Manager, Skills and Workforce Planning Technology
for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting includes: description about KPMG (intro) maybe "About the role"? Actually there is a paragraph describing KPMG and encouraging to join. That could be "About the role" or maybe "About the company". But we must follow headings list: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
We have content: Responsibilities (multiple bullet-like sentences). Qualifications (list). Also there is mention of benefits: "comprehensive, competitive benefits package... medical and dental plans, vision coverage, disability and life insurance, 401(k) plans, personal well-being benefits... Personal Time Off... holidays... two breaks each year..." So Benefits section exists.
Pay: there is salary range: California Salary Range: $91770 - $212750 and link to pay transparency. Also mention "KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package." So Pay section can include salary range.
Schedule: Not explicitly mentioned. There's mention of standard work hours? Not given. So we should not include Schedule if no specific content.
Skills: Could be derived from qualifications? But we have a separate Skills heading maybe for skills like "Experience implementing or supporting Workday Workforce Planning solutions... Hands-on knowledge of modeling or BI reporting tools... Demonstrated ability to manage multiple distinct technology projects... Solid understanding of Agile/Scrum processes... Proven ability to build consensus..." Those are more qualifications/skills. Could place under Skills. But we also have Qualifications heading for education/experience requirements. The posting includes "Qualifications:" with bullet list of experience, degree, etc. So we should put that under Qualifications. Skills could be separate if there are specific skill statements not covered. However the qualifications list includes many skill-like items. To avoid duplication, we could put skill-related items under Skills and keep Qualifications for education/experience. But the posting lumps them together under "Qualifications:" with bullet points that include experience, degree, experience implementing Workday, hands-on knowledge, ability to manage multiple projects, understanding of Agile, ability to build consensus. Those are qualifications/skills. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe combine Qualifications and Skills into one section? But we must follow headings list; we can omit Skills if no distinct content beyond Qualifications. However we need to decide.
We have "Responsibilities:" section clearly.
We have "Qualifications:" section.
We have Benefits.
We have Pay.
We could also have "About the role": the introductory paragraph about KPMG and the role description before Responsibilities. That seems appropriate.
Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay.
We should not include Skills (since covered). Not include Schedule.
Now we need to format: About the role
then
with the intro text (the paragraph about KPMG being great place to work, etc.) Ensure we preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove lines like "Applicants must be authorized to work in the U.S...." that's a requirement; that's part of Qualifications? Actually it's a requirement about work authorization. Should we keep? It's substantive. It's under Qualifications maybe. The posting includes that after Qualifications bullet list. It's a requirement; we should keep it. Also the EEO statement etc is boilerplate; remove. Also "No phone calls or agencies please." etc remove. Also "KPMG recruits on a rolling basis..." remove. Also "Los Angeles County applicants: Material job duties..." that's a legal notice; maybe remove as boilerplate? It's specific to location but still legal. The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is legal; remove. Also "KPMG is an equal opportunity employer." remove. Also "KPMG complies with all applicable federal..." remove. Also "The attached link contains further information..." remove. Also "No phone calls or agencies please." remove. Also "KPMG recruits on a rolling basis..." remove. Also "Los Angeles County applicants..." remove. Also "Additional details about our benefits can be found towards the bottom of our KPMG US Careers site at Benefits & How We Work." That's a reference; maybe keep? It's about benefits but it's a link; could keep as part of Benefits? Might be considered boilerplate? It's a pointer to more details; but we can keep the benefits description and maybe drop the link. The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The link is not substantive detail about benefits; it's a reference. Could drop. Also "Follow this link to obtain salary ranges by city outside of CA: https://kpmg.com/us/en/how-we-work/pay-transparency.html/?id=1232BPG_9_26" That's a link for pay transparency; we could keep as part of Pay? It's a reference; maybe keep as part of Pay? It's not substantive salary info but a link. Might be considered boilerplate? It's a link to salary ranges; could keep as part of Pay but it's not required. The instruction: remove duplicated lines, application instructions. This is not application instruction; it's a link for salary ranges. Might be okay to keep as part of Pay. But we already have California Salary Range. Could include the link as part of Pay. Also "KPMG offers a comprehensive compensation and benefits package." That's duplicate of benefits; we can keep. Now we need to ensure we don't include filler like "commensurate with experience" etc. Not present. Now craft HTML. About the role paragraph: combine the intro sentences: "Known for being a great place to work and build a career, KPMG provides audit, tax and advisory services for organizations in today's most important industries. Our growth is driven by delivering real results for our clients. It's also enabled by our culture, which encourages individual development, embraces an inclusive environment, rewards innovative excellence and supports our communities. With qualities like those, it's no wonder we're consistently ranked among the best companies to work for by Fortune Magazine, Consulting Magazine, Seramount, Fair360 and others. If you're as passionate about your future as we are, join our team. KPMG is currently seeking a Manager, Skills & Workforce Planning Technology to to join our Talent & Culture Technology & Data organization." Note there is a typo "to to". We should preserve as is? Probably keep exactly as given. But we could correct? Instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The typo is part of the text; we should keep it. So keep "to to". Now Responsibilities: we need to put as
- items. The responsibilities are a long string with semicolons separating duties. We need to split into list items. The text: "Serve as the dedicated functional subject matter specialist for the firm's skills intelligence and taxonomy platforms (for example ProFinda), driving system adoption, taxonomy maintenance, and capability expansion; manage end-to-end skills data, ensuring a smooth data synchronization between HR systems, learning platforms, and operational tools; partner with HR Digital and practice leaders to embed skills data into workforce planning, upskilling initiatives, and staffing workflowsServe as the functional point of contact for strategic workforce modeling platforms, aligning long-term business strategy with skills availability and future capacity demands; consult, design, and support configuration of the Workday Workforce Planning module, as well as other KPMG workforce planning technologies and solutions; adapt dynamically to manage a variety of simultaneous projects, system configurations, and data integrations across the RM, skills, and talent landscapeCoordinate integrations and data consistency across skills intelligence (for example ProFinda), workforce planning models, core HCM, and resource deployment platforms (for example Certinia / Salesforce); dynamically manage concurrent projects and configurations across the broader talent, skills, and deployment technology stack; establish and monitor data governance standards, taxonomy update protocols, user access, and system compliancePartner with third-party software vendors to track product defects, advocate for core product enhancements, and govern product licenses and exceptions; foster strong partnerships across Talent & Culture CoEs, functional business owners, and Digital Nexus to deliver smooth platform enhancementsDesign test scenarios, coordinate User Acceptance Testing (UAT), triage defects, and validate system changes prior to enterprise release; partner with functional owners to develop training guides, FAQs, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and release notes to drive high user adoption of new tools and featuresAct with integrity, professionalism, and personal responsibility to uphold KPMG's respectful and courteous work environment"
We need to split by semicolons, but note some sentences missing spaces before next. Eg "...staffing workflowsServe as the functional point..." There's missing space. We'll still split at semicolons; the resulting items may have concatenated words. We should preserve the text as is, but we can add a space? Better to keep original text; splitting may produce odd items but it's okay.
Let's split manually:
1. Serve as the dedicated functional subject matter specialist for the firm's skills intelligence and taxonomy platforms (for example ProFinda), driving system adoption, taxonomy maintenance, and capability expansion
2. manage end-to-end skills data, ensuring a smooth data synchronization between HR systems, learning platforms, and operational tools
3. partner with HR Digital and practice leaders to embed skills data into workforce planning, upskilling initiatives, and staffing workflowsServe as the functional point of contact for strategic workforce modeling platforms, aligning long-term business strategy with skills availability and future capacity demands
4. consult, design, and support configuration of the Workday Workforce Planning module, as well as other KPMG workforce planning technologies and solutions
5. adapt dynamically to manage a variety of simultaneous projects, system configurations, and data integrations across the RM, skills, and talent landscapeCoordinate integrations and data consistency across skills intelligence (for example ProFinda), workforce planning models, core HCM, and resource deployment platforms (for example Certinia / Salesforce)
6. dynamically manage concurrent projects and configurations across the broader talent, skills, and deployment technology stack
7. establish and monitor data governance standards, taxonomy update protocols, user access, and system compliancePartner with third-party software vendors to track product defects, advocate for core product enhancements, and govern product licenses and exceptions
8. foster strong partnerships across Talent & Culture CoEs, functional business owners, and Digital Nexus to deliver smooth platform enhancementsDesign test scenarios, coordinate User Acceptance Testing (UAT), triage defects, and validate system changes prior to enterprise release
9. partner with functional owners to develop training guides, FAQs, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and release notes to drive high user adoption of new tools and featuresAct with integrity, professionalism, and personal responsibility to uphold KPMG's respectful and courteous work environment
But some items still have concatenated phrases due to missing spaces. Might be okay.
Alternatively we could keep responsibilities as a paragraph
but instruction says use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So we must use list. Now Qualifications: The bullet list after "Qualifications:" includes: - Minimum five years of recent professional experience, with minimum three years focused on tech implementation, systems analysis, or product management within HR, skills, or workforce management systems - Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university in management information systems (MIS), business administration, human resources, computer science, or a related field or seven years of work experience preferred; minimum of a high school diploma or GED is required - Experience implementing or supporting Workday Workforce Planning solutions (Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Illuminate) and/or Skills-mapping (for example ProFinda) platforms; Hands-on knowledge of modeling