Jobs · Marketing

Lead Product Manager, Growth

Tilt · United States · 4 wk ago
RemoteRemoteMarketingFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections using

for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections where posting has real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info; remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, duplicated lines, application instructions. Must not include sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". Must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless posting actually states them. Let's parse posting for content. The posting includes: - Intro about Tilt, mission. - "The Opportunity: Lead Product Manager, Growth" description. - "How You'll Make An Impact" bullet list (actually sentences with line breaks). This is responsibilities. - "What The First 90 Days Look Like" with bullet points. - "Why You're a Great Fit" list of qualifications/skills. - "What You'll Get At Tilt" includes benefits: Virtual-first teamwork, WFH office reimbursement, Competitive pay, Complete support (flexible health plans, subsidies), Visibility, Paid global onsites, Impact recognized. - Also mention "Competitive pay: We're big on potential, and it's reflected in our competitive compensation packages and generous equity." So pay info present. - Benefits: health plans, subsidies, WFH reimbursement, paid global onsites, etc. - Schedule? Not explicitly mentioned. No schedule info. So we should not create Schedule section. - Pay section: we have competitive pay, compensation packages, equity. So we can include Pay section. - Benefits section: we have many benefits. - Skills: maybe we can extract from "Why You're a Great Fit": deep consumer growth experience, scale, genuine user empathy, hands-on experimentation, strategic range, judgment on quality vs speed, orchestration and influence, cross-functional partnership, conviction under pressure, track record in fast-moving environments, direct-to-consumer product experience required, subscription experience a plus. - Qualifications: maybe similar to skills; but we can separate Qualifications (e.g., direct-to-consumer product experience required) and Skills (the rest). However guidelines: prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could combine Qualifications and Skills into one? But they ask to use headings for those categories if content exists. We'll decide. We need to include About the role: maybe a paragraph summarizing role. Responsibilities: from "How You'll Make An Impact" and maybe "What The First 90 Days Look Like" (that's more like early milestones). Could treat as Responsibilities. Requirements: maybe from "Why You're a Great Fit" (qualifications). Could treat as Requirements. Qualifications: maybe overlapping; but we can have Requirements and Qualifications separate if distinct. However to avoid thin sections, maybe combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section called Requirements (or Qualifications). But they ask to use headings for those categories if content exists. We could have both but ensure each has substantive content. Let's extract: About the role: The opportunity description: Lead PM to own product-led growth across consumer app, not channel-optimization, own how new/existing users discover value, move through product, graduate to higher-value products, adopt more across ecosystem, build frameworks that decide where we route users, prioritize journeys for graduation and highest enterprise value, turn into clear shared view of where growth effort should go, lead and orchestrate heads of product areas, aligning them on opportunities and growth frameworks, be most senior product voice on growth: setting thesis, running experiments, making calls on what we build to move activation, conversion, retention, cross-product adoption, judgment call on quality vs speed, etc. That's substantive. Responsibilities: The "How You'll Make An Impact" list: growth thesis, frameworks, app structure and IA, retention as first-class outcome, prioritized experiment roadmap, end-to-end funnel, orchestrating heads of product areas, partnership with leaders of Cash Advance, Everyday Money, Line of Credit, Credit Card products, pricing structure owned with Credit and heads of each product, product-pipeline thesis owned jointly with Credit and Head of US Core, flywheels beyond obvious, partnership-driven growth opportunities. Also "What The First 90 Days Look Like" could be considered responsibilities or early milestones; but we could include as part of Responsibilities or separate section? There's no heading for 90 days; we could incorporate into Responsibilities as bullet points. Requirements/Qualifications: "Why You're a Great Fit": deep consumer growth experience, scale, genuine user empathy, hands-on experimentation, strategic range, judgment on quality vs speed, orchestration and influence, cross-functional partnership, conviction under pressure, track record in fast-moving environments, direct-to-consumer product experience required, subscription experience a plus. Skills: maybe same as above; but we could treat these as Skills. Benefits: Virtual-first teamwork, WFH office reimbursement, Competitive pay (but pay separate), Complete support (flexible health plans, subsidies), Visibility, Paid global onsites, Impact recognized. Pay: Competitive pay, compensation packages, generous equity. Schedule: none. Thus we will output sections: About the role (

About the role

), Responsibilities (

Responsibilities

), Requirements (

Requirements

) (or Qualifications), Skills (

Skills

), Benefits (

Benefits

), Pay (

Pay

). We must not include empty sections. We need to use
  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use

    for prose. We must preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all points from the posting, not omit any. We must not include boilerplate like cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. The posting didn't have those explicitly, but we must ensure we don't include any. We must not repeat job title as heading. We must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings. We must output only HTML fragment. Let's craft. First, About the role: a paragraph summarizing the opportunity. We'll include the sentences from "The Opportunity: Lead Product Manager, Growth" and maybe the intro about Tilt? The intro about Tilt is generic company description; could be considered part of About the role? Might be considered background. We'll include it as part of About the role. But we must not invent or summarize away detail; we need to preserve all substantive information. The intro about Tilt is substantive? It describes company mission; could be considered part of About the role. We'll include it. Now Responsibilities: we need to list each duty as

  • . Let's extract all responsibilities from "How You'll Make An Impact" and "What The First 90 Days Look Like". Also maybe from "The Opportunity" about leading and orchestrating heads of product areas etc. But that may duplicate. We'll create a comprehensive list: - Own product-led growth across the consumer app. - Determine how new and existing users discover value, move through the product, graduate to higher-value products, and adopt more of what we offer across the entire product ecosystem. - Build frameworks that decide where we route users. - Prioritize journeys for graduation and for the highest enterprise value. - Turn prioritization into a clear, shared view of where growth effort should go. - Lead and orchestrate the heads of different product areas, aligning them on opportunities and on the growth frameworks everyone builds against. - Act as the most senior product voice on growth: setting the thesis, running experiments, and making calls on what we build to move activation, conversion, retention, and cross-product adoption. - Make judgment calls on quality versus speed: knowing when a bet warrants a polished, durable build and when it should ship fast and rough to learn, and defend the chosen mode. - Define the growth thesis for the consumer product: where the biggest activation, conversion, retention, and cross-adoption opportunities are, and why. - Develop the frameworks that decide where we route users, prioritized for graduation and highest enterprise value. - Shape the app structure and information architecture: how the product is organized and how we navigate users to the right place at the right time. - Treat retention as a first-class outcome, not just top-of-funnel growth. - Create a prioritized experiment roadmap: design tests, define hypotheses, and read results yourself. - Own the end-to-end funnel from first touch through repeat engagement, including how users route between products and adopt adjacent ones. - Orchestrate the heads of product areas to align on growth opportunities and shared frameworks. - Partner with the leaders of Cash Advance, Everyday Money, Line of Credit, and Credit Card products to deliver best-in-class user experiences and returns across the portfolio. - Own the pricing structure, in close partnership with Credit and the heads of each product, to increase share of wallet and monetization across the portfolio. - Own the product-pipeline thesis, jointly with Credit and the Head of US Core: build the strategy, analysis, and thesis that determine which products are missing from our pipeline and worth building. - Identify flywheels beyond the obvious: pursue net-new growth loops, not just referral tweaks. - Pursue partnership-driven growth opportunities that extend reach beyond the core product surface. - By day 30: deliver a clear diagnosis of the funnel and retention gaps, backed by data and user insight, with the biggest opportunities scoped and prioritized. - By day 60: deliver an aligned, cross-functional growth framework that the product-area heads have bought into, from which hypotheses and tests are derived. - By day 90: have initial tests live and moving a key metric, or cleanly disproving it, with a roadmap the team is aligned behind. That seems comprehensive. Now Requirements: maybe we list the qualifications from "Why You're a Great Fit". But we also have Skills separate. To avoid duplication, we could treat Requirements as the mandatory qualifications (direct-to-consumer product experience required) and Skills as the rest. However the posting says "Direct-to-consumer product experience is required. Subscription experience is a plus, not a requirement." So we can put that as Requirements. But also they list many traits: deep consumer growth experience, scale, genuine user empathy, hands-on experimentation, strategic range, judgment on quality vs speed, orchestration and influence, cross-functional partnership, conviction under pressure, track record in fast-moving environments. Those could be Skills. Thus: Requirements (

    Requirements

    ): - Direct-to-consumer product experience is required. - Subscription experience is a plus (not required) – maybe we put that in Skills? Actually it's a plus, not a requirement, so maybe it's a skill. But we can include both in Requirements as bullet points, marking subscription experience as a plus. But guidelines: do not create sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". Not relevant. We'll include Requirements as: - Direct-to-consumer product experience (required) - Subscription experience (plus) But we also need to include the other traits? Those are more skills. Thus Skills section will list: - Deep consumer growth experience, with ability to point to work that moved real business metrics. - Experience scaling a product or growth function, showing trajectory. - Genuine user empathy: strong instincts for what makes users move, backed by research. - Hands-on experimentation: design and run A/B tests yourself, interpret results. - Strategic range: ability to zoom from multi-quarter growth thesis down to copy on a single screen and back. - Judgment on quality versus speed: know when to push for fast, scrappy test vs durable high-quality build, and articulate why. - Orchestration and influence: lead and align senior product and functional leaders without owning them, drive shared framework across areas. - Cross-functional partnership: partner deeply across design, credit, and other product owners to deliver experience and returns, not just metrics. - Conviction under pressure: hold a clear point of view and defend it with sharp reasoning, including against strong, opinionated cross-functional partners. - Track record in fast-moving environments where you owned a meaningful surface, not a sliver of a large org's roadmap

Similar jobs