Travel Interventional Radiology Technologist - $3,592 per week

We need to produce HTML fragment with sections for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. We need to parse the job posting. Key details: - Title: Interventional Radiology Technologist (travel) - Location: Rochester, New York (601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642) - Start Date: 10/26/2026 - Duration: 12 weeks (also mentions 13 weeks later; need to preserve both? The posting says Duration: 12 weeks then later Title: IR Rad Tech Duration: 13 weeks. There's inconsistency. We must preserve all substantive info, not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include both statements? Probably we can include both as separate sentences. But we must not create sections with filler. For Pay: "Pay package is based on 8 hour shifts and 40.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." That's not a specific amount, it's vague. According to rules: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). So we should NOT create a Pay section because the pay is not specified (tax-free stipend amount to be determined). So we omit Pay section. - Schedule: They have shift details: 40 hours per week, Shift: 8 hours, days; also "Schedule: Day Shift 5x8-Hour 40hours/week"; "Schedule: 5x8-hour day shifts"; On-Call: 5–7 call shifts per 7-week block 2–4 weekend call shifts; Callback/Holidays: Per unit needs. So we have schedule specifics. We can include a Schedule section with that info. - Benefits: Not mentioned explicitly. There's mention of tax-free stipend amount to be determined (but that's pay). No explicit benefits like health insurance, etc. So we should not create Benefits section. - Qualifications: Could include license, certifications, experience. The posting includes License: NYS License required or must be obtainable before start; Certifications: ARRT – Required; BLS – Required (AHA only); VIR Certification – Preferred. Also Experience: 2 years required. Also "Move Technician License (currently ANY Tech License is accepted in the state of NY) Required" seems weird. Also "Questions:" etc. We'll treat Requirements/Qualifications/Skills sections. We need to decide which headings to use: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to avoid duplication. The posting has a "Responsibilities:" list. So we will create Responsibilities section with

• items. We have "Skills:" section with a table-like list: Skill Required / Desired Amount of Experience Expertise Rating etc. That seems like a weird formatting. It lists: Move Technician License (currently ANY Tech License is accepted in the state of NY) Required; Two (2) years experience Required; BLS (American Heart Association ONLY) Required; VIR Certified Required; Interventional Radiology Required. This seems like a mix of requirements and skills. We could put these under Skills or Requirements. Since there is a "Skills:" heading in the posting, we can create a Skills section with those items. We also have "License: NYS License required or must be obtainable before start" and "Certifications: ARRT – Required BLS – Required (AHA only) VIR Certification – Preferred". Those could go under Requirements or Qualifications. Since we have both Requirements and Qualifications sections possible, we need to decide what to put where. The instructions: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have both Requirements and Qualifications. We need to allocate content appropriately without inventing. We can treat Requirements as the mandatory items: Experience 2 years required, License NYS required, Certifications ARRT required, BLS required (AHA only). Qualifications could be preferred items: VIR Certification preferred. Or we could put all under Requirements and leave Qualifications empty (but we must not emit a heading with filler). So we need to only include Qualifications if there is real specific content. There is VIR Certification – Preferred, which is a qualification (preferred). So we can put that under Qualifications. Also there is "Move Technician License (currently ANY Tech License is accepted in the state of NY) Required" which seems like a license requirement but maybe redundant. We'll include under Requirements. Also there are questions at the end: Question 1 Is HCP able to obtain TB skin test? Question 2 When can the HCP start the assignment? Question 3 Does this candidate have any RTO? If yes, what are the dates? Those are likely screening questions, not part of job description. Should we include? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The questions are part of the posting; they are not boilerplate; they are specific to the job. Should we include them? Possibly under a section like "Questions" but we don't have a heading for Questions in allowed list. The allowed headings are only those eight. We could incorporate them into About the role or Responsibilities? Not appropriate. Maybe we can omit them as they are akin to application instructions? They are screening questions for candidates. The instruction says remove application instructions. These questions are likely part of the application process. So we should drop them. Also there is "#AlliedImagingDiaTalentBurst, Inc Job ID #26-33050." That's metadata; we should drop Job ID. Also there is "Posted job title: Interventional Radiology Technologist" - we should not repeat job title as heading; we can drop that line. Also there is "About TalentBurst, Inc" paragraph describing the company. That's not about the role; it's boilerplate about the company. Should we keep? The instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The "About TalentBurst, Inc" is not exactly those categories, but it's company description. Might be considered boilerplate? Not sure. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The company description is substantive? It's not about the job but about the employer. Could be considered relevant. However typical job posting extraction often includes company overview. The instruction didn't explicitly say to remove company description. It only listed certain boilerplate types. So we might keep it under About the role? Actually About the role is for role description, not company. But we could still include a paragraph about the company under About the role? Might be odd. Perhaps we should create an "About the role" section that includes the job description summary: specialty, discipline, start date, duration, location, shift, etc. Then we could include company description under a separate heading? Not allowed. So maybe we omit company description as it's not strictly about the role. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; but if we omit company description, we are losing substantive info about the employer. However the instruction also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." It didn't forbid including company description. But we lack a heading for it. Could we put it under About the role? The About the role section could include both role and company info? Might be acceptable. Better to follow the instruction: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should only use those headings. So we need to fit all relevant content under those headings. About the role can contain a prose description of the role, including specialty, discipline, start date, duration, location, shift, etc. Responsibilities list. Requirements list (mandatory). Qualifications list (preferred). Skills list (maybe skills like technical skills). Benefits, Pay, Schedule sections only if present. Thus we need to extract: About the role: - TalentBurst, Inc is seeking a travel Interventional Radiology Technologist for a travel job in Rochester, New York. - Specialty: Interventional Radiology Technologist - Discipline: Allied Health Professional - Start Date: 10/26/2026 - Duration: 12 weeks (also mention 13 weeks? We'll include both as they appear) - Location: 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 - Shift: 8 hours, days - Employment Type: Travel - Schedule: Day Shift 5x8-Hour 40hours/week; 5x8-hour day shifts; On-Call: 5–7 call shifts per 7-week block 2–4 weekend call shifts; Callback/Holidays: Per unit needs - Contract: 6-month contractors will be considered Maybe also mention "Title: IR Rad Tech Duration: 13 weeks Location: 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 Start Date: 10/26/2026 Schedule: Day Shift 5x8-Hour 40hours/week". We'll combine. Responsibilities: list from "Responsibilities:" block. Requirements: - Experience: 2 years required - License: NYS License required or must be obtainable before start - Certifications: ARRT – Required; BLS – Required (AHA only) - Move Technician License (currently ANY Tech License is accepted in the state of NY) Required (maybe redundant) - Possibly also "Questions"? We'll drop. Qualifications: - VIR Certification – Preferred Skills: - The "Skills:" list: Move Technician License (currently ANY Tech License is accepted in the state of NY) Required; Two (2) years experience Required; BLS (American Heart Association ONLY) Required; VIR Certified Required; Interventional Radiology Required. This seems overlapping with requirements. But we can still list them as skills. However to avoid duplication, we could treat them as skills. But the instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; duplication is okay? It says remove duplicated lines. So we should avoid duplicating the same exact lines. The "Skills:" list includes some items that are also in Requirements (like 2 years experience, BLS, etc). Those are duplicated lines. We should remove duplicated lines. So we need to deduplicate. Let's list unique items: From Requirements: - 2 years experience required - NYS License required or must be obtainable before start - ARRT – Required - BLS – Required (AHA only) - Move Technician License (currently ANY Tech License is accepted in the state of NY) Required (maybe same as NYS License? It's a different statement; but it's about license. We'll keep as separate if not duplicate.) From Qualifications: - VIR Certification – Preferred From Skills list (after dedup): - Move Technician License (currently ANY Tech License is accepted in the state of NY) Required (duplicate) - Two (2) years experience Required (duplicate) - BLS (American Heart Association ONLY) Required (duplicate) - VIR Certified Required (but we have VIR Certification – Preferred; this says Required, conflict. We'll keep as required? The posting says VIR Certification – Preferred under Certifications, but under Skills says VIR Certified Required. This is contradictory. We must preserve all substantive info, not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep both statements: one says Preferred, another says Required. We'll keep both as separate lines maybe under Skills? But we need to avoid duplication; they are not exact duplicates. We'll keep both. - Interventional Radiology Required (skill) Thus Skills section could include: Inter