Travel CT Technologist - $3,237 per week

The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean semantic HTML. Let me analyze the content and apply the rules. First, identify sections: - About the role (Position Summary) - Responsibilities (Key Responsibilities) - Requirements/Qualifications (Qualifications) - State Licensing & Certification Requirements (this is detailed) - Benefits (listed at the end) - Pay/Schedule info (some details) - Company info (About The Good Life MedStaff) Rules: - Use

for section headings - Use

• for lists - Use

  for prose - Do NOT repeat job title as heading (page already shows it) - Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into short

  or drop it - Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail - Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions - Include a section ONLY when posting has real, specific content for it — never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") - Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them - Prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones - Output ONLY HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences Now, let's structure: 1. About the role: Position Summary paragraph. 2. Responsibilities: Key Responsibilities list. 3. Qualifications: Qualifications list. 4. State Licensing & Certification Requirements: This is a detailed table-like list. Could be a list of states with requirements. Might be best as a list of items with state and requirement. But it's a lot. Could be a

  with each state as a list item containing details. Or maybe a ? But rule says use
  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So I'll use
    • for each state requirement. However, the content includes a note about states without licensing. I'll include that as a paragraph or list item. 5. Benefits: list of benefits (Medical, Dental, Vision, 401k, Referral bonus). That's a list. 6. Pay/Schedule: The posting says "Pay package is based on 10 hour shifts and 40.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." Also shift: 10 hours, flexible; 40 hours per week; Shift: 10 hours, flexible; Employment Type: Travel; Start Date: 11/16/2026; Duration: 13 weeks. These are details about schedule and pay. Should I create a Schedule section? The rule says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. It does state schedule details (shift, hours, duration, start date) and pay info (tax-free stipend TBD). But pay is not specific (amount to be determined). The rule says never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text like "not specified", "TBD". So maybe we should not create a Pay section because it's TBD. But schedule details are specific: start date, duration, hours per week, shift length. Could create a "Schedule" section with those details. However, the rule says "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It does state schedule details. So we can include a Schedule section with those specifics. But also there is "Employment Type: Travel". That's more metadata. Could fold into a short paragraph. Also there is "Posted job title: Radiology:CT,06:00:00-16:00:00" which indicates shift times. That's schedule info. Company info: "About The Good Life MedStaff" - could be a section "About the Company" but rule says use headings like "About the role", "Responsibilities", etc. Not sure if "About the Company" is allowed. The example headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. "About the Company" not listed. But we can include a section "About the Company" if there is content. However, the rule says "use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It says e.g., so not exhaustive. But we should prefer few substantive sections. The company description is marketing fluff. Might be considered boilerplate? The rule says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. Company description might be considered boilerplate? But it's part of the posting. However, the user said "Preserve ALL substantive information". The company description is not substantive for the job itself. I think we can drop it or fold into a short paragraph. But the rule says "do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

      or drop it." Company info is minor metadata? Could fold into a short

      at the end. Job ID: "The Good Life MedStaff Job ID #38545202." That's minor metadata, fold into a short

      or drop. Now, let's decide sections: - About the role (Position Summary) - Responsibilities (Key Responsibilities) - Qualifications (Qualifications) - State Licensing & Certification Requirements (this is substantial) - Benefits (list) - Schedule (details: start date, duration, hours per week, shift length, shift times) - Maybe a short paragraph for employment type, job ID, pay note. But rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It states schedule details, so Schedule section is okay. Pay is not specific (TBD), so no Pay section. Benefits are stated, so Benefits section okay. Now, format each section with

      and content. Let's write HTML. First, About the role:

      About the role

      then

      Position Summary: ...

      Actually the heading "Position Summary" is in the posting. But we should use "About the role" as heading per example. The content: "A CT Technologist, or CT Tech, is responsible for performing diagnostic imaging procedures using computed tomography equipment. They play a key role in patient care by producing high-quality images used by physicians to diagnose and treat medical conditions." That's a paragraph. Responsibilities:

      Responsibilities

      then
      with each bullet. Qualifications:

      Qualifications

      then
      with each bullet. State Licensing & Certification Requirements: This is a list of states with requirements. Could be a

      State Licensing & Certification Requirements

      then
      with each state as a list item containing the details. But the list includes a note about states without licensing. I'll include each state as a list item with the requirement. For states with "No" license, include that. Also the note at the end: "Note: Even in states without a licensing requirement, most employers require or strongly prefer ARRT certification in CT." That could be a separate paragraph after the list. Benefits:

      Benefits

      then
      with each benefit. Schedule:

      Schedule

      then maybe a
      or

      with details. The posting has: Start Date: 11/16/2026, Duration: 13 weeks, 40 hours per week, Shift: 10 hours, flexible, Employment Type: Travel, Posted job title: Radiology:CT,06:00:00-16:00:00 (shift times). Could present as a list. Also there is "Pay package is based on 10 hour shifts and 40.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." That's pay info but TBD. Since it's not specific, we might not create a Pay section. But we could include that sentence in Schedule section or a separate paragraph. The rule says never create Pay section unless posting actually states them. It states pay package but amount TBD. That's placeholder. So we should not create a Pay section. We can fold that into a short paragraph maybe under Schedule or at the end. Job ID: fold into a short

      at the end. Company description: maybe drop or fold into a short

      . The rule says remove boilerplate. The company description is marketing. I'll drop it. Now, ensure we don't duplicate lines. The posting has "Specialty: CT Technologist Discipline: Allied Health Professional Start Date: 11/16/2026 Duration: 13 weeks 40 hours per week Shift: 10 hours, flexible Employment Type: Travel" These are metadata. We'll include in Schedule section. Now, write HTML. Let's structure:

      About the role

      A CT Technologist, or CT Tech, is responsible for performing diagnostic imaging procedures using computed tomography equipment. They play a key role in patient care by producing high-quality images used by physicians to diagnose and treat medical conditions.

      Responsibilities

      • Prepare and position patients for CT scans, ensuring safety and comfort.
      • Operate CT equipment to acquire high-resolution images.
      • Administer contrast media under the direction of a radiologist or physician.
      • Monitor patients during procedures to ensure safety and proper imaging.
      • Review and evaluate images for clarity and diagnostic quality.
      • Maintain accurate patient records and ensure documentation meets regulatory standards.
      • Adhere to radiation safety protocols and infection control procedures.
      • Communicate effectively with patients, radiologists, and healthcare teams.
      • Maintain equipment and report any issues to ensure functionality and compliance.
      • Stay updated on industry best practices and continuing education requirements.

      Qualifications

      • Associate’s or Bachelor’s degree in Radiologic Technology or a related field.
      • Completion of an accredited radiologic technology program.
      • ARRT (American Registry of Radiologic Technologists) certification in Radiography.
      • Advanced ARRT certification in Computed Tomography (CT) preferred or required by some employers.
      • BLS (Basic Life Support) certification.

      State Licensing & Certification Requirements

      • California: Must be licensed by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH-RHB). CT requires additional certification.
      • Texas: Requires MRT license through Texas Medical Board.
      • Florida: Certified Radiologic Technologist license through Florida DOH.
      • New York: Requires NYS license in Radiologic Technology.
      • Illinois: Requires accreditation from IEMA.
      • Ohio: Requires license through Ohio Department of Health.
      • Massachusetts: Must be licensed by the MA Radiation Control Program.
      • Oregon: Requires state license + ARRT certification.
      • Arizona: Arizona Medical Radiologic Technology Board of Examiners license needed.
      • Alaska: No state license required, but ARRT often required by employers.
      • Colorado: No state license, but ARRT strongly preferred by employers.
      • Pennsylvania: No state license, ARRT required by most employers.
      • Washington D.C.: Requires a license via Department of Health.
      • Other States: Varies; most follow ARRT standards; check specific state boards.