Liddle & Robinson
Viclaro · Robinson, VA · Yesterday
OTHRFull-time
About the firm
Liddle & Robinson is a plaintiff-side employment law firm based in New York City.
AI visibility
- Ranked #11 of 37 firms in the Employment Law (Plaintiff) category
- Response mention rate: 1.3% ±1.0% (95% confidence)
- Cited by 2 of 4 AI assistants (Claude, ChatGPT)
- Not cited by Gemini or Perplexity
- Sample-limited tier with 7 total citations
Citations by question type
- Decision: 1 mention
- Situation: 2 mentions
- Validation: 4 mentions
Where the firm is cited
Liddle & Robinson appeared in 3 prompts out of 100 ranking-layer buyer prompts in the latest snapshot.
W-001 (Situation) — Also cited: Wigdor LLP ×4, Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC ×3, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×2
W-002 (Decision) — Also cited: Outten & Golden LLP ×4, Wigdor LLP ×3, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×2
W-003 (Validation) — Also cited: Liddle & Robinson ×4, Wigdor LLP ×2, Outten & Golden LLP ×2
Missing prompts
97 of 100 ranking-layer buyer prompts do not cite this firm. Below are the missing prompts with the highest competitor citation weight:
- P-001 (Situation) — Cited: Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×5, Lambda Legal ×4, The LGBT Bar Association of New York (LGBTBarNY) ×1
- P-002 (Decision) — Cited: Joseph Law Group, P.C. ×5, Gottlieb & Greenspan, LLC ×1, Tully Rinckey PLLC ×1
- P-003 (Decision) — Cited: Legal Aid Society ×4, Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×4, New York Legal Assistance Group ×3
- P-004 (Decision) — Cited: Phillips Nizer LLP ×4, Joseph Law Group, P.C. ×2, Rosen Law Firm ×1
- P-005 (Decision) — Cited: Phillips Nizer LLP ×4, Tully Rinckey PLLC ×1
- P-006 (Situation) — Cited: Shim Law Group, P.C. ×4, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP ×3, IACP ×2
- P-007 (Situation) — Cited: Terc Law Offices, P.C. ×4
- P-008 (Decision) — Cited: Joseph Law Group, P.C. ×4, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP ×3, Proskauer Rose LLP ×3
- P-009 (Validation) — Cited: Stutman Stutman & Lichtenstein, LLP ×4
- P-010 (Situation) — Cited: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP ×4, Proskauer Rose LLP ×3, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP ×2
- P-011 (Situation) — Cited: Wigdor LLP ×4, Outten & Golden LLP ×3, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×2
- P-012 (Decision) — Cited: Outten & Golden LLP ×4, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×4, Wigdor LLP ×4
- P-013 (Decision) — Cited: Wigdor LLP ×4, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×3, Outten & Golden LLP ×3
- P-014 (Decision) — Cited: Outten & Golden LLP ×4, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×4, Wigdor LLP ×3
- P-015 (Decision) — Cited: Outten & Golden LLP ×4, Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC ×3, Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight ×2
Peer firms in New York City employment law (plaintiff)
- #1 Outten & Golden LLP — 11.6% share, cited by 2 of 4 AI
- #2 Wigdor LLP — 10.3% share, cited by 2 of 4 AI
- #3 Phillips Nizer LLP — 8.9% share, cited by 3 of 4 AI
- #4 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight — 8.7% share, cited by 2 of 4 AI
- #5 Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC — 6.2% share, cited by 2 of 4 AI
- #6 Joseph Law Group, P.C. — 5.1% share, cited by 3 of 4 AI
- #7 Terc Law Offices, P.C. — 4.2% share, cited by 3 of 4 AI
- #8 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP — 1.5% share, cited by 3 of 4 AI