Jobs · Management · Pennsylvania

ASSEMBLY OPERATOR I (2nd shift)

TE Connectivity · Jonestown, PA · Yesterday
On-siteManagement$19/hrFull-time
The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. Let me analyze the content and apply the rules. First, identify sections: - Shift and Schedule: "Second shift works Monday through Friday from 3 pm to 11 pm. Second shift receives a 10% shift differential." This is schedule info. - Primary Responsibilities: list of duties. - What your background should look like: seems like qualifications/requirements. - Qualifications: list of qualifications. - Physical Requirements: list of physical requirements. - About Te Connectivity: company description. - Compensation: salary info. - Benefits: benefits package. - EOE and fraud notice: boilerplate to remove. Rules: - Use

for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. - Use
  • for lists,

    for prose. - Do NOT repeat job title as heading (not provided anyway). - Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings. - Preserve ALL substantive information. - Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. - Include section ONLY when real specific content; no filler/placeholder text. - Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. - Prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. - Output ONLY HTML fragment, no /, no markdown. Now, map content to sections: 1. Schedule: "Second shift works Monday through Friday from 3 pm to 11 pm. Second shift receives a 10% shift differential." This is specific schedule info. Should be a Schedule section. 2. Primary Responsibilities: list of duties. Should be Responsibilities section. 3. What your background should look like: This seems like qualifications/requirements. But there's also a "Qualifications" section. Might combine or separate. The heading "What your background should look like" is not a standard heading; we should use standard headings like Requirements or Qualifications. The content under "What your background should look like" is actually a list of duties? Wait, reading: "Preparing machine for assembly process Operate automatic and semi-automatic assembly machines Load reels of strip terminals and housing onto assembly machines Make fine adjustments to properly align mating parts in machine Clear jams and inspect finished products Prepare completed reels for transport to other areas within facility". That looks like responsibilities, but it's under "What your background should look like". Actually, the posting structure: "Primary Responsibilities What your background should look like Preparing machine for assembly process ..." It might be that "What your background should look like" is a subheading for qualifications? But the bullet points are tasks. Let's examine: The text says "Primary Responsibilities What your background should look like Preparing machine for assembly process Operate automatic and semi-automatic assembly machines ..." It could be that "What your background should look like" is a heading for the list of responsibilities? Or maybe it's a misplacement. The user provided plain text. I need to interpret. Better to treat "Primary Responsibilities" as a heading, and the list that follows as responsibilities. Then "What your background should look like" might be a heading for qualifications? But then there is a separate "Qualifications" section. Let's read the whole text: "Primary Responsibilities What your background should look like Preparing machine for assembly process Operate automatic and semi-automatic assembly machines Load reels of strip terminals and housing onto assembly machines Make fine adjustments to properly align mating parts in machine Clear jams and inspect finished products Prepare completed reels for transport to other areas within facility Qualifications Must be able to use a microscope, calipers, and gages to inspect parts and perform visual inspection with training High energy, self-motivated, attention to detail and willingness to learn and advance in a fast-paced environment Physical Requirements Introductory experience in a manufacturing environment preferred Must be able to lift and carry a maximum weight of 37 lbs. Must be able to push a peak force of 34.5 lbs. Must be able to pull a peak force of 39.5 lbs. Frequent standing throughout the day is required in this job" It seems the text is concatenated without line breaks. The headings are: "Primary Responsibilities", "What your background should look like", "Qualifications", "Physical Requirements". The list under "What your background should look like" appears to be responsibilities (preparing machine, operate machines, etc.). That might be a duplicate or mislabeled. Actually, "What your background should look like" might be intended as "Requirements" but the content is responsibilities. Could be a formatting error in the source. I need to preserve all substantive information. I'll create a Responsibilities section with the list of duties (from both Primary Responsibilities and What your background should look like? But they are the same list). The text shows "Primary Responsibilities What your background should look like Preparing machine..." It might be that "What your background should look like" is a subheading for the responsibilities? Or maybe it's a separate list of qualifications? But the items are tasks. Let's assume the responsibilities are the bullet points after "What your background should look like". The "Primary Responsibilities" heading might be a section title. I'll create a Responsibilities section with those bullet points. Then "Qualifications" section: "Must be able to use a microscope, calipers, and gages to inspect parts and perform visual inspection with training High energy, self-motivated, attention to detail and willingness to learn and advance in a fast-paced environment". That's two bullet points. "Physical Requirements" section: list of physical requirements. "About Te Connectivity" is company description, could be "About the company" but the rule says headings like "About the role". Might not need a heading for company description? The rule says use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). "About the role" is for role description. The company description is not required but could be included as "About the company" but not in the example list. However, the rule says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". The posting has a paragraph about TE Connectivity. I could include it as a section "About the company" but the example headings don't include that. The rule says "e.g." so it's not exhaustive. But to be safe, I can include it as a section with heading "About the company" or "About Te Connectivity". However, the rule says "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It doesn't forbid other headings. But the instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." The company description is substantive but maybe not necessary for the job posting reformatting? The user wants to reformat the job posting. Usually, company description is included. I'll include it as a section "About the company" with a paragraph. Compensation: "Competitive base salary commensurate with experience: $19.00 (subject to change dependent on physical location) Posted salary ranges are made in good faith. TE Connectivity reserves the right to adjust ranges depending on the experience/qualification of the selected candidate as well as internal and external equity. Total Compensation = Base Salary + Incentive(s) + Benefits". This is pay information. Should be a Pay section. Benefits: "A comprehensive benefits package including health insurance, 401(k), disability, life insurance, employee stock purchase plan, paid time off and voluntary benefits." This is benefits. Should be a Benefits section. EOE and fraud notice: boilerplate, remove. Shift and Schedule: already have schedule info. Should be a Schedule section. Now, structure: - Schedule section: details about shift. - Responsibilities section: list of duties. - Qualifications section: list of qualifications (from Qualifications heading). - Physical Requirements section: list of physical requirements. - About the company section: paragraph. - Pay section: salary details. - Benefits section: benefits list. But note: "What your background should look like" might be considered Requirements. The rule says headings like Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. I could combine Qualifications and Physical Requirements into a Requirements section? But they are distinct. The rule says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Physical Requirements is a list of specific physical demands, which is substantive. Qualifications is also substantive. I'll keep them separate. Also, the "What your background should look like" list is actually responsibilities. I'll include those under Responsibilities. Now, write HTML. Use

    for each section heading. For lists, use
    • . For prose, use

      . Let's draft:

      Schedule

      Second shift works Monday through Friday from 3 pm to 11 pm. Second shift receives a 10% shift differential.

      Responsibilities

      • Preparing machine for assembly process
      • Operate automatic and semi-automatic assembly machines
      • Load reels of strip terminals and housing onto assembly machines
      • Make fine adjustments to properly align mating parts in machine
      • Clear jams and inspect finished products
      • Prepare completed reels for transport to other areas within facility

      Qualifications

      • Must be able to use a microscope, calipers, and gages to inspect parts and perform visual inspection with training
      • High energy, self-motivated, attention to detail and willingness to learn and advance in a fast-paced environment

      Physical Requirements

      • Introductory experience in a manufacturing environment preferred
      • Must be able to lift and carry a maximum weight of 37 lbs.
      • Must be able to push a peak force of 34.5 lbs.
      • Must be able to pull a peak force of 39.5 lbs.
      • Frequent standing throughout the day is required in this job

      About the Company

      TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) is a global industrial technology leader creating a safer, sustainable, productive, and connected future. As a trusted innovation partner, our broad range of connectivity and sensor solutions enable the distribution of power, signal and data to advance next-generation transportation, energy networks, automated factories, data centers enabling artificial intelligence, and more. Our more than 90,000 employees, including 10,000 engineers, work alongside customers in approximately 130 countries. In a world that is racing ahead, TE ensures that EVERY CONNECTION COUNTS. Learn more at www.te.com and on LinkedIn, Facebook, WeChat, Instagram and X (formerly Twitter).

      Pay

      Competitive base salary commensurate with experience: $19.00 (subject to change dependent on physical location). Posted salary ranges are made in good faith. TE Connectivity reserves the right to adjust ranges depending on the experience/qualification of the selected candidate as well as internal and external equity. Total Compensation = Base Salary + Incentive(s) + Benefits.

      Benefits

      • Health insurance
      • 401(k)
      • Disability
      • Life insurance
      • Employee stock purchase plan
      • Paid time off
      • Voluntary benefits
      Check for any missing info: The "What your background should look like" heading is not used; we used its content as responsibilities. That's fine. The "Primary Responsibilities" heading is not used as a separate heading; we used Responsibilities

Similar jobs