Literacy Leadership Consultant | Elementary

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually we need to use headings for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include only sections with real specific content. The posting includes: Brief Description About K12 Coalition (maybe not needed as heading? Could be "About the role"? Actually "About the role" is a heading for description of role. The posting includes "The Opportunity" describing role. Could map to "About the role". Then responsibilities: "What You’ll Do" list. Then qualifications: "Qualifications Required:" and "Preferred Background:" maybe under Requirements? Actually we have "Qualifications Required:" and "Preferred Background:" plus "Skill Qualifications". Could combine into Requirements and Skills sections. Also we have "How We Work at K12 Coalition" (core competencies) maybe not needed. Compensation Range: Pay section. Travel and location info maybe under Schedule? Not exactly schedule but we have travel expectations, office hours. Could put under Schedule? The instruction: include Schedule section only if posting actually states them. It does mention travel expectations, office hours, site visit days. That's schedule-ish. Could include Schedule section with travel and hours. Benefits: not mentioned. So omit Benefits. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID. Remove boilerplate like EEO, etc. Also remove duplicated lines (the posting repeats some sections near end). We need to preserve all substantive info, not invent. We need to use

for section headings. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use

  for prose. We need to decide sections: - About the role (maybe from "The Opportunity" paragraph) - Responsibilities (from "What You’ll Do") - Requirements (maybe from "Qualifications Required:" plus maybe "Preferred Background:"? but Preferred could be under Skills? Actually "Preferred Background:" includes abilities etc. Could be under Skills or Requirements. We'll treat Requirements as required qualifications, and Skills as skill qualifications (the list after "Skill Qualifications"). - Skills (from "Skill Qualifications" list) - Pay (from Compensation Range) - Schedule (from Travel, Office Hours, etc.) We must not create sections with filler like "not specified". Ensure we have real content. We need to extract content precisely. Let's parse the posting: Brief Description About K12 Coalition ... (maybe not needed as heading; could be part of About the role? But we have separate About the role heading for role description. The brief description about company could be omitted? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include that info somewhere. Could be in a paragraph before headings? The instruction says use headings for sections; we can have a

  before first heading? Probably okay. But we need to include the company description. Could put it under a heading "About K12 Coalition"? Not in allowed headings list. Allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we must fit company description into one of those. Perhaps "About the role" can include company description as part of role context. Or we could put it as a

  before any heading. The instruction: "Use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid other headings, but says use those for section headings. Likely they expect only those headings. So we need to embed company description within About the role paragraph. Thus About the role section will contain: description of K12 Coalition, Keys to Literacy, and the opportunity description. Let's extract: About K12 Coalition: "K12 Coalition provides products and services that help K-12 schools and teachers achieve transformational learning outcomes. We tackle many of today’s toughest education obstacles, including teacher certification, test preparation, professional learning, curriculum, consulting, and strategic planning. K12 Coalition came together when educators with deep experience as teachers, school leaders, and high-level district administrators observed a genuine need for something better. Our divisions include iteach, Passage Preparation, Teaching Channel, Keys to Literacy and Lavinia Group." About Keys To Literacy: "Keys to Literacy is dedicated to strengthening reading and writing instruction at every level through evidence-based literacy coaching, leadership development, and professional learning. Grounded in the belief that literacy is the foundation for all learning and essential to long-term success, our work centers on equipping educators and leaders with the knowledge and tools to drive meaningful outcomes for students. We partner with educators, school and district leaders, State Departments of Education, and Institutions of Higher Education to deliver comprehensive literacy solutions. Through professional development, coaching, consulting, and training, we provide support across in-person, virtual, and asynchronous formats to meet the evolving needs of our partners. Keys to Literacy brings deep expertise and a sustained commitment to advancing effective, research-aligned literacy instruction." The Opportunity: "The Literacy Leadership Consultant partners with district and school leaders to improve the systems and structures necessary for increased literacy outcomes that are aligned with the Science of Reading. Through leadership/instructional coaching utilizing a job-embedded professional learning model, this role supports instructional leaders in implementing evidence-based literacy practices. The consultant works collaboratively with school leadership to implement the structures necessary for data analysis, assessment, intervention, collaboration and professional development, thereby increasing literacy outcomes for all students. The Literacy Leadership Consultant reports to the Vice President of Professional Learning." We can combine these into About the role. Responsibilities: "What You’ll Do" bullet list: - Build strong, trust-based relationships with principals, instructional coaches, and district leaders to understand current systems, priorities, and instructional context. - Use a structured literacy needs assessment and multiple data sources to identify root causes, set goals, and determine actionable next steps to improve literacy outcomes. - Examine schoolwide literacy data (screening, diagnostic, progress monitoring, and outcome data) to inform instructional priorities, intervention planning, and systems-level decision-making. - Deliver ongoing, job-embedded coaching to school leaders that strengthens their ability to lead effective literacy instruction aligned to the Science of Reading and structured literacy. - Support leaders in establishing and refining systems for data use, intervention, professional learning, and collaborative planning (e.g., PLCs). - Design and deliver targeted professional learning experiences that build leadership capacity and support implementation of evidence-based literacy practices. - Engage leaders in clear, evidence-based conversations that promote reflection, ownership, and follow-through on instructional priorities. - Develop leaders’ ability to independently implement, monitor, and refine literacy systems to ensure long-term impact. - Collaborate with leadership teams to design and execute strategic, multi-year plans for sustained literacy improvement. - Other Duties: Support the team with additional tasks and responsibilities as needed to help meet evolving organizational goals and objectives. We need to put each as

  . Requirements: "Qualifications Required:" list: - Masters (preferred areas: administration, special education, reading) - Reading and Administration experience (e.g., building principal, district level administrator or state level leader) - Successful school or systems level experience in improving literacy outcomes for students - Experience in improving school systems designated as "in need of improvement" - Experience using and leading the use of literacy assessment tools, including screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring assessments to guide instructional planning and support decision-making - Experience in working in Title 1 school settings - Ability to guide building leadership in strategic decision-making that leads to measurable improvements in student outcomes. Also "Preferred Background:" list (maybe could be under Requirements as preferred, but we could treat as part of Requirements or Skills. Since we have Skills section separate, we could put Preferred Background under Skills? But it's more about experience/abilities. However we have Skill Qualifications list later. Let's treat Requirements as the required qualifications (the list above). Preferred Background could be placed under Skills or maybe also under Requirements as "Preferred". But instruction: we should not create sections with filler. We have content for Preferred Background, we could include it under Requirements as a sub-list? But we need to follow pattern: Use

  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So we can have a list that includes both required and preferred? Might be confusing. Better to keep Requirements as required qualifications, and put Preferred Background under Skills (since it's about abilities). However Skills section already has "Skill Qualifications" list. We could merge Preferred Background into Skills. Let's extract Skill Qualifications: - Ability to build trust and strong professional relationships with school and district leaders. - Strong organizational and project management skills, with the ability to manage multiple schools, timelines, and priorities simultaneously. - Proficiency with technology to support virtual meetings, data analysis, planning, navigating the digital HQIM platform, and/or providing professional learning. - Excellent written communication skills, with the ability to clearly convey complex ideas to diverse audiences including principals, coaches, and district leaders. - Adaptable and flexible - Strong facilitation skills to lead meetings and professional learning while navigating productive conversations, addressing challenges, and maintaining accountability. - Ability to synthesize research, data, and practical experience to support strategic decision-making. - Strong problem-solving and critical-thinking skills to address challenges related to literacy implementation and strengthening leadership systems. Preferred Background list: - Ability to coach instructional leaders including principals, district leadership and instructional coaches in providing effective instructional feedback to teachers in following a structured literacy approach. - Experience with implementation and/or usage of High-quality instructional materials (HQIM) - Knowledge of evidence-based intervention programs - An understanding of strong models of a literacy block and experience with creating a master schedule that ensures cohesion across tiers of instruction We could combine these into Skills section (since they are abilities/knowledge). So Skills section will contain both Skill Qualifications and Preferred Background items. Pay: "Compensation Range The Estimated Daily Rate For Each Piece Of Onsite Work Ranges From $645 To $845 Per Day, Inclusive Of Preparatory Time. This Calculation Is Based On: $80 - $100/hour for onsite work or virtual billable time $50/hour for non-billable time, such as administration tasks or internal meetings" Later duplicate: "The Estimated Daily Rate For Each Piece Of Onsite Work Ranges From $645 To $845 Per Day, Inclusive Of Preparatory Time. This Calculation Is Based On: $85/hour for onsite work or virtual billable time $50/hour for non-billable time, such as administration tasks or internal meetings" We need to preserve all substantive info; we can note the range and the calculation. There's slight variation: first says $80 - $100/hour, second says $85/hour. We should include both? Probably we should include the range and note the calculation as described. Could combine: $645-$845 per day, based on $80-$100/hour for onsite/virtual billable time and $50/hour for non-billable. The second duplicate says $85/hour (maybe a specific). To preserve all, we could mention both calculations: based on $80-$100/hour (or $85/hour) for onsite work... But that might be confusing. Perhaps we just include the first calculation and note that the rate is $645-$845 per day. The duplicate is essentially same info; we can omit duplicate as it's repetitive. The instruction: remove duplicated lines. So we keep one instance. Schedule: from "Employment Type: Part-Time Variable Non-Exempt Hourly Location: This is a remote position with expectations of on-site partnership. This position requires weekly travel to partner school sites. We are specifically targeting candidates located in the central and eastern time-zones. Travel: Travel typically is up to 6-8 days on site per month. Office Hours: Please plan to spend on average 7 hours per day at a school visit. Site visit days require up to a half day of remote preparation work." We need to put Schedule section with these details. We also have Employment Type: Part-Time Variable Non-Exempt Hourly.