General Engineer, AST, Technical Management (Direct Hire)

We need to output HTML fragment with sections only if real content. The posting includes summary, duties, requirements (conditions of employment), qualifications, education, additional information (benefits etc). We need headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Use

for each section heading. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use

  for prose. Do NOT repeat job title. Do NOT put Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. We need to preserve all substantive information. We need to decide which sections to include based on content. - About the role: could be summary. The summary paragraph: "Serves as the Data Officer responsible for developing and implementing data strategies to support effective scientific data management, governance, integration, and use. Applies data science and open science principles to improve data accessibility, collaboration, innovation, and technical decision-making. Provides technical leadership in data governance, analytics, security, policy, and emerging technologies." That's substantive. So we can have

  About the role

  with

  that summary. - Responsibilities: duties list. The duties are bullet points starting with "Help Leads development..." Actually each duty line begins with "Help". We need to extract them as list items. Remove "Help" maybe? The text: "Help Leads development and integration of the Biological and Physical Sciences (BPS) data ecosystem, applying advanced technologies to improve scientific data accessibility, interoperability, usability, and impact." etc. We'll keep the content after "Help". Probably we should keep the full sentence but we can strip leading "Help". The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep the text as is, maybe including "Help". But "Help" seems like a formatting artifact from the original (maybe bullet prefix). It's not substantive; but removing it might lose nothing? It's just a verb. Safer to keep it as part of the sentence. We'll keep the line as given. Thus Responsibilities section:

  • each duty. - Requirements: conditions of employment (U.S. citizenship, probationary period, background investigation, etc). That's substantive. We'll list as
    • . - Qualifications: includes specialized experience description and education requirements. That's substantive. Could be split into Qualifications and Education? The instruction says use headings for Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Education could be part of Qualifications? But we have a separate Education section in the posting. The allowed headings list includes Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. No Education heading. However we could put education under Qualifications (makes sense). Or we could create a custom heading? The instruction: "Use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It says e.g., implying those are examples but we should use those headings when appropriate. It doesn't forbid other headings, but better to stick to those. Education content could go under Qualifications (since qualifications include education). We'll embed education details inside Qualifications section, perhaps as a sub-list or paragraphs. - Skills: not explicitly listed; but we could infer from qualifications? However we should not create a section unless posting has real, specific content for it. There's no explicit skills list. So we omit Skills. - Benefits: there is a paragraph about benefits: "A career with the U.S. government provides employees with a comprehensive benefits package..." That's substantive. So we include Benefits section with that paragraph. - Pay: not specified (no salary). So omit. - Schedule: not specified (full-time maybe implied but not explicit). Omit. Thus we will output sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications (including education), Benefits. We need to ensure we don't include filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present. We need to remove duplicated lines, boilerplate like "See Additional Information section", "Please visit ...", "Additional selections may be made..." etc. That's additional information but not benefits? It includes info about CTAP/ICTAP, VSIP repayment, probationary period details (some already in Requirements). We need to decide what to keep. The "Additional information" includes many details that are substantive: probationary period details, CTAP/ICTAP, VSIP repayment, etc. Some of that overlaps with Requirements (probationary period). We should keep substantive info not already covered. However we must avoid duplication. We'll include relevant details under Requirements (conditions of employment) maybe expand. Let's parse the Additional information section: - "Additional selections may be made for similar positions across NASA within the local commuting area(s) of the location(s) identified in this announcement." This is procedural, maybe not substantive for applicant? Could be considered boilerplate? It's about selection process. Might be considered administrative; but it's substantive info about hiring. However instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. This is not exactly those, but could be considered "additional information" about selection. Might be okay to keep? The instruction says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Might be okay to include under Requirements or a separate section? There's no heading for "Selection process". Could incorporate into Requirements? Might be considered part of Conditions of employment? Not exactly. Safer to omit as it's more procedural. - "By applying, you agree to have your application shared with interested selecting official(s) within NASA." That's also procedural. - "CTAP/ICTAP will be cleared for any additional selection from this announcement." etc. That's about CTAP/ICTAP eligibility. Might be considered part of Requirements? Could be included under Requirements as additional condition? It's about eligibility for priority selection. Might be considered substantive for applicants with CTAP/ICTAP rights. We could include a bullet under Requirements about CTAP/ICTAP eligibility. - "If you have special priority selection rights under the Agency Career Transition Assistance Program (CTAP) or the Interagency Career Transition Assistance Program (ICTAP), you must: Indicate your eligibility when applying for a position. The questionnaire asks you to identify your ICTAP/CTAP eligibility. Be well qualified for this position to receive consideration. Candidates rated in the 'Best Qualified' category are considered well-qualified. Please see 'How You Will Be Evaluated' for more information. Submit proof that you meet the requirements for CTAP/ICTAP as indicated in 'Required Documents.' For additional information about CTAP/ICTAP eligibility, click here - https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/workforce-restructuring/employee-guide-to-career-transition/#ictap." That's quite detailed; could be kept under Requirements as a bullet. - "Any applicant that received a Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP) from the federal government within the last five years based of the closing date of this announcement, if selected, may be required to repay the full amount prior to establishing a start date. For additional information on the VSIP repayment requirement, click here - https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/workforce-restructuring/voluntary-separation-incentive-payments/." That's also a condition. - "Per Executive Order 14343, this position is not part of a bargaining unit." That's substantive. - "Probationary Period You may be required to serve a one-year probationary period during which we will evaluate your fitness and whether your continued employment advances the public interest. If selected, the requirement to serve such period will be determined by Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 11. In determining if your employment advances the public interest, we may consider: your performance and conduct; the needs and interests of the agency; whether your continued employment would advance organizational goals of the agency or the Government; and whether your continued employment would advance the efficiency of the Federal service. Upon completion of your probationary period your employment will be terminated unless you receive certification, in writing, that your continued employment advances the public interest. Candidates should be committed to improving the efficiency of the Federal government, passionate about the ideals of our American republic, and committed to upholding the rule of law and the United States Constitution." That's detailed probationary period info; we already have mention of probationary period in Requirements (conditions of employment). We can expand that bullet. - "A career with the U.S. government provides employees with a comprehensive benefits package..." That's benefits. Thus we need to incorporate all substantive info from Additional Information into appropriate sections (Requirements, Benefits). Avoid duplication. Let's structure: About the role: summary paragraph. Responsibilities: list of duties (the six bullet points starting with "Help"). Requirements: combine conditions of employment (citizenship, probationary period, background investigation, financial disclosure, drug testing, travel requirements may differ) plus CTAP/ICTAP eligibility, VSIP repayment, not part of bargaining unit, plus detailed probationary period considerations. We need to avoid repeating probationary period bullet twice; we can combine. We'll produce a

      with items: - Must be a U.S. citizen, national, or owe allegiance to the U.S. - May require a one-year probationary period; determination per Title 5 CFR Part 11. During probation, evaluation based on performance and conduct, agency needs/interests, advancement of organizational goals, efficiency of Federal service. Employment terminated unless certification that continued employment advances public interest. Candidates should be committed to improving efficiency of Federal government, passionate about ideals of American republic, and committed to upholding rule of law and U.S. Constitution. - Subject to pre-employment background investigation or higher-level clearance; investigation/clearance may differ based on duty location/NASA Center requirements. - Financial disclosure, drug testing, and/or travel requirements may differ and be required based on duty location/NASA Center requirements. - If you have special priority selection rights under CTAP or ICTAP, you must indicate eligibility when applying; the questionnaire asks you to identify ICTAP/CTAP eligibility; you must be well qualified; candidates rated 'Best Qualified' are considered well-qualified; see 'How You Will Be Evaluated' for more info; submit proof of CTAP/ICTAP eligibility as indicated in 'Required Documents'; for additional info see OPM link. - Any applicant who received a Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP) from the federal government within the last five years (based on closing date) may, if selected, be required to repay the full amount prior to start date; see OPM link for details. - Per Executive Order 14343, this position is not part of a bargaining unit. We need to ensure we didn't invent info; all derived. Qualifications: include specialized experience description and education requirements. We'll produce a

      for specialized experience narrative (the bullet points). Then maybe a

      ? Not allowed; we can just continue with

      for education. But we need to keep the specialized experience bullet points as list? The text: "To qualify for GS-15, you must have one year of directly related specialized experience equivalent to the GS-14 level: Developing, implementing, and overseeing data governance frameworks, policies, standards, or stewardship practices supporting scientific research, policy compliance, interoperability, or long-term data management. Managing complex scientific data systems that integrate research data repositories, computational capabilities, and collaborative efforts across multiple organizations. Applying advanced technologies and open science principles to scientific data systems to improve data accessibility, analysis, integration, transparency, or technical decision-making." That's three sentences; we can make a

      with each as
      • . Then education requirements: Basic Education Requirement: bachelor's degree with major in specific fields; details about ABET etc. Also alternative graduate degree, exceptional experience, etc. We'll summarize but must preserve all substantive information; we cannot summarize away detail. However we can keep the detailed text as paragraphs; it's okay