Software Test Analyst 5

We need to output HTML fragment with sections for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. Must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Must remove boilerplate like EEO, etc. Must preserve all substantive info. We need to parse the posting. Content: - Contract Opportunity | Lansing, MI | $40–$50/Hour Reliance One is seeking an experienced Software Test Analyst 5 for a hybrid contract opportunity in Lansing, Michigan. We're looking for a detail-oriented QA professional with a strong background in software testing, test automation, defect management, and enterprise applications. - Position Details Contract opportunity Location: Lansing, MI Hybrid schedule Pay Rate: $40–$50/hour Benefits begin Day 1 - What You'll Be Doing (list of duties) - Required Qualifications (list) - Preferred Qualifications (list) - The ideal Software Test Analyst is someone who doesn't just find defects—they help prevent them. We're looking for a strong analytical thinker who can build repeatable testing processes, dig into complex systems, and work across technical and business teams to deliver high-quality applications. If you have a strong background in QA, software testing, test automation, Azure DevOps, or SQL, we'd love to hear from you! - Reliance One is an Equal Opportunity Employer ... (boilerplate, remove) - #INDLOXO (hashtag, remove) We need sections: About the role (maybe intro paragraph), Responsibilities (What You'll Be Doing), Requirements (maybe Required Qualifications?), Qualifications (maybe Preferred Qualifications?), Skills (maybe combine?), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must not create sections with filler. So we need to see if we have content for each. - About the role: we have introductory paragraph describing role and company. That's substantive. - Responsibilities: the "What You'll Be Doing" list. - Requirements: maybe "Required Qualifications". That's a list. - Qualifications: maybe "Preferred Qualifications". That's a list. - Skills: Could we extract skills from required/preferred? Might be redundant. The instruction: prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could combine Required and Preferred into Qualifications? But they said use headings like Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to decide. We have both Required and Preferred qualifications. Could treat Required as Requirements, Preferred as Qualifications. Skills maybe not needed separately if covered. But we could create Skills section summarizing skillsets like SQL, API testing, automation, Agile, etc. However that might be thin. Better to omit Skills if not distinct. Benefits: "Benefits begin Day 1" is specific. So we can have Benefits section with that line. Pay: "Pay Rate: $40–$50/hour" => Pay section. Schedule: "Hybrid schedule" => Schedule section. We must not include placeholder like "commensurate with experience". We have actual values. Now we need to output HTML fragment: use

for section headings. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. Thus we need to convert each bullet list into

  • . For prose paragraphs, use

    . We must not repeat job title as heading. The title is "Software Test Analyst 5". Not to be used as heading. We must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings (none present). We must remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. So remove the Equal Opportunity Employer paragraph and the hashtag. Now let's extract content. Intro paragraph: "Reliance One is seeking an experienced Software Test Analyst 5 for a hybrid contract opportunity in Lansing, Michigan. We're looking for a detail-oriented QA professional with a strong background in software testing, test automation, defect management, and enterprise applications." Also there is earlier line: "Contract Opportunity | Lansing, MI | $40–$50/Hour Reliance One is seeking..." but that's basically same. We'll combine into a single prose paragraph. We could also include "Contract opportunity" etc but those are covered in Pay, Benefits, Schedule sections. Now Responsibilities list: each line starts with a verb. List: - Develop and execute test plans, test cases, and test scenarios based on business and technical requirements - Perform functional, regression, integration, system, and user acceptance testing - Create automated test banks and repeatable automated regression testing - Develop testing metrics and evaluate test coverage against requirements - Review requirements and identify gaps, inconsistencies, and potential quality risks - Identify, document, prioritize, and track software defects through resolution - Partner with developers and business stakeholders to troubleshoot issues and validate fixes - Perform data validation and reconciliation using SQL as needed - Test APIs, system integrations, interfaces, and application workflows - Support deployment and production validation activities - Maintain testing documentation, results, and defect-tracking records - Provide updates on testing progress, defects, risks, and outstanding issues - Participate in requirements reviews, project meetings, and release planning - Recommend process improvements to increase testing efficiency and software quality Now Required Qualifications list: - Bachelor's degree - 7+ years of experience in IT quality assurance, software testing, or systems analysis - 5+ years of hands-on experience developing and executing test cases - 5+ years of experience identifying, documenting, and tracking software defects - 5+ years of experience with Azure DevOps, Jira, ServiceNow, or similar testing/defect management platforms - Strong analytical and problem-solving skills - Excellent attention to detail and documentation skills - Strong written and verbal communication skills - Ability to work independently while collaborating with cross-functional teams - Ability to manage multiple priorities and project deadlines Preferred Qualifications list: - SQL and database testing experience - API and system integration testing experience - Automated testing experience - Agile/Scrum experience - Experience testing web-based and enterprise applications - Strong understanding of SDLC and software testing methodologies - Experience supporting large-scale IT projects or system implementations Now the ideal Software Test Analyst paragraph: "The ideal Software Test Analyst is someone who doesn't just find defects—they help prevent them. We're looking for a strong analytical thinker who can build repeatable testing processes, dig into complex systems, and work across technical and business teams to deliver high-quality applications. If you have a strong background in QA, software testing, test automation, Azure DevOps, or SQL, we'd love to hear from you!" We could incorporate that into About the role or maybe a separate section like "About the ideal candidate". But we have no heading for that. Could add to About the role as additional prose. Benefits: "Benefits begin Day 1" Pay: "Pay Rate: $40–$50/hour" Schedule: "Hybrid schedule" Now we need to decide sections. We have: - About the role (intro + ideal candidate paragraph) - Responsibilities (list) - Requirements (Required Qualifications) - Qualifications (Preferred Qualifications) - Benefits (Benefits begin Day 1) - Pay (Pay Rate) - Schedule (Hybrid schedule) We could also combine Benefits, Pay, Schedule into one section? But they said prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. However each of those has specific info; they are thin but substantive. Could we combine them into a "Details" section? But headings are prescribed: we can use those headings only if we have content. We could combine Benefits, Pay, Schedule under a single heading like "Compensation & Details" but not allowed; headings must be from the list. So we need to decide whether to include each as separate section. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe we should combine Benefits, Pay, Schedule into one section? But we don't have a heading for combined. Could we omit some if they are thin? But they are substantive: Pay rate, Benefits begin Day 1, Hybrid schedule. They are specific. Could we put them in a

    under About the role? That would lose the headings but maybe acceptable? The instruction: "Use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It suggests we can use those headings if we have content. It doesn't say we must use all; we can choose which to include. It also says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". So we can include Benefits, Pay, Schedule as separate sections if they have real specific content. They do. However they are thin but still specific. The instruction to prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones suggests we might combine them into a single section like "Details" but we don't have that heading. Could we put them under "About the role" as a paragraph? That would still preserve info but not use headings for those. That might be acceptable because we are not creating thin sections; we are keeping them within a substantive section. However the instruction says "Use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid using other headings, but suggests those are typical. It doesn't require we use them. It says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". So we could create a section called "Details" with those three items, but that heading is not in the example list but not prohibited. However safer to follow the examples: use those headings only if we have content. Having three thin sections may be against the preference but not prohibited. The instruction says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we should try to minimize number of sections. So maybe we combine Benefits, Pay, Schedule into one section under a heading like "Compensation & Schedule". But that's not in the list. Could we use "Benefits" heading and include Pay and Schedule within that as subpoints? That would be mixing categories but still under Benefits heading. Might be okay but could be confusing. Alternatively, we could create a section "Pay, Benefits, Schedule" but not in list. Given the instruction to prefer few substantive sections, I'd combine them into one section titled "Compensation & Details" but that deviates from examples. However the instruction says "Use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." implies those are examples, not an exhaustive list. So we can use other headings as long as they are meaningful. But to be safe, maybe we stick to the examples and create separate sections for Benefits, Pay, Schedule. That yields many thin sections but each is substantive (they have actual info). The instruction to prefer few over many is a suggestion, not a hard rule. I'd follow the examples and include them. Thus we will have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We will not include Skills section because we don't have a distinct skills list separate from qualifications. Now we need to format. HTML fragment:

    About the role

    Reliance One is seeking an experienced Software Test Analyst 5 for a hybrid contract opportunity in Lansing, Michigan. We're looking for a detail-oriented QA professional with a strong background in software testing, test automation, defect management, and enterprise applications. The ideal Software Test Analyst is someone who doesn't just find defects—they help prevent them. We're looking for a strong analytical thinker who can build repeatable testing processes, dig into complex systems, and work across technical and business teams to deliver high-quality applications. If you have