Special Education Teachers
for section headings. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use
for prose.
We must preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep specifics: push-in/pull-out model, TOH or TOSD Certification required, co-cert in subject, K-6 certificates paired with TOSD may be considered, subjects: High School Mathematics, High School ELA/English, High School Science, Special Education (maybe generic). Bonus: $3,000 for Special Education Certified teachers, $7,500 for Certified Math teachers. Base Salary SY26/27: $70,000- $100,000. Plus several bonus, stipend, and raise opportunities (we keep that phrase). Hours: 7:15-3:05, Monday-Friday.
School description: dynamic and successful charter school, 3 campuses, BelovED sister school, diverse students, Jersey City, Hoboken, NYC, staff dedicated.
WE VALUE OUR FACULTY: highest paid in NJ, academic success without burnout, teacher supports.
TEACHER SUPPORTS: school-wide team, career-long coaching, PLCs, specialists, abundant planning periods, research-based curriculum, high-quality formative assessments, full-time reading and math specialists, counselors and social workers.
Requirements: NJ DOE CE, Limited CE, CEAS or Standard Certificate in Special Education.
Benefits: part of NJ TPAF, pension transfer, Health Care Plan (Medical, Dental & Vision), Retirement Plan, Paid Time Off (Vacation, Sick & Public Holidays), Family Leave (Maternity, Paternity), Short Term & Long Term Disability, Training & Development.
We need to format benefits as list.
We need to avoid boilerplate: EEO, equal opportunity, etc. Also remove "INDINSTRUCTION". Also remove duplicated lines (maybe "Special Education Special Education"? There's a duplicated phrase: "Special Education Special Education Certified teachers are eligible for a $3,000 bonus!" Actually text: "Special Education Special Education Certified teachers are eligible for a $3,000 bonus!" Might be a mistake; we keep as is? Probably we should keep the content: Special Education Certified teachers eligible for $3,000 bonus. We'll phrase as "Special Education Certified teachers are eligible for a $3,000 bonus!" and "Certified Math teachers are eligible for a $7,500 bonus!"
We must not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep exact numbers and phrases.
Now produce HTML.
Structure:
About the role
Empowerment Academy Charter School is hiring Special Education teachers to join our growing High School this year. The role follows a push‑in/pull‑out model. TOH or TOSD Certification is required; your co‑certification should be in the subject you are teaching, though K‑6 certificates paired with TOSD may be considered. Positions are available for High School Mathematics, High School ELA/English, High School Science, and Special Education.
Maybe also mention bonuses.
But we have separate Pay section for salary and bonuses.
Responsibilities: maybe we can list duties: push-in/pull-out model, teaching subjects, collaborating with specialists, etc. However the posting does not explicitly list responsibilities beyond role description. Could treat the role description as About the role and Responsibilities as maybe "Teach special education students using push‑in/pull‑out model, collaborate with general education teachers, participate in PLCs, etc." But that might be summarizing. Safer to only include sections where there is explicit content. The posting does not have a separate "Responsibilities" heading; but we can infer responsibilities from description. However the instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." It says include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text. So we need to see if there is specific content for Responsibilities. The posting does not have a list of duties; but we could treat the role description as responsibilities. However we already used About the role for that. Could we skip Responsibilities? Probably yes.
Requirements: we have specific certification requirement.
Qualifications: maybe same as Requirements; we could skip.
Skills: not explicit.
Benefits: we have list.
Pay: we have base salary and bonuses.
Schedule: we have hours.
Thus sections: About the role, Requirements, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
We could also include "Teacher Supports" as a section? Not in the list of allowed headings; only those given. So we cannot add custom headings. So we need to fit teacher supports into maybe About the role or Responsibilities? But we don't have Responsibilities. Could we put teacher supports under About the role? Might be too much. But we could include a section "Responsibilities" and put teacher supports there? However teacher supports are not responsibilities; they are supports. But we could put them under About the role as part of description. The instruction: "Use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It says e.g., meaning those are examples; we can use those headings. It doesn't forbid other headings? It says use those for section headings. Likely we should stick to those headings only. So we need to map content to those headings.
Thus we need to decide which headings to use.
We have content for About the role (role description). Responsibilities maybe we can extract from role description: push-in/pull-out model, teaching subjects, collaborating with specialists, etc. But that's somewhat overlapping.
Requirements: certification.
Qualifications: maybe we could treat certification as qualification as well, but we can skip Qualifications if redundant.
Skills: not present.
Benefits: present.
Pay: present.
Schedule: present.
Thus we will output sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
We need to ensure we don't create empty sections.
Now craft content.
About the role: include description of role, subjects, push-in/pull-out, certification, co-cert, bonuses? Actually bonuses belong to Pay. So About the role: description of role, subjects, push-in/pull-out, certification requirement, co-cert note, maybe mention that positions are for HS Mathematics, ELA/English, Science, Special Education.
Responsibilities: maybe list duties: Provide special education instruction via push‑in/pull‑out model, collaborate with general education teachers, participate in PLCs, work with specialists (reading/math specialists, counselors, social workers), use research‑based curriculum, administer formative assessments, etc. However these are from Teacher Supports section, not responsibilities. But we can treat them as responsibilities? Might be stretching.
Better to keep Responsibilities minimal: maybe we can note that teachers will implement push‑in/pull‑out instruction, deliver specialized instruction in assigned subject area, and collaborate with colleagues. That's derived from role description.
But we must not invent detail. The posting does not explicitly say "collaborate with general education teachers" but push-in/pull-out implies collaboration. It's arguably implied. Might be okay.
But to be safe, we could skip Responsibilities and just have About the role, Requirements, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. That's four sections. The instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So four is fine.
Thus we will output:
About the role
Empowerment Academy Charter School is hiring Special Education teachers to join our growing High School this year. The role follows a push‑in/pull‑out model. TOH or TOSD Certification is required; your co‑certification should be in the subject you are teaching, though K‑6 certificates paired with TOSD may be considered. Positions are available for High School Mathematics, High School ELA/English, High School Science, and Special Education. Special Education Certified teachers are eligible for a $3,000 bonus; Certified Math teachers are eligible for a $7,500 bonus.
But note we included bonus info in About the role; but we also have Pay section for salary and bonuses. Might duplicate. Better to keep bonus in Pay section. So About the role should not include bonus. Let's keep About the role purely role description.
Thus About the role: description of role, subjects, push-in/pull-out, certification, co-cert.
Now Requirements: certification requirement.
Benefits: list.
Pay: base salary and bonuses.
Schedule: hours.
Now we need to ensure we preserve all substantive information: we must not lose any detail like "Base Salary SY26/2
for prose. We must preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep specifics: push-in/pull-out model, TOH or TOSD Certification required, co-cert in subject, K-6 certificates paired with TOSD may be considered, subjects: High School Mathematics, High School ELA/English, High School Science, Special Education (maybe generic). Bonus: $3,000 for Special Education Certified teachers, $7,500 for Certified Math teachers. Base Salary SY26/27: $70,000- $100,000. Plus several bonus, stipend, and raise opportunities (we keep that phrase). Hours: 7:15-3:05, Monday-Friday. School description: dynamic and successful charter school, 3 campuses, BelovED sister school, diverse students, Jersey City, Hoboken, NYC, staff dedicated. WE VALUE OUR FACULTY: highest paid in NJ, academic success without burnout, teacher supports. TEACHER SUPPORTS: school-wide team, career-long coaching, PLCs, specialists, abundant planning periods, research-based curriculum, high-quality formative assessments, full-time reading and math specialists, counselors and social workers. Requirements: NJ DOE CE, Limited CE, CEAS or Standard Certificate in Special Education. Benefits: part of NJ TPAF, pension transfer, Health Care Plan (Medical, Dental & Vision), Retirement Plan, Paid Time Off (Vacation, Sick & Public Holidays), Family Leave (Maternity, Paternity), Short Term & Long Term Disability, Training & Development. We need to format benefits as list. We need to avoid boilerplate: EEO, equal opportunity, etc. Also remove "INDINSTRUCTION". Also remove duplicated lines (maybe "Special Education Special Education"? There's a duplicated phrase: "Special Education Special Education Certified teachers are eligible for a $3,000 bonus!" Actually text: "Special Education Special Education Certified teachers are eligible for a $3,000 bonus!" Might be a mistake; we keep as is? Probably we should keep the content: Special Education Certified teachers eligible for $3,000 bonus. We'll phrase as "Special Education Certified teachers are eligible for a $3,000 bonus!" and "Certified Math teachers are eligible for a $7,500 bonus!" We must not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep exact numbers and phrases. Now produce HTML. Structure:
About the role
Empowerment Academy Charter School is hiring Special Education teachers to join our growing High School this year. The role follows a push‑in/pull‑out model. TOH or TOSD Certification is required; your co‑certification should be in the subject you are teaching, though K‑6 certificates paired with TOSD may be considered. Positions are available for High School Mathematics, High School ELA/English, High School Science, and Special Education.
Maybe also mention bonuses. But we have separate Pay section for salary and bonuses. Responsibilities: maybe we can list duties: push-in/pull-out model, teaching subjects, collaborating with specialists, etc. However the posting does not explicitly list responsibilities beyond role description. Could treat the role description as About the role and Responsibilities as maybe "Teach special education students using push‑in/pull‑out model, collaborate with general education teachers, participate in PLCs, etc." But that might be summarizing. Safer to only include sections where there is explicit content. The posting does not have a separate "Responsibilities" heading; but we can infer responsibilities from description. However the instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." It says include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text. So we need to see if there is specific content for Responsibilities. The posting does not have a list of duties; but we could treat the role description as responsibilities. However we already used About the role for that. Could we skip Responsibilities? Probably yes. Requirements: we have specific certification requirement. Qualifications: maybe same as Requirements; we could skip. Skills: not explicit. Benefits: we have list. Pay: we have base salary and bonuses. Schedule: we have hours. Thus sections: About the role, Requirements, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We could also include "Teacher Supports" as a section? Not in the list of allowed headings; only those given. So we cannot add custom headings. So we need to fit teacher supports into maybe About the role or Responsibilities? But we don't have Responsibilities. Could we put teacher supports under About the role? Might be too much. But we could include a section "Responsibilities" and put teacher supports there? However teacher supports are not responsibilities; they are supports. But we could put them under About the role as part of description. The instruction: "Use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It says e.g., meaning those are examples; we can use those headings. It doesn't forbid other headings? It says use those for section headings. Likely we should stick to those headings only. So we need to map content to those headings.
Thus we need to decide which headings to use.
We have content for About the role (role description). Responsibilities maybe we can extract from role description: push-in/pull-out model, teaching subjects, collaborating with specialists, etc. But that's somewhat overlapping.
Requirements: certification.
Qualifications: maybe we could treat certification as qualification as well, but we can skip Qualifications if redundant.
Skills: not present.
Benefits: present.
Pay: present.
Schedule: present.
Thus we will output sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
We need to ensure we don't create empty sections.
Now craft content.
About the role: include description of role, subjects, push-in/pull-out, certification, co-cert, bonuses? Actually bonuses belong to Pay. So About the role: description of role, subjects, push-in/pull-out, certification requirement, co-cert note, maybe mention that positions are for HS Mathematics, ELA/English, Science, Special Education.
Responsibilities: maybe list duties: Provide special education instruction via push‑in/pull‑out model, collaborate with general education teachers, participate in PLCs, work with specialists (reading/math specialists, counselors, social workers), use research‑based curriculum, administer formative assessments, etc. However these are from Teacher Supports section, not responsibilities. But we can treat them as responsibilities? Might be stretching.
Better to keep Responsibilities minimal: maybe we can note that teachers will implement push‑in/pull‑out instruction, deliver specialized instruction in assigned subject area, and collaborate with colleagues. That's derived from role description.
But we must not invent detail. The posting does not explicitly say "collaborate with general education teachers" but push-in/pull-out implies collaboration. It's arguably implied. Might be okay.
But to be safe, we could skip Responsibilities and just have About the role, Requirements, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. That's four sections. The instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So four is fine.
Thus we will output:
About the role
Empowerment Academy Charter School is hiring Special Education teachers to join our growing High School this year. The role follows a push‑in/pull‑out model. TOH or TOSD Certification is required; your co‑certification should be in the subject you are teaching, though K‑6 certificates paired with TOSD may be considered. Positions are available for High School Mathematics, High School ELA/English, High School Science, and Special Education. Special Education Certified teachers are eligible for a $3,000 bonus; Certified Math teachers are eligible for a $7,500 bonus.
But note we included bonus info in About the role; but we also have Pay section for salary and bonuses. Might duplicate. Better to keep bonus in Pay section. So About the role should not include bonus. Let's keep About the role purely role description. Thus About the role: description of role, subjects, push-in/pull-out, certification, co-cert. Now Requirements: certification requirement. Benefits: list. Pay: base salary and bonuses. Schedule: hours. Now we need to ensure we preserve all substantive information: we must not lose any detail like "Base Salary SY26/2