IT Solution Consultant II
for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. We must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate. We need to parse the posting. Content: Intro paragraph: "At Wipfli, people count..." etc. That's about the role? Could be "About the role". We'll put that in
under About the role. Then: "The IT Solution Consultant II can work either 100% in person or in a hybrid environment, with office visits as needed, in the Chicago area. About 15% travel to client locations in IL and WI is required." That's about work arrangement and travel. Could be part of About the role or maybe Schedule? Travel is not schedule. Might be part of About the role. Then: "The Consultant II will develop and implement solutions for clients that are either consultative or technical in nature that provide improvements to the client’s business processes and information technology. They will interface regularly with clients and others outside Wipfli." Also about role. Then "Responsibilities" heading with bullet list. Then "Qualifications" heading with bullet list. Then "Additional Details" includes pay, benefits, etc. We need sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We have Responsibilities content. Qualifications content. Benefits content. Pay content. Schedule? Not explicit schedule besides hybrid/100% in person, travel 15%. Could be considered Schedule? Might be "Work arrangement" but not explicit schedule like hours. The instruction: only include Schedule if posting actually states them. It mentions "can work either 100% in person or in a hybrid environment, with office visits as needed". That's about work location, not schedule. No explicit schedule like full-time, part-time, shift. So we should not create Schedule section. Requirements? Might be same as Qualifications? The posting has "Qualifications" bullet list. Could treat that as Qualifications. Requirements maybe not separate. We could combine Requirements and Qualifications? But we need to follow headings: we can include Requirements if there is distinct content. The posting includes "Qualifications" bullet list; also earlier mentions "Bachelor’s Degree or an equivalent combination of education and experience" etc. That's qualifications. There's no separate "Requirements" section. So we should not create Requirements heading if no specific content. Skills? The qualifications include proficiency with Microsoft Azure and Active Directory, etc. Could be considered Skills. But we already have Qualifications. Might be better to have Skills section for technical skills. However instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could combine Qualifications and Skills into one Qualifications section. But we have to use headings exactly as given? It says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't say we must use all; we can choose which to include. So we can include About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay. Possibly also Skills if we want to split. But we can keep Qualifications covering both education/experience and skills. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay. Check if any content for Requirements: none. Now extract content. About the role: combine introductory paragraphs up to before Responsibilities. Let's capture: "At Wipfli, people count. At Wipfli, our people are core to everything we do—the catalyst behind our ability to create exceptional impact and extraordinary results. We believe in flexibility. We focus on relationships. We encourage each individual to follow their own path. People truly matter and they feel it. For those looking to make a difference and find a professional home, Wipfli offers a career-defining opportunity. The IT Solution Consultant II can work either 100% in person or in a hybrid environment, with office visits as needed, in the Chicago area. About 15% travel to client locations in IL and WI is required. The Consultant II will develop and implement solutions for clients that are either consultative or technical in nature that provide improvements to the client’s business processes and information technology. They will interface regularly with clients and others outside Wipfli." That's the About the role. Responsibilities: list bullet points after "Responsibilities". The bullet points are a long sentence separated by commas? Actually they are a list but not bullet formatted. We need to turn each duty into
maybe but we could also bullet list. The instruction: Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So benefits list should be
- . However the benefits are described in sentences with commas. We could split into items but that may be too granular. Could treat each sentence as a list item? Better to keep as
for prose? The rule says use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So we need to make a list. We could break into logical items: health plan options, dental/vision, HSA, EAP, life/disability, 401k, well-being incentive, education assistance, flexible time off, family care leave, parental leave, family formation benefits, cell phone reimbursement, travel rewards, voluntary offerings (critical illness, accident, hospital indemnity, legal, long-term care, pet, ID theft, supplemental life/AD&D). That's many items but okay.
But we must preserve ALL substantive information; not invent or summarize away detail. Splitting into items is okay as long as we don't lose info. We'll create
- with each distinct benefit as
- . Ensure we include all. Let's extract: - 8 health plan options (both HMO & PPO plans) - dental and vision coverage - opportunity to enroll in HSA with potential Firm contribution - Employee Assistance Program - firm-sponsored basic life coverage - firm-sponsored short-term disability coverage - firm-sponsored long-term disability coverage - 401(k) savings plan & profit share - Firm matching contribution (to 401k) - well-being incentive - education & certification assistance - flexible time off - family care leave - parental leave - family formation benefits - cell phone reimbursement - travel rewards - Voluntary benefit offerings: - critical illness & accident insurance - hospital indemnity insurance - legal - long-term care - pet insurance - ID theft protection - supplemental life/AD&D We could nest voluntary as sublist but not required. Simpler: list each as separate
- . Might be long but okay. Pay: The posting includes: "
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So we need to make a list. We could break into logical items: health plan options, dental/vision, HSA, EAP, life/disability, 401k, well-being incentive, education assistance, flexible time off, family care leave, parental leave, family formation benefits, cell phone reimbursement, travel rewards, voluntary offerings (critical illness, accident, hospital indemnity, legal, long-term care, pet, ID theft, supplemental life/AD&D). That's many items but okay.
But we must preserve ALL substantive information; not invent or summarize away detail. Splitting into items is okay as long as we don't lose info. We'll create
- . However the benefits are described in sentences with commas. We could split into items but that may be too granular. Could treat each sentence as a list item? Better to keep as