Senior Systems Administrator, Classified IT

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role (the description after "About The Role"), Responsibilities (What You'll Do), Requirements (Required Qualifications), maybe Qualifications (Preferred Qualifications), Benefits, Pay (US Salary Range). Also maybe "What Success Looks Like" could be part of responsibilities? But we only include sections when posting has real specific content. The posting includes "What Success Looks Like" which is a description; could be its own section maybe "What Success Looks Like". However instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. It doesn't list "What Success Looks Like". So we should not create a heading for that unless we map it to something else. Probably we can incorporate that content into Responsibilities or Requirements? It's more about success criteria; could be part of Responsibilities? But better to keep as a separate section maybe "What Success Looks Like" but not in allowed list. The instruction: "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The e.g. suggests those are examples, not exclusive. But they say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." We could include About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay. That seems enough. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. So we need to strip the scam warning, data privacy, etc. Also remove "Protecting Yourself from Recruitment Scams" and "Data Privacy". Also remove "Explore Our Benefits" link maybe? Keep benefits description. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to keep the description about Anduril mission etc? That's introductory paragraph before About The Role. Should we include that? It's part of the posting but not under a heading. The instruction: "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". It doesn't say we cannot include introductory text. We could include it as a

before sections. Probably okay. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /. Use

for headings,

• for lists,

  for prose. We need to extract content: Intro: "Anduril Industries is a defense technology company with a mission to transform U.S. and allied military capabilities with advanced technology. By bringing the expertise, technology, and business model of the 21st century’s most innovative companies to the defense industry, Anduril is changing how military systems are designed, built and sold. Anduril’s family of systems is powered by Lattice OS, an AI-powered operating system that turns thousands of data streams into a realtime, 3D command and control center. As the world enters an era of strategic competition, Anduril is committed to bringing cutting-edge autonomy, AI, computer vision, sensor fusion, and networking technology to the military in months, not years." Then "About The Role" heading. Content after that: "We are looking for a Senior Systems Administrator to independently administer, troubleshoot, maintain, and secure enterprise Windows and Linux systems in classified environments. Senior Systems Administrators are expected to perform nearly all routine and advanced administration with little to no assistance, serve as a technical escalation point, mentor other administrators, and lead operational work. Assistance should generally be limited to unfamiliar technologies, high-risk changes, architecture decisions, or issues requiring specialized engineering expertise." Then "What You'll Do" list: multiple sentences each maybe separate bullet. We'll convert each sentence to

• . List items: - Independently administer and troubleshoot Windows Server/desktop and Linux systems, Active Directory, enterprise authentication, permissions, services, applications, and domain-connected systems. - Administer and troubleshoot enterprise Windows services including Group Policy (GPO), WSUS/patch management, DNS, DHCP, file services, certificates/PKI dependencies, and related system components. - Create, modify, test, validate, and troubleshoot GPOs, including inheritance, precedence, OU targeting, security filtering, gpresult, and Resultant Set of Policy (RSoP). - Administer WSUS or equivalent patching solutions, including synchronization, targeting, approvals, deployment status, failed updates, reporting, and patch-compliance remediation. - Interpret DISA STIG requirements; use applicable STIG tools/checklists; implement and validate remediations, including GPO-based security configurations; document findings; and troubleshoot operational impacts. - Independently administer and troubleshoot existing VMware, Hyper-V, or similar virtualization environments and virtual machines. - Troubleshoot complex issues across operating systems, identity, applications, virtualization, storage, certificates, and network dependencies using logs and diagnostic tooling. - Use PowerShell, Bash, and other scripting/automation methods for administration, bulk changes, data collection, troubleshooting, and repeatable tasks. - Research and resolve unfamiliar issues using vendor documentation, technical references, logs, DISA guidance, and available tooling before requiring escalation. - Plan and lead system changes, maintenance, upgrades, and migrations with implementation, validation, rollback, documentation, and change-control considerations. - Serve as an escalation point and mentor for Junior Systems Administrators and Systems Administrators; provide peer review and technical guidance. - Identify recurring problems, technical debt, security/configuration gaps, and process deficiencies and lead practical improvements within established architecture. Then "Required Qualifications" list: - Active TS/SCI security clearance. - Active CompTIA Security+ certification or higher DoD 8140/8570-aligned certification. - Strong hands-on Windows and Linux systems administration experience with demonstrated ability to work independently. - Hands-on experience with Active Directory, GPO administration/troubleshooting, enterprise patch management/WSUS, and domain-connected systems. - Experience interpreting and remediating DISA STIG findings within secure or regulated environments. - Working knowledge of VMware, Hyper-V, or comparable virtualization technologies. - Strong understanding of TCP/IP, DNS, DHCP, IP addressing, subnetting, and network troubleshooting. - Experience with PowerShell, Bash, or similar administrative scripting. - Demonstrated ability to independently research and resolve complex technical problems, lead technical work, mentor others, and produce effective documentation. Then "Preferred Qualifications" list: - Advanced Microsoft, Linux, VMware, networking, or cybersecurity certifications. - Experience supporting engineering, manufacturing, or specialized technical applications. - Experience leading infrastructure upgrades, migrations, maintenance events, or cross-functional technical efforts. Then "What Success Looks Like" maybe we could incorporate into Responsibilities or a separate section "Success Criteria". But we can omit if we think it's thin? It's a paragraph: "A successful Senior Systems Administrator can be given an existing environment or system and independently run, secure, maintain, and troubleshoot it. They do not need every answer memorized, but are expected to research unfamiliar problems and drive them to resolution with limited assistance. Systems Engineering engagement is primarily required when work crosses into new architecture, major redesign, specialized engineering, or high-risk technical decisions." That's substantive; we could add a section "What Success Looks Like". The instruction didn't forbid it; just gave examples. So we can include. Then "US Salary Range $146,000—$194,000 USD". That's pay. Then Benefits: paragraph about benefits. We'll keep that. We need to exclude the "The salary range for this role is an estimate..." etc. That's part of benefits description? Actually after Benefits heading they have a paragraph: "The salary range for this role is an estimate based on a wide range of compensation factors, inclusive of base salary only. Actual salary offer may vary based on (but not limited to) work experience, education and/or training, critical skills, and/or business considerations. Highly competitive equity grants are included in the majority of full time offers; and are considered part of Anduril's total compensation package. Additionally, Anduril offers top-tier benefits for full-time employees, including: At Anduril, we invest in our people. Our comprehensive, competitive benefits package (available at little to no cost to employees) ensures you’re supported in health, recovery, and whatever comes next. For more information, Explore Our Benefits." We need to keep substantive info: mention equity grants, top-tier benefits, etc. The sentence about salary range being an estimate is maybe redundant with Pay section; we could keep it but it's somewhat boilerplate. Might be okay to keep as part of Benefits? But we have separate Pay section. We could keep that sentence in Benefits as it's about compensation factors. However it's somewhat generic. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." We'll keep Benefits section with the description about equity grants and top-tier benefits. We'll maybe omit the sentence about salary range estimate as it's covered in Pay. We also need to remove "For more information, Explore Our Benefits." That's a link/application instruction? It's not exactly application instruction but could be considered a call to action. Might be considered boilerplate; we can drop it. Now produce HTML:

  Intro paragraph.

  About the role

  We are looking for a Senior Systems Administrator to independently administer, troubleshoot, maintain, and secure enterprise Windows and Linux systems in classified environments. Senior Systems Administrators are expected to perform nearly all routine and advanced administration with little to no assistance, serve as a technical escalation point, mentor other administrators, and lead operational work. Assistance should generally be limited to unfamiliar technologies, high-risk changes, architecture decisions, or issues requiring specialized engineering expertise.

  Responsibilities

  • Independently administer and troubleshoot Windows Server/desktop and Linux systems, Active Directory, enterprise authentication, permissions, services, applications, and domain-connected systems.
  • Administer and troubleshoot enterprise Windows services including Group Policy (GPO), WSUS/patch management, DNS, DHCP, file services, certificates/PKI dependencies, and related system components.
  • Create, modify, test, validate, and troubleshoot GPOs, including inheritance, precedence, OU targeting, security filtering, gpresult, and Resultant Set of Policy (RSoP).
  • Administer WSUS or equivalent patching solutions, including synchronization, targeting, approvals, deployment status, failed updates, reporting, and patch-compliance remediation.
  • Interpret DISA STIG requirements; use applicable STIG tools/checklists; implement and validate remediations, including GPO-based security configurations; document findings; and troubleshoot operational impacts.
  • Independently administer and troubleshoot existing VMware, Hyper-V, or similar virtualization environments and virtual machines.
  • Troubleshoot complex issues across operating systems, identity, applications, virtualization, storage, certificates, and network dependencies using logs and diagnostic tooling.
  • Use PowerShell, Bash, and other scripting/automation methods for administration, bulk changes, data collection, troubleshooting, and repeatable tasks.
  • Research and resolve unfamiliar issues using vendor documentation, technical references, logs, DISA guidance, and available tooling before requiring escalation.
  • Plan and lead system changes, maintenance, upgrades, and migrations with implementation, validation, rollback, documentation, and change-control considerations.
  • Serve as an escalation point and mentor for Junior Systems Administrators and Systems Administrators; provide peer review and technical guidance.
  • Identify recurring problems, technical debt, security/configuration gaps, and process deficiencies and lead practical improvements within established architecture.

  Requirements

  • Active TS/SCI security clearance.
  • Active CompTIA Security+ certification or higher DoD 8140/8570-aligned certification.
  • Strong hands-on Windows and Linux systems administration experience with demonstrated ability to work independently.
  • Hands-on experience with Active Directory, GPO administration/troubleshooting,