Director - Public Affairs, CO

The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. I need to follow the rules: 1. Use

for section headings (e.g., About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule) 2. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose 3. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) 4. Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it 5. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail 6. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions 7. Include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") 8. Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them 9. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones 10. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences Let me analyze the job posting content: The posting has: - Role Overview (prose) - Key Responsibilities with multiple subsections: - Colorado Advisory Board and State Regulator Relationships - Colorado Board Governance and Organizational Support - Strategic Program Management - Cross-Functional Coordination with CAA Teams - Government Relations and Strategic Partnerships - Strategic Communications and Public Affairs - Skills & Competencies (list) - Qualifications (list) - Compensation & Other Information (includes Location, Pay Rate, Reports To, EEO statement) I need to structure this appropriately. The "Role Overview" could be an "About the role" section. The "Key Responsibilities" could be a "Responsibilities" section with sub-sections. "Skills & Competencies" could be "Skills". "Qualifications" could be "Requirements" or "Qualifications". "Compensation & Other Information" has location, pay rate, reports to - but pay rate is vague ("Based on a variety of factors..."). The rules say never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The pay rate is stated but it's generic. Location is stated. Reports to is stated. I could include a "Compensation & Other Information" section or fold into a short

  . The rules say fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it. But location and reports to are substantive. However, the rules say "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting states "Pay Rate: Based on a variety of factors..." which is a statement but not specific. I think I should include a section for "Compensation & Other Information" but only if there's real content. The location is specific (Remote, in Colorado). Reports to is specific. Pay rate is generic. I'll include a section with the substantive info. Also need to remove EEO boilerplate. The EEO statement is boilerplate, so remove it. The accommodation contact is also boilerplate. Now, structure: -

  About the role

  with

  for the role overview. -

  Responsibilities

  with subsections? The rules say use

  for section headings. But we have sub-sections under responsibilities. Could use

  ? The rules only mention

  for section headings. It says "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It doesn't forbid other heading levels, but to keep it simple, maybe use

  for each major responsibility area? But that would be many

  s. The example shows "Responsibilities" as a section heading. I think we should have one

  Responsibilities

  and then use

  for sub-sections? However, the rules don't mention

  . But they don't forbid it. The instruction: "use

  for section headings". It doesn't say we cannot use other headings. But to be safe, maybe we can use

  for each major responsibility area? That would be many sections. The posting has six responsibility areas. Could make each an

  ? But then we lose the grouping under "Responsibilities". The rules say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe keep "Responsibilities" as one section with sub-lists? But the content is detailed and distinct. I think using

  for each responsibility area is acceptable as they are substantive sections. However, the example list includes "Responsibilities" as a section heading. The user might expect a single "Responsibilities" heading with sub-items. But the posting has clear sub-headings. I'll use

  for each responsibility area, but that might be too many. Let's see: "Colorado Advisory Board and State Regulator Relationships", "Colorado Board Governance and Organizational Support", "Strategic Program Management", "Cross-Functional Coordination with CAA Teams", "Government Relations and Strategic Partnerships", "Strategic Communications and Public Affairs". That's six

  s. Plus "About the role", "Skills", "Qualifications", "Compensation & Other Information". That's 10 sections. Might be okay. Alternatively, I could have one

  Responsibilities

  and then use
  with nested lists? But the content is prose and bullet points. The posting uses bullet points under each sub-heading. I'll follow the structure: each sub-heading becomes an

  ? But the rules say "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". That suggests those are the typical section headings. The sub-headings are not in that list. However, the rules don't explicitly forbid other headings. I think it's better to keep the hierarchy: use

  for the main sections, and for sub-sections use

  or just bold? But the output is HTML fragment, we can use

  . The rules don't prohibit

  . I'll use

  for main sections and

  for sub-sections under Responsibilities. Let's decide on main sections: 1. About the role 2. Responsibilities (with sub-sections) 3. Skills 4. Qualifications 5. Compensation & Other Information (maybe just "Additional Information") But the rules say "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting states "Compensation & Other Information" with location, pay rate, reports to. So I'll include a section for that. Now, for each sub-section under Responsibilities, I'll use

  and then

  • for the bullet points. Some are prose, some are bullet points. The posting uses bullet points. I'll convert each bullet to
  • . Some bullet points are long and contain multiple sentences; that's fine. For Skills & Competencies, it's a list of bullet points. Use
    • . For Qualifications, it's a list of bullet points. Use
      • . For Compensation & Other Information, it's a few lines: Location, Pay Rate, Reports To. I'll put them in a
        • or

          . Since they are key-value pairs, maybe

          • Location: Remote, in Colorado
          etc. Now, remove EEO statement and accommodation contact. Also, the role overview is a paragraph. I'll put it under About the role. Now, write the HTML fragment. Let's start:

          About the role

          Serves as a senior leader within CAA Colorado, responsible for advancing the successful implementation of Colorado’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Program. The role provides strategic leadership and operational execution for CAA Colorado team efforts across state regulator relationships, Colorado board governance, interest holder engagement, service provider relationships, and cross-functional coordination across Circular Action Alliance (CAA) teams.

          Responsibilities

          Colorado Advisory Board and State Regulator Relationships

          • Represent CAA on the Colorado EPR Advisory Board.
          • Prepare and submit Advisory Board materials and presentations.
          • Attend Advisory Board meetings and provide strategic updates and recommendations to the Colorado Executive Director.
          • In collaboration with Compliance & Regulatory Affairs (CRA), support management of CAA’s relationship with CDPHE.
          • In collaboration with CRA, represent CAA in regulator meetings as directed by the Executive Director and serve as a point of contact for regulators on designated matters.
          • Work closely with CRA teams regarding regulator meeting preparation, agendas, issue management, follow-up actions, and implementation of regulatory requirements.

          Colorado Board Governance and Organizational Support

          • Develop Colorado board meeting agendas in partnership with the Executive Director and the administrative team.
          • Coordinate preparation of board materials and presentations, engaging subject matter experts as needed.
          • Plan board meeting schedules and cadence in close coordination with administrative and legal teams.
          • Facilitate CAA Colorado board meetings and take meeting minutes.
          • Monitor and track completion of board-directed actions and follow-up items.

          Strategic Program Management

          • Partner with the Executive Director and CAA teams to implement Colorado’s approved Program Plan.
          • In collaboration with CRA, analyze Colorado legislation, regulations, local ordinances, market conditions, and stakeholder developments that may affect program implementation.
          • Conduct strategic assessments of emerging risks, opportunities, and operational challenges.
          • Develop and implement strategic recommendations that advance program objectives and organizational priorities.
          • Lead strategic development and execution of program deliverables supporting CAA Colorado operations and program implementation.
          • Lead special projects and strategic initiatives supporting long-term program success.
          • Ensure Colorado operational considerations and compliance requirements are understood and incorporated into state and national planning and support functions.

          Cross-Functional Coordination with CAA Teams

          • Facilitate communication and coordination between CAA Colorado and Program Planning and Operations.
          • In collaboration with CRA, track implementation activities, regulatory developments, state regulations, stakeholder issues, and operational priorities.
          • Collaborate with Legal, CRA, Communications, Finance, and other business units to align Colorado strategies and operational practices with organizational objectives.
          • Support CRA in the development of annual reports.
          • Coordinate with CRA to ensure compliance reporting requirements are completed accurately and on schedule.

          Government Relations and Strategic Partnerships

          • Represent CAA Colorado with participating local governments, elected officials, service providers, non-governmental organizations, industry associations, and other stakeholders.
          • Participate in conferences, workgroups, stakeholder forums, and public meetings on behalf of CAA Colorado.
          • Represent CAA Colorado before organizations such as Colorado Municipal League, Colorado Counties Inc., and similar entities.
          • Collaborate with national government affairs and stakeholder relations teams on broader engagement efforts.
          • Support interactions with producers, trade associations, other state EPR programs, and national or international organizations.
          • Manage and oversee the state lobbying contract and associated external consultants at the direction of the State Executive Director