Emergency Medical Technician (EMT B)
` for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)
- Use `- ` for any list of duties/requirements/benefits
- Use `
` for prose
- Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (page already shows it)
- Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short `
` or drop it
- Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail
- Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions
- IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them
- Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones
- Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no `/`, no markdown code fences
2. **Analyze the Input Job Posting:**
- Company: Allegiance Mobile Health of Corpus Christi, TX
- Position: Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT-B)
- SUMMARY: Looking for compassionate and reliable EMT-Basic to provide essential pre-hospital care and emergency medical assistance. Respond to 911 calls, assess patient conditions, perform basic life support procedures, assist in patient transport and transfer. Requires strong communication, calm demeanor under pressure, commitment to patient care.
- ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: (list of many specific duties)
- Physical Requirements: Lift/carry/balance/push up to 125 lbs (250 with assistance), flexibility/coordination tests, climb 20 sets of stairs without rest within 60 seconds, fine manual dexterity, correctable vision, etc.
- Psychological Requirements: Good judgment, calm in high-stress, positive attitude, interpersonal/conflict resolution skills, function under extreme fatigue, etc.
- MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: High school graduate or GED, Certified as EMT in Texas, CPR certification, PHTLS or ITLS, communicate effectively in English, previous experience preferred, valid Texas driver's license and insurable, EEO employer statement
- "Allegiance is an EEO employer as defined by the EEOC." -> This is boilerplate/EEO, should be removed per instructions
- "Job Posted by ApplicantPro" -> application instructions/boilerplate, remove
- No explicit Benefits, Pay, or Schedule sections mentioned -> must NOT create them
3. **Determine Sections to Include:**
Based on the rules, I should use `
` for: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule - but ONLY when the posting has real content.
Let's map what's in the posting:
- "SUMMARY" section -> This is about the role. I can use "About the role" or keep it as a heading but content is there. The rule says "use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". I should map the content to these semantically. The posting has a SUMMARY, so I'll use `About the role
` or maybe just keep the summary content under an appropriate heading. The rule says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". So I shouldn't have an h1 or h2 for the title. I'll use h3s.
- Responsibilities: Yes, detailed list. Use `- `.
- Requirements: The posting has "Physical Requirements" and "Psychological Requirements" and "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS". I need to figure out how to structure this. The rules say use headings for: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. I think "Requirements" could encompass the qualifications, physical/psychological requirements. Or I could split into "Requirements" and "Qualifications". Let's see: The posting has MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS, Physical Requirements, Psychological Requirements. I'll likely create sections: "Requirements" (maybe covering min qualifications + physical/psych, or I'll separate them? The rule says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So I should combine related content. I'll make one "Requirements" section that includes minimum qualifications, physical requirements, and psychological requirements, or maybe "Qualifications" for the listed credentials, and combine physical/psychological into requirements? Let's re-read: "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It lists both "Requirements" and "Qualifications" as examples. I should probably use them distinctly if the content warrants, but the rule also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." The posting has clear sections: Minimum Qualifications, Physical Requirements, Psychological Requirements. I could do "Qualifications" for the credentials/education, and "Requirements" for physical/psychological, or just one "Requirements" section. To be safe and follow "prefer a few substantive sections", I'll likely use "Qualifications" for the listed qualifications (education, certifications, license), and maybe fold physical/psychological into a general "Requirements" section, or omit if not clear. But the posting has substantial content for both. Let's look at the exact wording: "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:" then list. "Physical Requirements" then list. "Psychological Requirements" then list. I think I'll create two sections: "Qualifications" for the MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS block, and "Requirements" for Physical and Psychological Requirements. That seems reasonable and follows the heading examples. But the rule says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". Both have specific content. I'll use "Qualifications" and "Requirements". Alternatively, I could just use one "Requirements" section encompassing all. Let's see what's more standard. I'll read carefully: "use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It lists both Requirements and Qualifications as separate examples. I'll use both if content fits. The posting has "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS" block and "Physical Requirements" + "Psychological Requirements" blocks. I'll map: "Qualifications" -> the MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS block. "Requirements" -> Physical and Psychological Requirements. That uses two headings with real content, which is fine.
- Skills: The posting mentions clinical competencies, physical competencies, communication, etc. But it's not explicitly a "Skills" section. However, the duties imply skills. The rule says include a section ONLY when the posting has real specific content. I could argue the "Essential Duties" cover skills, but there's no explicit "Skills" heading content. I'll skip "Skills" unless I can map specific skill statements. The posting has "Demonstrates clinical competency" and "Demonstrates physical competencies", but those are under responsibilities/requirements. I'll probably not create a separate "Skills" section to avoid thin content, or I could include a "Skills" section if I extract from the text. But the rule says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." I'd rather combine into existing sections. I'll skip "Skills".
- Benefits, Pay, Schedule: Not mentioned in the posting. Must NOT create them. So I'll omit those headings entirely.
Let's structure the HTML fragment:
- No job title heading (already on page)
- Remove EEO, "Job Posted by ApplicantPro", any boilerplate.
- Keep the SUMMARY content under "About the role" or similar.
- Keep ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES under "Responsibilities".
- Keep Physical and Psychological Requirements and MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS under appropriate headings.
Let's map carefully:
- "About the role": The SUMMARY paragraph. I'll use `About the role
` and then `
` with the summary text.
- "Responsibilities": The "ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:" list. I'll use `
- ` for each duty. Note: The heading says "(Responsibilities include, but not limited to)" then lists. I'll extract all the listed duties as `
- ` items.
- "Qualifications": The "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:" block. I'll use `
Qualifications
` and `- ` for each qualification, or `
` if they are prose-like. The list items are somewhat prose but can be list items. I'll use `
- ` for clarity, but the rule says "Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose." The MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS are kind of a mix. I'll use `
- ` since they are listed items.
- "Requirements": The Physical and Psychological Requirements blocks. I'll use `
Requirements
` and combine them into one section with lists or prose. Or I could do two sub-sections, but that might be too many. I'll combine into one "Requirements" section with `- ` for physical and psychological criteria. Or I could keep them as separate paragraphs under one heading. I'll use `
- ` for each, maybe label them. But the rule says "Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". I'll treat Physical and Psychological Requirements as lists.
Let's re-read the exact input text for each section to preserve ALL substantive information, do NOT invent or summarize away detail.
Summary block:
"Allegiance Mobile Health is looking for a compassionate and reliable EMT-Basic to provide essential pre-hospital care and emergency medical assistance. The EMT-B will respond to 911 calls, assess patient conditions, perform basic life support procedures, and assist in patient transport and transfer. This role requires strong communication, a calm demeanor under pressure, and a commitment to patient care."
Essential Duties:
1. Responds to emergency and non-emergency calls 24 hours per day
2. drives a variety of emergency vehicles in all road conditions including inclement weather, dense traffic and rural off-road settings.
3. Reads map books and follows written and verbal directions in order to respond in an efficient and safe manner.
4. Follows all departmental, local and state driving laws, policies and procedures.
5. Uses a variety of communication equipment and appropriately communicates verbally to dispatchers, EMS crews, first responders and other organizations according to departmental policies and procedures.
6. Maintains vehicles and equipment in a constant state of readiness and cleanliness.
7. Completes daily vehicle and supply checklists and assists with vehicle re-supply, vehicle and equipment decontamination and general readiness-related tasks.
8. Immediately reports, in writing, any discrepancies with vehicles, supplies or equipment and their state of readiness.
9. Provides direct
` for prose - Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (page already shows it) - Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short `
` or drop it - Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail - Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions - IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them - Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones - Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no `/`, no markdown code fences 2. **Analyze the Input Job Posting:** - Company: Allegiance Mobile Health of Corpus Christi, TX - Position: Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT-B) - SUMMARY: Looking for compassionate and reliable EMT-Basic to provide essential pre-hospital care and emergency medical assistance. Respond to 911 calls, assess patient conditions, perform basic life support procedures, assist in patient transport and transfer. Requires strong communication, calm demeanor under pressure, commitment to patient care. - ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: (list of many specific duties) - Physical Requirements: Lift/carry/balance/push up to 125 lbs (250 with assistance), flexibility/coordination tests, climb 20 sets of stairs without rest within 60 seconds, fine manual dexterity, correctable vision, etc. - Psychological Requirements: Good judgment, calm in high-stress, positive attitude, interpersonal/conflict resolution skills, function under extreme fatigue, etc. - MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: High school graduate or GED, Certified as EMT in Texas, CPR certification, PHTLS or ITLS, communicate effectively in English, previous experience preferred, valid Texas driver's license and insurable, EEO employer statement - "Allegiance is an EEO employer as defined by the EEOC." -> This is boilerplate/EEO, should be removed per instructions - "Job Posted by ApplicantPro" -> application instructions/boilerplate, remove - No explicit Benefits, Pay, or Schedule sections mentioned -> must NOT create them 3. **Determine Sections to Include:** Based on the rules, I should use `
` for: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule - but ONLY when the posting has real content.
Let's map what's in the posting:
- "SUMMARY" section -> This is about the role. I can use "About the role" or keep it as a heading but content is there. The rule says "use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". I should map the content to these semantically. The posting has a SUMMARY, so I'll use `About the role
` or maybe just keep the summary content under an appropriate heading. The rule says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". So I shouldn't have an h1 or h2 for the title. I'll use h3s.
- Responsibilities: Yes, detailed list. Use `- `.
- Requirements: The posting has "Physical Requirements" and "Psychological Requirements" and "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS". I need to figure out how to structure this. The rules say use headings for: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. I think "Requirements" could encompass the qualifications, physical/psychological requirements. Or I could split into "Requirements" and "Qualifications". Let's see: The posting has MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS, Physical Requirements, Psychological Requirements. I'll likely create sections: "Requirements" (maybe covering min qualifications + physical/psych, or I'll separate them? The rule says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So I should combine related content. I'll make one "Requirements" section that includes minimum qualifications, physical requirements, and psychological requirements, or maybe "Qualifications" for the listed credentials, and combine physical/psychological into requirements? Let's re-read: "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It lists both "Requirements" and "Qualifications" as examples. I should probably use them distinctly if the content warrants, but the rule also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." The posting has clear sections: Minimum Qualifications, Physical Requirements, Psychological Requirements. I could do "Qualifications" for the credentials/education, and "Requirements" for physical/psychological, or just one "Requirements" section. To be safe and follow "prefer a few substantive sections", I'll likely use "Qualifications" for the listed qualifications (education, certifications, license), and maybe fold physical/psychological into a general "Requirements" section, or omit if not clear. But the posting has substantial content for both. Let's look at the exact wording: "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:" then list. "Physical Requirements" then list. "Psychological Requirements" then list. I think I'll create two sections: "Qualifications" for the MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS block, and "Requirements" for Physical and Psychological Requirements. That seems reasonable and follows the heading examples. But the rule says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". Both have specific content. I'll use "Qualifications" and "Requirements". Alternatively, I could just use one "Requirements" section encompassing all. Let's see what's more standard. I'll read carefully: "use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It lists both Requirements and Qualifications as separate examples. I'll use both if content fits. The posting has "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS" block and "Physical Requirements" + "Psychological Requirements" blocks. I'll map: "Qualifications" -> the MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS block. "Requirements" -> Physical and Psychological Requirements. That uses two headings with real content, which is fine.
- Skills: The posting mentions clinical competencies, physical competencies, communication, etc. But it's not explicitly a "Skills" section. However, the duties imply skills. The rule says include a section ONLY when the posting has real specific content. I could argue the "Essential Duties" cover skills, but there's no explicit "Skills" heading content. I'll skip "Skills" unless I can map specific skill statements. The posting has "Demonstrates clinical competency" and "Demonstrates physical competencies", but those are under responsibilities/requirements. I'll probably not create a separate "Skills" section to avoid thin content, or I could include a "Skills" section if I extract from the text. But the rule says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." I'd rather combine into existing sections. I'll skip "Skills".
- Benefits, Pay, Schedule: Not mentioned in the posting. Must NOT create them. So I'll omit those headings entirely.
Let's structure the HTML fragment:
- No job title heading (already on page)
- Remove EEO, "Job Posted by ApplicantPro", any boilerplate.
- Keep the SUMMARY content under "About the role" or similar.
- Keep ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES under "Responsibilities".
- Keep Physical and Psychological Requirements and MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS under appropriate headings.
Let's map carefully:
- "About the role": The SUMMARY paragraph. I'll use `About the role
` and then `
` with the summary text.
- "Responsibilities": The "ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:" list. I'll use `
- ` for each duty. Note: The heading says "(Responsibilities include, but not limited to)" then lists. I'll extract all the listed duties as `
- ` items.
- "Qualifications": The "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:" block. I'll use `
Qualifications
` and `- ` for each qualification, or `
` if they are prose-like. The list items are somewhat prose but can be list items. I'll use `
- ` for clarity, but the rule says "Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose." The MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS are kind of a mix. I'll use `
- ` since they are listed items.
- "Requirements": The Physical and Psychological Requirements blocks. I'll use `
Requirements
` and combine them into one section with lists or prose. Or I could do two sub-sections, but that might be too many. I'll combine into one "Requirements" section with `- ` for physical and psychological criteria. Or I could keep them as separate paragraphs under one heading. I'll use `
- ` for each, maybe label them. But the rule says "Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". I'll treat Physical and Psychological Requirements as lists.
Let's re-read the exact input text for each section to preserve ALL substantive information, do NOT invent or summarize away detail.
Summary block:
"Allegiance Mobile Health is looking for a compassionate and reliable EMT-Basic to provide essential pre-hospital care and emergency medical assistance. The EMT-B will respond to 911 calls, assess patient conditions, perform basic life support procedures, and assist in patient transport and transfer. This role requires strong communication, a calm demeanor under pressure, and a commitment to patient care."
Essential Duties:
1. Responds to emergency and non-emergency calls 24 hours per day
2. drives a variety of emergency vehicles in all road conditions including inclement weather, dense traffic and rural off-road settings.
3. Reads map books and follows written and verbal directions in order to respond in an efficient and safe manner.
4. Follows all departmental, local and state driving laws, policies and procedures.
5. Uses a variety of communication equipment and appropriately communicates verbally to dispatchers, EMS crews, first responders and other organizations according to departmental policies and procedures.
6. Maintains vehicles and equipment in a constant state of readiness and cleanliness.
7. Completes daily vehicle and supply checklists and assists with vehicle re-supply, vehicle and equipment decontamination and general readiness-related tasks.
8. Immediately reports, in writing, any discrepancies with vehicles, supplies or equipment and their state of readiness.
9. Provides direct
About the role
` or maybe just keep the summary content under an appropriate heading. The rule says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". So I shouldn't have an h1 or h2 for the title. I'll use h3s. - Responsibilities: Yes, detailed list. Use `- `.
- Requirements: The posting has "Physical Requirements" and "Psychological Requirements" and "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS". I need to figure out how to structure this. The rules say use headings for: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. I think "Requirements" could encompass the qualifications, physical/psychological requirements. Or I could split into "Requirements" and "Qualifications". Let's see: The posting has MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS, Physical Requirements, Psychological Requirements. I'll likely create sections: "Requirements" (maybe covering min qualifications + physical/psych, or I'll separate them? The rule says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So I should combine related content. I'll make one "Requirements" section that includes minimum qualifications, physical requirements, and psychological requirements, or maybe "Qualifications" for the listed credentials, and combine physical/psychological into requirements? Let's re-read: "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It lists both "Requirements" and "Qualifications" as examples. I should probably use them distinctly if the content warrants, but the rule also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." The posting has clear sections: Minimum Qualifications, Physical Requirements, Psychological Requirements. I could do "Qualifications" for the credentials/education, and "Requirements" for physical/psychological, or just one "Requirements" section. To be safe and follow "prefer a few substantive sections", I'll likely use "Qualifications" for the listed qualifications (education, certifications, license), and maybe fold physical/psychological into a general "Requirements" section, or omit if not clear. But the posting has substantial content for both. Let's look at the exact wording: "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:" then list. "Physical Requirements" then list. "Psychological Requirements" then list. I think I'll create two sections: "Qualifications" for the MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS block, and "Requirements" for Physical and Psychological Requirements. That seems reasonable and follows the heading examples. But the rule says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". Both have specific content. I'll use "Qualifications" and "Requirements". Alternatively, I could just use one "Requirements" section encompassing all. Let's see what's more standard. I'll read carefully: "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It lists both Requirements and Qualifications as separate examples. I'll use both if content fits. The posting has "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS" block and "Physical Requirements" + "Psychological Requirements" blocks. I'll map: "Qualifications" -> the MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS block. "Requirements" -> Physical and Psychological Requirements. That uses two headings with real content, which is fine. - Skills: The posting mentions clinical competencies, physical competencies, communication, etc. But it's not explicitly a "Skills" section. However, the duties imply skills. The rule says include a section ONLY when the posting has real specific content. I could argue the "Essential Duties" cover skills, but there's no explicit "Skills" heading content. I'll skip "Skills" unless I can map specific skill statements. The posting has "Demonstrates clinical competency" and "Demonstrates physical competencies", but those are under responsibilities/requirements. I'll probably not create a separate "Skills" section to avoid thin content, or I could include a "Skills" section if I extract from the text. But the rule says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." I'd rather combine into existing sections. I'll skip "Skills". - Benefits, Pay, Schedule: Not mentioned in the posting. Must NOT create them. So I'll omit those headings entirely. Let's structure the HTML fragment: - No job title heading (already on page) - Remove EEO, "Job Posted by ApplicantPro", any boilerplate. - Keep the SUMMARY content under "About the role" or similar. - Keep ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES under "Responsibilities". - Keep Physical and Psychological Requirements and MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS under appropriate headings. Let's map carefully: - "About the role": The SUMMARY paragraph. I'll use `
About the role
` and then `` with the summary text. - "Responsibilities": The "ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:" list. I'll use `
- ` for each duty. Note: The heading says "(Responsibilities include, but not limited to)" then lists. I'll extract all the listed duties as `
- ` items.
- "Qualifications": The "MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:" block. I'll use `
Qualifications
` and `- ` for each qualification, or `
` if they are prose-like. The list items are somewhat prose but can be list items. I'll use `
- ` for clarity, but the rule says "Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose." The MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS are kind of a mix. I'll use `
- ` since they are listed items.
- "Requirements": The Physical and Psychological Requirements blocks. I'll use `
Requirements
` and combine them into one section with lists or prose. Or I could do two sub-sections, but that might be too many. I'll combine into one "Requirements" section with `- ` for physical and psychological criteria. Or I could keep them as separate paragraphs under one heading. I'll use `
- ` for each, maybe label them. But the rule says "Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". I'll treat Physical and Psychological Requirements as lists. Let's re-read the exact input text for each section to preserve ALL substantive information, do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Summary block: "Allegiance Mobile Health is looking for a compassionate and reliable EMT-Basic to provide essential pre-hospital care and emergency medical assistance. The EMT-B will respond to 911 calls, assess patient conditions, perform basic life support procedures, and assist in patient transport and transfer. This role requires strong communication, a calm demeanor under pressure, and a commitment to patient care." Essential Duties: 1. Responds to emergency and non-emergency calls 24 hours per day 2. drives a variety of emergency vehicles in all road conditions including inclement weather, dense traffic and rural off-road settings. 3. Reads map books and follows written and verbal directions in order to respond in an efficient and safe manner. 4. Follows all departmental, local and state driving laws, policies and procedures. 5. Uses a variety of communication equipment and appropriately communicates verbally to dispatchers, EMS crews, first responders and other organizations according to departmental policies and procedures. 6. Maintains vehicles and equipment in a constant state of readiness and cleanliness. 7. Completes daily vehicle and supply checklists and assists with vehicle re-supply, vehicle and equipment decontamination and general readiness-related tasks. 8. Immediately reports, in writing, any discrepancies with vehicles, supplies or equipment and their state of readiness. 9. Provides direct
- ` for each, maybe label them. But the rule says "Use
- ` for physical and psychological criteria. Or I could keep them as separate paragraphs under one heading. I'll use `
- ` since they are listed items.
- "Requirements": The Physical and Psychological Requirements blocks. I'll use `
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
- ` for clarity, but the rule says "Use
- ` for each qualification, or `