BRANCH HEAD FOR INTEGRATED INFORMATION WARFARE FIRES.

We need to produce HTML fragment with sections: Duties (maybe "Responsibilities"? The posting says Duties. Use

for section headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. The posting has Duties, Requirements, Conditions of employment (maybe part of Requirements), Qualifications, Additional information (maybe not needed). No explicit Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we include only sections with real content: Duties (maybe as Responsibilities?), Requirements, Qualifications. Also maybe "Additional information" could be considered but not a standard heading; we can omit if not matching allowed headings. The instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should map Duties to Responsibilities? Probably use Responsibilities heading for duties. Use Requirements heading for conditions of employment and requirements. Use Qualifications heading for qualifications. Also maybe include "Additional information" as a paragraph under Qualifications? But we should not create extra headings not listed. So we will output:

Responsibilities

... duties text ...

Requirements

• ... each condition ...

Qualifications

... qualifications text ...

We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Must include all duties sentences, all requirements sentences, all qualifications sentences. Also include the "Additional information" maybe as part of Qualifications? But it's separate; maybe we can include as a paragraph under Qualifications? But that would be adding content not under a heading; still okay as long as we don't create a heading not allowed. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could combine Additional information into Qualifications section as extra paragraphs. We must not repeat job title. No Job ID. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. The posting includes some EEO statements repeated: "Candidates should be committed to improving the efficiency of the Federal government, passionate about the ideals of our American republic, and committed to upholding the rule of law and the United States Constitution." appears twice (in Qualifications and Additional information). We need to preserve ALL substantive information; but duplicated lines should be removed. So we should keep only one instance of that sentence. Also there is repeated "A career with the U.S. government provides employees with a comprehensive benefits package..." that's boilerplate? It's under Additional information; maybe it's generic benefits description; but we are not to create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. This paragraph is about benefits but generic; we could keep it as part of Additional information but we don't have a Benefits heading. Since we are not to create Benefits section unless posting actually states them, but we can keep the paragraph under Qualifications or as a separate paragraph without heading? The instruction: "Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences." It didn't forbid extra paragraphs outside headings. So we can include a

for that benefits paragraph under Qualifications or after Qualifications? But better to keep it as part of Qualifications? However it's not a qualification; it's about benefits. Could create a Benefits section? The posting does mention benefits generically but not specific. The instruction: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It does state benefits generically: "A career with the U.S. government provides employees with a comprehensive benefits package." That is a statement about benefits, albeit generic. Should we create a Benefits section? It says "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting does state that there is a benefits package, but not details. It's still stating them. However the instruction also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe we can include that paragraph under Qualifications or as a separate

without heading. But better to follow the allowed headings: Benefits is allowed. Since the posting mentions benefits, we could create a Benefits section with that paragraph. However the benefits description is generic; but it's still substantive. I'd include a Benefits section with that paragraph. Similarly, there is mention of "Federal annuitant information" etc. That's more about policies; not benefits. Could be omitted as boilerplate? It's not EEO/legal? It's policy info. Might be considered boilerplate. Safer to omit. We also have "More Information On These Core Qualifications Are Available At ..." that's a link; could be considered boilerplate? It's reference. Might keep as part of Qualifications. We need to preserve all substantive information; not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include the details about duties, requirements, qualifications, and the benefits statement. Let's extract duties sentences: - "You will foster an environment of continuous improvement; design and execute change strategies and workforce planning goals aligned directly with the organizational strategic plan, mission, and core priorities." - "You will serve as the principal advisor and subject matter expert on emerging and disruptive warfighting technologies synthesizing technical insights into actionable guidance for operational planning and acquisition program decisions." - "You will direct, research, architecture design, and operational execution for all aspects of warfare across the Electro-Magnetic Spectrum (EMS) to ensure operational dominance." - "You will direct the development, coordination, and alignment of DoW and Navy Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) processes, ensuring strategic program objectives directly support maritime mission priorities." - "You will apply Navy Information Warfare expertise – across cryptology, intelligence, space, and networks-to design and execute strategic roadmaps for future warfighting capabilities." - "You will deliver persuasive briefs on complex warfare capabilities to senior leaders and peers, represent the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) and information Warfare positions with high-level tact, discretion, and strategic influence." Now requirements (conditions of employment and other requirements): List: - Must be a US Citizen. - Must be determined suitable for federal employment. - Must participate in the direct deposit pay program. - New employees to the Department of the Navy will be required to successfully pass the E-Verify employment verification check. - To learn more about E-Verify, including your rights and responsibilities, visit e-verify.gov - You will be required to complete ethics orientation within three months of appointment and submit a Public Financial Disclosure Report, OGE-278e within 30 days of appointment. - You must possess and maintain a Top-Secret security clearance with access to Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) prior to entrance on duty. - Within the Department of Defense (DoD), the appointment of retired military members within 180 days immediately following retirement date to a civilian position is subject to the provisions of 5 United States Code 3326. - Males born after 12-31-59 must be registered for Selective Service. - You may be required to successfully complete a polygraph examination. - You may be subject to a 1-year trial period in the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service unless required trial has been served. - Successful completion of a pre-employment drug test (including marijuana) is required. A tentative offer of employment will be rescinded if you fail to report to the drug test appointment or fail the test. You will be subject to random testing. - This position may require travel from normal duty station to CONUS and OCONUS and may include remote or isolated sites. You must be able to travel on military and commercial aircraft for extended periods of time. - Supervisors in the executive branch have a heightened personal responsibility for advancing government ethics. You will be required to review the 14 General Principles of Ethical Conduct at 5 CFR 2635.101. Also there is a line: "You may be subject to a 1-year trial period in the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service unless required trial has been served." Keep. Now qualifications section includes: - Intro: "Candidates should be committed to improving the efficiency of the Federal government, passionate about the ideals of our American republic, and committed to upholding the rule of law and the United States Constitution." (but we will keep only one instance) - "To meet the minimum qualification requirements for this position, you must show that you possess the Executive Core Qualifications (ECQ), Intelligence Community Senior Officer Core Qualifications (ICSOCQ), and Technical Qualifications (TQ) related to this position within your resume - NOT TO EXCEED 2 PAGES. Resumes over the 2-page limit will be disqualified. Your resume should include examples of experience, education, and accomplishments applicable to the qualification(s). If your resume does not reflect demonstrated evidence of these qualifications, you may not receive consideration for the position." - Then definitions of ICSOCQ, TQs (TQ1, TQ2, TQ3), ECQs (ECQ1-5), plus note about More Information On These Core Qualifications Are Available At ... and link. - Also "Additional information" includes: "This position is in the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service (DISES), a small elite group of top government leaders. DISES members possess a diverse portfolio of experiences including strong skills to lead across organizations. As an executive, you will influence the direction of innovation and transformation of the federal government and lead the next generation of public servants. Veteran's preference does not apply to the Senior Executive Service. This position is not covered by the Department of Defense Priority Placement Program. Additional vacancies may be filled by this announcement. A tentative offer of employment will be rescinded if the selectee fails to meet the pre-employment requirements, including failure to report to any of the scheduled appointments. Federal annuitant information: The selection of an annuitant is subject to the Department of Defense and Department of the Navy policy on the employment of annuitants. Policy information may be found at: All Defense Intelligence positions under the Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel System (DCIPS) are in the excepted service by specific statute, 10 U.S.C. 1601. This position is in the excepted service. Non-DCIPS applicants selected for a DCIPS position must acknowledge in writing, prior to actual appointment to the DCIPS position, that the position for which he or she has been selected is in the excepted service and covered by DCIPS. Federal employees currently serving in the competitive service must also acknowledge that they will voluntarily leave the competitive service by accepting an offer of employment for a DCIPS position. This acknowledgement is necessary as movement between the excepted service and competitive service may be limited if the employee does not possess competitive status. Joint Duty Assignments - Joint IC Duty certification is a prerequisite for appointment to senior executive, senior professional, and DCIPS positions classified above GG grade 15. There are three key documents that contain important information about your rights and obligations. Please read and retain these documents: Employment Information Resources - Resource Center Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Policy Statement: Candidates should be committed to improving the efficiency of the Federal government, passionate about the ideals of our American republic, and committed to upholding the rule of law and the United States Constitution. A career with the U.S. government provides employees with a comprehensive benefits package. As a federal employee, you and your family will have access to a range of benefits that are designed to make your federal career very rewarding. Eligibility for benefits depends on the type of position you hold and whether your position is full-time, part-time or intermittent. Contact the hiring agency for more information on the specific benefits offered." We need to remove boilerplate: EEO Policy Statement duplicated, etc. Also the "Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Policy Statement:" line is boilerplate; we should remove it. Also the sentence about benefits is substantive; we can keep. We also need to remove duplicated lines: The sentence about candidates committed to improving efficiency appears twice (in Qualifications and Additional information). We'll keep one. We also need to remove "Additional vacancies may be filled by this announcement." maybe keep? It's substantive? It's about announcement; could