Director of International Programs

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for each section present: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include only sections with real specific content. No filler. We must not repeat job title. No Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate like EEO, application instructions, etc. We need to parse the posting. Key info: - Full-time, fully remote | Based anywhere in the world | Reports to the Senior Director of Global Programs and Foundations - About Students For Liberty: description. - Position Summary: leading international regions, six Regional Directors report to you, covering Africa, Asia-Pacific, Brazil, Europe, Latin America, South Asia, along with managers and associates. - What you will own: Diagnose, Align, Steward, Develop, Transfer (these are subheadings within responsibilities). We can treat these as bullet list under Responsibilities. - Who we are looking for: list of qualifications/experience. - What SFL offers: benefits: fully remote workplace with extremely flexible hours, SFL grants to grow your professional skills, Room to advance, 15 days PTO plus 5 mental health days and public holidays, Travel to staff retreats and SFL events around the world, International community, Getting paid to spread values of liberty. - No explicit Pay or Schedule details beyond "extremely flexible hours" (maybe schedule). But schedule: "extremely flexible hours" could be considered schedule info. However we should only include Schedule section if posting actually states it. It says "extremely flexible hours". That is schedule info. So we can include Schedule section with that detail. - Pay: not specified. No salary range. So we should NOT include Pay section because no specific content. - Benefits: we have list. - Skills: maybe language skills: Working Spanish, Portuguese, or French helps. Also fluency in English. Also experience with evidence, CRMs, dashboards, measurement systems; Salesforce is a plus. Also change management, stakeholder management, etc. Could be under Skills or Requirements. We need to decide sections. We have headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide what goes where. About the role: could be position summary and description of SFL. Responsibilities: the "What you will own" bullet points (Diagnose, Align, Steward, Develop, Transfer) each with description. Requirements: maybe the "Who we are looking for" bullet points (experience managing people, language, change management, etc.) Could be considered Requirements. Qualifications: maybe overlapping; but we need to avoid duplication. Could treat Requirements as mandatory experience, Qualifications as preferred? But we have limited content. Perhaps we combine into Requirements and Qualifications? But we need to follow instruction: include a section ONLY when posting has real, specific content for it. So we need to decide which sections have content. We have content for: - About the role: yes (position summary and org description). - Responsibilities: yes (What you will own). - Requirements: yes (Who we are looking for list). Could be considered Requirements. - Qualifications: maybe not distinct; but we could treat some items as Qualifications (e.g., fluency in English, language skills, experience with change management, etc.) However the "Who we are looking for" already covers qualifications. To avoid duplication, we could put all under Requirements and skip Qualifications. Or we could split: Requirements = managing people experience, Qualifications = language skills, change management experience, etc. But we need to ensure we don't invent content. The posting says: "You have at least five years managing people, including managing managers in more than one country and time zone. Working Spanish, Portuguese, or French helps in this portfolioYou have led a change through an organization and made it hold: ... You practice change management and stakeholder management as disciplines. Experience with a structured change method (Kotter, Prosci ADKAR, or an equivalent you can defend), and with boards, partner institutions, or funders, counts in your favorYou have designed the parts that decide whether a change succeeds: ... You have found the problem before it reached a report. ... You have turned around a team that was missing its targets and kept the team intactYou have carried unwelcome news to a senior leader, including news about a decision they made, and kept both the relationship and the goalYou can look at six regions running at different speeds and say what must be the same everywhere, what should stay local, and in what order to moveYou have driven the adoption of a standard across teams that did not report to you, and you have managed directors or senior staff, not only coordinatorsYou are at home with evidence, CRMs, dashboards, and measurement systems; Salesforce is a plusFluent written and spoken EnglishOwnership, humility, professionalism, and an entrepreneurial attitude" Thus we can treat these as Requirements (mandatory) and Qualifications (preferred). But the posting does not explicitly label them as required vs preferred. However we can still create sections: Requirements (the core experience) and Qualifications (additional skills). But we need to avoid filler. It's okay to split. Better: Use Requirements for the mandatory experience (5 years managing people, managing managers across countries/time zones). Use Qualifications for language skills, change management experience, experience with structured change method, designing parts of change, problem detection, turning around teams, delivering unwelcome news, ability to assess regions, driving adoption across teams, experience with evidence/CRMs/dashboards/Salesforce, fluency in English, ownership/humility/professionalism/entrepreneurial attitude. But many of those are also requirements. However we can still allocate. Skills: maybe language skills (Spanish, Portuguese, French) and technical skills (evidence, CRMs, dashboards, Salesforce). Could be separate. But we need to avoid too many thin sections. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we should combine. Thus maybe we have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Benefits, Schedule. We can put language skills and technical skills under Requirements or Skills. But we have a Skills heading available; we could use Skills for language and technical proficiencies. Let's decide: - About the role: description of SFL and position summary. - Responsibilities: the five ownership areas (Diagnose, Align, Steward, Develop, Transfer) each with bullet points. - Requirements: core experience: at least five years managing people, including managing managers in more than one country and time zone. - Skills: language skills (Spanish, Portuguese, French helpful), fluency in English, experience with evidence, CRMs, dashboards, measurement systems; Salesforce plus; change management/stakeholder management; structured change method experience; ability to design change components; problem detection; turning around teams; delivering unwelcome news; assessing regions; driving adoption across teams; ownership/humility/professionalism/entrepreneurial attitude. But that's a lot; maybe better to put all under Requirements and skip Skills. However we have a Skills heading; we could use it for language and technical skills only, making it substantive. But we need to ensure we don't create filler. If we put only language skills under Skills, that's substantive enough. Let's see: The posting mentions "Working Spanish, Portuguese, or French helps in this portfolio" and "Fluent written and spoken English". Also "You are at home with evidence, CRMs, dashboards, and measurement systems; Salesforce is a plus". Those are skills. Thus Skills section can include: Fluency in English; working knowledge of Spanish, Portuguese, or French (helpful); experience with evidence, CRMs, dashboards, measurement systems; Salesforce experience a plus. Now Requirements: core experience: at least five years managing people, including managing managers in more than one country and time zone; plus maybe the leadership achievements? But we already put many under Skills. However the posting also includes many leadership/experience items that are not strictly skills but experience. Could be under Requirements. But we need to avoid duplication. Let's allocate: Requirements: - Minimum five years of experience managing people, including managing managers across multiple countries and time zones. Qualifications (maybe we can use Qualifications for the rest of the leadership/experience items). But we have Qualifications heading available. We could use Qualifications for the list of leadership/experience achievements: leading change, change management, designing change components, problem detection, turning around teams, delivering unwelcome news, assessing regions, driving adoption across teams, managing directors/senior staff. That seems reasonable. Thus sections: - About the role - Responsibilities - Requirements - Qualifications - Skills - Benefits - Schedule We will not include Pay. Now we need to format. Use

for each section heading. Under each heading, use

for prose,

• for lists. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. We must not repeat job title. We must not include boilerplate like EEO, application instructions, equal opportunity statement, etc. We must not include "How to apply" etc. We must not include navigation, cookie, legal, etc. We must not include duplicated lines. Now let's extract content. About the role: - Full-time, fully remote | Based anywhere in the world | Reports to the Senior Director of Global Programs and Foundations - About Students For Liberty: description: "Students For Liberty is the largest pro-liberty student organization in the world, with volunteers active in 127 countries on every inhabited continent. With a multi-million-dollar budget and more than 80 full-time staff, we identify the top pro-liberty students and empower them to become agents of change in their communities. Last school year, our students organized over 3,700 events with more than 221,000 people in attendance. We are a fully virtual, entrepreneurial organization with a team in the U.S. and around the world." - Position Summary: "We are looking for someone to lead Students For Liberty international regions. This is a full-time, fully remote role reporting to the Senior Director of Global Programs and Foundations. Six Regional Directors report to you, covering Africa, Asia-Pacific, Brazil, Europe, Latin America, and South Asia, along with the managers and associates who run the programs under them. We are looking for a leader who can bring six regions to a single global standard, name a problem before it reaches a number, and arrive with a plan that the regions have already agreed to. SFL turns pro-liberty students into leaders, and our goal is for a volunteer in Nairobi, São Paulo, or Kathmandu to receive the same quality of program, and for a leadership team to see a regional problem forming a quarter before it shows up in a report. The Director of International Programs is someone who has already driven change through an organization and made it stick. You have taken a standard, a system, or a way of working and made it hold across units, each with its own leaders, history, and reasons to wait. You have walked into a team that was missing its targets, found the cause two levels down, and fixed it without breaking the team. You have told a senior leader something they did not want to hear and kept both the relationship and the goal. We want that capability pointed at six regions, the directors who run them, and the thousands of students who feel the difference. A successful candidate will bring a firm commitment to classical-liberal ideas and to SFL’s vision and mission." We can combine these into a few paragraphs. Responsibilities: The "What you will own" section includes Diagnose, Align, Steward, Develop, Transfer each with description. Let's extract each: Diagnose: - "Diagnose SFL should never learn about a regional problem from a missed number. You keep a live read on all six regions by talking with the people who do the work, not only the people who report it: regional managers, associates, and the coordinators they train. You test what the dashboards claim against what the field says. You own the monthly regional read that reaches the Senior Director of Global Programs and Foundations, and the rule governing it: every risk arrives with