We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title. Remove boilerplate, navigation, EEO, etc. Must preserve all substantive info.
Let's parse the posting.
Key sections:
- About this opportunity: description of role: "Cenovus Energy is now hiring for a Senior Staff Process and Technical Safety Engineer who will be accountable for the overall implementation and application of Process Safety as a competency within the US Refineries & for supporting policy development/application beyond the US. This role will serve as the US Region's leading SME and thought leader in the field of Process Safety; will also play a dual role in leading the company's overall PSM expertise with Canadian counterpart(s)."
That's about the role.
- What you’ll do: Responsibilities list bullet points.
- Who you are: requirements: legal authorization, degree, years experience, etc.
- Also there is "We acknowledge the value of transferrable skills..." but that's generic.
- There's note about application deadline (should be removed as boilerplate? It's metadata but maybe considered minor metadata; we can fold into short p or drop. The instruction: do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. So we can include a short p for deadline? It's not job ID but still metadata. Probably drop.
- Then "Cenovus was ranked one of Canada’s Best Employers in 2025..." etc. That's about benefits? It's generic marketing. Might be considered boilerplate. But there is a section "The Cenovus Experience Total rewards" describing benefits: generous paid vacation, annual bonus, retirement savings plan matching, long-term incentives, medical & dental coverage, life insurance, disability benefits, employee assistance program, virtual healthcare coverage, generous leave of absence programs, fitness membership reimbursement, eligibility varies. That's substantive benefits.
- Then "Our development philosophy" describing development initiatives: internal course offerings, education assistance, special projects, leadership development programs, internal job movement.
- Then "Our culture": purpose, values, Cenovus Cares, staff resource groups.
- Then "Equal opportunity employer" boilerplate to remove.
- Then "The requirements of this posting may be modified..." etc.
We need to decide which sections to include: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (maybe combine qualifications and skills?), Benefits, maybe Development? But we only have allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We should map content accordingly.
We have:
- About the role: from "About this opportunity".
- Responsibilities: bullet list under "What you’ll do".
- Requirements: could include legal auth, degree, years experience, etc. Also maybe "Functional Safety Engineer Certification considered an asset" etc. That's qualifications.
- Qualifications: maybe education and certifications.
- Skills: maybe specific technical skills: HAZOP, LOPA, HAZID, PHAST, API, NFPA, CCPS, RMP, Fire Hazard Analysis, QRA, facility siting, Bowtie, etc.
- Benefits: from Total rewards section.
- Pay: not specified; we should not include Pay section unless posting actually states it. No pay info given, so omit.
- Schedule: not stated; omit.
We must not create sections with filler like "not specified". So omit Pay and Schedule.
We need to ensure we preserve all substantive information. Let's extract.
About the role paragraph: as above.
Responsibilities bullet list:
- Lead Process Safety as a competency across the US Refineries—owning methodology development, regulatory and code interpretation, and industry policy representation
- Build and develop competent, capable Process Safety Engineers trained in Cenovus Risk Methodology (HAZOP, LOPA, HAZID, etc.)
- Design, deliver, and maintain a comprehensive risk-training suite for site personnel, including QA/QC of site deliverables and the ongoing development of new team members
- Champion and safeguard key risk standards across the organization (PHA standard, RMP compliance, etc.)
- Directly conduct/coordinate centrally managed third-party studies (Facility Siting, Fire Hazard Analysis, etc.)
- Drive and support assurance audits within the PSM space
We need to keep each as
.
Requirements: from "Who you are":
- Legally authorized to work in the US
- Bachelor's degree in Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, or a closely related engineering discipline required
- 16+ years working directly in a Process Safety role or closely related discipline required; 10+ years within Oil and Gas/Petrochemicals considered an asset; Functional Safety Engineer Certification considered an asset
- Experience leading multiple complex unit HAZOPs and MOCs for a chemical/oil and gas operator, and conducting LOPA analyses with translation into SIL requirements required
- Experience in process safety information auditing or RAGAGEP verification required
- Experience in consequence modelling required (experience with PHAST software considered an asset)
- Familiarity with API, NFPA, and CCPS codes & US regulations required. Familiarity with RMP compliance required
- Experience with Fire Hazard Analysis techniques, QRA and facility siting studies, Barrier Health / Safety Critical Element / Bowtie / HAZID concepts, and PSM in projects considered an asset
Also "We acknowledge the value of transferrable skills..." but that's generic; we can include as a note maybe but it's not specific requirement; could be omitted? It's substantive but it's a statement about consideration; we could include as a p under Requirements maybe.
Qualifications: maybe separate education and certifications? But we already included degree in Requirements. Could split: Requirements = experience, Qualifications = education/certifications, Skills = technical skills. However the instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe combine into Requirements and Skills only. But we have headings allowed; we can include multiple if substantive.
Let's think: We have:
- About the role (substantive)
- Responsibilities (substantive)
- Requirements (substantive: legal auth, years experience, etc.)
- Qualifications (maybe degree and certifications)
- Skills (technical competencies: HAZOP, LOPA, etc.)
- Benefits (substantive)
We need to avoid duplication. Let's allocate:
Qualifications: Bachelor's degree in Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, or closely related engineering discipline required. Functional Safety Engineer Certification considered an asset.
Requirements: 16+ years working directly in a Process Safety role or closely related discipline required; 10+ years within Oil and Gas/Petrochemicals considered an asset; Legally authorized to work in the US; Experience leading multiple complex unit HAZOPs and MOCs for a chemical/oil and gas operator, and conducting LOPA analyses with translation into SIL requirements required; Experience in process safety information auditing or RAGAGEP verification required; Experience in consequence modelling required (experience with PHAST software considered an asset); Familiarity with API, NFPA, and CCPS codes & US regulations required; Familiarity with RMP compliance required.
Skills: Experience with Fire Hazard Analysis techniques, QRA and facility siting studies, Barrier Health / Safety Critical Element / Bowtie / HAZID concepts, and PSM in projects considered an asset. Also maybe "Experience leading multiple complex unit HAZOPs and MOCs" is skill but we already put in requirements. Could keep as skill.
But to avoid duplication, maybe better: Requirements = years experience, legal auth, degree. Qualifications = certifications. Skills = technical skills list.
Let's decide:
- About the role: paragraph.
- Responsibilities: bullet list.
- Requirements: Legally authorized to work in the US; Bachelor's degree in Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, or a closely related engineering discipline required; 16+ years working directly in a Process Safety role or closely related discipline required; 10+ years within Oil and Gas/Petrochemicals considered an asset.
- Qualifications: Functional Safety Engineer Certification considered an asset.
- Skills: Experience leading multiple complex unit HAZOPs and MOCs for a chemical/oil and gas operator, and conducting LOPA analyses with translation into SIL requirements required; Experience in process safety information auditing or RAGAGEP verification required; Experience in consequence modelling required (experience with PHAST software considered an asset); Familiarity with API, NFPA, and CCPS codes & US regulations required; Familiarity with RMP compliance required; Experience with Fire Hazard Analysis techniques, QRA and facility siting studies, Barrier Health / Safety Critical Element / Bowtie / HAZID concepts, and PSM in projects considered an asset.
- Benefits: bullet list from Total rewards.
We must ensure we don't include filler like "considered an asset" is okay; it's specific.
Now we need to strip boilerplate: remove "Note: The application deadline..." etc. Remove "Cenovus was ranked one of Canada’s Best Employers in 2025..." but we kept benefits from Total rewards; that section includes that sentence? Actually the Total rewards section starts after "Cenovus was ranked one of Canada’s Best Employers in 2025. We’re committed to being an employer of choice in our industry by offering a competitive total rewards package and employee programs and rewarding career development opportunities. Learn more." Then "If you require accessibility assistance..." etc. Then "Who we are:" etc. Then "The Cenovus Experience Total rewards We’re committed to being an employer of choice through competitive compensation and our comprehensive total rewards package, including: ..." So we should capture the benefits list after that heading. The preceding sentences about ranking etc are boilerplate; we can drop them. Keep only the benefits list.
Also drop "Our development philosophy", "Our culture", "Equal opportunity employer", etc.
Now produce HTML.
Structure:
About the role
...
Responsibilities
Requirements
- Legally authorized to work in the US
- Bachelor's degree in Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, or a closely related engineering discipline required
- 16+ years working directly in a Process Safety role or closely related discipline required
- 10+ years within Oil and Gas/Petrochemicals considered an asset
Qualifications
- Functional Safety Engineer Certification considered an asset
Skills
- Experience leading multiple complex unit HAZOPs and MOCs for a chemical/oil and gas operator, and conducting LOPA analyses with translation into SIL requirements required
- Experience in process safety information auditing or RAGAGEP verification required
- Experience in consequence modelling required (experience with PHAST software considered an asset)
- Familiarity with API, NFPA, and CCPS codes & US regulations required
- Familiarity with RMP compliance required
- Experience with Fire Hazard Analysis techniques, QRA and facility siting studies, Barrier Health / Safety Critical Element / Bowtie / HAZID concepts, and PSM in projects considered an asset
Benefits
- Generous paid vacation
- Annual bonus
- Retirement savings plan matching
- Long-term incentives*
- Medical & dental coverage
- Life insurance
- Disability benefits
- Employee assistance program
- Virtual healthcare coverage
- Generous leave of absence programs
- Fitness membership reimbursement
- Eligibility for Total Rewards varies by position. This role may not be eligible for all Total Rewards offerings.
We need to ensure we don't include any