Home-Based & Infant Mental Health Supervisor

We need to produce HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually the posting includes sections: "About Oakland Family Services", "WHAT'S IN IT FOR YOU?" (benefits), "WE KNOW CULTURE MATTERS…", "About Our Award-winning Culture", "About The Opportunity/Work", "Does this Describe YOU?" (requirements). Also there is a mission/vision earlier. We need to use

for section headings (e.g., About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). We should map content to appropriate headings. The instructions: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences. Thus we need to decide which sections to include based on content. We have: - About Oakland Family Services (description, mission, vision). Could be "About the role"? Actually "About the role" is generic; but we have "About Oakland Family Services". Could map to "About the role"? The instruction says use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It suggests those are examples; we can use other headings? Probably we should stick to those headings where appropriate. But we can also use other headings if they match content? The instruction: "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It implies we should use those headings for those types of content. So we need to map content to those headings. Thus we need sections like: - About the role: description of the position (Home-Based and Infant Mental Health Supervisor). Could be from "About The Opportunity/Work". That includes responsibilities. - Responsibilities: list of duties (maybe from the same section). Could be bullet list. - Requirements: qualifications (education, licensure, experience). From "Does this Describe YOU?" plus maybe other. - Qualifications: maybe similar to Requirements; but we can combine? The instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one? But they are separate headings; we could include both if we have content. However we might avoid duplication. - Skills: maybe list of skills (leadership, supervisory, clinical). Could be from requirements. - Benefits: from "WHAT'S IN IT FOR YOU?" includes many benefits. - Pay: not explicitly stated; there is "Competitive compensation." but no specific numbers. The instruction says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. "Competitive compensation" is vague but still states compensation exists. However they said avoid filler like "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD". "Competitive compensation" is somewhat vague but still a statement. Might be okay to include Pay section with that phrase? But they said never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state "Competitive compensation." So we could include Pay section with that sentence. However they also said prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could combine Pay into Benefits? But Benefits already includes many items; Pay could be separate. - Schedule: not mentioned explicitly; there is "Flexible work schedules, as appropriate." and "Hybrid and virtual work options, as appropriate." That's schedule info. So we could include Schedule section with that. Thus we can have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. But we need to avoid filler. Ensure each section has real specific content. Let's extract content. About the role: description of the position: "Home-Based and Infant Mental Health Supervisor of the Specialized Services for Youth (SSY) department assumes responsibilities common to all supervisory positions as described in the Agency Manual; provides management and performs specific requirements of programs under departmental jurisdiction and assures orderly procedures for translating the Agency goals and values into practice." plus maybe mission/vision? But that's about organization. Could be separate "About Oakland Family Services" but not in list. Could we add a section "About the organization"? Not in allowed headings but maybe we can still use

  for any heading; the instruction says use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests using those. Safer to stick to those. Thus we could treat "About Oakland Family Services" as "About the role"? Not ideal. Maybe we can include a brief paragraph about the organization under "About the role" as context. Alternatively we could omit that and focus on role specifics. But we must preserve ALL substantive information; cannot omit mission/vision etc. So we need to include that somewhere. Could be under "About the role" as a description of the organization. Thus "About the role" could contain both role description and organization overview. Responsibilities: list of duties from the "About The Opportunity/Work" section. Many bullet-like sentences. Requirements: education, licensure, experience from "Does this Describe YOU?" plus maybe other. Qualifications: maybe similar to Requirements; but we could treat Requirements as education/licensure/experience, Qualifications as specialized endorsements (Infant Mental Health Specialist Endorsement, DECA certification, etc.) and Skills as leadership, supervisory, clinical skills. Benefits: list from "WHAT'S IN IT FOR YOU?" plus culture items? But culture items maybe separate. Pay: "Competitive compensation." plus maybe "Annual pay increases, as approved." That's also pay. Schedule: "Flexible work schedules, as appropriate." "Hybrid and virtual work options, as appropriate." Also "Twelve (12) paid holidays, including a floating holiday of your choice!" That's more benefits but could be schedule. We need to avoid duplication. Let's extract details. From posting: **Why work for Oakland Family Services?** (culture, benefits). We'll capture benefits. **About Oakland Family Services**: description, mission, vision, 100 years, continuum of services. **WHAT'S IN IT FOR YOU?** list: - Competitive compensation. - Comprehensive medical, dental, prescription, and vision coverage. - Flexible Spending Accounts and HSA options. - Retirement plan with a company match. - Long-term disability insurance. - Voluntary short-term disability. - Life insurance and AD&D. - Malpractice insurance. - Paid time off benefits, including generous vacation, sick, personal, and bereavement days. - Twelve (12) paid holidays, including a floating holiday of your choice! - Annual pay increases, as approved. - Employee assistance program for you and immediate family. - Network of support for your health & well-being. - Verizon cellular plan discount. - Mileage reimbursement at the IRS rate. - Loan forgiveness programs. - PLUS... Commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. - Family friendly practices and support. - Flexible work schedules, as appropriate. - Hybrid and virtual work options, as appropriate. - Highly robust and comprehensive onboarding and training program. - Paid professional development. - Free online trainings that count toward continuing education credits. - Employee assistance programs. (duplicate) - “Dress for Your Day” approach to dress code. - Financial literacy education and workshops. - Collaborative annual performance appraisals. - “Dollars for a Difference” program for clients and staff in need. - And more! - Some benefits applicable to regular, full-time employees only. **WE KNOW CULTURE MATTERS…**: description of culture, ten defined cultural value statements, etc. **About Our Award-winning Culture**: CEO open-door policy, staff lunches, townhalls, open communication, benefit of doubt, feedback, staff suggestion program, staff recognition program, fun events, etc. **About The Opportunity/Work**: detailed responsibilities list. **Does this Describe YOU?**: qualifications list. We need to output HTML with

  headings and

  • for lists,

    for prose. We need to avoid duplication: e.g., Employee assistance program appears twice; we can include once. We need to preserve all substantive information; we must not omit any of the listed items. Thus we need to include all benefits items, all responsibilities, all qualifications, all culture statements maybe. But we must avoid creating sections with filler. So we need to ensure each section has substantive content. Potential sections: - About the role: could include description of Oakland Family Services (mission, vision, history) plus role overview. - Responsibilities: list of duties from About The Opportunity/Work. - Requirements: education, licensure, experience from Does this Describe YOU? (master's degree, licensure, supervisory experience, post-masters experience, etc.) - Qualifications: specialized endorsements/certifications (Infant Mental Health Specialist Endorsement, DECA certification, etc.) plus other special abilities (experience in CMH system, substance use qualifications, trauma-informed care, etc.) - Skills: leadership, management, supervisory skills, clinical supervision, reflective supervision, etc. Could be extracted from responsibilities and qualifications. - Benefits: list from WHAT'S IN IT FOR YOU? plus culture items? But culture items maybe separate. - Pay: Competitive compensation, Annual pay increases. - Schedule: Flexible work schedules, Hybrid/virtual options, Twelve paid holidays (maybe also schedule). Could also include flexible schedules. But we need to avoid thin sections. Pay could be combined with Benefits? But they said prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. However they also said include a section ONLY when posting has real specific content for it. Pay has content: "Competitive compensation." and "Annual pay increases, as approved." That's specific enough? Might be considered thin but still specific. Could combine Pay into Benefits as a bullet? But Benefits already includes many items; we could add "Competitive compensation" and "Annual pay increases" as part of Benefits list. That would avoid a separate Pay section. The instruction says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state them, but we can still include them under Benefits if we want fewer sections. However they gave examples of headings: Benefits, Pay, Schedule. It might be expected to separate them. But they also say prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. If we make Pay separate with only two bullets, that's thin. Might be better to incorporate into Benefits. Similarly Schedule: we have "Flexible work schedules, as appropriate." "Hybrid and virtual work options, as appropriate." "Twelve (12) paid holidays, including a floating holiday of your choice!" That's three items; could be a Schedule section with those bullets. That's not too thin. Thus we could have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits (including compensation and pay increases), Schedule. But we also have culture info; maybe we could include under About