Associate Director, WW Medical Learning, Hematology

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually we need to use headings for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include only sections that have real specific content. The posting includes a lot of description: "What We Are Looking For" etc. We need to map content to appropriate sections. We need to preserve all substantive info, not invent or summarize away detail. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "Supporting People With Disabilities", "Candidate Rights", "Data Protection", etc. Also remove "How We Work", "Benefits" maybe we keep Benefits if present. There's a Benefits section later: "Benefits Subject to the terms...". That is specific content, so include Benefits heading. Pay: there is "Compensation Overview Princeton - NJ - US: $177,990 - $215,682". Also mention discretionary incentive cash and stock. So we can include Pay heading. Schedule: there is mention of ability to travel up to ~10% based on requirements. Also maybe schedule not explicit. There's no explicit schedule like full-time, part-time. Might not include Schedule unless there is real content. The posting mentions "home office-based role with the ability to travel (up to ~10% based on requirements)". That's more about location/travel, not schedule. Could treat as Schedule? Not exactly. Probably omit Schedule if no explicit schedule. Qualifications: there is a Qualifications section with bullet-like sentences. We'll put under

Qualifications

and list items as

• . Skills: maybe we can extract from qualifications: "Proven ability to set direction and influence senior stakeholders..." etc. Could be considered Skills. But we already have Qualifications; maybe we can combine. The instruction: prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could combine Qualifications and Skills into one? But they ask to use headings for those categories if content exists. We have qualifications content; we also have skills content embedded. Could create a Skills section for the skill-based items (like strategic planning, adult learning principles, communication, etc.) and Qualifications for education/experience. Let's parse. Qualifications block: "Advanced degree required: MD, DO, PharmD, DNP, PhD, or MSN strongly preferred 2+ years TA experience preferred 5+ years pharmaceutical / biotech / relevant industry experience as a field MSL or similar field-based and/or office-based position preferred with a proven track record of success Proven ability to set direction and influence senior stakeholders across matrixed, global organisations without direct authority. Strong executive presence and public presentation skills, with the ability to represent a strategic agenda to senior leadership. Demonstrated strategic planning, prioritisation, and portfolio-management skills across competing priorities and tight timelines. Deep knowledge and applied expertise in adult learning principles and the design of effective, scalable learning solutions. Excellent written, verbal, and interpersonal communication skills, with the ability to build and sustain senior internal and external partnerships. A self-directed, highly motivated individual comfortable operating with minimal direction and high accountability for outcomes. Ability to travel (up to ~10% based on requirements)." We could split: education/experience as Qualifications; skills as Skills. But the instruction says prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Might be better to have one Qualifications section that includes all. But they also have a Skills heading option. If we put all under Qualifications, we still satisfy requirement to include a section only when posting has real content. That's fine. We'll not create a separate Skills heading if we think it's thin. However we have a lot of skill-like content; but we can still put under Qualifications. Responsibilities: there is a big block under "Strategic Accountabilities" and also earlier "What We Are Looking For" description. We'll create Responsibilities section with list items. About the role: maybe we can have an About the role section summarizing the role purpose. The posting includes introductory paragraphs about BMS purpose, WW Medical Learning team role, etc. That could be About the role. We'll include that. We must not repeat job title as heading. The job title is "Associate Director, WW Medical Learning, Hematology". Not to be used as heading. We must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings; we can drop them or put in a short p. We'll drop. We must remove boilerplate: EEO, disability, candidate rights, data protection, fraud protection, supporting people with disabilities, etc. Also remove "How We Work", "Supporting People With Disabilities", "Candidate Rights", "Data Protection", "Visit careers.bms.com/eeo-accessibility", etc. Also remove "We hire for skills and capabilities..." maybe keep as part of Qualifications? It's a statement encouraging apply; could be considered boilerplate? It's not exactly boilerplate but it's a generic encouragement. Might keep as part of Qualifications? It's not a qualification. Could be omitted as it's not substantive detail about role. Safer to omit. We must preserve all substantive information: responsibilities, qualifications, pay, benefits, etc. Let's extract About the role: The initial paragraphs up to "What We Are Looking For". Let's capture: "At Bristol Myers Squibb, our employees often ask, “Who are you working for?”—a question that fuels collaboration, accountability, and urgency in our work. Our purpose-driven culture inspires us to discover, develop, and deliver innovative medicines to prevail over serious diseases. We offer uniquely interesting and meaningful work, opportunities for growth, and a supportive environment that values inclusion, wellbeing, flexibility, and comprehensive benefits. This is work that transforms the lives of patients, and the careers of those who do it. At Bristol Myers Squibb, we are inspired by a single vision – transforming patients’ lives through science. In oncology, haematology, cardiovascular disease, immunology and neuroscience – and one of the most diverse and promising pipelines in the industry – each of our passionate colleagues contribute to innovations that drive meaningful change. We bring a human touch to every treatment we pioneer. Join us and make a difference. The WW Medical Learning Team plays a critical role in ensuring that healthcare providers are educated on the appropriate use of BMS medicines and have the information they need to improve outcomes for their patients. We develop and deploy strategies, tools, education, and skill building to empower Home Office Medical (HOM) and Field Medical (FM) teams across the globe to perform effectively and compliantly, ensuring high quality scientific exchange with the healthcare community." That seems good for About the role. Responsibilities: The "What We Are Looking For" section plus the "Strategic Accountabilities" bullet list. Let's capture: "What We Are Looking For WW Medical Learning is seeking a strategic leader to own the scientific learning agenda for BMS Hematology across WW/International Markets. This is predominantly a strategy-setting role: the Associate Director defines what FM and HOM teams globally need to know and be able to do in order to deliver trusted, high-impact scientific exchange – and builds the multi-year plans, partnerships, and governance model that make that possible. The Associate Director, WW/International Markets Medical Learning, translates the medical mission into a scientific learning strategy that positions FM and HOM as the trusted partner of choice to a broad set of stakeholders – driving scientific exchange and insight generation that create measurable medical impact, advance science, and enhance patient access to our medicines." Then the "Strategic Remit & Key Relationships" paragraph maybe also part of responsibilities. Then the list under "Strategic Accountabilities". We'll combine. We'll produce a
  • list for each bullet point. We need to preserve all substantive info; we should not lose any details. Let's list each bullet from Strategic Accountabilities: - Own the multi-year scientific learning strategy for WW/International Markets hematology translating medical and commercial priorities into a coherent roadmap that governs how FM and HOM capability is built and sustained. - Set the strategic framework for launch readiness, defining the standards, milestones, and governance that ensure FM and HOM teams globally are positioned to support priority clinical trials and major data readouts ahead of need. - Architect the WW Medical learning approach to scientific data education at major medical congresses – establishing the strategic model for embargoed data readiness, post-congress contextualization, and knowledge-retention systems adopted across international markets. - Build and govern a strategic partnership model across WW Medical Affairs, US Medical Learning, the WW Commercialisation Learning Centre of Excellence, Medical Excellence, and International Markets Medical Enablement teams, ensuring learning investment is concentrated against the highest-impact business priorities and content is leveraged rather than duplicated. - Champion innovation and AI, in scientific education, evaluating and introducing new learning modalities, technologies, and adult-learning methodologies that raise the bar for the broader WW Medical Learning function. - Define the strategic model for scientific onboarding and continuous learning journeys for international FM/HOM teams – ensuring consistency, scalability, and reuse of content developed for first market launches across subsequent worldwide launches. - Set the strategy for measuring learning effectiveness, using training needs assessments and stakeholder feedback to shape where the function invests next, and advising the Director, WW/International Markets Medical Learning accordingly. - Act as a strategic business partner with senior HOM and FM leadership to establish governance around training cadence – protecting field capacity for core activities while ensuring the organisation remains scientifically ready. - Collaborate with International Market Medical Enablement team for deployment of scientific/skills resources - Work closely with US Medical Learning and International Market Medical Enablement teams to support strategic alignment in education plans and resource development, leveraging and modifying content developed in support of first market launches for subsequent market launches for worldwide usage. - Direct resourcing and vendor strategy for the therapeutic area, ensuring third-party support is deployed against the highest-priority strategic initiatives. - Align all trainings with medical strategic imperatives, medical communication topics, scientific narratives, and core competencies - Act as a thought partner and advisor to the Director on the overall prioritisation, and evolution of the WW/International Markets Medical Learning portfolio. - Create annual WW training plans based on training needs assessments to support the needs of HOM and FM teams; work with matrix partners to align plans with strategic needs of the business (WW Medical Affairs, US Scientific Learning, Medical Excellence, etc) - Consistently evaluate quality of training materials & programs and medical training needs by regularly conducting training needs assessments with the Director, WW/International Market Medical Learning - Demonstrate flexibility during times of competing priorities & participate in training of new team hires as appropriate (Disclaimer: The responsibilities listed above are only a summary and other responsibilities will be requirements as assigned) We need to keep the disclaimer? It's part of responsibilities but maybe considered boilerplate? It's a note that responsibilities are summary. Might keep but it's not substantive detail; could drop. Safer to keep? The instruction: remove duplicated lines, boilerplate. This disclaimer is generic; could be considered boilerplate. I'd drop it. Now Qualifications: we have list as above. We'll output as
    • . Pay: we have compensation overview. We'll output as

      maybe inside Pay section. Benefits: we have paragraph about benefits. We'll output as

      inside Benefits. Schedule: none explicit; we could omit. Now ensure we don't include any heading with empty content. Let's craft HTML:

      About the role

      ... (the about text)

      Responsibilities

      • ... each bullet

      Qualifications

      • ... each qualification bullet

      Pay

      Compensation Overview Princeton - NJ - US: $177,990 - $215,682. The starting pay range(s) listed above is for full-time employees (FTE). You may also be eligible for additional discretionary incentive cash and stock opportunities. Final compensation is guided by pay equity principles and applicable employment laws.

      Benefits