Internal Auditor - Business Operations
for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Must preserve all substantive info. Must include sections only when posting has real specific content. Must not create sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". Must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless posting actually states them. The posting includes "What's In It For You" with benefits list, and mentions competitive pay but not specific pay amount. It says "competitive pay and great benefits". Does that count as stating pay? It says competitive pay but no specifics. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does mention competitive pay but not a specific figure. Likely we should not create a Pay section because no specific pay info. Benefits: they list benefits, so we can include Benefits section. Schedule: not mentioned, so no Schedule.
We need sections: About the role (intro paragraph), Responsibilities, Qualifications (maybe combine Qualifications and Requirements? The posting has "Qualifications" heading. Also there is "What's In It For You" which is Benefits. There's also maybe "Skills"? Not explicit but we could infer from qualifications list includes skills. But we should only create sections when posting has real specific content. The posting has a "Qualifications" section with bullet-like list. So we can have Qualifications heading. There's also "Responsibilities" heading. There's also maybe "About the role" from the introductory paragraphs. There's no explicit "Requirements" separate from Qualifications; but we could treat Qualifications as requirements. The instruction says use headings for those categories if content exists. We have content for About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits. We should not create Skills unless there is explicit skills list; we could embed skills within Qualifications. Better to not create Skills heading.
We need to use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So for Responsibilities we need a list. For Qualifications we need a list. For Benefits we need a list.
We need
for prose.
We must preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from the posting, but we can format them.
Let's extract substantive content:
Intro paragraph: "At Air Products, we reimagine what’s possible. By tapping into the motivation of our people and our collective experience, we create the ideas and innovations that drive us forward. When we come together – where every voice is heard and everyone knows they belong and matter – we create solutions that launch people into space, support lifesaving care in hospitals, and enable the construction of groundbreaking, world scale production facilities. Reimagine What’s Possible Do you have a passion for uncovering insights, strengthening business processes, and driving continuous improvement? Air Products is seeking a highly motivated Internal Auditor to join our team in Allentown, PA. In this role, you will partner with stakeholders across the organization to evaluate financial controls, business processes, and operational effectiveness, helping to identify opportunities, manage risk, and support business success. As an Internal Auditor, you will lead and execute a variety of audit engagements across Air Products' global operations, including finance, business processes, software systems, and regulatory compliance. You will be responsible for conducting thorough and well-organized audits, delivering clear and actionable recommendations, and communicating findings to key stakeholders. This position offers a unique opportunity to gain broad exposure to diverse business functions while contributing to the continued growth, efficiency, and integrity of the organization. As a trusted partner to senior leaders across Industrial Gases, Product Delivery Organization, Digital Technology, Finance, Legal, and other business functions, you will provide assurance and recommendations on a myriad of business processes, relating to measurable business value. This position plays a critical role in providing assurance, identifying and mitigating risk, and supporting business objectives through strategic, best-in-class auditing practices."
That's the About the role.
Responsibilities bullet list (the posting shows each line starting with a verb). Let's capture each:
- Develop audit engagement scopes of limited to moderate complexity, relying on knowledge of Air Products business developments/structure, challenges.
- Develop robust risk and control matrixes and audit testing procedures for audit engagements, relying on knowledge of Air Products core business risks (both inherit and emerging).
- Execute audit engagements of limited to moderate complexity, adhering to all internal and external audit work process standards.
- Interpret and organize information from audit engagements in a comprehensive, concise report, articulating observations, root causes, business risks, and relevant recommendations.
- Deliver report information in a professional manner to stakeholders.
- Identify control techniques from a process walkthrough (observation) and evaluate the control's ability to mitigate identified risks.
- Perform Sarbanes-Oxley testing of relevant controls using established templates but relying on analytical abilities and control understanding.
Qualifications list:
- Associate’s degree in engineering, Supply Chain Management, Information Technology, Finance, or a related field.
- Minimum 2 years' experience in Engineering, Digital Technology, Sourcing, Procurement, or Operations.
- Professional certifications such as CPA, CIA are preferred but not required.
- Basic knowledge in Excel (formulas, pivot tables, graphs)
- Demonstrated ability to influence and collaborate effectively with internal stakeholders.
- Demonstrated ability to interpret policies, process documentation and procedures to determine compliance and identify areas of risk or noncompliance.
- Demonstrated basic data analytic techniques to extrapolate trends and observations from data.
- Demonstrated ability to learn and use relevant software required to complete an audit engagement or SOX testing’s.
- Understanding of simple project management concepts and techniques to deliver on objectives.
- Ability to perform multiple projects simultaneously, in various project/program stages.
- Ability to travel domestically and internationally up to 10%.
Benefits list (from "What's In It For You"):
- Affordable medical, dental, and vision insurance available day one of employment
- 401(k) retirement savings plan with 100% vested company core and match
- Paid vacation, holidays, and sick time
- Paid parental leave
- Adoption assistance
- Flexible spending accounts
- Life Insurance (AD&D), Supplemental AD&D
- Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Also there is a statement: "At Air Products we foster a culture of inclusion where every voice is heard, and everyone feels they belong and matter. Additionally, we offer competitive pay and great benefits for our employees." That's prose for Benefits section maybe.
We should not include EEO boilerplate etc. Also remove duplicated lines, application instructions, etc. The posting includes some duplicated lines like "Founded in 1940..." etc. That's boilerplate about company history; we should remove as it's not substantive to the job? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The company history might be considered substantive? It's more about the company, not the job. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The company history is not explicitly listed but could be considered boilerplate. However it's not navigation/legal/EEO. It's about the company. Might be considered part of the posting but not essential to the role. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; but also says remove boilerplate. The company history might be considered boilerplate but not sure. Safer to keep it? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." It does not say remove company history. So we should keep it if it's not duplicated. However there is a duplicated line: "Reimagine What’s Possible" appears twice? Actually appears at start and later. Might be considered duplicated. We should remove duplicated lines. The phrase "Reimagine What’s Possible" appears at the beginning and also as a heading? It's in the intro. Might be considered duplicated. Safer to keep only one occurrence? The instruction: remove duplicated lines. We could keep just one instance. But it's part of the prose; removing might lose some substantive? It's a tagline. Might be okay to keep one.
We also have "Founded in 1940, Air Products is a world-leading industrial gases company..." That's not duplicated. Keep.
We also have "We are an Equal Opportunity Employer (U.S.)..." That's EEO boilerplate; must remove.
Also "Air Products is committed to working with and providing a reasonable accommodation..." That's also EEO/accommodation; remove.
Also "General application status inquiries..." that's application instructions; remove.
Thus final HTML:
About the role
... (the intro paragraph without duplicated tagline maybe).
Responsibilities
- ...
...
Qualifications
- ...
...
Benefits
At Air Products we foster a culture of inclusion where every voice is heard, and everyone feels they belong and matter. Additionally, we offer competitive pay and great benefits for our employees.
- Affordable medical, dental, and vision insurance available day one of employment
- 401(k) retirement savings plan with 100% vested company core and match
- Paid vacation, holidays, and sick time
- Paid parental leave
- Adoption assistance
- Flexible spending accounts
- Life Insurance (AD&D), Supplemental AD&D
- Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
We should not include Pay or Schedule sections.
Check for any other sections like Skills: not needed.
Make sure we didn't miss any substantive info: The line "Check out some of our benefits below!" is instructional; we can drop as it's part of benefits intro but we already have a prose sentence. Could keep as part of benefits prose but it's just a prompt. Might be considered boilerplate? It's not navigation/legal. Could keep but it's fluff. Safer to omit.
We kept the culture sentence.
Now ensure we haven't included any disallowed content: No EEO, no accommodation, no application instructions, no duplicated lines.
Check for duplicated lines: The phrase "Reimagine What’s Possible" appears twice in the intro: At start: "At Air Products, we reimagine what’s possible." and later "Reimagine What’s Possible Do you have a passion..." Actually the second is capitalized and no period. Might be considered duplicated. We could keep only the first occurrence and remove the second? But the second is part of the sentence: "Reimagine What’s Possible Do you have a passion..." It's basically a tagline then question. If we remove it, we lose the question "Do you have a passion for uncovering insights, strengthening business processes, and driving continuous improvement?" That's substantive. So we need to keep that sentence but maybe rephrase to avoid duplication? The duplication is just the phrase "Reimagine What’s Possible". Could keep both but it's duplicated phrase. The instruction says remove duplicated lines, not necessarily duplicate words within a line. So if the line is different, it's okay. The line "Reimagine What’s Possible Do you have a passion..." is not identical to the earlier line "At Air Products, we reimagine what’s possible." So it's fine.
Now ensure we didn't inadvertently include any boilerplate like "Founded in 1940..." That's okay.
Now produce final HTML.
Be careful to escape any special characters? Not needed.
Let's craft the About the role paragraph: combine the intro sentences into a coherent paragraph. We'll keep all sentences.
Original intro:
"At Air Products, we reimagine what’s possible. By tapping into the motivation of our people
for prose. We must preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from the posting, but we can format them. Let's extract substantive content: Intro paragraph: "At Air Products, we reimagine what’s possible. By tapping into the motivation of our people and our collective experience, we create the ideas and innovations that drive us forward. When we come together – where every voice is heard and everyone knows they belong and matter – we create solutions that launch people into space, support lifesaving care in hospitals, and enable the construction of groundbreaking, world scale production facilities. Reimagine What’s Possible Do you have a passion for uncovering insights, strengthening business processes, and driving continuous improvement? Air Products is seeking a highly motivated Internal Auditor to join our team in Allentown, PA. In this role, you will partner with stakeholders across the organization to evaluate financial controls, business processes, and operational effectiveness, helping to identify opportunities, manage risk, and support business success. As an Internal Auditor, you will lead and execute a variety of audit engagements across Air Products' global operations, including finance, business processes, software systems, and regulatory compliance. You will be responsible for conducting thorough and well-organized audits, delivering clear and actionable recommendations, and communicating findings to key stakeholders. This position offers a unique opportunity to gain broad exposure to diverse business functions while contributing to the continued growth, efficiency, and integrity of the organization. As a trusted partner to senior leaders across Industrial Gases, Product Delivery Organization, Digital Technology, Finance, Legal, and other business functions, you will provide assurance and recommendations on a myriad of business processes, relating to measurable business value. This position plays a critical role in providing assurance, identifying and mitigating risk, and supporting business objectives through strategic, best-in-class auditing practices." That's the About the role. Responsibilities bullet list (the posting shows each line starting with a verb). Let's capture each: - Develop audit engagement scopes of limited to moderate complexity, relying on knowledge of Air Products business developments/structure, challenges. - Develop robust risk and control matrixes and audit testing procedures for audit engagements, relying on knowledge of Air Products core business risks (both inherit and emerging). - Execute audit engagements of limited to moderate complexity, adhering to all internal and external audit work process standards. - Interpret and organize information from audit engagements in a comprehensive, concise report, articulating observations, root causes, business risks, and relevant recommendations. - Deliver report information in a professional manner to stakeholders. - Identify control techniques from a process walkthrough (observation) and evaluate the control's ability to mitigate identified risks. - Perform Sarbanes-Oxley testing of relevant controls using established templates but relying on analytical abilities and control understanding. Qualifications list: - Associate’s degree in engineering, Supply Chain Management, Information Technology, Finance, or a related field. - Minimum 2 years' experience in Engineering, Digital Technology, Sourcing, Procurement, or Operations. - Professional certifications such as CPA, CIA are preferred but not required. - Basic knowledge in Excel (formulas, pivot tables, graphs) - Demonstrated ability to influence and collaborate effectively with internal stakeholders. - Demonstrated ability to interpret policies, process documentation and procedures to determine compliance and identify areas of risk or noncompliance. - Demonstrated basic data analytic techniques to extrapolate trends and observations from data. - Demonstrated ability to learn and use relevant software required to complete an audit engagement or SOX testing’s. - Understanding of simple project management concepts and techniques to deliver on objectives. - Ability to perform multiple projects simultaneously, in various project/program stages. - Ability to travel domestically and internationally up to 10%. Benefits list (from "What's In It For You"): - Affordable medical, dental, and vision insurance available day one of employment - 401(k) retirement savings plan with 100% vested company core and match - Paid vacation, holidays, and sick time - Paid parental leave - Adoption assistance - Flexible spending accounts - Life Insurance (AD&D), Supplemental AD&D - Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Also there is a statement: "At Air Products we foster a culture of inclusion where every voice is heard, and everyone feels they belong and matter. Additionally, we offer competitive pay and great benefits for our employees." That's prose for Benefits section maybe. We should not include EEO boilerplate etc. Also remove duplicated lines, application instructions, etc. The posting includes some duplicated lines like "Founded in 1940..." etc. That's boilerplate about company history; we should remove as it's not substantive to the job? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The company history might be considered substantive? It's more about the company, not the job. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The company history is not explicitly listed but could be considered boilerplate. However it's not navigation/legal/EEO. It's about the company. Might be considered part of the posting but not essential to the role. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; but also says remove boilerplate. The company history might be considered boilerplate but not sure. Safer to keep it? The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." It does not say remove company history. So we should keep it if it's not duplicated. However there is a duplicated line: "Reimagine What’s Possible" appears twice? Actually appears at start and later. Might be considered duplicated. We should remove duplicated lines. The phrase "Reimagine What’s Possible" appears at the beginning and also as a heading? It's in the intro. Might be considered duplicated. Safer to keep only one occurrence? The instruction: remove duplicated lines. We could keep just one instance. But it's part of the prose; removing might lose some substantive? It's a tagline. Might be okay to keep one. We also have "Founded in 1940, Air Products is a world-leading industrial gases company..." That's not duplicated. Keep. We also have "We are an Equal Opportunity Employer (U.S.)..." That's EEO boilerplate; must remove. Also "Air Products is committed to working with and providing a reasonable accommodation..." That's also EEO/accommodation; remove. Also "General application status inquiries..." that's application instructions; remove. Thus final HTML:
About the role
... (the intro paragraph without duplicated tagline maybe).
Responsibilities
- ... ...
Qualifications
- ... ...
Benefits
At Air Products we foster a culture of inclusion where every voice is heard, and everyone feels they belong and matter. Additionally, we offer competitive pay and great benefits for our employees.
- Affordable medical, dental, and vision insurance available day one of employment
- 401(k) retirement savings plan with 100% vested company core and match
- Paid vacation, holidays, and sick time
- Paid parental leave
- Adoption assistance
- Flexible spending accounts
- Life Insurance (AD&D), Supplemental AD&D
- Employee Assistance Program (EAP)