Manager, Third Party Risk Management

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? The posting includes intro paragraph about KPMG, then "KPMG is currently seeking a Manager, Third Party Risk...". The instructions: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading. Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We need to decide which sections to include based on content. Content includes: - Intro paragraph about KPMG (company description). Could be "About the role"? Actually "About the role" would be description of the role, but we have responsibilities and qualifications. The intro about KPMG could be considered "About the role"? Might be better as a paragraph before sections. The instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have sections: About the role (maybe summarizing the role description), Responsibilities, Qualifications (maybe combine Requirements and Qualifications?), Benefits, Pay (they gave salary range for California and mention benefits). They also mention "KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package." They gave salary range for California: $96600 - $185000. Also mention benefits: medical, dental, vision, disability, life insurance, 401(k), personal well-being benefits, PTO, holidays, breaks. So we have Pay and Benefits sections with concrete info. Schedule: Not mentioned. So we should not include Schedule. Skills: Not explicitly listed as separate; qualifications include skills like communication, problem solving, etc. Could be included under Qualifications or Skills. But we should avoid thin sections. Perhaps combine Qualifications and Skills into one "Qualifications" section that includes both requirements and skills. The instruction list includes Requirements and Qualifications as separate possible headings, but we can choose to include only those with substantive content. We have qualifications (experience, education, certifications, understanding, etc.) and also skills (communication, problem solving, analytical, etc.). Both are substantive. Could make two sections: Qualifications (experience, education, certifications) and Skills (communication, problem solving, etc.). But we need to avoid thin sections; each should have substantive content. Both have multiple bullet points. Alternatively, we could have a single "Qualifications and Skills" section but the instruction only allows those specific headings. It says "Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests those as examples. Safer to stick to those headings. We can include Requirements and Qualifications separately if we have content for each. Let's see: Requirements: maybe the minimum experience, education, authorization to work. Qualifications: advanced understanding, etc. But the posting lumps them together under "Qualifications:" heading. It includes: Minimum five years of recent Third-Party Risk/Vendor Risk, compliance or similar experience within a large professional services environment; Bachelor's degree ...; relevant industry certifications ...; Advanced understanding ...; Solid understanding ...; Serve as a change agent ...; Strong verbal/written communication, problem solving, analytical and independent judgment skills ...; Applicants must be authorized to work in the U.S. ... So that's a mix of requirements and skills. Could split: Requirements: experience, education, certifications, work authorization. Qualifications: advanced understanding, solid understanding, change agent, communication skills, etc. But the instruction says not to create sections with filler. Both would have content. We also have Responsibilities section with bullet points. We have About the role: maybe the introductory paragraph describing KPMG and the role. Could be considered "About the role". We'll include that as a paragraph. We have Benefits: they describe benefits package. We have Pay: they give California salary range and mention compensation package. We should not include Schedule. We must remove boilerplate: EEO, equal opportunity, visa sponsorship details? The visa sponsorship is substantive (Applicants must be authorized to work in the U.S. without need for employment-based visa sponsorship now or in the future; KPMG LLP will not sponsor applicants for U.S. work visa status for this opportunity (no sponsorship is available for H-1B, L-1, TN, O-1, E-3, H-1B1, F-1, J-1, OPT, CPT or any other employment-based visa)). That's a requirement about work authorization, so we keep it. We must remove duplicated lines, cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, application instructions. The posting includes many EEO statements at the end; we should remove those. Also remove "No phone calls or agencies please." etc. Also remove "KPMG recruits on a rolling basis." etc. Also remove "Los Angeles County applicants: Material job duties for this position are listed above." etc. That's maybe considered boilerplate? It's location-specific legal notice; might be considered boilerplate but it's about criminal history and Fair Chance Act. Might be considered legal boilerplate; we should remove it per instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. So remove that. Also remove "Follow this link to obtain salary ranges by city outside of CA: https://kpmg.com/us/en/how-we-work/pay-transparency.html/?id=7224_9_26". That's a link for salary ranges; maybe considered part of Pay section? It's a reference; but we already have California salary range. The link is extra; could be considered boilerplate? It's a link for more info; maybe we keep it as part of Pay? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The link is substantive? It's a reference for salary ranges outside CA. Might be considered part of Pay info. But we could keep it as a link within Pay section. However, the instruction says to remove duplicated lines, etc. Not sure. I'd keep it as a link in Pay section. Also remove "KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package." That's generic but we already have Benefits and Pay sections; could be considered boilerplate but it's a statement; we might keep it as part of Benefits or Pay intro. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown. Let's structure:

About the role

Known for being a great place to work and build a career, KPMG provides audit, tax and advisory services for organizations in today's most important industries. Our growth is driven by delivering real results for our clients. It's also enabled by our culture, which encourages individual development, embraces an inclusive environment, rewards innovative excellence and supports our communities. With qualities like those, it's no wonder we're consistently ranked among the best companies to work for by Fortune Magazine, Consulting Magazine, Seramount, Fair360 and others. If you're as passionate about your future as we are, join our team. KPMG is currently seeking a Manager, Third Party Risk to join our Enterprise Security Services organization.

Responsibilities

• Apply a thorough knowledge of Third-Party and Supplier Risk to provide input to and execute a multi-disciplined strategy and framework, with the ability to enable leadership to make informed, risk-based decisions across disparate categories of Third-Party Risk, for example, operations, cyber, information handling, physical security, resiliency
• Build and maintain trust-based relationships with peers and leaders; evaluate compliance and risk reduction and mitigation activities to continually drive towards risk reduction methodologies
• Manage the day-to-day business operations with leadership oversight of the technology systems utilized by the Third-Party Risk Management program
• Evaluate the changing operating landscape and determine its impact on current processes, obligations, and external expectations; recommend changes to strategy to ensure consistency with current policy requirements and best practices
• Provide direct compliance oversight for the Third-Party Risk Management program
• May oversee work product(s) and lead entire small to medium size projects, managing deadlines, expectations, and often contributing to staffing decisions and supervising the work performed by more junior staff; provide coaching, mentoring and feedback to such individuals and may also serve as a formal performance manager of a team of junior employees
• Act with integrity, professionalism, and personal responsibility to uphold KPMG's respectful and courteous work environment

Qualifications

• Minimum five years of recent Third-Party Risk/Vendor Risk, compliance or similar experience within a large professional services environment
• Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university is preferred; minimum of a high school diploma or GED required; relevant industry certifications, for example, CRVPM or CTPRP preferred
• Advanced understanding of Third-Party Risk and Compliance Programs and supporting technology solutions with the ability to analyze and synthesize technical data and convey it to non-technical audiences
• Solid understanding of key business objectives and how to balance business objectives against risks
• Serve as a change agent for the TPRM function across the organization
• Strong verbal/written communication, problem solving, analytical and independent judgment skills to support an environment driven by customer service and teamwork; ability to positively influence, mentor and be a credible source of knowledge to less experienced team members
• Applicants must be authorized to work in the U.S. without the need for employment-based visa sponsorship now or in the future; KPMG LLP will not sponsor applicants for U.S. work visa status for this opportunity (no sponsorship is available for H-1B, L-1, TN, O-1, E-3, H-1B1, F-1, J-1, OPT, CPT or any other employment-based visa)

Benefits

• Comprehensive, competitive benefits package including medical and dental plans, vision coverage, disability and life insurance, 401(k) plans, and a robust suite of personal well-being benefits to support mental health
• Personal Time Off per fiscal year (based on job classification, standard work hours, and years of service)
• Calendar of holidays observed each year; eligible employees receive two breaks each year where PTO is not required (year‑end and around July 4th)

Pay

California Salary Range: $96,600 - $185,000. For salary ranges by city outside of CA, see KPMG Pay Transparency page. KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package.

We should ensure we didn't include any filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present. We removed EEO boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions, etc. Check for any leftover boilerplate: The paragraph about "KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package." is generic but we kept it in Pay section; maybe it's okay. Could be considered boilerplate but