": experience requirements.
Then "Bonus Points": additional qualifications.
Then "Mission and Identity": paragraph about mission.
Then "Why Gallatin?": paragraph about why join.
Then "Compensation": paragraph about pay and benefits.
Then EEO etc to remove.
We need to avoid duplication: there may be duplicated lines like "U.S. citizenship and ability to obtain/maintain a security clearance required." appears also later? We'll keep once.
Now we need to format as HTML fragment.
We'll produce:
About the role
... (About Gallatin + About The Role + Mission and Identity + Why Gallatin? maybe)
But we need to separate About Gallatin (company) from About the role. The instruction says do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings. It didn't forbid having multiple sections. So we could have separate About Gallatin
but that's not in the list. However we could treat About Gallatin as part of About the role? Might be okay to have a separate heading but risk not following instruction. The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). It doesn't say you cannot use other headings, but the examples are those. Safer to stick to those headings. So we need to map About Gallatin content somewhere. Could be under About the role as a preamble. Or we could create a About the role
and include both company overview and role description. That seems acceptable.
Thus:
About the role
About Gallatin: At Gallatin, we are rebuilding logistics infrastructure for the national security missions of the United States and allied partners. We build AI systems that determine how logistics decisions are made — not just how they're executed. From factory to foxhole, we operate at the layer where data becomes decisions, and decisions make the advantage.
The Role: Gallatin is hiring a Mission Development Manager — Air Force & Space Force to drive adoption of its Navigator platform across a mission landscape supported by more than $50 billion in annual operating-force investment. This person will help the Air Force and Space Force address consequential challenges in maintenance, sustainment, logistics, readiness, mobility, and contested operations. This is a full-cycle growth role—not an account-management or proposal-coordination position. You will identify high-value mission problems, create net-new opportunities, build relationships with operational and acquisition stakeholders, and lead complex pursuits from initial discovery through award. You will be expected to understand how the Air Force and Space Force operate, translate mission needs into executable opportunities, and position Gallatin’s Navigator platform against consequential logistics, readiness, sustainment, and operational-planning challenges. Success requires equal parts mission credibility, enterprise sales discipline, acquisition fluency, and personal initiative. You will work closely with Gallatin’s Product, Engineering, Solutions, Engagement Management, Capture, and executive teams, but you will remain accountable for developing the territory, creating qualified pipeline, advancing opportunities, and delivering bookings.
Mission and Identity: We are building the system that enables faster, smarter logistics decisions in contested environments, and we're doing it with a team of seasoned entrepreneurs, operators, and technologists who have built and scaled solutions in this space before. We hold ourselves to an extremely high standard. We value clear thinking, direct communication, and the kind of ownership that doesn't stop until something actually works. Our mission is to create decision advantage when the stakes are the highest. If we succeed, the system doesn't just run; it gets smarter. We're not building AI for its own sake. We're building it because faster, smarter decisions in the most demanding environments on earth can't wait. If you want to work somewhere the stakes are real and the mission is urgent — you'll fit in here.
Why Gallatin?: The logistics infrastructure that supports America's warfighters and humanitarian disaster responders is overdue for transformation, and we are building it. From defense operations to disaster response, we're solving the hardest problems that keep missions moving when it matters most. Join a team where the mission is the point.
Now Responsibilities: take the "What You'll Do Overview" bullet points.
We need to convert each sentence into - . The overview includes multiple sentences; we can break into list items.
Let's list:
- Build Gallatin’s Air Force and Space Force business across priority commands, program offices, mission communities, and operational users.
- Identify high-impact problems in logistics, sustainment, readiness, mobility, maintenance, deployment, installation support, and contested operations.
- Engage mission users and leaders to understand operational workflows and translate them into measurable outcomes and executable opportunities.
- Create net-new pipeline and lead qualified pursuits from initial discovery through technical validation, acquisition, negotiation, and award.
- Develop champions, align stakeholders, and navigate funding, contracting, security, and integration requirements.
- Lead territory and account planning while maintaining clear opportunity strategies, close plans, CRM discipline, and accurate forecasts.
- Coordinate Gallatin’s Product, Engineering, Solutions, Capture, and executive teams to deliver mission-aligned solutions and win strategic opportunities.
We'll put under
Responsibilities
with .
Now Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: We need to decide how to split.
We have several categories: Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise, Enterprise Sales Capability, Technical & Mission Fluency, Leadership & Operating Style, Clearance & Military Experience, What We're Looking For, Bonus Points.
We could make sections:
Requirements
with sub-sections? But we cannot add extra headings beyond . Could embed as
with bold? But we need to preserve info. Maybe we can create separate
sections for each category, but they are not in the list. However the instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but it says "use for section
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). Likely they expect we use those headings where applicable. We have content: About Gallatin (company overview). Could map to "About the role"? No, that's about role. There's "About The Role" heading in posting. That matches "About the role". So we will use About the role
and put the content under that.
Then we have responsibilities: "What You'll Do Overview ..." plus bullet-like paragraphs. We'll put under Responsibilities
with - items.
Then requirements/qualifications: there is "Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise", "Enterprise Sales Capability", "Technical & Mission Fluency", "Leadership & Operating Style", "Clearance & Military Experience". Those could be under Requirements or Qualifications. We'll decide: maybe combine into
Requirements
with sub-sections? But we cannot add extra headings beyond those? The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests we use those. Probably we should map content to those categories. Let's see: The posting includes "What We're Looking For" which is qualifications/experience. Also "Bonus Points". Could be under Qualifications. Also "Clearance & Military Experience" could be under Requirements. Also "Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise" etc could be under Skills? Actually Skills could be technical & mission fluency, leadership etc. But we have to decide.
We need to preserve all substantive info. We can create multiple sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to include only those with real content. Pay: The posting mentions "Compensation Gallatin offers competitive compensation commensurate with experience. Actual compensation may vary based on experience, skills, and location. In addition to base salary, we offer a generous equity grant, full healthcare coverage, 401k, unlimited PTO, and the perks of working in a high-caliber, mission-driven environment." That's specific enough for Pay and Benefits. So we can have Pay
with description of compensation (competitive, commensurate, equity grant etc). And Benefits
with healthcare, 401k, unlimited PTO, perks. However the instruction says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state compensation and benefits, so okay.
Schedule: Not mentioned. So omit Schedule.
Now we need to avoid boilerplate: remove EEO, equal opportunity, legal, scam warning, etc. Also remove "Why Gallatin?" maybe not needed but could be considered part of About Gallatin? Actually there is a "Why Gallatin?" section after mission and identity. That's more about company culture; could be part of About Gallatin or maybe we could include as part of About the role? But it's not required. The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. "Why Gallatin?" is not boilerplate; it's part of the posting describing mission and identity. Could be considered part of About Gallatin or maybe a separate section like "Mission and Identity". But we only have allowed headings list; we could put it under About the role? Might be okay to include as a paragraph under About the role or maybe under a separate heading like "Mission and Identity" but that's not in the list. Safer to incorporate into About the role or maybe under a generic
without heading? The instruction says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). It doesn't forbid other headings, but we should likely stick to those. So we can put the mission/identity content under About the role as additional paragraphs.
Now we need to preserve all substantive info: we must not lose any details. Let's extract sections.
First, "About Gallatin": paragraph about rebuilding logistics infrastructure, AI systems, etc.
Then "About The Role": description of role, mission development manager, etc.
Then "What You'll Do Overview": bullet-like responsibilities.
Then "Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise": bullet-like requirements.
Then "Enterprise Sales Capability": bullet-like.
Then "Technical & Mission Fluency": bullet-like.
Then "Leadership & Operating Style": bullet-like.
Then "Clearance & Military Experience": bullet-like.
Then "What We're Looking For": experience requirements.
Then "Bonus Points": additional qualifications.
Then "Mission and Identity": paragraph about mission.
Then "Why Gallatin?": paragraph about why join.
Then "Compensation": paragraph about pay and benefits.
Then EEO etc to remove.
We need to avoid duplication: there may be duplicated lines like "U.S. citizenship and ability to obtain/maintain a security clearance required." appears also later? We'll keep once.
Now we need to format as HTML fragment.
We'll produce:
About the role
... (About Gallatin + About The Role + Mission and Identity + Why Gallatin? maybe)
But we need to separate About Gallatin (company) from About the role. The instruction says do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings. It didn't forbid having multiple sections. So we could have separate About Gallatin
but that's not in the list. However we could treat About Gallatin as part of About the role? Might be okay to have a separate heading but risk not following instruction. The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). It doesn't say you cannot use other headings, but the examples are those. Safer to stick to those headings. So we need to map About Gallatin content somewhere. Could be under About the role as a preamble. Or we could create a About the role
and include both company overview and role description. That seems acceptable.
Thus:
About the role
About Gallatin: At Gallatin, we are rebuilding logistics infrastructure for the national security missions of the United States and allied partners. We build AI systems that determine how logistics decisions are made — not just how they're executed. From factory to foxhole, we operate at the layer where data becomes decisions, and decisions make the advantage.
The Role: Gallatin is hiring a Mission Development Manager — Air Force & Space Force to drive adoption of its Navigator platform across a mission landscape supported by more than $50 billion in annual operating-force investment. This person will help the Air Force and Space Force address consequential challenges in maintenance, sustainment, logistics, readiness, mobility, and contested operations. This is a full-cycle growth role—not an account-management or proposal-coordination position. You will identify high-value mission problems, create net-new opportunities, build relationships with operational and acquisition stakeholders, and lead complex pursuits from initial discovery through award. You will be expected to understand how the Air Force and Space Force operate, translate mission needs into executable opportunities, and position Gallatin’s Navigator platform against consequential logistics, readiness, sustainment, and operational-planning challenges. Success requires equal parts mission credibility, enterprise sales discipline, acquisition fluency, and personal initiative. You will work closely with Gallatin’s Product, Engineering, Solutions, Engagement Management, Capture, and executive teams, but you will remain accountable for developing the territory, creating qualified pipeline, advancing opportunities, and delivering bookings.
Mission and Identity: We are building the system that enables faster, smarter logistics decisions in contested environments, and we're doing it with a team of seasoned entrepreneurs, operators, and technologists who have built and scaled solutions in this space before. We hold ourselves to an extremely high standard. We value clear thinking, direct communication, and the kind of ownership that doesn't stop until something actually works. Our mission is to create decision advantage when the stakes are the highest. If we succeed, the system doesn't just run; it gets smarter. We're not building AI for its own sake. We're building it because faster, smarter decisions in the most demanding environments on earth can't wait. If you want to work somewhere the stakes are real and the mission is urgent — you'll fit in here.
Why Gallatin?: The logistics infrastructure that supports America's warfighters and humanitarian disaster responders is overdue for transformation, and we are building it. From defense operations to disaster response, we're solving the hardest problems that keep missions moving when it matters most. Join a team where the mission is the point.
Now Responsibilities: take the "What You'll Do Overview" bullet points.
We need to convert each sentence into - . The overview includes multiple sentences; we can break into list items.
Let's list:
- Build Gallatin’s Air Force and Space Force business across priority commands, program offices, mission communities, and operational users.
- Identify high-impact problems in logistics, sustainment, readiness, mobility, maintenance, deployment, installation support, and contested operations.
- Engage mission users and leaders to understand operational workflows and translate them into measurable outcomes and executable opportunities.
- Create net-new pipeline and lead qualified pursuits from initial discovery through technical validation, acquisition, negotiation, and award.
- Develop champions, align stakeholders, and navigate funding, contracting, security, and integration requirements.
- Lead territory and account planning while maintaining clear opportunity strategies, close plans, CRM discipline, and accurate forecasts.
- Coordinate Gallatin’s Product, Engineering, Solutions, Capture, and executive teams to deliver mission-aligned solutions and win strategic opportunities.
We'll put under
Responsibilities
with .
Now Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: We need to decide how to split.
We have several categories: Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise, Enterprise Sales Capability, Technical & Mission Fluency, Leadership & Operating Style, Clearance & Military Experience, What We're Looking For, Bonus Points.
We could make sections:
Requirements
with sub-sections? But we cannot add extra headings beyond . Could embed as
with bold? But we need to preserve info. Maybe we can create separate
sections for each category, but they are not in the list. However the instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but it says "use for section
Requirements
with sub-sections? But we cannot add extra headings beyond those? The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests we use those. Probably we should map content to those categories. Let's see: The posting includes "What We're Looking For" which is qualifications/experience. Also "Bonus Points". Could be under Qualifications. Also "Clearance & Military Experience" could be under Requirements. Also "Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise" etc could be under Skills? Actually Skills could be technical & mission fluency, leadership etc. But we have to decide.
We need to preserve all substantive info. We can create multiple sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to include only those with real content. Pay: The posting mentions "Compensation Gallatin offers competitive compensation commensurate with experience. Actual compensation may vary based on experience, skills, and location. In addition to base salary, we offer a generous equity grant, full healthcare coverage, 401k, unlimited PTO, and the perks of working in a high-caliber, mission-driven environment." That's specific enough for Pay and Benefits. So we can have Pay
with description of compensation (competitive, commensurate, equity grant etc). And Benefits
with healthcare, 401k, unlimited PTO, perks. However the instruction says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state compensation and benefits, so okay.
Schedule: Not mentioned. So omit Schedule.
Now we need to avoid boilerplate: remove EEO, equal opportunity, legal, scam warning, etc. Also remove "Why Gallatin?" maybe not needed but could be considered part of About Gallatin? Actually there is a "Why Gallatin?" section after mission and identity. That's more about company culture; could be part of About Gallatin or maybe we could include as part of About the role? But it's not required. The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. "Why Gallatin?" is not boilerplate; it's part of the posting describing mission and identity. Could be considered part of About Gallatin or maybe a separate section like "Mission and Identity". But we only have allowed headings list; we could put it under About the role? Might be okay to include as a paragraph under About the role or maybe under a separate heading like "Mission and Identity" but that's not in the list. Safer to incorporate into About the role or maybe under a generic
without heading? The instruction says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). It doesn't forbid other headings, but we should likely stick to those. So we can put the mission/identity content under About the role as additional paragraphs.
Now we need to preserve all substantive info: we must not lose any details. Let's extract sections.
First, "About Gallatin": paragraph about rebuilding logistics infrastructure, AI systems, etc.
Then "About The Role": description of role, mission development manager, etc.
Then "What You'll Do Overview": bullet-like responsibilities.
Then "Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise": bullet-like requirements.
Then "Enterprise Sales Capability": bullet-like.
Then "Technical & Mission Fluency": bullet-like.
Then "Leadership & Operating Style": bullet-like.
Then "Clearance & Military Experience": bullet-like.
Then "What We're Looking For": experience requirements.
Then "Bonus Points": additional qualifications.
Then "Mission and Identity": paragraph about mission.
Then "Why Gallatin?": paragraph about why join.
Then "Compensation": paragraph about pay and benefits.
Then EEO etc to remove.
We need to avoid duplication: there may be duplicated lines like "U.S. citizenship and ability to obtain/maintain a security clearance required." appears also later? We'll keep once.
Now we need to format as HTML fragment.
We'll produce:
About the role
... (About Gallatin + About The Role + Mission and Identity + Why Gallatin? maybe)
But we need to separate About Gallatin (company) from About the role. The instruction says do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings. It didn't forbid having multiple sections. So we could have separate About Gallatin
but that's not in the list. However we could treat About Gallatin as part of About the role? Might be okay to have a separate heading but risk not following instruction. The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). It doesn't say you cannot use other headings, but the examples are those. Safer to stick to those headings. So we need to map About Gallatin content somewhere. Could be under About the role as a preamble. Or we could create a About the role
and include both company overview and role description. That seems acceptable.
Thus:
About the role
About the role
and include both company overview and role description. That seems acceptable. Thus:About the role
About Gallatin: At Gallatin, we are rebuilding logistics infrastructure for the national security missions of the United States and allied partners. We build AI systems that determine how logistics decisions are made — not just how they're executed. From factory to foxhole, we operate at the layer where data becomes decisions, and decisions make the advantage.
The Role: Gallatin is hiring a Mission Development Manager — Air Force & Space Force to drive adoption of its Navigator platform across a mission landscape supported by more than $50 billion in annual operating-force investment. This person will help the Air Force and Space Force address consequential challenges in maintenance, sustainment, logistics, readiness, mobility, and contested operations. This is a full-cycle growth role—not an account-management or proposal-coordination position. You will identify high-value mission problems, create net-new opportunities, build relationships with operational and acquisition stakeholders, and lead complex pursuits from initial discovery through award. You will be expected to understand how the Air Force and Space Force operate, translate mission needs into executable opportunities, and position Gallatin’s Navigator platform against consequential logistics, readiness, sustainment, and operational-planning challenges. Success requires equal parts mission credibility, enterprise sales discipline, acquisition fluency, and personal initiative. You will work closely with Gallatin’s Product, Engineering, Solutions, Engagement Management, Capture, and executive teams, but you will remain accountable for developing the territory, creating qualified pipeline, advancing opportunities, and delivering bookings.
Mission and Identity: We are building the system that enables faster, smarter logistics decisions in contested environments, and we're doing it with a team of seasoned entrepreneurs, operators, and technologists who have built and scaled solutions in this space before. We hold ourselves to an extremely high standard. We value clear thinking, direct communication, and the kind of ownership that doesn't stop until something actually works. Our mission is to create decision advantage when the stakes are the highest. If we succeed, the system doesn't just run; it gets smarter. We're not building AI for its own sake. We're building it because faster, smarter decisions in the most demanding environments on earth can't wait. If you want to work somewhere the stakes are real and the mission is urgent — you'll fit in here.
Why Gallatin?: The logistics infrastructure that supports America's warfighters and humanitarian disaster responders is overdue for transformation, and we are building it. From defense operations to disaster response, we're solving the hardest problems that keep missions moving when it matters most. Join a team where the mission is the point.
Now Responsibilities: take the "What You'll Do Overview" bullet points. We need to convert each sentence intoResponsibilities
with- .
Now Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: We need to decide how to split.
We have several categories: Air Force / Space Force Domain Expertise, Enterprise Sales Capability, Technical & Mission Fluency, Leadership & Operating Style, Clearance & Military Experience, What We're Looking For, Bonus Points.
We could make sections:
Requirements
with sub-sections? But we cannot add extra headings beyond. Could embed as
with bold? But we need to preserve info. Maybe we can create separate