AC Quality Control Inspector

We need to output HTML fragment with sections only if real content. The posting includes General Description, Duties, Education/Experience Requirements, Physical Requirements, plus some boilerplate like EQUAL OPPORTUNITY etc which we must remove. Also there is mention of "General Description" which could be a section heading. Use

for section headings. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use

  for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. We need to decide sections: About the role? The posting has "General Description". Could map to "About the role". But we should only use headings that match typical list: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We should use those headings only if content exists. The posting includes description, duties, requirements (education/experience), physical requirements (maybe under Requirements or Qualifications). There's no explicit Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we should not create those sections. We need to decide mapping: "General Description" could be "About the role". "Duties" -> "Responsibilities". "Education/Experience Requirements" -> "Requirements" or "Qualifications". Physical Requirements could be part of "Requirements" or separate "Qualifications". Since we have both Requirements and Qualifications headings allowed, we could put education/experience under Requirements, and physical under Qualifications. Or combine. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe combine education/experience and physical into one "Requirements" section. But we have to preserve all info; we can put both under Requirements with sublists. We need to use

  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So duties list should be
    • . Requirements list also
      • . Physical requirements also list. We need to avoid repeating job title as heading. No Job ID. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences. Let's extract substantive content: General Description: "Performs Quality Assurance Representatives level inspections in their areas of expertise. Schedules, documents and tracks quality assurance inspections per directives and as tasked for their field of expertise." Duties: The long paragraph starting "The QI shall have academic and demonstrated knowledge...". Actually that seems like requirements not duties. Let's parse: The text after "Duties" includes many requirements: "The QI shall have academic and demonstrated knowledge and working experience in military aircraft maintenance organizations governed under CNAFINST 4790.2 (series) and NAVAIR Instruction 3710.1(series) requirements.A QI shall have demonstrated competence through satisfactory, progressive performance as an aircraft quality control inspector. Must have demonstrated knowledge, experience, and working level skills/ability in:Maintenance and repair expertise in their respective inspection area(s) (e.g., power plants, ALSS).Quality Assurance inspections scheduling, criteria, documents, directives, policies and requirements.Quality Assurance documentation, forms, logs and records.NALCOMIS and VIDMAFsThe QI shall have a minimum of four (4) years aircraft maintenance experience at an I and/or D level of repair in their work center areas of expertise.The QI shall have a minimum of three (3) years' experience in the field of DON military aviation as a "Quality Assurance Representative" in the last ten (10) years to the level of effort and complexity their respective work center expertise (e.g., Avionics, ALSS, Power plants/structures/ hydraulics/SE) of the requirements in this SOW. Examples of acceptable experience:QI-(AP) Aircraft Power Plants/Structures//Hydraulics/SE: Navy Aviation Machinist's Mate (AD) or Aviation Structural Mechanic (AM) Senior Enlisted with Aviation Quality Assurance Representative Maintenance Experience (i.e., E-6, E-7, E-8 or E-9) or USMC equivalency. Graduate from military A and C schools.QI-(ALSS) Aircraft Life Support Systems: Navy Aircrew Survival Equipment man (PR) Senior Enlisted with Aviation Quality Assurance Representative Maintenance Experience (i.e., E-6, E-7, E-8 or E-9) or USMC equivalency. Graduate from military A and C schools.QI-(AV) Aircraft Avionics Systems: Navy Aviation Electronics Technician (AT) or Aviation Electricians Mate (AE) Senior Enlisted with Aviation Quality Assurance Representative Maintenance Experience (i.e., E-6, E-7, E-8 or E-9) or USMC equivalency. Graduate from military A and C schools.The QI shall have completed Navy Quality Assurance Representative course or equivalent.The QI-Aircraft Avionics Systems must be capable of a SECRET security clearance." Then "Education/Experience Requirements" section: "High School diploma or equivalent.Must have a minimum of four (4) years aircraft maintenance experience at an I and/or D level of repair in their work center areas of expertise.Must have a minimum of three (3) years' experience in the field of DON military aviation as a "Quality Assurance Representative".Must have academic and demonstrated knowledge and working experience in military aircraft maintenance organizations governed under CNAFINST 4790.2.Must be a US CitizenMust have or be able to obtain a Secret Clearance. The Secret Clearance process will include requesting a credit history.We maintain a drug-free workplace and perform post offer, pre-employment substance abuse testing." Then "Physical Requirements": list of abilities. We need to avoid duplication: The duties section repeats many of the same requirements as Education/Experience Requirements. We should preserve all substantive info but not duplicate? The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." It doesn't say we must deduplicate; but we should not repeat duplicated lines. It says "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we should remove duplicated lines. So we need to identify duplicated content and keep only one instance. What is duplicated? The duties section includes many requirements that also appear in Education/Experience Requirements. For example: "Must have a minimum of four (4) years aircraft maintenance experience at an I and/or D level of repair in their work center areas of expertise." appears both. Also "Must have a minimum of three (3) years' experience in the field of DON military aviation as a 'Quality Assurance Representative'." appears both. Also "Must have academic and demonstrated knowledge and working experience in military aircraft maintenance organizations governed under CNAFINST 4790.2." appears both. Also maybe others. Thus we should keep one copy, perhaps under Requirements section, and not repeat under Duties. However the duties section also includes some unique items like "Schedules, documents and tracks quality assurance inspections per directives and as tasked for their field of expertise." That's from General Description. Also "Performs Quality Assurance Representatives level inspections in their areas of expertise." That's also General Description. The duties section includes many specific examples of acceptable experience (QI-(AP), QI-(ALSS), QI-(AV)). Those are not duplicated elsewhere. Also "The QI shall have completed Navy Quality Assurance Representative course or equivalent." and "The QI-Aircraft Avionics Systems must be capable of a SECRET security clearance." Those are not duplicated. Thus we need to craft a duties/responsibilities section that includes the unique duty statements: performing inspections, scheduling, documenting, tracking. Also maybe the examples of acceptable experience could be considered qualifications, not duties. But they are under duties heading in original; but we can treat them as qualifications. However we must preserve all substantive info; we can place them under Requirements or Qualifications. We need to decide sections: About the role (General Description). Responsibilities (duties: performing inspections, scheduling, documenting, tracking). Requirements (education/experience, clearance, citizenship, drug-free workplace). Qualifications (maybe physical requirements). Or we could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one Requirements section to avoid many thin sections. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe we have three sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (which includes education/experience, clearance, citizenship, drug testing, physical requirements). That seems reasonable. We need to use
        • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So for Responsibilities we can list bullet points. For Requirements we can list bullet points. We need to avoid headings with filler text. Ensure each heading has real content. Let's extract content: About the role (General Description): - Performs Quality Assurance Representatives level inspections in their areas of expertise. - Schedules, documents and tracks quality assurance inspections per directives and as tasked for their field of expertise. Responsibilities (duties): Maybe we can list: - Perform QA representative level inspections in area of expertise. - Schedule, document, and track QA inspections per directives and as tasked. - (Maybe also include ensuring compliance with CNAFINST 4790.2 and NAVAIR 3710.1? Those are requirements.) But we already have those in requirements. However we could include them as responsibilities if not duplicated. But they appear in requirements; we might consider them as responsibilities but they'd be duplicate. Safer to keep them only in requirements. Thus responsibilities bullets: - Perform Quality Assurance Representative level inspections in assigned area of expertise. - Schedule, document, and track quality assurance inspections per directives and as tasked. Requirements (combined): We need to list: - High school diploma or equivalent. - Minimum of four (4) years aircraft maintenance experience at an I and/or D level of repair in work center areas of expertise. - Minimum of three (3) years' experience in the field of DON military aviation as a "Quality Assurance Representative" within the last ten (10) years. - Academic and demonstrated knowledge and working experience in military aircraft maintenance organizations governed under CNAFINST 4790.2. - Demonstrated competence through satisfactory, progressive performance as an aircraft quality control inspector. - Maintenance and repair expertise in respective inspection area(s) (e.g., power plants, ALSS). - Knowledge of QA inspections scheduling, criteria, documents, directives, policies and requirements. - Knowledge of QA documentation, forms, logs and records. - Familiarity with NALCOMIS and VIDMAFs. - Completed Navy Quality Assurance Representative course or equivalent. - For Aircraft Avionics Systems QI: capable of obtaining SECRET security clearance. - US Citizen. - Able to obtain Secret Clearance (process includes credit history check). - Drug-free workplace: post-offer pre-employment substance abuse testing. - Physical requirements: - Able to walk and stand on level and/or inclined surfaces for certain periods throughout the day. - Able to climb stairs, ramps, ladders, and work stands, working at heights with fall protection devices. - Able to crouch, crawl, grasp or handle objects, use finger dexterity, bend elbow/knee and reach above/below shoulders. - May be required to lift up to 50 pounds and carry for short distances. - May be required to read dials/gauges, identify small objects and hand tools. - Must be able to see imperfections, micrometer readings and other small scales. - Must be able to communicate by voice and detect sound by ear. - Must be able to distinguish color and judge three-dimensional depth. - May be required to operate power vehicles, machinery, hand tools, ground support equipment, fork lift, APU, etc. We need to ensure we didn't miss any unique items: The examples of acceptable experience (QI-(AP), QI-(ALSS), QI-(AV)) are specific to certain specialties; they are not generic requirements but examples. Should we include them? They are substantive info about acceptable experience. We could include them under Requirements as bullet points: