CBRNE/WMD Instructor

We need to output only HTML fragment, with headings

for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, not invent or summarize away detail. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, scam warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. We need to parse the description. Key sections: - Description: includes role description: "In support of a specialized training program at the Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP) the CBRNE/WMD Instructor will contribute to the strategic plan for the organization, work closely with the Subject Matter Expert (SME) Course Leader to ensure seamless training delivery, and periodically evaluate training delivery and recommend changes as indicated. The successful candidate will maintain knowledge base as a SME in the CBRNE/WMD discipline through training and continued involvement in the field and maintain qualification to instruct in CBRNE/WMD related courses." That could be "About the role" or "Responsibilities"? Usually "About the role" is a short description. We'll put that under

About the role

with a

. - Primary Responsibilities: list of duties. We'll put under

Responsibilities

with

• each bullet. - Basic Qualifications: list of qualifications. Could be under

  Requirements

  or

  Qualifications

  . The instruction says we can use sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide which to use. Basic Qualifications likely go under Requirements (or Qualifications). Preferred Qualifications could go under Qualifications or Skills. We have both Basic and Preferred. We could combine them under Requirements (basic) and Qualifications (preferred). Or we could put Basic under Requirements and Preferred under Qualifications. We'll do that. - Skills: maybe not explicitly listed; we have functional knowledge of federal response plan/NIMS, ability to lift, ability to wear PPE, etc. Those are more like requirements. Could also be under Skills. But we already have Requirements and Qualifications sections; we could put skill-like items under Skills. However we must not create sections without real specific content. We have specific content for skills: "Ability to lift a minimum of 65 pounds (i.e. SCBA and other equipment) during demonstrations and exercises. Ability to perform prolonged standing, bending, climbing, kneeling, and pushing and pulling carts containing equipment. Ability to wear Level A-C PPE including SCBA for period of 1 hour up to five hours." Also "Possess functional knowledge of the federal response plan/NIMS." Those could be skills. We'll decide. Better: Use Requirements for basic qualifications (experience, teaching cert, etc). Use Qualifications for preferred qualifications (Bachelors degree, WMD incident experience). Use Skills for physical abilities and functional knowledge. But we need to avoid duplication. Let's extract. Basic Qualifications bullet list: - 10+ years of experience working within one of the emergency response disciplines that support all-hazard response. - Of the 10 required years of experience, 5 years must be specialized experience working with WMD, CBRNE, or Hazardous materials (civilian or military) at the technician level as defined by OSHA and/or NFPA. - Minimum 3 years of current instructional experience. - Possess a teaching certification, have postsecondary teaching experience, or teaching degree. - Possess functional knowledge of the federal response plan/NIMS. - Ability to lift a minimum of 65 pounds (i.e. SCBA and other equipment) during demonstrations and exercises. - Ability to perform prolonged standing, bending, climbing, kneeling, and pushing and pulling carts containing equipment. - Ability to wear Level A-C PPE including SCBA for period of 1 hour up to five hours. - Must pass a pre-placement and annual medical exam. - Must submit to and obtain final suitability by successful completion of background check, financial institutions/credit bureau check, and disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. - Due to Federal Contract Regulations, U. S. citizenship is required. - Must have an accepted form of government-issued ID compliant with the Real ID Act. - Must submit to and obtain final suitability by successful completion of a pre-placement screening consisting of background check, financial institutions/credit bureau check, and disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. (duplicate of earlier? It's repeated; we should deduplicate.) We need to preserve all substantive info but remove duplicated lines. So we should include each unique point once. Preferred Qualifications: - Working knowledge of weapons of mass destruction which includes related experience in a WMD incident and/or experience in a manmade or natural disaster of national significance. - Bachelors Degree in related field. Also there is a fluff paragraph: "If you're looking for comfort, keep scrolling. At Leidos, we outthink, outbuild, and outpace the status quo — because the mission demands it. We're not hiring followers. We're recruiting the ones who disrupt, provoke, and refuse to fail. Step 10 is ancient history. We're already at step 30 — and moving faster than anyone else dares." That's marketing fluff; but it's substantive? It's not required info; but it's part of posting. Should we keep? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. This is substantive? It's marketing copy; but it's part of the posting. However it's not about the role; it's generic company branding. Might be considered boilerplate? Not exactly legal/EEO. It's not navigation or legal. It's not duplicated. It's not cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/scam-warning. It's not application instructions. It's not pay/benefits. It's not required. I'd say we should keep it? But it's not about the role; but it's still part of description. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep it, maybe under About the role? But it's not about the role; it's about Leidos. Could be considered "About Leidos" section, but we don't have that heading. We could include it under About the role as extra paragraph. However the instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could incorporate that fluff into About the role paragraph. But we also have "Original Posting September 15, 2026" and "For U.S. Positions: While subject to change based on business needs, Leidos reasonably anticipates that this job requisition will remain open for at least 3 days with an anticipated close date of no earlier than 3 days after the original posting date as listed above." That's metadata about posting duration; we could drop as minor metadata? The instruction: do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it. This is minor metadata; we could fold into a short p or drop. Probably drop it as not essential. Pay Range: we have "Pay Range Pay Range $52,000.00 - $94,000.00 The Leidos pay range for this job level is a general guideline only and not a guarantee of compensation or salary. Additional factors considered in extending an offer include (but are not limited to) responsibilities of the job, education, experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities, as well as internal equity, alignment with market data, applicable bargaining agreement (if any), or other law." That's specific pay info; we should include a Pay section. Benefits: we have "Pay And Benefits Pay and benefits are fundamental to any career decision. That's why we craft compensation packages that reflect the importance of the work we do for our customers. Employment benefits include competitive compensation, Health and Wellness programs, Income Protection, Paid Leave and Retirement. More details are available at www.leidos.com/careers/pay-benefits." That's benefits info; we should include Benefits section. Also there is "Securing Your Data Beware of fake employment opportunities using Leidos’ name..." that's scam warning; we must remove scam-warning boilerplate. Commitment to Non-Discrimination: EEO boilerplate; remove. Thus we will produce sections: - About the role: combine the initial description paragraph plus maybe the marketing fluff? I'd include the initial description paragraph only; the marketing fluff could be considered part of About Leidos but we don't have that heading; we could still include it as part of About the role but it's not about role. Safer to include only the role description; the marketing fluff could be omitted? But instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; the marketing fluff is substantive? It's not about the job but it's still part of posting. However it's not required for understanding the role; but it's still part of the posting. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep it. Where to put? Could add a separate

  About Leidos

  but not allowed headings list. Could fold into About the role as a paragraph after the role description. That would be okay. Thus About the role will have two paragraphs: first the role description, second the marketing fluff. - Responsibilities: list all primary responsibilities bullets. - Requirements: basic qualifications bullet list (deduplicated). - Qualifications: preferred qualifications bullet list. - Skills: maybe we could put physical abilities and functional knowledge under Skills. But we already placed functional knowledge and physical abilities under Requirements; we could move them to Skills. Let's decide: Requirements could be experience, teaching cert, citizenship, background check, medical exam, etc. Skills could be physical abilities and functional knowledge. That seems logical. Thus: Requirements (basic qualifications): - 10+ years experience in emergency response discipline supporting all-hazard response. - 5 years specialized experience with WMD/CBRNE/HazMat at technician level (OSHA/NFPA). - Minimum 3 years current instructional experience. - Teaching certification OR postsecondary teaching experience OR teaching degree. - U.S. citizenship (due to Federal Contract Regulations). - Accepted government-issued ID compliant with Real ID Act. - Must pass pre-placement and annual medical exam. - Must submit to and obtain final suitability via background check, financial institutions/credit bureau check, and disclosure under FOIA. (Only once) Skills: - Functional knowledge of the federal response plan/NIMS. - Ability to lift minimum 65 pounds (SCBA and other equipment) during demonstrations/exercises. - Ability to perform prolonged standing, bending, climbing, kneeling, pushing/pulling carts containing equipment. - Ability to wear Level A-C PPE including SCBA for period of 1 hour up to five hours. Qualifications (preferred): - Working knowledge of WMD which includes related experience in a WMD incident and/or experience in a manmade or natural disaster of national significance. - Bachelor's degree in related field. Benefits: - Competitive compensation - Health and Wellness programs - Income Protection - Paid Leave - Retirement Pay: - Pay range $52,000.00 - $94,000.00 (general guideline, not guarantee; additional factors considered) Schedule: Not mentioned; we should not create Schedule section. Now we need to output HTML fragment only, with

  headings and

  or

  • . No extra tags. We must not include markdown code fences. Let's craft. We need to ensure we don't repeat any info inadvertently. Let's write:

    About the role

    In support of a specialized training program at the Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP) the CBRNE/WMD Instructor will contribute to the strategic plan for the organization, work closely with the Subject Matter Expert (SME) Course Leader to ensure seamless training delivery, and periodically evaluate training delivery and recommend changes as indicated. The successful candidate will maintain knowledge