Jobs · Management · Nebraska

Field Diesel Mechanic - Sign-On Bonus Available!

Titan Machinery · Lincoln, NE · 1 wk ago
ManagementFull-time
The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. I need to follow specific rules: 1. Use

for section headings (About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule) 2. Use
  • for lists of duties/requirements/benefits, and

    for prose 3. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading 4. Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings 5. Preserve ALL substantive information 6. Remove boilerplate (cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions) 7. Include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it 8. Never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text 9. Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them 10. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones 11. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences Let me analyze the job posting: - Overview/About the role: There's an "Overview" section describing the role - Responsibilities: There's a "Responsibilities" section with subsections - Qualifications: There's a "Qualifications" section with Required and Preferred - Benefits: There's a detailed benefits section - Pay: The posting mentions "Titan reserves the right to adjust compensation based on factors..." but doesn't give specific pay info. It says "Performance-based incentives" but no salary range. So I should NOT create a Pay section. - Schedule: Mentions "flexible/on call hours", "weekend and after-hours service calls", "travel up to 75%", "50% or more work offsite/in the field". This is schedule-related info but not a formal schedule section. I could include schedule info in the qualifications or responsibilities, but the rules say to use

    for Schedule if the posting actually states them. The posting does mention schedule-related details. However, the rule says "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting does state schedule-related requirements. But it's not a separate "Schedule" section. I think I should include schedule info in the Qualifications or Responsibilities sections, not create a separate Schedule heading unless there's a clear schedule section. The posting doesn't have a "Schedule" heading. So I'll omit a Schedule section. - There's also "Additional Leave Benefits" and "Additional Voluntary Benefits" under benefits. - There's a link to learn more about benefits, but that's application instruction/navigation, should be removed. - There's EEO/E-Verify boilerplate at the end, should be removed. - There's "Apply today..." and "Learn more about our benefits here:" - application instructions, remove. - The job title "Case CE Diesel Mechanic" appears in the overview, but the rule says do NOT repeat the job title as a heading. The page already shows it. So I won't include it as a heading. - There's no Job ID/requisition number. Now, structure: I'll create sections: 1. About the role (from Overview) 2. Responsibilities (from Responsibilities section) 3. Qualifications (from Qualifications section, split into Required and Preferred) 4. Benefits (from Benefits section) I need to use

    for each section heading. For Responsibilities, the posting has subsections: "Diagnostic, Repair, and Technical Expertise", "Documentation and Communication", "Technical Development and Customer Focus", "Safety and Compliance". I could either make them subheadings (but rule says use

    for section headings, not subheadings). The rule says "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It doesn't mention subheadings. I think I should keep the main sections as

    and within Responsibilities, use
    • for each bullet point, perhaps grouping by the subsections but not creating subheadings. However, the posting has clear subsections with multiple bullet points each. I could use

      for subsections? But the rule only mentions

      for section headings. It doesn't forbid other headings, but says "use

      for section headings". I think it's okay to use

      for subsections, but to be safe, I'll keep only

      for main sections and use
      • for all bullet points, maybe with bold text for the subsection titles within list items? But that might not be semantic. Better to use

        for subsections within Responsibilities. However, the instruction says "use

        for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It doesn't say not to use other headings. But to follow the spirit, I'll use

        for main sections only, and for subsections, I'll incorporate them as list items with strong labels. Alternatively, I can make each subsection a separate
          with a preceding

          Diagnostic, Repair, and Technical Expertise

          then list. But that's not semantic. I think using

          is acceptable as it's still semantic HTML. But the rule might be strict. Let's see: "use

          for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use
          • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

            for prose." It doesn't mention subheadings. I'll assume we can use

            for subsections within a section. However, to be safe, I'll keep only

            headings and use
            • for all bullet points, grouping them under the main Responsibilities heading. I'll include the subsection titles as part of the list items or as separate list items with strong text. Let's parse the content: Overview: "Join the Titan Machinery team as a Case CE Diesel Mechanic. This position is responsible for performing diesel machinery diagnostics, repairs, maintenance, and pre-delivery work on customer equipment, internal units, and warranty repairs at a high level of quality and efficiency. Work may be performed in the shop or in the field, and all assigned tasks must be completed safely, professionally, and profitably." That's prose, so

              . Responsibilities: Four subsections, each with bullet points (though not explicitly bulleted, but each line is a duty). I'll convert each duty to a list item. Qualifications: Required and Preferred. Required has many bullet points. Preferred has two bullet points. Benefits: Many bullet points. Now, I need to remove boilerplate: "Titan reserves the right to adjust compensation based on factors including but not limited to: scope and geography of the position, qualifications and experience of candidates, and other business and operational conditions." This is about pay, but not specific pay info. It's a disclaimer. Should I include it? The rule says remove legal/EEO/equal-opportunity boilerplate. This is a compensation disclaimer, maybe keep? But it's not substantive pay info. The rule says "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." This is a statement about pay adjustment, but not a pay section. I think it's boilerplate and can be removed. "Titan Machinery is an Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action employer: Women, Minorities, the Disabled and Veterans are encouraged to apply. Titan Machinery is an E-Verify participant. To learn more, please refer to the main Careers page." This is EEO boilerplate, remove. "Learn more about our benefits here: https://www.titanmachinery.com/titancareers/careers/benefits" - navigation, remove. "Apply today and take the next step towards a rewarding career with Titan Machinery!" - application instruction, remove. "#TMMechanic" - hashtag, remove. Now, let's write HTML. I'll start with

              About the role

              then

              for the overview paragraph. Then

              Responsibilities

              then a
                with list items for each duty. I'll group by subsection but not create subheadings. I'll include the subsection title as a strong prefix in the first list item of each group, or just list all duties sequentially. The posting has clear groupings. I'll create separate
                  for each subsection? But that would be multiple lists under one heading. That's okay. I'll do:

                  Responsibilities

                  Diagnostic, Repair, and Technical Expertise

                  • Perform accurate diagnosis, repair, and reconditioning of machine systems and components in accordance with manufacturer specifications.
                  • Provide professional, timely, and courteous field service as directed by the Service Manager, including potential weekend and after-hours service calls.

                  Documentation and Communication

                  • Communicate findings, repair needs, and expected timelines clearly with equipment owners, operators, and the service team.
                  • Request, install, and manage all parts and supplies required for equipment repairs.
                  • Complete work orders and all required service-related documentation accurately and in a timely manner.

                  Technical Development and Customer Focus

                  • Participate in ongoing professional and technical training to maintain current product knowledge and service capabilities.
                  • Proactively recommend maintenance, upgrades, or solutions that add value for customers and improve equipment performance.

                  Safety and Compliance

                  • Follow all safety rules, policies, and regulations while performing work assignments.
                  But the rule says "Use
                  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

                    for prose." Using

                    ...

                    for subsection titles is prose, okay. Alternatively, I could use

                    but I'll stick with

                    for simplicity. Now Qualifications:

                    Qualifications

                    Required

                    • Have 2+ years of related experience OR an Associate's Degree in Diesel Equipment Technology or related program
                    • 1+ years of successfully completing tasks with limited supervision
                    • Clean driving record
                    • Must have own tools
                    • Must have or have the ability to obtain and maintain a DOT Medical Certification
                    • Ability to travel up to 75% of the time with occasional overnights and perform 50% or more work offsite/in the field
                    • Ability to work flexible/on call hours
                    • Keen attention to detail, high level of initiative, and the ability to work independently
                    • Exceptional documentation and communication abilities

                    Preferred

                    • Ability to work flexible hours
                    • Ability to travel to customer and company locations
                    Note: The preferred qualifications are somewhat redundant with required (flexible hours, travel). But I'll include as posted. Benefits:

                    Benefits

                    • Comprehensive Health and Dental Coverage
                    • HSA (Health Savings Account) - up to $1200 tax-free each year, contributed to your account by Titan Machinery
                    • 8 Paid Holidays, Competitive PTO, and Paid Company Volunteer Hours
                    • 401(k) with company matching on your FIRST DAY of employment

Similar jobs