Bank Business Process Consultant Lead
for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "Why USAA?" maybe considered intro but it's part of description; we can keep as prose under About the role? The instruction: Use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we need to decide which sections have content.
From posting:
- Intro: "Why USAA? ..." includes mission, core values, support for spouses, remote/hybrid flexibility. That's about the role/company. Could be "About the role" or maybe "About USAA". We'll put under About the role
with paragraphs.
- "The Opportunity As a dedicated Bank Business Process Consultant Lead, you will ..." This is responsibilities. So we can put under Responsibilities
with paragraphs and maybe list.
- Then "What You'll Do" list of bullet points: these are responsibilities as well. Could combine.
- Then "What You Have" includes qualifications: Bachelor's degree; OR 4 years of relevant education and/or experience. 8 years experience... etc. That's qualifications/requirements. Could be under Requirements
or Qualifications
. We need both maybe but we should avoid thin sections. Could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one? But instruction says use those headings if content exists. We have content for both Requirements and Qualifications. Could treat "What You Have" as Qualifications. And maybe "What Sets You Apart" as Skills? Or maybe Skills. Also there is "Compensation range" for Pay. Benefits section present. Schedule: mention flexible work environment requiring office 4 days per week, location options, remote eligible, etc. That's schedule info.
Thus we can have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
We need to ensure we don't create sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". We have actual content.
We must not include application instructions, EEO, etc. Also remove duplicated lines.
We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to include details: mission, core values, support for spouses, remote/hybrid flexibility. Also mention the opportunity description, responsibilities list, what you'll do list, what you have (education, experience), what sets you apart (list), compensation range, benefits description, schedule/flexibility and location.
We must not invent or summarize away detail. Keep specifics.
We'll need to format lists with - . For prose use
.
We must not include headings for empty sections.
Let's extract content.
**About the role** (maybe combine Why USAA and The Opportunity? Actually The Opportunity is more responsibilities. We'll keep Why USAA as About the role.)
Paragraphs:
- "Why USAA? At USAA, our mission is to empower our members to achieve financial security through highly competitive products, exceptional service and trusted advice. We seek to be the #1 choice for the military community and their families. Embrace a fulfilling career at USAA, where our core values – honesty, integrity, loyalty and service – define how we treat each other and our members. Be part of what truly makes us special and impactful. We are proud to support active-duty military spouses. USAA roles may offer remote or hybrid flexibility for active-duty military spouses consistent with applicable policy and business needs."
That's about the role/company.
**Responsibilities**: Combine The Opportunity paragraph and What You'll Do bullet list.
The Opportunity paragraph: "As a dedicated Bank Business Process Consultant Lead, you will leverage expert knowledge of bank processes and products to serve as a trusted advisor to internal business partners. Your consultation services will span end-to-end knowledge of the template creation process for operational communications and existing production monitoring and reporting capabilities within the Bank. You will be responsible for the centralized risk management of all risk activities pertaining to Bank Operational Communications. This position requires a comprehensive understanding of risk and regulatory compliance, ensuring that risks associated with business activities are effectively identified, measured, monitored, and controlled in accordance with policies and procedures. You will lead the development of a new communication governance framework for the Bank operational communications. This will require cross-departmental coordination to eliminate redundant or duplicate processes and messaging that ensure all communications are strategically aligned with the Bank’s standards and regulatory requirements and maximizing member experience. Additionally, you will provide project management coordination for various initiatives and execute, oversee, and monitor the development of business process-related communication solutions for our members. You will drive operational efficiency by evaluating and improving processes, identifying opportunities, and running existing BOC controls, while also collaborating with stakeholders to define project scopes, ensure process documentation, and monitor implementation against performance benchmarks."
Then What You'll Do bullet list (converted to
- ):
- Identify and implement strategic opportunities and solutions for key stakeholders.
- Develop business process enhancements for the Bank that aligns business deliverables, bank strategy and risk management framework.
- Ensure alignment with customer and appropriate bank roadmap(s) and strategy.
- Coach others and leads acquisition and application of expert knowledge of the business.
- Lead planning & execution and direct and coordinates activities for highly complex projects.
- Apply a holistic understanding of risk and regulatory compliance to include business strategies and solutions.
- Manage risks by using established methodologies and exercising control plans to ensure alignment with Function or Line of Business specific requirements, process requirements, and business needs.
- Provides consultation to influence and ensure Function and/or Line of Business processes address risk across all activities.
- Review, advise, and develop communication plans for customers and internal stakeholders.
- Ensure alignment between internal stakeholders and customers across all business process projects and services using proactive communication and engagement strategies.
- Utilize data and analytics to deliver insight into customer and business process performance, identifying opportunities to influence customer and business process activities and inform key stakeholders.
- Ensure risks associated with business activities are effectively identified, measured, monitored, and controlled in accordance with risk and compliance policies and procedures.
Note some duplication with earlier paragraph but we keep all.
**Requirements**: Might be the "What You Have" bullet list? Actually that's qualifications. But we can treat Requirements as the basic eligibility: Bachelor's degree; OR 4 years of relevant education and/or experience. 8 years of experience in business process consultation, process design, developing business processes, procedures, measures, and metrics. Expert knowledge of bank products and processes. Experience leading programs/projects, business process owner/consultant or working in an agile environment. Extensive experience in applying quality management, process improvement, and leveraging process improvement tools and methodologies. Experience applying retail bank subject matter expertise to simplify the customer experience, standardize process execution, and automate where possible. Expert experience/ knowledge of Risk Management frameworks and Banking Regulatory requirements. Demonstrated experience with process improvement, workflow, benchmarking and/or evaluation of business processes.
We'll put that as Requirements.
**Qualifications**: Could be "What Sets You Apart" list: Extensive experience/knowledge of bank operational communication processes and tools; Extensive experience with bank risk management processes and requirements; Experience with establishing new processes, ensuring collaboration, and compliance with regulatory requirements; Experience with establishing and maintaining controls to support business processes; Experience with leading projects/initiatives to accomplish a shared goal and common objectives.
We'll put that as Qualifications.
**Skills**: Could be maybe not separate; but we could treat Qualifications as Skills? However we already used Qualifications for "What Sets You Apart". Could also have Skills section for maybe "Expert knowledge of bank products and processes" etc but that's already in Requirements. To avoid thin sections, maybe we skip Skills if content overlaps. But instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section called Requirements (or Qualifications). But we need to follow headings list; we can omit Skills if not enough distinct content. However we have distinct "What Sets You Apart" which could be considered Skills. Let's keep Skills as that list.
Thus we will have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications (maybe rename to "Preferred Qualifications"? but heading must be Qualifications), Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
But we need to ensure we don't duplicate content. We'll assign:
- Requirements: baseline qualifications (education, years experience, etc.)
- Qualifications: maybe "What You Have" already used; but we already used that for Requirements. Let's think: The posting has "What You Have" (list) and "What Sets You Apart" (list). So we can map:
- Requirements: "What You Have" (the baseline)
- Qualifications: maybe not needed; but we could treat "What Sets You Apart" as Qualifications (preferred). Then Skills could be omitted or we could combine.
But we have headings list includes Qualifications and Skills separate. We could assign:
- Qualifications: "What You Have"
- Skills: "What Sets You Apart"
But then Requirements would be something else? Maybe we could treat Requirements as the educational/experience baseline (which is essentially same as What You Have). Actually What You Have includes education and experience; that's both requirements and qualifications. To avoid duplication, we could make Requirements = education/experience baseline, Qualifications = specific expert knowledge etc (maybe from What You Have after the first bullet). But that's messy.
Simpler: Use only sections that have distinct content: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (combining education/experience and expert knowledge), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. And maybe Skills as "What Sets You Apart". That gives us 6 sections.
But we need to follow instruction: Use headings e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. It's okay to omit some if no content. So we can omit Qualifications if we merge into Requirements or Skills. Let's decide:
- About the role: intro.
- Responsibilities: The Opportunity + What You'll Do.
- Requirements: Education/experience baseline (Bachelor's degree; OR 4 years... 8 years experience... etc.)
- Skills: "What Sets You Apart" list.
- Benefits: benefits paragraph.
- Pay: compensation range paragraph.
- Schedule: flexible work environment, location, remote eligibility, travel, relocation assistance note.
We'll omit Qualifications.
Now we need to ensure we don't include boilerplate like "USAA does not provide visa sponsorship..." That's substantive? It's a restriction; maybe we should keep as part of Requirements or Pay? It's about visa sponsorship. It's substantive info about eligibility. We should keep it. Where to place? Could be under Requirements as a note. Or maybe under Pay? Better under Requirements as a note about eligibility. We'll include a paragraph: "USAA does not provide visa sponsorship for this role. Please do not apply for this role if at any time (now or in the future) you will need immigration support (i.e., H-1B, TN, STEM OPT Training Plans, etc.)."
Also there is statement about compensation process etc. That's part of Pay.
Also there is statement about "The above description reflects the details considered necessary to describe the principal functions of the job and should not be construed as a detailed description of all the work requirements that may be performed in the job." That's boilerplate; we should remove.
Also "Applications for this position are accepted on an ongoing basis..." that's application instruction; remove.
Also "USAA is an Equal Opportunity Employer..." remove.
Now we need to ensure we keep all substantive info: location list, remote eligibility, travel, relocation assistance not available.
Let's draft HTML.
We'll open with maybe not needed; just output fragment.
We'll do:
About the role
Why USAA? At USAA, our mission is to empower our members to achieve financial security through highly competitive products, exceptional service and
About the role
with paragraphs. - "The Opportunity As a dedicated Bank Business Process Consultant Lead, you will ..." This is responsibilities. So we can put underResponsibilities
with paragraphs and maybe list. - Then "What You'll Do" list of bullet points: these are responsibilities as well. Could combine. - Then "What You Have" includes qualifications: Bachelor's degree; OR 4 years of relevant education and/or experience. 8 years experience... etc. That's qualifications/requirements. Could be underRequirements
orQualifications
. We need both maybe but we should avoid thin sections. Could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one? But instruction says use those headings if content exists. We have content for both Requirements and Qualifications. Could treat "What You Have" as Qualifications. And maybe "What Sets You Apart" as Skills? Or maybe Skills. Also there is "Compensation range" for Pay. Benefits section present. Schedule: mention flexible work environment requiring office 4 days per week, location options, remote eligible, etc. That's schedule info. Thus we can have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to ensure we don't create sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". We have actual content. We must not include application instructions, EEO, etc. Also remove duplicated lines. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to include details: mission, core values, support for spouses, remote/hybrid flexibility. Also mention the opportunity description, responsibilities list, what you'll do list, what you have (education, experience), what sets you apart (list), compensation range, benefits description, schedule/flexibility and location. We must not invent or summarize away detail. Keep specifics. We'll need to format lists with- . For prose use
. We must not include headings for empty sections. Let's extract content. **About the role** (maybe combine Why USAA and The Opportunity? Actually The Opportunity is more responsibilities. We'll keep Why USAA as About the role.) Paragraphs: - "Why USAA? At USAA, our mission is to empower our members to achieve financial security through highly competitive products, exceptional service and trusted advice. We seek to be the #1 choice for the military community and their families. Embrace a fulfilling career at USAA, where our core values – honesty, integrity, loyalty and service – define how we treat each other and our members. Be part of what truly makes us special and impactful. We are proud to support active-duty military spouses. USAA roles may offer remote or hybrid flexibility for active-duty military spouses consistent with applicable policy and business needs." That's about the role/company. **Responsibilities**: Combine The Opportunity paragraph and What You'll Do bullet list. The Opportunity paragraph: "As a dedicated Bank Business Process Consultant Lead, you will leverage expert knowledge of bank processes and products to serve as a trusted advisor to internal business partners. Your consultation services will span end-to-end knowledge of the template creation process for operational communications and existing production monitoring and reporting capabilities within the Bank. You will be responsible for the centralized risk management of all risk activities pertaining to Bank Operational Communications. This position requires a comprehensive understanding of risk and regulatory compliance, ensuring that risks associated with business activities are effectively identified, measured, monitored, and controlled in accordance with policies and procedures. You will lead the development of a new communication governance framework for the Bank operational communications. This will require cross-departmental coordination to eliminate redundant or duplicate processes and messaging that ensure all communications are strategically aligned with the Bank’s standards and regulatory requirements and maximizing member experience. Additionally, you will provide project management coordination for various initiatives and execute, oversee, and monitor the development of business process-related communication solutions for our members. You will drive operational efficiency by evaluating and improving processes, identifying opportunities, and running existing BOC controls, while also collaborating with stakeholders to define project scopes, ensure process documentation, and monitor implementation against performance benchmarks." Then What You'll Do bullet list (converted to
- ):
- Identify and implement strategic opportunities and solutions for key stakeholders.
- Develop business process enhancements for the Bank that aligns business deliverables, bank strategy and risk management framework.
- Ensure alignment with customer and appropriate bank roadmap(s) and strategy.
- Coach others and leads acquisition and application of expert knowledge of the business.
- Lead planning & execution and direct and coordinates activities for highly complex projects.
- Apply a holistic understanding of risk and regulatory compliance to include business strategies and solutions.
- Manage risks by using established methodologies and exercising control plans to ensure alignment with Function or Line of Business specific requirements, process requirements, and business needs.
- Provides consultation to influence and ensure Function and/or Line of Business processes address risk across all activities.
- Review, advise, and develop communication plans for customers and internal stakeholders.
- Ensure alignment between internal stakeholders and customers across all business process projects and services using proactive communication and engagement strategies.
- Utilize data and analytics to deliver insight into customer and business process performance, identifying opportunities to influence customer and business process activities and inform key stakeholders.
- Ensure risks associated with business activities are effectively identified, measured, monitored, and controlled in accordance with risk and compliance policies and procedures.
Note some duplication with earlier paragraph but we keep all.
**Requirements**: Might be the "What You Have" bullet list? Actually that's qualifications. But we can treat Requirements as the basic eligibility: Bachelor's degree; OR 4 years of relevant education and/or experience. 8 years of experience in business process consultation, process design, developing business processes, procedures, measures, and metrics. Expert knowledge of bank products and processes. Experience leading programs/projects, business process owner/consultant or working in an agile environment. Extensive experience in applying quality management, process improvement, and leveraging process improvement tools and methodologies. Experience applying retail bank subject matter expertise to simplify the customer experience, standardize process execution, and automate where possible. Expert experience/ knowledge of Risk Management frameworks and Banking Regulatory requirements. Demonstrated experience with process improvement, workflow, benchmarking and/or evaluation of business processes.
We'll put that as Requirements.
**Qualifications**: Could be "What Sets You Apart" list: Extensive experience/knowledge of bank operational communication processes and tools; Extensive experience with bank risk management processes and requirements; Experience with establishing new processes, ensuring collaboration, and compliance with regulatory requirements; Experience with establishing and maintaining controls to support business processes; Experience with leading projects/initiatives to accomplish a shared goal and common objectives.
We'll put that as Qualifications.
**Skills**: Could be maybe not separate; but we could treat Qualifications as Skills? However we already used Qualifications for "What Sets You Apart". Could also have Skills section for maybe "Expert knowledge of bank products and processes" etc but that's already in Requirements. To avoid thin sections, maybe we skip Skills if content overlaps. But instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section called Requirements (or Qualifications). But we need to follow headings list; we can omit Skills if not enough distinct content. However we have distinct "What Sets You Apart" which could be considered Skills. Let's keep Skills as that list.
Thus we will have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications (maybe rename to "Preferred Qualifications"? but heading must be Qualifications), Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
But we need to ensure we don't duplicate content. We'll assign:
- Requirements: baseline qualifications (education, years experience, etc.)
- Qualifications: maybe "What You Have" already used; but we already used that for Requirements. Let's think: The posting has "What You Have" (list) and "What Sets You Apart" (list). So we can map:
- Requirements: "What You Have" (the baseline)
- Qualifications: maybe not needed; but we could treat "What Sets You Apart" as Qualifications (preferred). Then Skills could be omitted or we could combine.
But we have headings list includes Qualifications and Skills separate. We could assign:
- Qualifications: "What You Have"
- Skills: "What Sets You Apart"
But then Requirements would be something else? Maybe we could treat Requirements as the educational/experience baseline (which is essentially same as What You Have). Actually What You Have includes education and experience; that's both requirements and qualifications. To avoid duplication, we could make Requirements = education/experience baseline, Qualifications = specific expert knowledge etc (maybe from What You Have after the first bullet). But that's messy.
Simpler: Use only sections that have distinct content: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (combining education/experience and expert knowledge), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. And maybe Skills as "What Sets You Apart". That gives us 6 sections.
But we need to follow instruction: Use headings e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. It's okay to omit some if no content. So we can omit Qualifications if we merge into Requirements or Skills. Let's decide:
- About the role: intro.
- Responsibilities: The Opportunity + What You'll Do.
- Requirements: Education/experience baseline (Bachelor's degree; OR 4 years... 8 years experience... etc.)
- Skills: "What Sets You Apart" list.
- Benefits: benefits paragraph.
- Pay: compensation range paragraph.
- Schedule: flexible work environment, location, remote eligibility, travel, relocation assistance note.
We'll omit Qualifications.
Now we need to ensure we don't include boilerplate like "USAA does not provide visa sponsorship..." That's substantive? It's a restriction; maybe we should keep as part of Requirements or Pay? It's about visa sponsorship. It's substantive info about eligibility. We should keep it. Where to place? Could be under Requirements as a note. Or maybe under Pay? Better under Requirements as a note about eligibility. We'll include a paragraph: "USAA does not provide visa sponsorship for this role. Please do not apply for this role if at any time (now or in the future) you will need immigration support (i.e., H-1B, TN, STEM OPT Training Plans, etc.)."
Also there is statement about compensation process etc. That's part of Pay.
Also there is statement about "The above description reflects the details considered necessary to describe the principal functions of the job and should not be construed as a detailed description of all the work requirements that may be performed in the job." That's boilerplate; we should remove.
Also "Applications for this position are accepted on an ongoing basis..." that's application instruction; remove.
Also "USAA is an Equal Opportunity Employer..." remove.
Now we need to ensure we keep all substantive info: location list, remote eligibility, travel, relocation assistance not available.
Let's draft HTML.
We'll open with maybe not needed; just output fragment.
We'll do:
About the role
Why USAA? At USAA, our mission is to empower our members to achieve financial security through highly competitive products, exceptional service and
- ):
- Identify and implement strategic opportunities and solutions for key stakeholders.
- Develop business process enhancements for the Bank that aligns business deliverables, bank strategy and risk management framework.
- Ensure alignment with customer and appropriate bank roadmap(s) and strategy.
- Coach others and leads acquisition and application of expert knowledge of the business.
- Lead planning & execution and direct and coordinates activities for highly complex projects.
- Apply a holistic understanding of risk and regulatory compliance to include business strategies and solutions.
- Manage risks by using established methodologies and exercising control plans to ensure alignment with Function or Line of Business specific requirements, process requirements, and business needs.
- Provides consultation to influence and ensure Function and/or Line of Business processes address risk across all activities.
- Review, advise, and develop communication plans for customers and internal stakeholders.
- Ensure alignment between internal stakeholders and customers across all business process projects and services using proactive communication and engagement strategies.
- Utilize data and analytics to deliver insight into customer and business process performance, identifying opportunities to influence customer and business process activities and inform key stakeholders.
- Ensure risks associated with business activities are effectively identified, measured, monitored, and controlled in accordance with risk and compliance policies and procedures.
Note some duplication with earlier paragraph but we keep all.
**Requirements**: Might be the "What You Have" bullet list? Actually that's qualifications. But we can treat Requirements as the basic eligibility: Bachelor's degree; OR 4 years of relevant education and/or experience. 8 years of experience in business process consultation, process design, developing business processes, procedures, measures, and metrics. Expert knowledge of bank products and processes. Experience leading programs/projects, business process owner/consultant or working in an agile environment. Extensive experience in applying quality management, process improvement, and leveraging process improvement tools and methodologies. Experience applying retail bank subject matter expertise to simplify the customer experience, standardize process execution, and automate where possible. Expert experience/ knowledge of Risk Management frameworks and Banking Regulatory requirements. Demonstrated experience with process improvement, workflow, benchmarking and/or evaluation of business processes.
We'll put that as Requirements.
**Qualifications**: Could be "What Sets You Apart" list: Extensive experience/knowledge of bank operational communication processes and tools; Extensive experience with bank risk management processes and requirements; Experience with establishing new processes, ensuring collaboration, and compliance with regulatory requirements; Experience with establishing and maintaining controls to support business processes; Experience with leading projects/initiatives to accomplish a shared goal and common objectives.
We'll put that as Qualifications.
**Skills**: Could be maybe not separate; but we could treat Qualifications as Skills? However we already used Qualifications for "What Sets You Apart". Could also have Skills section for maybe "Expert knowledge of bank products and processes" etc but that's already in Requirements. To avoid thin sections, maybe we skip Skills if content overlaps. But instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section called Requirements (or Qualifications). But we need to follow headings list; we can omit Skills if not enough distinct content. However we have distinct "What Sets You Apart" which could be considered Skills. Let's keep Skills as that list.
Thus we will have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications (maybe rename to "Preferred Qualifications"? but heading must be Qualifications), Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
But we need to ensure we don't duplicate content. We'll assign:
- Requirements: baseline qualifications (education, years experience, etc.)
- Qualifications: maybe "What You Have" already used; but we already used that for Requirements. Let's think: The posting has "What You Have" (list) and "What Sets You Apart" (list). So we can map:
- Requirements: "What You Have" (the baseline)
- Qualifications: maybe not needed; but we could treat "What Sets You Apart" as Qualifications (preferred). Then Skills could be omitted or we could combine.
But we have headings list includes Qualifications and Skills separate. We could assign:
- Qualifications: "What You Have"
- Skills: "What Sets You Apart"
But then Requirements would be something else? Maybe we could treat Requirements as the educational/experience baseline (which is essentially same as What You Have). Actually What You Have includes education and experience; that's both requirements and qualifications. To avoid duplication, we could make Requirements = education/experience baseline, Qualifications = specific expert knowledge etc (maybe from What You Have after the first bullet). But that's messy.
Simpler: Use only sections that have distinct content: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (combining education/experience and expert knowledge), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. And maybe Skills as "What Sets You Apart". That gives us 6 sections.
But we need to follow instruction: Use headings e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. It's okay to omit some if no content. So we can omit Qualifications if we merge into Requirements or Skills. Let's decide:
- About the role: intro.
- Responsibilities: The Opportunity + What You'll Do.
- Requirements: Education/experience baseline (Bachelor's degree; OR 4 years... 8 years experience... etc.)
- Skills: "What Sets You Apart" list.
- Benefits: benefits paragraph.
- Pay: compensation range paragraph.
- Schedule: flexible work environment, location, remote eligibility, travel, relocation assistance note.
We'll omit Qualifications.
Now we need to ensure we don't include boilerplate like "USAA does not provide visa sponsorship..." That's substantive? It's a restriction; maybe we should keep as part of Requirements or Pay? It's about visa sponsorship. It's substantive info about eligibility. We should keep it. Where to place? Could be under Requirements as a note. Or maybe under Pay? Better under Requirements as a note about eligibility. We'll include a paragraph: "USAA does not provide visa sponsorship for this role. Please do not apply for this role if at any time (now or in the future) you will need immigration support (i.e., H-1B, TN, STEM OPT Training Plans, etc.)."
Also there is statement about compensation process etc. That's part of Pay.
Also there is statement about "The above description reflects the details considered necessary to describe the principal functions of the job and should not be construed as a detailed description of all the work requirements that may be performed in the job." That's boilerplate; we should remove.
Also "Applications for this position are accepted on an ongoing basis..." that's application instruction; remove.
Also "USAA is an Equal Opportunity Employer..." remove.
Now we need to ensure we keep all substantive info: location list, remote eligibility, travel, relocation assistance not available.
Let's draft HTML.
We'll open with maybe not needed; just output fragment.
We'll do: